RESUMEN
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) represent the most frequent adverse effect of lecanemab, a monoclonal antibody drug that targets amyloid beta. ARIA is observed in approximately 20% of patients who receive lecanemab. Most patients are asymptomatic; however, some develop serious neurological symptoms, and optimal management remains clinically challenging in such cases. In this review, I summarize the pathomechanism underlying ARIA and associated disorders, in addition to countermeasures for ARIA.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Péptidos beta-Amiloides/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Anticuerpos Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Glomerulonefritis por IGA , Humanos , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/tratamiento farmacológico , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/inmunología , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/diagnóstico , Anticuerpos Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos/sangre , Anticuerpos Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Masculino , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biopsia , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that has been approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study presents a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the post-marketing safety profile of EV in the real-world based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports regarding EV between January 2020 and December 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. The standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) narrow search AEs on the preferred term (PT) level were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify the AE signals for EV with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Results: A total of 2,216 reports regarding EV were included in the present study. SMQ analysis results indicated that a stronger strength signal was found in severe cutaneous adverse reactions, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and peripheral neuropathy. A total of 116 significant disproportionality PTs referring to 14 system organ classes (SOCs) were retained by disproportionality analysis, with 49 PTs not listed on the EV drug label. Frequently reported EV-related AEs included rash, peripheral neuropathy, decreased appetite, alopecia, and pruritus. The time to onset of the majority of EV-related AEs was within 30 days (66.05%), with only 0.73% events occurring after 1 year. Conclusion: The disproportionality analysis highlights that dermatologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major AEs induced by EV. The potential AEs not listed on the drug label were mainly related to gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary events. Further research is needed to confirm and explore the EV-related AEs in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Farmacovigilancia , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Anciano de 80 o más Años , United States Food and Drug Administration , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with systemic inflammation and a higher risk of cardiovascular comorbidities. This study retrospectively evaluates coagulation parameters in psoriasis vulgaris patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab) and IL-23 inhibitors (risankizumab, guselkumab), compared to those untreated systemically. The study reviewed records from 177 patients treated between January 2019 and March 2023. Patients were grouped into control (n = 77), secukinumab (n = 36), ixekizumab (n = 19), guselkumab (n = 24), and risankizumab (n = 21). Coagulation parameters, including PT, aPTT, PLT, MPV, INR, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and B12 levels, were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the comparison of coagulation parameters between groups. Significant differences were found in PT, with secukinumab-treated patients showing a significantly shorter PT compared to controls (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in other coagulation parameters across the groups. The study highlights a potential effect of secukinumab on coagulation pathways, possibly related to IL-17's role in inflammation and endothelial function. Despite current literature suggest a risk of cerebrovascular events with risankizumab, this study did not show any significant changes in coagulation parameters with risankizumab, indicating no hypercoagulability risk associated with this IL-23 inhibitor. Our findings suggest IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors are generally safe concerning coagulation parameters, but regular monitoring may be warranted for patients on secukinumab due to its effect on PT. Further long-term studies are needed to fully understand the cardiovascular risks associated with these therapies.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Coagulación Sanguínea , Interleucina-17 , Interleucina-23 , Psoriasis , Humanos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/sangre , Psoriasis/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Interleucina-17/antagonistas & inhibidores , Interleucina-17/sangre , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Interleucina-23/antagonistas & inhibidores , Interleucina-23/sangre , Adulto , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Polatuzumab vedotin(Pola)combination therapy is used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL)treatment. In clinical trials, more than 90% of the patients have received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(G-CSF)as primary prophylaxis. However, reports investigating the benefit of prophylactic administration are lacking. In this study, we addressed the incidence of febrile neutropenia(FN)with and without primary prophylaxis with G-CSF combined with Pola therapy. We observed that the incidence of FN with Pola-BR therapy was 0% and 9.5% with and without G-CSF, respectively. The incidence of FN with Pola-R-CHP tended to be higher: 0% and 31.2% with and without G-CSF, respectively. The duration of hospitalization significantly decreased in the Pola-BR group with G-CSF(11 days vs. 18 days in the group without G-CSF), suggesting that prophylaxis might contribute to this reduction. Although not statistically significant, prophylactic G-CSF administration tended to reduce the incidence of Grade 3 or higher leukopenia and neutropenia, suggesting that primary prophylactic G-CSF administration in Pola combination therapy could contribute to reduced hematologic toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Filgrastim , Polietilenglicoles , Humanos , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , InmunoconjugadosAsunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiple , Oligopéptidos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Amplificación de Genes , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sjögren's disease is a chronic autoimmune disease with an unmet need for targeted therapies. The aim of the TWINSS study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iscalimab, a monoclonal antibody against CD40, in patients with active Sjögren's disease. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study, conducted at 71 sites in 23 countries, enrolled patients aged 18 years or older fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2016 criteria. In the dose-ranging cohort 1, patients with a EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) score of 5 or higher and a EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) score of 5 or higher were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to subcutaneous iscalimab 150 mg, 300 mg, 600 mg, or placebo. In the proof-of-concept cohort 2, patients with an ESSDAI score of less than 5, ESSPRI (dryness or fatigue) score of 5 or higher, and Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life score of 30 or higher were randomly assigned (1:1) to iscalimab 600 mg or placebo. The sponsor, investigator, site personnel, and patients were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary objectives were to demonstrate a dose-response relationship of iscalimab based on the change in ESSDAI from baseline to week 24 in cohort 1 by Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modelling (MCP-Mod), and to assess the effect of iscalimab 600 mg on ESSPRI at week 24 in cohort 2. All the efficacy analyses included all patients who were randomly assigned, and safety analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03905525), and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 1, 2019, and Feb 28, 2022, 460 patients were screened; 173 patients were assigned to cohort 1 (44 to iscalimab 150 mg, 43 to 300 mg, 43 to 600 mg, and 43 to placebo) and 100 to cohort 2 (50 to each group). In cohort 1, the MCP step showed a significant dose-response relationship for placebo-adjusted ESSDAI change from baseline in one of four models (Linlog model, one-sided p=0·0041). ESSDAI decreased from baseline to week 24 with all three doses of iscalimab; 150 mg and 600 mg doses showed statistically significant improvement (placebo-adjusted least squares [LS] mean difference -3·0 [95% CI -4·9 to -1·1]; p=0·0025 for 150 mg and -2·9 [-4·9 to -1·0]; p=0·0037 for 600 mg). In cohort 2, ESSPRI showed a trend towards improvement with iscalimab 600 mg (placebo-adjusted LS mean change from baseline -0·57 points [95% CI -1·30 to 0·15]; p=0·12). Serious adverse events were reported in nine patients in cohort 1 (one [2%] of 43 in the placebo group, one [2%] of 44 in the iscalimab 150 mg group, three [7%] of 42 in the 300 mg group, four [9%] of 44 in the 600 mg group) and four patients in cohort 2 (two [4%] of 50 in each group). No deaths occurred over the 24-week period. INTERPRETATION: The study met the primary objective of demonstrating a significant dose-response relationship with iscalimab in terms of disease activity at week 24. Iscalimab was well tolerated and showed initial clinical benefit over placebo in two distinct populations of patients with Sjögren's disease, to be confirmed in larger trials. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.
Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Síndrome de Sjögren , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome de Sjögren/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anciano , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We performed a pilot study of daratumumab (an mAb directed against CD38) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and treatment-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with MIBC underwent baseline transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by four weekly doses of daratumumab prior to cystectomy. Patients with mRCC underwent baseline and sequential biopsies after eight weekly doses. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response rate for the MIBC cohort and objective response rate and progression-free survival for the mRCC cohort. Exploratory analyses included immune monitoring and overall survival. A Bayesian sequential monitoring design for toxicity was used for excessive toxicity. RESULTS: In both the MIBC (n = 8) and mRCC (n = 8) cohorts, no toxicity events were encountered. In the MIBC cohort, one patient experienced pathologic complete response rate. In the mRCC cohort, no objective responses were reported, and the median progression-free survival was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.8 months). Immune monitoring found significant reductions in NK cells in circulation in both cohorts after treatment. In the tissue analysis, IHC found evidence of diminished CD38 presence in mRCC with treatment, whereas the baseline levels in MIBC were low. CONCLUSION: Treatment with daratumumab was safe. No signal of efficacy was detected in mRCC, and conclusions on the activity in MIBC were limited. Evidence of daratumumab targeting CD38 was detected in circulating immune cells and within the tumor microenvironment of mRCC and MIBC. SIGNIFICANCE: In this prospective clinical trial of daratumumab, treatment in patients with MIBC and mRCC was safe. Limited efficacy was observed. Treatment with daratumumab resulted in CD38-expressing immune cell subsets to be targeted both in circulation and within the tumor microenvironment.
Asunto(s)
ADP-Ribosil Ciclasa 1 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Masculino , ADP-Ribosil Ciclasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/inmunología , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/inmunología , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glicoproteínas de MembranaRESUMEN
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory infection amongst all ages, causing a significant global health burden. Preventative and therapeutic options for RSV infection have long been under development, and recently, several widely-publicised vaccines targeting older adult and maternal populations have become available. Promising monoclonal antibody (mAb) and antiviral (AV) therapies are also progressing in clinical trials, with the prophylactic mAb nirsevimab recently approved for clinical use in infant populations. A systematic review on current progress in this area is lacking. We performed a systematic literature search (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, EudraCT, ANZCTR-searched Nov 29th, 2023) to identify studies on all RSV-specific mAbs and AV therapies that has undergone human clinical trials since year 2000. Data extraction focused on outcomes related to the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the intervention on trial, and all studies were graded against the OCEBM Levels of Evidence Table. Results from 59 studies were extracted, covering efficacy and safety data on six mAbs (motavizumab, motavizumab-YTE, nirsevimab, ALX-0171, suptavumab, clesrovimab) and 12 AV therapies (ALN-RSV01, RSV604, presatovir, MDT-637, lumicitabine, IFN-α1b, rilematovir, enzaplatovir, AK0529, sisunatovir, PC786, EDP-938). Of the mAbs reviewed, nirsevimab and clesrovimab hold considerable promise. The timeline for RSV-specific AV availability is less advanced, although EDP-938 and AK0529 have reported promising phase 2 efficacy and safety data. Moving forward, passive immunisation and treatment options for RSV infection will play a significant role in reducing the health burden of RSV, complementing recent advancements in vaccine development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376633.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Antivirales , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Antivirales/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/inmunología , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: the increase of older adults living with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is associated with higher use of high efficacy therapies (HETs) in a clinical practice. The are no data regarding the safety of HET in this patient group. OBJECTIVE: to analyze the safety of HETs in older people with MS (pwMS) in a real-life cohort. METHODS: retrospective cohort study including pwMS under HETs (cladribine and monoclonal antibodies) treated in two specialized MS centers in Latin America. We compare: pwMS ≥ 50 years old (G1) and < 50 years old (G2). In all pwMS, presence and type of adverse events, and comorbidities were recorded. RESULTS: 882 pwMS were included, 141 (15.9 %) had ≥50 years old, 47 (33.3 %) werunde HETs (G1). The most used DMT in G1 was ocrelizumab (48.9 %), mean time under HETs: 2.06 ± 0.8 years. The most frequent adverse event in G1 was urinary tract infection (UTI) (21.3 %). We did not find significant differences between G1 and G2 in infusion reactions, lymphopenia, neoplasms, respiratory infections, and liver disease. We found differences in the frequency of urinary tract infections (p = 0.004). No cases of VZV reactivation, tuberculosis or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were registered. In a regression model adjusted for MS evolution, time under HET, EDSS, Charlson comorbidity index and phenotype, patients 50 ≥ under HETs did not have a higher incidence of adverse events compared to < 50 (Adjusted OR 0.72; CI95 % 0.143 -3.43, p = 0.67)} CONCLUSION: the short term use of HETs in pwMS older than 50 years old seems to be safe.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Factores de Edad , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), implicated in migraine pain, also possesses bone anabolic properties, which leads to the possibility that monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRPs) might increase the risk of bone density abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore bone mineral density abnormalities in a cohort of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRPs. METHODS: This was a single-center, cross-sectional, cohort study including migraine patients who underwent a densitometry assessment during anti-CGRP treatment. We assessed the frequency of osteopenia or osteoporosis (OSTEO+ status), defined as a bone mineral density T-score of -1 to -2.5, and <-2.5 standard deviations from the young female adult mean, respectively. Additionally, the association of OSTEO+ status with anti-CGRP treatment duration and primary osteoporosis' risk factors was investigated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Data from 51 patients (43 female, mean age 46 ± 13.9 years) were evaluated. The mean duration of anti-CGRP treatment was 15.7 (±11.8) months. Twenty-seven patients (53%) were OSTEO+ (n = 22 osteopenia; n = 5 osteoporosis). In the final model, menopause [odds ratio 11.641 (95% confidence interval 1.486-91.197), p = 0.019] and anti-seizure drug use [odds ratio 12.825 (95% confidence interval 1.162-141.569), p = 0.037] were associated with OSTEO+ status. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of migraine patients, no evidence of an association between anti-CGRP treatment duration and an increasing risk of bone mineral density abnormalities was found. However, these findings are preliminary and necessitate further longitudinal research with larger cohorts and extended follow-up to be validated.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Densidad Ósea , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Trastornos Migrañosos , Osteoporosis , Humanos , Femenino , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Masculino , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/epidemiología , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/inmunología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The mesothelin-targeting antibody-drug conjugate anetumab ravtansine was evaluated in combination with the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab based on the common expression of mesothelin and reports of activity in mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase 1 safety run-in of the combination of anetumab ravtansine (6.5 mg/kg iv q3weeks) and pembrolizumab (200 mg, IV q3weeks) was conducted, followed by a phase 2 randomization to the combination or pembrolizumab alone at medical centers across the United States and Canada in the National Cancer Institute's Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network. Patients with pleural mesothelioma that expressed mesothelin and had previously received platinum-based therapy were eligible. RESULTS: In phase 1 (n = 12) only one dose limiting toxicity was observed and the rules for dose reduction were not met. In phase 2, there was no difference in the confirmed response rates between the combination group (n = 18, 2 partial responses [PR], 11 %) and the pembrolizumab group (n = 17, 1 PR, 6 %; z = -0.5523, p = 0.29116). The median PFS was 12.2 months (95 % CI 5.1-not evaluable [NE]) for the combination, and 3.9 months for pembrolizumab (95 % CI 2.1-NE)(HR=0.55, p = 0.20). Patients with high baseline levels of soluble mesothelin who received anetumab ravtansine had a median PFS of 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The numeric difference in PFS between treatment groups was not statistically significant, likely related to a smaller than planned sample size. High levels of soluble mesothelin should potentially be considered to select against the use of mesothelin-targeting therapies in development that are neutralized by soluble mesothelin.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Mesotelioma , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Mesotelioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Mesotelioma/mortalidad , Mesotelioma/patología , Mesotelina , Maitansina/análogos & derivados , Maitansina/uso terapéutico , Maitansina/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Pleurales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pleurales/patología , Neoplasias Pleurales/mortalidad , Proteínas Ligadas a GPI/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , InmunoconjugadosRESUMEN
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, in the form of injectable monoclonal antibodies, are a newer class of drugs for the prevention of migraine headaches. In clinical trials, they have been found to be effective with good tolerance and few adverse effects. Alopecia has been increasingly noted as a post-marketing event associated with CGRP inhibitor injectables. Of the case reports available on this topic, alopecia has commonly been localised to the scalp and associated with erenumab use; however, not as much has been reported for fremanezumab nor for injection site-related alopecia. We report an occurrence of persistent lower extremity localised injection site alopecia in a patient within our headache clinic who used fremanezumab. The possible mechanism of alopecia may be related to the failure of hair follicle immune privilege in the absence of CGRP immunomodulatory effects.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Alopecia/inducido químicamente , Alopecia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: We previously reported that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and baseline liver metastasis are at a higher risk of developing grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities when treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody. This study aimed to identify additional factors associated with skin toxicities induced by anti-EGFR treatment in patients with liver metastatic CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with liver metastatic CRC who initially received anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-containing treatment (n=77) were retrospectively assessed. The primary endpoint was to identify the factor(s) responsible for the development of grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities. Additionally, factors for grade ≥2 rash and paronychia were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of grade ≥2 overall skin symptoms, rash, and paronychia was 62.3%, 31.2%, and 28.6%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed that age <65 years and anemia were independent baseline risk factors for grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities (adjusted hazard ratio 2.09, 95% confidence interval=1.10-3.97, p=0.02 for age; 2.36, 1.20-4.61, p=0.01 for anemia). In contrast, combination prophylaxis using systemic minocycline and corticosteroid ointment was a preventive factor (0.47, 0.25-0.88, p=0.02). Males and age <65 years were baseline risk factors for grade ≥2 rash, and combination prophylaxis was identified as a preventive factor. No factors were identified for paronychia. CONCLUSION: Age <65 years and anemia were identified as independent baseline risk factors. Additionally, combination prophylaxis was found to be a preventive factor against anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-induced grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities in patients with liver metastatic CRC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The usefulness of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and its dynamics before/after durvalumab consolidation therapy to predict safety or efficacy remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (D group) or chemoradiotherapy alone (non-D group) at multiple institutions. We investigated the association between dNLR, or its dynamics, and pneumonitis, checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP), irAEs, and efficacy. Ninety-eight and fifty-six patients were enrolled in the D and non-D groups, respectively. The dNLR at baseline was significantly lower in patients who experienced irAEs or CIP than in those who did not. The low dNLR group, 28 days following durvalumab consolidation therapy (dNLR28 ≤ 3), demonstrated longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the high dNLR group (dNLR28 > 3) (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.88, p = 0.020; OS, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.94, p = 0.037). Among patients with high dNLR at baseline (dNLR > 3), the dNLR28 ≤ 3 group showed longer PFS than the dNLR28 > 3 group (p = 0.010). The dNLR is a predictive factor for irAEs and CIP in patients receiving durvalumab consolidation therapy. The dNLR at 28 days after durvalumab consolidation therapy and its dynamics predict favorable outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Linfocitos , Neutrófilos , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To present the main findings of a post-authorization safety study assessing pregnancy and infant outcomes after prenatal golimumab exposure in a real-world setting. METHODS: This observational population-based cohort study included data from pregnancies ending in 2006-2018 (Finland) or 2019 (Denmark, Sweden). Infants born to women with rheumatic diseases or ulcerative colitis diagnoses were identified. Based on prescription fills from 90 days prior to pregnancy until delivery, infants were assigned to one of the four drug-exposure cohorts: golimumab, other anti-TNF biologics, other biologics, and nonbiologic systemic therapy, and the general population. Prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, mortality, diagnoses of major congenital anomalies (MCA), and inpatient infections in the infants' first year of life were assessed. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated for MCA and infection. RESULTS: Among 134 infants in the golimumab cohort, none were stillborn or died in the first year of life. MCA were diagnosed in 4.5% of the infants in the golimumab cohort, versus 6.8%, 10.9%, 5.5%, and 4.6% in the other anti-TNF biologics, other biologics, nonbiologic systemic therapy and general population cohorts, respectively. Inpatient infections were diagnosed in 11% of golimumab-exposed infants, compared with 9%-11% of infants in the other cohorts. Unadjusted and selected adjusted comparisons showed no association between prenatal golimumab exposure and MCA or infection compared with the other exposure cohorts or general population. CONCLUSIONS: The number of infants with prenatal golimumab exposure was low, but results are reassuringly consistent with the evidence available for other anti-TNF biologics. Continued monitoring is needed.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Resultado del Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Suecia/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Recién Nacido , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Finlandia/epidemiología , Lactante , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncoscopía , Radioterapia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Importance: Increasing evidence suggests a potential role of immune-modulatory drugs for treatment-resistant depression. This scoping review explores the emerging evidence regarding the antidepressant effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a relatively newer class of immune therapeutics with favorable safety profile.Observations: PubMed was searched up to November 2023 for English publications addressing the antidepressant effects of mAbs, including meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, open-label, single-arm studies, and case series. Several mAbs have shown potential antidepressant effects, but most studies in primary inflammatory disorders included patients with mild depression. Only infliximab and sirukumab were directly examined in individuals with primary depression. mAbs that do not require laboratory monitoring, such as ixekizumab and dupilumab, could hold potential promise if future studies establish their safety profile regarding suicide risk.Conclusions and Relevance: The use of several mAbs for the treatment of primary inflammatory disorders has been associated with improvement of comorbid depressive symptoms. Given their unique mechanisms of action, mAbs may offer a new hope for depressed patients who do not respond to currently available antidepressants. Further research addressing individuals with more severe depressive symptoms is essential. Direct examination of antidepressant effects of mAbs in people with primary depressive disorders is also crucial to refine their clinical use in the treatment of depression.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Antidepresivos , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of immunotherapy in mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer (pMMR-CRC) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with limited efficacy. DAPPER (NCT03851614) is a phase 2, basket study randomizing patients with pMMR CRC or PDAC to durvalumab with olaparib (durvalumab + olaparib) or durvalumab with cediranib (durvalumab + cediranib). METHODS: PDAC or pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to either durvalumab+olaparib (arm A), or durvalumab + cediranib (arm B). Co-primary endpoints included pharmacodynamic immune changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and safety. Objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined. Paired tumor samples were analyzed by multiplexed immunohistochemistry and RNA-sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 31 metastatic pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to arm A (n = 16) or B (n = 15). In 28 evaluable patients, 3 patients had stable disease (SD) (2 patients treated with durvalumab + olaparib and 1 patient treated with durvalumab + cediranib) while 25 had progressive disease (PD). Among patients with PDAC (n = 19), 9 patients were randomized to arm A and 10 patients were randomized to arm B. In 18 evaluable patients, 1 patient had a partial response (unconfirmed) with durvalumab + cediranib, 1 patient had SD with durvalumab + olaparib while 16 had PD. Safety profile was manageable and no grade 4-5 treatment-related adverse events were observed in either arm A or B. No significant changes were observed for CD3+/CD8+ immune infiltration in on-treatment biopsies as compared to baseline for pMMR-CRC and PDAC independent of treatment arms. Increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at baseline, low baseline CD68+ cells and different immune gene expression signatures at baseline were associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pMMR-CRC or PDAC, durvalumab + olaparib and durvalumab + cediranib showed limited antitumor activity. Different immune components of the TME were associated with treatment outcomes.