RESUMEN
Introducción: Diversos estudios evidencian que la audiometría de alta frecuencia cumple un importante rol en la detección temprana de pérdida auditiva; sin embargo, en Chile aún no se dispone de una normativa para su aplicación clínica. Objetivo: Normalizar los umbrales audiométricos de alta frecuencia (9-20 kHz) en normoyentes entre 8 y 23 años y 11 meses pertenecientes a la ciudad de Chillán. Material y método: No experimental, tipo descriptivo y corte transversal. Se evaluaron a 259 sujetos normoyentes, estudiantes de enseñanza básica, media y universitaria. A la muestra se le aplicó una audiometría de alta frecuencia, empleando un audiómetro (Gradson Stadler) GSI61 con fonoauriculares (Sennheiser) HDA 200. Resultados: Los umbrales auditivos incrementaron su valor según la edad y frecuencia. No se encontraron diferencias significativas según sexo. Se observaron diferencias significativas interaural en 9, 10 y 14 kHz. Los valores de los umbrales se presentaron en percentiles, considerando como normalidad aquellos ubicados entre el P10 y P75. Conclusión: Esta norma podría ser utilizada como referencia de normalidad para pesquisar tempranamente a sujetos en riesgo de pérdida auditiva y tomar las acciones sanitarias más pertinentes a cada caso en particular, empleando equipamiento similar.
Introduction: There are several studies showing that high frequency audiometry serves the important purpose in hearing loss early detection; nonetheless, Chile does not have a standard regulation for clinical implementation of the previously mentioned exam. Aim: To standardize high frequency thresholds (9-20) in patients with normal hearing in between the ages of 8 and 23 years and 11 months old from Chillan city. Material and method: Non-experimental, descriptive and held in a transversal lapse of time. 259 normal-hearing subjects were evaluated, belonging to elementary, middle, high school and higher -university- levels of education. All subjects underwent a high-frequency audiometry for which was used a (Gradson Stadler) GSI61 audiometer, with (Sennheiser) HDA 200 headphones. Results: It was observed that high-frequency thresholds tended to increase their figures according to age and frequency requirements. No meaningful differences -regarding male or female subjects- were found, although there were note worthy differences in 9, 10 and 14 kHz frequencies. The numbers of the thresholds were presented as percentiles, considering 'normal' those located in between P10 and P75. Conclusion: This regulation can be used as a point of reference for normality in order to early detect subjects having a hearing loss risk, and to also take health-related action suitable for each particular case, by using similar equipment to the one described in this study.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Audiometría de Tonos Puros/normas , Umbral Auditivo , Estándares de Referencia , Chile , Estudios Transversales , Distribución por EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: temporal auditory processing is defined as the perception of sound or of sound alteration within a restricted time interval and is considered a fundamental ability for the auditory perception of verbal and non verbal sounds, for the perception of music, rhythm, periodicity and in the discrimination of pitch, duration and of phonemes. AIM: to compare the performance of normal Brazilian adults in two temporal resolution tests: the Gaps-in-Noise Test (GIN) and the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), and to analyze potential differences of performance in these two tests. METHOD: twenty-five college students with normal hearing (11 males and 14 females) and no history of educational, neurological and/or language problems, underwent the GIN and RGDT at 40dB SL. RESULTS: statistically significant gender effects for both tests were found, with female participants showing poorer performance on both temporal processing tests. In addition, a comparative analysis of the results obtained in the GIN and RGDT revealed significant differences in the threshold measures derived for these two tests. In general, significantly better gap detection thresholds were observed for both male and female participants on the GIN test when compared to the results obtained for the RGDT. CONCLUSION: male participants presented better performances on both RGDT and GIN, when compared to the females. There were no differences in performance between right and left ears on the GIN test. Participants of the present investigation, males and females, performed better on the GIN when compared to the RGDT. The GIN presented advantages over the RGDT, not only in terms of clinical validity and sensibility, but also in terms of application and scoring.
Asunto(s)
Audiometría/métodos , Enfermedades Auditivas Centrales/diagnóstico , Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Umbral Auditivo/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica , Adolescente , Adulto , Audiometría/normas , Audiometría de Tonos Puros/normas , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Percepción Sonora/fisiología , Masculino , Ruido , Tiempo de Reacción , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Percepción del Habla/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
TEMA: o processamento auditivo temporal se refere a percepção de um evento sonoro ou de uma alteração no mesmo, dentro de um intervalo definido de tempo e é considerado uma habilidade fundamental na percepção auditiva de sons verbais e não verbais, na percepção de música, ritmo e pontuação e na discriminação de pitch, de duração e de fonemas. OBJETIVO: realizar um estudo comparativo do desempenho de adultos jovens normais nos testes de resolução temporal, Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) e Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) e analisar diferenças entre esses dois métodos de avaliação. MÉTODO: 25 universitários, 11 homens e 14 mulheres, com audição normal e sem histórico de alterações educacionais, neurológicas e/ou linguagem, foram submetidos ao RGDT e ao GIN, a 40dB NS. RESULTADO: observou-se diferença estatisticamente significante entre os sexos sendo que as mulheres apresentaram pior desempenho nos dois testes. No estudo comparativo dos resultados do RGDT e GIN, observaram-se diferenças significativas no desempenho da amostra. De maneira geral, os limiares de detecção de gap no teste GIN foram melhores do que os limiares obtidos no RGDT. CONCLUSÃO: o sexo masculino teve melhor desempenho tanto no teste RGDT quanto no GIN, quando comparado ao feminino. Além disso, não houve diferença significante nas repostas do GIN nas orelhas direita e esquerda. Os sujeitos deste estudo tiveram melhor desempenho no teste GIN, quando comparado ao RGDT, tanto no sexo masculino quanto no feminino. Portanto, o teste GIN apresentou vantagens sobre o RGDT não apenas quanto à sua validade e sensibilidade, mas também com relação a sua aplicação e correção dos resultados.
BACKGROUND: temporal auditory processing is defined as the perception of sound or of sound alteration within a restricted time interval and is considered a fundamental ability for the auditory perception of verbal and non verbal sounds, for the perception of music, rhythm, periodicity and in the discrimination of pitch, duration and of phonemes. AIM: to compare the performance of normal Brazilian adults in two temporal resolution tests: the Gaps-in-Noise Test (GIN) and the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), and to analyze potential differences of performance in these two tests. METHOD: twenty-five college students with normal hearing (11 males and 14 females) and no history of educational, neurological and/or language problems, underwent the GIN and RGDT at 40dB SL. RESULTS: statistically significant gender effects for both tests were found, with female participants showing poorer performance on both temporal processing tests. In addition, a comparative analysis of the results obtained in the GIN and RGDT revealed significant differences in the threshold measures derived for these two tests. In general, significantly better gap detection thresholds were observed for both male and female participants on the GIN test when compared to the results obtained for the RGDT. CONCLUSION: male participants presented better performances on both RGDT and GIN, when compared to the females. There were no differences in performance between right and left ears on the GIN test. Participants of the present investigation, males and females, performed better on the GIN when compared to the RGDT. The GIN presented advantages over the RGDT, not only in terms of clinical validity and sensibility, but also in terms of application and scoring.