RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although hormonal contraceptives may help acne or worsen it, there is limited evidence on the effects of many commonly prescribed agents. The present study evaluates patient-reported effect on acne from 2147 patients who were utilizing a hormonal contraceptive at the time of their initial consultation for acne.
METHODS: At the time of initial consultation for acne, each of 2147 consecutive patients using hormonal contraception provided her assessment of how her contraceptive had affected her acne. The Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare patient-reported outcomes by contraceptive type.
RESULTS: Depot injections, subdermal implants, and hormonal intrauterine devices worsened acne on average, and were inferior to the vaginal ring and combined oral contraceptives (COCs; P ≤ .001 for all pairwise comparisons), which improved acne on average. Within COC categories, a hierarchy emerged based on the progestin component, where drospirenone (most helpful) > norgestimate and desogestrel > levonorgestrel and norethindrone (P ≤ .035 for all pairwise comparisons). The presence of triphasic progestin dosage in COCs had a positive effect (P = .005), while variation in estrogen dose did not have a significant effect (P = .880).
CONCLUSIONS: Different hormonal contraceptives have significantly varied effects on acne, including among types of COC.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(6):670-674.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

For many years, it has been well documented that combined hormonal contraceptives increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The third-generation pill use (desogestrel or gestodene (GSD)) is associated with an increased VTE risk as compared with second-generation (levonorgestrel) pill use. Other progestins such as drospirenone or cyproterone acetate combined with ethinyl-estradiol (EE) have been investigated. Most studies have reported a significant increased VTE risk among users of these combined oral contraceptives (COCs) when compared with users of second-generation pills. Non-oral combined hormonal contraception, such as the transdermal patch and the vaginal ring, is also available. Current data support that these routes of administration are more thrombogenic than second-generation pills. These results are consistent with the biological evidence of coagulation activation. Overall, the estrogenic potency of each hormonal contraceptive depending on both EE doses and progestin molecule explains the level of thrombotic risk. Some studies have shown a similar increased VTE risk among users of COCs containing norgestimate (NGM) as compared with users of second-generation pill. However, for this combination, biological data, based on quantitative assessment of sex hormone-binding globulin or haemostasis parameters, are not in agreement with these epidemiological results. Similarly, the VTE risk associated with low doses of EE and GSD is not biologically plausible. In conclusion, newer generation formulations of hormonal contraceptives as well as non-oral hormonal contraceptives seem to be more thrombogenic than second-generation hormonal contraceptives. Further studies are needed to conclude on the combinations containing NGM or low doses of EE associated with GSD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Most women have used at least 1 method of contraception during their reproductive years, with the majority favoring combined oral contraceptives. Women are often concerned about the safety of their method of choice and also ask about likely effects on their pre-existing headache or migraine and restrictions on using their headache medication. While there should be no restriction to the use of combined hormonal contraceptives by women with migraine without aura, the balance of risks vs benefits for women with aura are debatable. Migraine with aura, but not migraine without aura, is associated with a twofold increased risk of ischemic stroke, although the absolute risk is very low in healthy, nonsmoking women. Although ethinylestradiol has been associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke, the risk is dose-dependent. Low-dose pills currently used are considerably safer than pills containing higher doses of ethinylestradiol but they are not risk-free. This review examines the evidence available regarding the effect that different methods of contraception have on headache and migraine and identifies strategies available to minimize risk and to manage specific triggers such as estrogen "withdrawal" headache and migraine associated with combined hormonal contraceptives. The independent risks of ischemic stroke associated with migraine and with hormonal contraceptives are reviewed, and guidelines for use of contraception by women with migraine are discussed in light of the current evidence.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the most recent progestogens to be developed, to provide clinical comparisons with older progestogens and to look at the potential of products not yet marketed. DATA SOURCES: Searches of Medline and Popline together with requests for bibliographies from the Population Council, Wyeth-Ayerst Research and Schering Health Care. STUDY SELECTION: Information from technical papers was used to ascertain the metabolic characteristics and receptor binding affinities of the compounds. Previous reviews were scrutinised in order to make comparisons with older compounds. Any available trials were examined to ascertain efficacy, bleeding patterns and tolerability, more weight being given to comparative trials. DISCUSSION: Five progestogens have been developed in the last decade. They are all devoid of androgenic activity; some have antiandrogenic activity. Combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills containing dienogest and drospirenone are already marketed. Nomegestrol and nestorone have been extensively studied as subdermal implants. CONCLUSIONS: Newer progestogens used in combination with oestrogen behave very similarly to existing products. Progestogen-only products using new progestogens have potential for significantly better tolerability due to their lack of androgenic activity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The antinidatory activity of the oral contraception is generally unknown: the contraceptive pill mainly prevents the gametes from meeting. However, pregnancies under pill indicate conception of embryos. Besides, missed pills protocols sometimes record ovulatory escape. We suggest the computation of an Embryo Destruction Index (EDI), in order to measure the antinidatory effect of two categories of oral contraceptives: combined estroprogestatives and microprogestatives.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Among the low dose oral contraceptives that is to say less than 50 mcg of ethinylestradiol per pill one must single out the pills made of a third generation progestagen (desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate) from the others. The contraceptive efficacy (tested on the Pearl index) according to the files of government authorities visa (AMM) is equivalent for all the oral contraceptives whatever their composition (between 0 to 0.07 women year). The clinical tolerance of the low dose pills of the 3rd generation is comparable to that of the other low dose pills. Is there any advantage then in prescribing them? The most important advantage is the decrease of metabolic and vascular effects. The use of so-called third generation progestive, besides the beneficial effects an lipidic and glucidic metabolisms, has mainly enabled the decrease of the estrogen doses of progestagens. The ethinylestradiol is directly implicated in the risk of venous thrombosis: hemostasis the modifications are less important with 30 mcg than with 50, 20 than 30 mcg. Relying on theoretical arguments one could have estimated that minipills would lead to an insufficient ovarian slow down. These hypothesis are contradicted by recent studies from Falsetti and Benagiano who studied the rates of FSH and LH under minipills. This does not include the variability and the individual sensitiveness of the patients and as well the reason following which minipills would favor functional ovarian cysts, lies on the confusion made between a cyst and a 20 mm diameter follicule.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Disturbances in both the plasma lipid profile and in insulin handling have been implicated in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). Estrogens and progestins are known to affect significantly both lipid and insulin metabolism. Since an increased incidence of myocardial infarction has been identified among users of oral contraceptives (OCs), the metabolic effect of these drugs on risk factors for CHD is of interest. Comparison of a range of monophasic and triphasic OCs that differ primarily in their progestin content has shown that lowering the progestin dose and using a less androgenic steroid reduce the impact on both low-density lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins (HDLs). In terms of the HDL-2 subfraction, a lipoprotein class that may be of special relevance to the development of CHD, low-dose norethindrone and desogestrel monophasic agents had the least adverse effect. Triglyceride levels were increased by the low-dose OCs used in this study; this may be an unavoidable consequence of current trends in OC development. However, the clinical significance of these increased triglyceride levels is not clear. Glucose tolerance deteriorated similarly with all the formulations in this study, although the effect on insulin concentrations was less marked with formulations containing lower doses of progestins. It was concluded that reducing the progestin dose and changing the progestin type effectively reduce the adverse impact of OCs on metabolic risk for CHD. Although further study is recommended, the use of OC formulations without adverse effects on risk profile is indicated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PIP: 5 cases of vascular complications--hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, retinal vein thrombosis, thrombotic stroke and deep vein thrombosis--in young women taking low dose oral contraceptives are described from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. The hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 1987 in a 24-year old heavy smoker taking Triphasil (Wyeth) for 12 months. She recovered fully. A 34-year old woman had an anteroseptal infarction while on Minovlar ED (Schering, 50 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate) for 2 years. She had no risk factors other than smoking 5 cigarettes daily. The woman with retinal vein thrombosis had 2 episodes, the 1st while taking Restovar 28 (Organon, 37.5 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 0.75 mg lynestrenol) for 7 years. 19 months later she began Diane (Schering AG, 50 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 2 mg cyproterone acetate) and had a bilateral retinal vein thrombosis leaving her partially blind. The woman with thrombotic stroke was 24 when she was struck in 1986, after 1 year of taking Logynon ED (Schering AG, 6/5/7 days, 30,40/40 mcg ethinyl estradiol and o.5/0.75/0.125 mg levonorgestrel). The patient with deep vein thrombosis was 19, smoked, and had used Triphasil for 2.5 years.^ieng

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The multiplicity of oral contraceptives suggests a classification for clinical routine. From the dosage of estrogens and gestagens in oral contraceptives, aberration indices were calculated from consideration of proliferation and transformation aspects. According to these a classification of oral contraceptives into 3 "estrogen" groups and 4 "gestagen" groups was made. Such a classification was made in 525 women taking oral contraceptives which took into consideration the following parameters: age, length of time during which oral contraceptives had been taken, subjective side-effects, sexual medical and psychometric aspects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PIP: The author presents an alphabetical list of oral contraceptives. To classify the commercial names of oral contraceptives all over the world is practically impossible for the following reasons: some agents are discontinued without the medical profession being aware of it; the same product can have various names depending on the country and the laboratory. Some products exist in different forms (21 pills including 7 inactive tablets). Finally, some laboratories change the posology of a product without changing its name.^ieng

Asunto(s)