Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 10.831
Filtrar
1.
AMA J Ethics ; 26(9): E679-683, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39250938

RESUMEN

Nonhuman animals used in biomedical research frequently suffer and are harmed as part of their use as experimental models. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of a given institution is meant to ensure that research protocols follow federal guidelines, but research protocols such as those described in this case can generate unnecessary suffering; this problem suggests limitations of IACUCs' capacity to protect nonhuman animals' welfare. This commentary on the case considers how to more fully protect nonhuman animals used in scientific research and identifies barriers to more comprehensive protection of nonhuman animals' welfare.


Asunto(s)
Comités de Atención Animal , Experimentación Animal , Bienestar del Animal , Animales de Laboratorio , Bienestar del Animal/ética , Bienestar del Animal/normas , Animales , Experimentación Animal/ética , Experimentación Animal/normas , Investigación Biomédica/ética , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Ética en Investigación
2.
AMA J Ethics ; 26(9): E716-723, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39250944

RESUMEN

Discussions of nonhuman research ethics tend to focus on what we owe nonhuman research subjects in laboratory settings only. But humans make critical decisions about these animals outside the lab, too, during breeding, transportation, and end-of-study protocols. This article reviews extra-lab risks and harms to nonhuman research subjects, focusing on the most commonly and intensively used animals like rodents and fishes, and argues that extra-lab risks and harms merit ethical consideration by researchers and institutional review.


Asunto(s)
Experimentación Animal , Animales , Experimentación Animal/ética , Humanos , Bienestar del Animal/ética , Ética en Investigación , Peces , Animales de Laboratorio
3.
J Toxicol Sci ; 49(9): 409-423, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39231685

RESUMEN

Drug-induced convulsion is a serious concern in drug development, such that the convulsion liability of drug candidates must be evaluated in preclinical safety studies. However, information on the differences among species regarding their sensitivity to convulsions induced by convulsant drugs in humans remains limited. Here, we selected 11 test articles from several pharmacological classes and compared the sensitivities of three types of laboratory animal to convulsion. All 11 test articles were examined in mice via intraperitoneal injection and in rats via intravenous bolus; and 6 of the 11 test articles, selected mainly based on availabilities of data on drug plasma concentrations in humans at convulsion, were examined in non-human primates (NHPs) via intravenous infusion. Plasma concentrations of the test articles shortly after convulsion onset or 5 min after administration were measured. All 11 articles tested in mice, 10 of 11 articles tested in rats, and all 6 articles tested in NHPs induced convulsion with premonitory signs. Although there was a general tendency that rats and NHPs exhibited convulsions at lower plasma drug concentrations than did mice, the plasma concentrations at convulsion onset were generally comparable, within 3-fold differences, across the animal species. We conclude that the mice, rats, and NHPs examined in the present study generally showed similar sensitivities to convulsion induced by the test articles. Thus, each of these laboratory animals can be used for the assessment of convulsion risk in the early stages of drug development, depending on throughput, cost, and test article-specific requirements.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Convulsiones , Especificidad de la Especie , Animales , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Medición de Riesgo , Ratones , Ratas , Masculino , Convulsivantes/toxicidad , Humanos , Animales de Laboratorio , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales
5.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0292908, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39178211

RESUMEN

This cross-sectional study surveyed veterinarians and facility managers to characterise the use of antimicrobials in laboratory rodent facilities within Australia and New Zealand. Most facilities (71%) reported routine administration of antimicrobials. The indications for antibiotic use reflected those described in publications and differed significantly to reasons for use in non-laboratory animals. Antimicrobials used include those of critical importance to human health, and access to these drugs is unregulated, as prescription-only classes are ordered through research catalogues, without human or veterinary physician prescriptions. The ways in which antimicrobials are used in Australian and New Zealand rodent facilities are likely contributing to antimicrobial resistance within rodent populations, particularly as they are largely administered in drinking water, risking subtherapeutic dosing. Much antimicrobial use reported is unnecessary and could be replaced with changes to husbandry and handling. The generation of resistance in both pathogenic and commensal microbes may also represent a work health and safety issue for humans working with these animals. Reported disposal of antimicrobials included discharge into wastewater, without inactivation, and some respondents reported disposal of substrate, or soiled bedding, nesting material, and disposable enrichment items, from treated animals and medicated feed into landfill, without prior inactivation. Environmental contamination with resistant microbes and antimicrobials is a significant driver of antimicrobial resistance. As such, significant opportunities exist to implement judicious and responsible use of antimicrobials within research rodent facilities in Australia and New Zealand, with a particular focus on instituting aseptic surgery, optimising dosing regimens, and inactivation of medicated water and substrate before disposal.


Asunto(s)
Veterinarios , Nueva Zelanda , Animales , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Animales de Laboratorio , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Roedores
6.
J Biol Rhythms ; 39(4): 323-330, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39086225

RESUMEN

Light is recognized as an important component of the environment for laboratory animals. It supports vision, sets the phase of circadian clocks, and drives wide-ranging adjustments in physiological and behavioral state. Manipulating light is meanwhile a key experimental approach in the fields of vision science and chronobiology. Nevertheless, until recently, there has been no consensus on methods for quantifying light as experienced by laboratory animals. Widely adopted practices employ metrics such as illuminance (units = lux) that are designed to quantify light as experienced by human observers. These weight energy across the spectrum according to a spectral sensitivity profile for human vision that is not widely replicated for non-human species. Recently, a Consensus View was published that proposes methods of light measurement and standardization that take account of these species-specific differences in wavelength sensitivity. Here, we draw upon the contents of that consensus to provide simplified advice on light measurement in laboratory mammal experimentation and husbandry and quantitative guidance on what constitutes appropriate lighting for both visual and circadian function.


Asunto(s)
Ritmo Circadiano , Luz , Mamíferos , Animales , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Mamíferos/fisiología , Iluminación , Humanos , Animales de Laboratorio/fisiología , Visión Ocular/fisiología , Relojes Circadianos/fisiología
7.
Gac Med Mex ; 160(2): 202-210, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116848

RESUMEN

In Mexico, it is not known which institutions use animals for scientific purposes. This work reports, based on data requested from the National Institute of Transparency, Access to Information and Protection of Personal Data (INAI), the types of institutions that use animals for research and how many of these have an ethics committee. Research centres, colleges, hospitals, national institutes, technical colleges, and public universities are the types of institutions that report using animals for experimentation. Only 54% of institutions have ethics committees. Mexican institutions from 2015 to 2021 used a total of 2,112,786 animals. Mammals are the most widely used animal group. The scientific purposes for using animals depend on the type of institution that uses them. In Mexico, it is necessary to update the regulations in order to regulate the use, protection and the care of laboratory animals.


En México se desconoce cuáles son las instituciones que utilizan animales con fines científicos. Se reporta, a partir de datos solicitados al Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personales (INAI), los tipos de instituciones que usan animales y cuántas poseen un comité interno para el cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Los centros de investigación, colegios, hospitales, institutos nacionales, tecnológicos y universidades públicas son los tipos de instituciones que reportaron usar animales. El 54% de las instituciones poseen comités de ética. Un total de 2,112,786 animales fueron usados por instituciones del 2015 al 2021. Los mamíferos es el grupo animal más utilizado. El uso de los animales se encuentra en función del tipo de institución que los utiliza. En México, es necesario actualizar la normatividad, con el fin de regular el uso, la protección y el cuidado de los animales de laboratorio.


Asunto(s)
Experimentación Animal , México , Animales , Experimentación Animal/ética , Animales de Laboratorio , Universidades , Humanos
8.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5574, 2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956430

RESUMEN

The biomedical research community addresses reproducibility challenges in animal studies through standardized nomenclature, improved experimental design, transparent reporting, data sharing, and centralized repositories. The ARRIVE guidelines outline documentation standards for laboratory animals in experiments, but genetic information is often incomplete. To remedy this, we propose the Laboratory Animal Genetic Reporting (LAG-R) framework. LAG-R aims to document animals' genetic makeup in scientific publications, providing essential details for replication and appropriate model use. While verifying complete genetic compositions may be impractical, better reporting and validation efforts enhance reliability of research. LAG-R standardization will bolster reproducibility, peer review, and overall scientific rigor.


Asunto(s)
Animales de Laboratorio , Guías como Asunto , Animales , Animales de Laboratorio/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de Investigación , Experimentación Animal/normas , Investigación Biomédica/normas
9.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 709, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951842

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we added laboratory animal ethics education into both didactic sessions and practical sessions the general surgery laboratory course, with the didactic sessions focus on teaching the fundamental principles of laboratory animal ethics, while the practical sessions emphasize the application of these principles in laboratory classes and have assessed the changes in medical students' perception of laboratory animal ethics following medical students exposure to such education. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-nine third-year medical students from Wuhan University's Second Clinical College completed a laboratory animal ethics awareness questionnaire and a laboratory animal ethics written examination before and after laboratory animal ethics education. RESULTS: After receiving laboratory animal ethics education, the percentage of students who supported euthanasia for the execution of animals and humane treatment of laboratory animals were 95.2% and 98.8%, respectively, which did not differ from the 94.9% and 96.4% observed before the education. Moreover, there was a notable increase in the proportion of students who knew about regulations related to laboratory animals (from 39.9% to 57.1%), welfare issues (from 31.9% to 50.0%), and the 3R principle (from 30.4% to 58.9%) post-education, all statistically significant at P < 0.05. Test scores also showed improvement, with students scoring (93.02 ± 11.65) after education compared to (67.83 ± 8.08) before, a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: This research helps to provide information for the good practices of laboratory animal ethics education. After receiving laboratory animal ethics education, students are better able to treat laboratory animals in a correct animal ethical manner. Laboratory animal ethics education helps improve students' knowledge of laboratory animal ethics. Students' perception towards how the laboratory animal ethics course should be delivered may vary. Still, new courses or better organized courses on laboratory animal ethics education are required in order to provide students an in-depth understanding.


Asunto(s)
Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Animales , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Masculino , Femenino , Curriculum , Animales de Laboratorio , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ciencia de los Animales de Laboratorio/educación , Ciencia de los Animales de Laboratorio/ética , Bienestar del Animal/ética , Experimentación Animal/ética , China , Evaluación Educacional , Adulto Joven , Concienciación
10.
Lab Anim (NY) ; 53(7): 172, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956361
11.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2824: 425-445, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039428

RESUMEN

Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is an arboviral pathogen of clinical and agricultural relevance. The ongoing development of targeted RVFV prophylactics and therapeutics is overwhelmingly dependent on animal models due to both natural, that is, sporadic outbreaks, and structural, for example, underresourcing of endemic regions, limitations in accessing human patient samples and cohorts. Elucidating mechanisms of viral pathogenesis and testing therapeutics is further complicated by the diverse manifestations of RVFV disease and the heterogeneity of the host response to infection. In this chapter, we describe major clinical manifestations of RVFV infection and discuss the laboratory animal models used to study each.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Fiebre del Valle del Rift , Virus de la Fiebre del Valle del Rift , Fiebre del Valle del Rift/virología , Animales , Virus de la Fiebre del Valle del Rift/patogenicidad , Humanos , Ratones , Animales de Laboratorio/virología
14.
Bull Hist Med ; 98(1): 26-60, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881469

RESUMEN

Following the medical breakthroughs of Pasteur and Koch after 1880, the use of simians became pivotal to laboratory research to develop vaccines and cultivate microbes through the technique of serial passage. These innovations fueled research on multiple diseases and unleashed a demand for simians, which died easily in captivity. European and American colonial expansion facilitated a burgeoning market for laboratory animals that intensified hunting for live animals. This demand created novel opportunities for disease transfers and viral recombinations as simians of different species were confined in precarious settings. As laboratories moved into the colonies for research into a variety of diseases, notably syphilis, sleeping sickness, and malaria, the simian market was intensified. While researchers expected that colonial laboratories offered more natural environments than their metropolitan affiliates, amassing apes, people, microbes, and insects at close quarters instead created unnatural conditions that may have facilitated the spread of undetectable diseases.


Asunto(s)
Colonialismo , Animales , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XIX , Colonialismo/historia , Laboratorios/historia , Animales de Laboratorio , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Haplorrinos , Experimentación Animal/historia
15.
PeerJ ; 12: e17300, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38903880

RESUMEN

One primary goal of laboratory animal welfare science is to provide a comprehensive severity assessment of the experimental and husbandry procedures or conditions these animals experience. The severity, or degree of suffering, of these conditions experienced by animals are typically scored based on anthropocentric assumptions. We propose to (a) assess an animal's subjective experience of condition severity, and (b) not only rank but scale different conditions in relation to one another using choice-based preference testing. The Choice-based Severity Scale (CSS) utilizes animals' relative preferences for different conditions, which are compared by how much reward is needed to outweigh the perceived severity of a given condition. Thus, this animal-centric approach provides a common scale for condition severity based on the animal's perspective. To assess and test the CSS concept, we offered three opportunistically selected male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) choices between two conditions: performing a cognitive task in a typical neuroscience laboratory setup (laboratory condition) versus the monkey's home environment (cage condition). Our data show a shift in one individual's preference for the cage condition to the laboratory condition when we changed the type of reward provided in the task. Two additional monkeys strongly preferred the cage condition over the laboratory condition, irrespective of reward amount and type. We tested the CSS concept further by showing that monkeys' choices between tasks varying in trial duration can be influenced by the amount of reward provided. Altogether, the CSS concept is built upon laboratory animals' subjective experiences and has the potential to de-anthropomorphize severity assessments, refine experimental protocols, and provide a common framework to assess animal welfare across different domains.


Asunto(s)
Bienestar del Animal , Animales de Laboratorio , Conducta de Elección , Macaca mulatta , Animales , Masculino , Conducta de Elección/fisiología , Recompensa , Conducta Animal/fisiología
18.
PLoS Biol ; 22(5): e3002606, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814944

RESUMEN

Zebrafish are popular research organisms selected for laboratory use due in part to widespread availability from the pet trade. Many contemporary colonies of laboratory zebrafish are maintained in aquaculture facilities that monitor and aim to curb infections that can negatively affect colony health and confound experiments. The impact of laboratory control on the microbial constituents associated with zebrafish in research environments compared to the pet trade are unclear. Diseases of unknown causes are common in both environments. We conducted a metatranscriptomic survey to broadly compare the zebrafish-associated microbes in pet trade and laboratory environments. We detected many microbes in animals from the pet trade that were not found in laboratory animals. Cohousing experiments revealed several transmissible microbes including a newly described non-enveloped, double-stranded RNA virus in the Birnaviridae family we name Rocky Mountain birnavirus (RMBV). Infections were detected in asymptomatic animals from the pet trade, but when transmitted to laboratory animals RMBV was associated with pronounced antiviral responses and hemorrhagic disease. These experiments highlight the pet trade as a distinct source of diverse microbes that associate with zebrafish and establish a paradigm for the discovery of newly described pathogenic viruses and other infectious microbes that can be developed for study in the laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Pez Cebra , Animales , Pez Cebra/virología , Pez Cebra/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Peces/virología , Enfermedades de los Peces/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Peces/transmisión , Mascotas/virología , Mascotas/microbiología , Animales de Laboratorio/virología , Animales de Laboratorio/microbiología , Acuicultura
19.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci ; 63(3): 209-220, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749659

RESUMEN

Animal research facilities are noisy environments. The high air change rates required in animal housing spaces tend to create higher noise levels from the heating and cooling systems. Housing rooms are typically constructed of hard wall material that is easily cleaned but simultaneously highly reverberant, meaning that the sound cannot be controlled/attenuated so the sounds that are generated bounce around the room uncontrolled. (Soft, sound-absorbing surfaces generally cannot be used in animal facilities because they collect microbes; various wall surface features and sound control panel options are available, although rarely used.) In addition, many of our husbandry tasks such as cage changing, animal health checks, cleaning, and transporting animals produce high levels of noise. Finally, much of the equipment we have increasingly employed in animal housing spaces, such as ventilated caging motors, biosafety, or procedure cabinets, can generate high levels of background noise, including ultrasound. These and many additional factors conspire to create an acoustic environment that is neither naturalistic nor conducive to a stress-free environment. The acoustic variability both within and between institutions can serve as an enormous confounder for research studies and a threat to our ability to reproduce studies over time and between research laboratories. By gaining a better appreciation for the acoustic variables, paired with transparency in reporting the levels, we might be able to gain a better understanding of their impacts and thereby gain some level of control over such acoustic variables in the animal housing space. The result of this could improve both animal welfare and study reproducibility, helping to address our 3Rs goals of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement in the animal biomedical research enterprise.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales de Laboratorio , Vivienda para Animales , Ruido , Ruido/efectos adversos , Animales , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Bienestar del Animal , Experimentación Animal/normas
20.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA