RESUMEN

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by vascular thrombosis and obstetric morbidity, with accurate laboratory examination of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) being crucial for diagnosis. This study focused on anti-ß2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies and aimed to establish the first population-based cutoff values for aß2GPI IgA/IgM/IgG antibodies in non-pregnant women of reproductive age in Southwest China. The study cohort comprised 181 healthy women of reproductive age for study. Blood samples were collected on an early morning fast. Anti-ß2GPI antibodies including IgA, IgM and IgG were measured in serum using the HOB® BioCLIA kit. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, the study used non-parametric percentile methods to calculate the 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentiles cutoff values for aß2GPI IgA/IgM/IgG antibodies, along with corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CI), while excluding outliers. A total of 168 independent samples were collected for verification, including 85 samples from healthy subjects and 83 samples from APS patients, in order to evaluate the analytical performance of the obtained cutoff values. The 99th percentile cutoff values were 3.36 RU/mL for aß2GPI IgA, 27.54 RU/mL for aß2GPI IgM and 1.81 RU/mL for aß2GPI IgG, which indicated that the levels of aß2GPI IgM antibodies were generally higher compared to those of IgA and IgG antibodies. Our established reference range was confirmed to be successful in validating the detected values of aß2GPI antibodies in all healthy controls. With the 99th percentile cutoff value, the sensitivity was 14.46% for aß2GPI IgA, 22.89% for aß2GPI IgG, and 9.64% for aß2GPI IgM in APS patients. This study established population-based cutoff values that are applicable to the local population for the accurate laboratory examination of aß2GPI antibodies in non-pregnant women of reproductive age. The study also recommends paying more attention to IgM positivity in women of reproductive age.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We present a case of a woman in her 20s with inadequately treated systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). She presented with heavy menstrual bleeding, along with nasal and gum bleeding worsening over 3 months. There was no bleeding history in her family, childhood, dental procedures or childbirth. Evaluation ruled out structural causes, revealing prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (incomplete correction on mixing studies), normal prothrombin time, moderate thrombocytopenia, and lupus anticoagulant and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibody positivity twice, 12 weeks apart. Further evaluation showed very low von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels (<5%). She was treated with pulse methylprednisolone for 3 days, resulting in complete symptom resolution and improvement in vWF levels to 130%. The absence of bleeding history, family history, presence of very low vWF and its response to corticosteroids led to a diagnosis of acquired vWF syndrome as the cause of mucosal bleeding in an SLE patient with concomitant positive antiphospholipid antibody. She was discharged on hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil and tapering oral corticosteroids.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate both antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and non-criteria aPLs (NC-aPLs) in relation with pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1574 pregnant women with experienced at least one miscarriage who were tested for aPLs and NC-aPLs, and compared their clinical characteristics, immune biomarkers, and pregnancy outcomes. The χ2 test or Fisher's exact test compared pregnancy outcomes among patients negative for all aPLs, positive for NC­aPLs subtypes, and positive for criteria aPLs subtypes. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that positive aPLs (OR = 2.216, 95 % CI 1.381-3.558), and positive NC-aPLs (OR = 1.619, 95 % CI 1.245-2.106) are linked to adverse outcomes. For fetal loss, positive aPLs (OR = 2.354, 95 % CI 1.448-3.829), NC-aPLs (OR = 1.443, 95 % CI 1.076-1.936) were significant. Premature delivery was associated with positive NC-aPLs (OR = 2.102, 95 % CI 1.452-3.043). In the NC-aPLs positive group, the rate of adverse outcomes was higher in the multiple-positive subgroup (77.8 %) compared to the double-positive (52.3 %) and single-positive (37.0 %) subgroups. The rates of fetal loss and premature delivery were also higher in the multiple-positive NC-aPLs subgroup compared to the single-positive subgroup (48.1 % vs. 22.6 % for fetal loss and 57.1 % vs. 16.5 % for premature delivery). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that both aPLs and NC-aPLs are associated with an increased incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and patients presenting with multiple NC-aPLs positivity were found to have a higher incidence of adverse outcomes compared to their single-positive counterparts.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Thrombotic manifestations, mainly venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke, are the most common and potentially life-threatening presentations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The management of APS requires the assessment of the antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) profile, of concurrent systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic autoimmune diseases and the presence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and bleeding. Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) remains the cornerstone of therapy for thrombotic APS. As platelets play a central role in APS, low-dose aspirin is the first option for primary thromboprophylaxis in asymptomatic aPL carriers, and also plays a role as combination therapy with VKAs in arterial thrombosis. Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) could be considered in certain low-risk situations, although they are not recommended in patients with arterial thrombosis or triple positive aPL. Adjuvant therapies such as hydroxychloroquine and statins may be useful in complex settings such as thrombotic recurrences or high risk of bleeding. In this article, we review the evidence and the recommendations of the guidelines for the treatment of APS, and provide a critical and practical approach of its management from our clinical perspective.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a family of autoantibodies targeting phospholipid-binding proteins and are associated with several clinical settings, and most notably define the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These antibodies can be identified using a variety of laboratory tests, which include both solid-phase immunological assays and functional clotting assays that detect lupus anticoagulants (LA). aPLs are linked to a range of adverse medical conditions, such as thrombosis and complications affecting the placenta and fetus, potentially leading to morbidity and mortality. The specific aPL identified, along with the pattern of reactivity, correlates with the severity of these conditions. Therefore, laboratory testing for aPL is crucial for evaluating the risk of complications and for fulfilling certain classification criteria for APS, which are also applied as diagnostic markers in medical practice. This review provides an overview of the available laboratory tests currently for measuring aPL and discusses their clinical implications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This review aims to identify biological markers associated with the risk of recurrence of thrombotic and/or obstetric events in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: A comprehensive review of literature was conducted to evaluate established and potential novel biological markers associated with thrombosis in APS. To this end, a PubMed literature search was conducted for the last twenty years using the following keywords or their combinations: thrombotic risk, recurrence of thrombosis, risk stratification, severity, predictive value. RESULTS: Previous studies showed that multiple aPL positivity correlates with an increased risk of thrombosis in APS. Moreover, the analysis of N-glycosylation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) revealed that low levels of IgG sialylation, fucosylation or galactosylation increases the pro-inflammatory activity of aPL, predisposing to thrombosis. In addition, quantification of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and antibodies directed against NETs (anti-NETs) in serum demonstrates promising prognostic utility in assessing APS severity. Oxidative stress plays a role in the pathogenicity of APS and paraoxonase 1 (PON1) activity emerges as a promising biomarker of thrombotic risk in APS. Furthermore, identification of novel antigenic targets involved in the pathophysiology of APS, such as lysobisphosphatidic acid (LBPA), had led to the discovery of unconventional aPL, antibodies directed against the LBPA (aLBPA), whose clinical value could make it possible to identify APS patients at high risk of thrombotic recurrence. CONCLUSION: The immunological profile of aPL, N-glycosylation of aPL, quantification of NETs and anti-NETs, analysis of biomarkers of oxidative stress and the discovery of aLBPA offer potential prognostic tools for risk stratification in APS patients.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of concomitant systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on the clinicopathological manifestations of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective study compared clinical and antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) data from 118 patients, 58 with SLE-associated APS (SLE-APS), and 60 with primary APS. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13.9 (IQR 7.7-19.3) and 8.6 years (3.5-10.6) for the SLE-APS cohort and PAPS cohort, respectively. Age at diagnosis of APS was lower in the SLE-APS cohort (mean 35.9 vs PAPS: 46.7 years; p < 0.05). Distribution of aPL subtypes was similar across cohorts. 198 thrombotic events were identified overall (index plus recurrent), with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thrombosis each occurring in just over half of patients in both cohorts. Microvascular thrombosis (12.1% vs 0%), and a mixed (any combination of venous, arterial and microvascular) thrombotic phenotype (19.0% vs 6.7%, p = 0.05) were more prevalent in SLE-APS patients. Recurrent thrombosis incidence rates (∼0.5 events/10-patient years), and Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival after index thrombosis, were similar. In the PAPS cohort, only: (i) triple-aPL-positivity was associated with a significantly higher recurrent thrombosis event rate (incidence rate ratio 2.22, p = 0.03) and lower recurrence-free survival after first thrombosis (log-rank test p = 0.01); (ii) lupus anticoagulant (LA)-positivity was associated with higher prevalance of arterial thrombosis (RR 2.69, p = 0.01), and lower prevlance of VTE (RR 0.48, p < 0.001), versus LA-negativity. CONCLUSION: Concomitant SLE does not appear to modify long-term recurrent thrombosis risk, or aPL phenotypes, in patients with APS. Triple-aPL-positivity and LA-positive status may have less influence on thrombotic outcomes in patients with SLE-APS compared to PAPS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a single oral dose of 200,000 IU of vitamin D3 on antiphospholipid antibodies in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. METHODS: This is a post-hoc, exploratory analysis from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial performed in two centers in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were randomly assigned to receive either vitamin D3 (n = 97) or placebo (n = 97). In this post-hoc analysis, the endpoints were titers and frequency of anti-ß2-Glycoprotein-I (aß2-GP) and Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies [Immunoglobulin G, M and A (IgG, IgM and IgA)]. RESULTS: Overall mean (SD) age was 55.3 (13.9) years, Body Mass Index (BMI) was 32.2 (7.1 kg/m2), and 106 participants (54.6 %) were male. There was a significant group by time interaction (p = 0.046) for frequency of aCL IgG, with increased values from baseline to discharge in the placebo group [n (%), from 13 (13.4) to 25 (25.8)] compared to the vitamin D3 [from 25 (25.8) to 29 (29.9)]. However, the frequency of aCL IgG did not change between the groups on discharge. No significant differences between vitamin D3 and placebo groups were found for any other autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: These findings do not support the use of a single oral dose of 200,000 IU of vitamin D3 to modulate autoantibodies in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine is associated with several genetic or acquired comorbidities. Studies conducted in recent years emphasize that the frequency of thrombophilia is high in migraine, especially migraine with aura (MA). Similarly, the presence of white matter lesions (WMLs) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans has been associated with migraine for many years. OBJECTIVE: Based on the knowledge that both WMLs and thrombophilia variants are frequently observed in MA, we aimed to investigate whether there is a relationship between genetic thrombophilia and the presence of WMLs in these patients. METHODS: The levels of proteins S and C, antithrombin III activities, activated protein C (APC) resistance, antiphospholipid immunoglobulin G/immunoglobulin M (IgG/IgM) and anticardiolipin IgG/IgM antibodies were investigated in 66 MA patients between the ages of 18 and 49 years who presented no cardiovascular risk factors. The presence of WMLs and the Fazekas grade was determined from the brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans' T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence taken from the patients. The rates of WMLs were compared in patients with and without thrombophilia. RESULTS: Thrombophilia was detected in 34.8% of the patients, and 27.3% were determined to have WMLs in brain MRI scans. The WMLs were detected in 23.3% of the patients without thrombophilia, in 34.8% of those with thrombophilia, and in 50% of the subjects with multiple thrombophilia disorders. Among the thrombophilia disorders, only APC resistance was significantly more common in patients with WMLs. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study showed that thrombophilia may be a mechanism that should be investigated in the etiology of increased WMLs in MA.

ANTECEDENTES: La migraña se asocia con una serie de comorbilidades genéticas o adquiridas. Los estudios realizados en los últimos años destacan que la frecuencia de trombofilia es elevada en la migraña, especialmente en la migraña con aura (MA). De manera similar, la presencia de lesiones de la sustancia blanca (LSB) en las imágenes por resonancia magnética (RM) del cerebro se ha asociado con la migraña hace muchos años. OBJETIVO: Con base en la información de que se suelen observar tanto LSB como variantes de la trombofilia en MA, nuestro objetivo fue investigar si existe una relación entre la trombofilia genética y la presencia de LSB en estos pacientes. MéTODOS: Se investigaron los niveles de proteína S y de proteína C, actividades de antitrombina III, resistencia a la proteína C activada (PCA), anticuerpos antifosfolípidos inmunoglobulina G/inmunoglobulina M (IgG/IgM) y anticuerpos anticardiolipina IgG/IgM en 66 pacientes con MA entre 18 y 49 años que no presentaban factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Se determinaron la presencia de LSB y el grado de Fazekas a partir de imágenes por RM del cerebro en la secuencia ponderada en T2 y recuperación de la inversión atenuada de fluido (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, FLAIR, en inglés) obtenidas de los pacientes. Se compararon las tasas de LSB en pacientes con y sin trombofilia. RESULTADOS: Se detectó trombofilia en el 34,8% de los pacientes y LSB en el 27,3%. Las LSB estuvieron presentes en el 23,3% de los pacientes sin trombofilia, en el 34,8% de los que tenían trombofilia, y en el 50% de los que tenían múltiples trastornos trombofílicos. La resistencia a la PCA fue significativamente más común en aquellos pacientes con LSB. CONCLUSIóN: Los resultados del presente estudio mostraron que la trombofilia puede ser un mecanismo que debe investigarse en la etiología del aumento de LSB en MA.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a cause of pregnancy morbidity. We aim to determine the frequency of criteria and non-criteria anti-phospholipid (aPL) autoantibodies in patients admitted for unexplained fetal death (UFD), pre-eclampsia (PE) and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: All consecutive patients with UFD, PE and/or FGR followed in the department of Obstetrics, Bichat Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, between January 2019 and December 2021 were screened. Patients with available serum stored from the index pregnancy were included. Patients with previously known APS or twin pregnancy were excluded. Testing for aPL autoantibodies included anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-ß2GPI (aß2GPI), anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgG/IgM and anti-annexin V IgG. When available, placenta specimens were analyzed by a pathologist blinded to the aPL status. All clinical characteristics, pregnancy features, and comorbidities were extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Overall 167 (32 (28.8-35.7) years) patients with UFD (n = 28; 16.8 %), PE (n = 60; 35.9 %) and/or FGR (n = 105; 62.9 %) were screened for aPL autoantibodies. Moderate titers of aPL autoantibodies were detected in 33 (n = 33/167, 19.8 %) patients. aPL autoantibodies were non-criteria aPE IgG/IgM in most cases (n = 28/33, 84.8 %). aPS/PT IgG/IgM were found in 11 (n = 11/33, 33.3 %) cases and aCL or aß2GP1 IgG/IgM in 4 (n = 4/33, 12.1 %). Multivariable logistic regression showed that aPL autoantibodies were mostly associated with UFD (OR 4.37 [1.72-11.20], p = 0.002), PE ≤ 34th week of gestation (3.22 [0.86-11.90], p = 0.070) and chronic deciduitis (8.03 [0.89-67.2], p = 0.060) DISCUSSION: The frequency of aPL autoantibodies, mostly aPE, is high in patients with late pregnancy morbidity and may qualify obstetrical APS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Substantial morbidity and mortality affect those with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), yet patient experiences remain poorly understood. This research investigated patient experiences of aPL/APS diagnosis; effects on daily life; and healthcare and treatment. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with APS per the Revised Sapporo criteria or with ≥1 positive aPL on ≥2 occasions were recruited from a Canadian multidisciplinary APS clinic to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Interviews were conducted virtually and transcribed verbatim for subsequent thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with aPLs/APS participated; 95.2% were female, mean (SD) age was 45.6 (15.0) years. Most (71.4%) had APS, and 71.4% had aPLs/APS with SLE. Results are presented around patient experiences of aPL/APS diagnosis, effects on daily life, and healthcare and treatment. Participants described medical complications/physical symptoms and the healthcare, lifestyle, and emotional impacts experienced around the time of aPLs/APS diagnosis. In addition to the physical and psychosocial impacts of living with aPLs/APS, patients reported modified leisure activities, altered employment trajectories, and positive and negative impacts on relationships. Impacts on family planning were also a critical component of the aPL/APS lived experience; participants shared experiences of miscarriage, other pregnancy complications, and medication-related challenges (e.g., with low-molecular-weight heparin injections). Challenging aspects of aPL/APS healthcare and treatment were also discussed, particularly related to the lifestyle, physical, and emotional burden of medication use. Although a lack of resources was described, participants expressed trust in healthcare providers when making management decisions or when seeking information. Suggestions for resources included the need for additional medication-related information, examples to help contextualize management behaviours, and additional information for those with aPLs/APS without SLE. CONCLUSION: Patients highlighted how the diverse manifestations of aPLs/APS, accentuated by management-related challenges, impose considerable physical and psychosocial burdens. Results will inform the development of patient resources aligned with patient priorities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease mainly affecting young individuals. Testing for antiphospholipid antibodies is recommended for young patients who are suspected to have APS. Yet, it is hard to differentiate APS from other acquired thrombophilia disorders in elderly-onset APS patients. This study aim to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of elderly-onset APS. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study. Thrombotic APS patients who underwent follow-ups between 2009 and 2022 were included. Elderly-onset APS patients (onset age ≥60 years) were compared to non-elderly-onset APS patients (onset age <60 years) and matched cases of elderly non-APS patients (age ≥60 years with thrombosis). RESULTS: A total of 161 APS patients were included in this study, 45 (28.0%) were elderly-onset APS. Stroke (35.6% vs. 18.1%, p = .018) was more common at disease onset in elderly-onset APS patients. Compared to non-elderly-onset patients, elderly-onset APS patients were associated with a higher number of cardiovascular risk factors. Elderly-onset APS patients showed significantly lower positive rate (51.1% vs. 71.6%, p = .014) and ratios [1.24 (1.01-1.38) vs. 1.37 (1.16-1.77), p = .004] of lupus anticoagulant. Elderly-onset APS patients had a significantly higher 10-years cumulative all-cause mortality (p < .001) and APS-related mortality than non-elderly-onset patients (p = .002) and elderly non-APS patients (p = .040). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly-onset APS patients have unique disease characteristics with higher 10-years cumulative all-cause mortality and APS-related mortality. Early recognition and control of comorbidities may reduce the recurrence of thrombosis and mortality in elderly-onset APS patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunity play a pivotal role in the risk of ischemic stroke, and studies have also shown a relationship between ischemic stroke and autoimmune diseases. In light of this we conducted a prospective cohort study to elucidate the impact of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), antinuclear antibodies (ANA), and anti-extractable nuclear antigen autoantibodies (anti-ENA) on the prognosis of ischemic stroke. METHODS: 245 stroke patients were recruited in this single-center study and followed up with for 3 years. Autoantibodies, including aPLs (ACA, anti-ß2GPI, LA), ANA and anti-ENA were evaluated in recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) and nonrecurrent ischemic stroke (nonRIS). Stroke severity was judged using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). For preventive treatment, 42 IS patients with positive aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA were randomized 1:1 into a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment group and a control group, and the prognoses were compared. RESULTS: The positive rate of ACA IgG (p = 0.018), anti-ß2GPI IgG (p = 0.047), LA (p = 0.023), and aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (p = 0.000) were significantly higher in patients with RIS compared to patients with nonRIS, and aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (HR2.31, 95 % CI1.02-5.25, p = 0.046) and hypertension (HR2.50, 95 % CI1.17-5.35, p = 0.018) were the independent risk factors of recurrence. There were differences in NIHSS at month 36 between those positive and negative for aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (p = 0.001, Eta2 = 0.052), anti-ENA (p = 0.016, Eta2 = 0.030), ANA (p = 0.035, Eta2 = 0.022), and LA (p = 0.016, Eta2 = 0.028). Furthermore, the recurrence rate of the HCQ treatment group was lower than that of the control group (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Co-positivity of aPLs and ANA/anti-ENA is an independent risk factor for RIS. However, HCQ therapy may reduce the recurrence rate of IS for these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To determine the humoral immunity in advanced maternal-age women with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). Methods: A retrospective study was performed between January 2022 and October 2023 in the Department of Reproductive Immunity of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. Women with RSA were recruited and multiple autoantibodies were tested. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to compare the associations between different age groups (20 to 34 years old in the low maternal-age group and 35 to 45 years in the advanced maternal-age group) and multiple autoantibodies, while controlling for three confounding factors, including body mass index (BMI), previous history of live birth, and the number of spontaneous abortions. Then, we investigated the differences in the humoral immunity of advanced maternal-age RSA women and low maternal-age RSA women. Result: A total of 4009 women with RSA were covered in the study. Among them, 1158 women were in the advanced maternal-age group and 2851 women were in the low maternal-age group. The prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and undifferentiated connective tissue disease was 15.6% and 14.1%, 0.0% and 0.1%, 0.9% and 0.9%, 0.3% and 0.0%, and 23.7% and 22.6% in the advanced maternal-age group and low maternal-age group, respectively, showing no statistical difference between the two groups. The positive rates of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), antinuclear antibody (ANA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibody, anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody, anti single-stranded DNA (ssDAN) antibody, antibodies against alpha-fodrin (AAA), and thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) were 19.1% and 19.5%, 6.6% and 6.6%, 9.2% and 10.5%, 2.0% and 2.0%, 2.2% and 1.2%, 5.1% and 4.9%, and 17.8% and 16.8%, respectively. No differences were observed between the two groups. 1.6% of the women in the advanced maternal-age group tested positive for lupus anticoagulant (LA), while 2.7% of the women in the low maternal-age group were LA positive, with the differences being statistically significant (odds ratio=0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.78). In the 4008 RSA patients, the cumulative cases tested positive for the three antibodies of the aPLs spectrum were 778, of which 520 cases were positive for anti-ß2 glycoprotein Ⅰ antibodies (ß2GPⅠ Ab)-IgG/IgM, 58 were positive for aCL-IgG/IgM, 73 were positive for LA, 105 were positive for both ß2GPⅠ Ab-IgG/IgM and aCL-IgG/IgM, 17 were positive for both ß2GPⅠ Ab-IgG/IgM and LA, 2 were positive for both aCL-IgG/IgM and LA, and 3 were positive for all three antibodies. Conclusion: Our study did not find a difference in humoral immunity between RSA women of advanced maternal age and those of low maternal age.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is an autoimmune disorder associated with various pathological pregnancies, such as recurrent miscarriage, stillbirth, severe pre-eclampsia and severe placental insufficiency. The persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) is the most important laboratory characteristic of OAPS. OAPS severely affects the reproductive health of women of childbearing age in China. Reports indicate that approximately 9.6% stillbirths, 11.5% severe pre-eclampsia, and 54% recurrent miscarriages are associated with OAPS or aPLs. However, the pathogenesis of OAPS remains unclear. Previously, thrombosis at the maternal-fetal interface (MFI) was considered the main mechanism of OAPS-related pathological pregnancies. Consequently, the use of low molecular weight heparin and aspirin throughout pregnancy was recommended to improve outcomes in OAPS patient. In recent years, many studies have found that thrombosis in MFI is uncommon, but various inflammatory factors are significantly increased in the MFI of OAPS patients. Based on these findings, some clinicians have started using anti-inflammatory treatments for OAPS, which have preliminarily improved the pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on these second-line treatments of OAPS. Another troubling issue is the clinical diagnosis of OAPS. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, there are only classification criteria for OAPS, and clinical diagnosis of OAPS depends on the clinicians' experience. The present classification criteria of OAPS were established for clinical and basic research purposes, not for patient clinical management. In clinical practice, many patients with both positive aPLs and pathological pregnancy histories do not meet the strict OAPS criteria. This has led to widespread issues of incorrect diagnosis and treatment. Timely and accurate diagnosis of OAPS is crucial for effective treatment. In this article, we reviewed the epidemiological research progress on OAPS and summarized its classification principles, including: 1) the persistent presence of aPLs in circulation; 2) manifestations of OAPS, excluding other possible causes. For the first point, accurate assessment of aPLs is crucial; for the latter, previous studies regarded only placenta-related pregnancy complications as characteristic manifestations of OAPS. However, recent studies have indicated that adverse pregnancy outcomes related to trophoblast damage, such as recurrent miscarriage and stillbirth, also need to be considered in OAPS. We also discussed several key issues in the diagnosis and treatment of OAPS. First, we addressed the definition of non-standard OAPS and offered our opinion on defining non-standard OAPS within the framework of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) APS criteria. Then, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of different aPL testing methods, emphasizing that harmonizing results across platforms and establishing specific reference values are keys to resolving controversies in aPL testing results. We also introduced the application of non-criteria aPLs, especially anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibody (aPS/PT) and anti-ß2 glycoprotein Ⅰ domain Ⅰ antibody (aß2GPⅠDⅠ). Additionally, we discussed aPL-based OAPS risk classification strategies. Finally, we proposed potential treatment methods for refractory OAPS. The goal is to provide a reference for the clinical management of OAPS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM AND METHODOLOGY: To provide a comprehensive review on new findings and current recommendations regarding antiphospholipid antibodies with particular emphasis on clinical impact on gestation. CONCLUSION: Antiphospholipid antibodies are an important risk factor for the development of a series of pregnancy-related complications. Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy can reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss and pregnancy-related complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired multisystem autoimmune disease characterized clinically by vascular thrombotic events, or pregnancy complications or nonthrombotic manifestations in the presence of persistently elevated antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We highlighted our case, which fulfills both the old APS classification criteria (1999,2006) _and the newest one (2023). The latest demonstrates very high specificity (99%) for APS diagnosis, compared to the older revised Sapporo criteria (86%). According to the new recommendation, the criteria are classified into 6 clinical and 2 laboratory domains, patient must accumulate at least 3 points from each clinical and laboratory domains. Our patient was diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome in 2018, as she had transient ischemic attack (TIA) without any changes on magnetic resonance tomography (MRI), and laboratory tests revealed triple positive antiphospholipid antibodies (12 points). Additional diagnostic tests were performed_thrombocytopenia, aortic valve thickening was noteworthy (4 points). Thus, TIA which had similar strength to stroke as the manifestation of arterial thrombosis by old guidelines, it is rejected according to the new recommendation, so the patient lost minimum 2 points; On the other hand, the current criteria added nonthrombotic events as weighted clinical domains, which gave the points to our patient. In conclusion we fully and highly specifically confirmed APS diagnosis as ACR/EULAR suggests.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)