RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the stent expansion of the durable-polymer Zotarolimus-eluting stent (dp-ZES), the durable-polymer Everolimus-eluting stent (dp-EES), and the bioabsorbable-polymer Sirolimus-eluting stent (bp-SES) in calcified coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). BACKGROUND: The newer generation stents with ultrathin struts might raise concerns regarding reduced radial strength and higher stent recoil (SR) when implanted in calcified CTOs. METHODS: Between January 2017 and June 2021 consecutive patients with CTO undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with dp-ZES, dp-EES, or bp-SES were evaluated. The analysis was performed in calcific and in noncalcific CTOs. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was used to assess diameter stenosis (DS), absolute and relative SR, absolute and relative focal SR, absolute and relative balloon deficit (BD), and absolute and relative focal BD. The primary endpoint was DS. RESULTS: A total of 213 CTOs were evaluated, 115 calcific CTOs (dp-ZES:25, dp-EES:29, bp-SES:61) and 98 non-calcific CTOs (dp-ZES:41, dp-EES:11, bp-SES:46). In calcific CTOs, residual DS was lower in dp-ZES than in dp-EES and bp-SES (-1.00% [-6.50-6.50] vs. 13.00% [7.0-19.00] vs. 15.00% [5.00-20.00]; p < 0.001). Dp-ZES was also an independent predictor of residual DS ≤ 10% (OR 11.34, 95% CI 2.6-49.43, p = 0.001). Absolute and relative focal SR and absolute and relative SR were similar between dp-ZES, dp-EES, and bp-SES (p = 0.913, p = 0.890, p = 0.518, p = 0.426, respectively). In noncalcified CTOs, the residual DS was similar in the three groups (p = 0.340). High relative focal SR was less frequent in dp-ZES than in dp-EES and in bp-SES (19.5% vs. 54.5% vs. 37.0%; p < 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The three stent platforms demonstrated an overall low residual DS when implanted in CTOs. However, dp-ZES was associated with the lowest residual DS and identified as independent predictor of residual DS ≤ 10% in patients with calcific CTOs. Dp-ZES was associated with a lower incidence of high relative focal stent recoil, in noncalcific CTOs. Balloon deficit might be considerate as a surrogate for stent expansion in calcified CTOs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Everolimus/efectos adversos , Stents , Polímeros , Implantes Absorbibles , Diseño de Prótesis , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent (PF-BES) and a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) recently showed similar clinical profiles and appear to be competing options in specific clinical settings of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether they perform similarly also in complex procedural settings as coronary bifurcation lesions remains unaddressed. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing coronary bifurcation PCI with PF-BES or the new iteration of the ZES from three large multicenter real-world registries were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis (ST). Multiple analyses to adjust for baseline differences were carried out including propensity-score matching, propensity-score stratification and inverse-probability-weighting. Outcomes are reported according to Cox proportional hazard models censored at 400-day follow-up. RESULTS: 1169 patients treated with PF-BES (n = 440) or ZES (n = 729) on the main branch of a coronary bifurcation lesion were included (mean age 69 ± 11 years, 75.4% male, 53.8% acute coronary syndrome at presentation, 26.6% left main bifurcation, median dual antiplatelet therapy duration 12 [range 12-12] months). MACE, all-cause death, TLR and ST tended towards non-statistically higher rates with the PF-BES as compared to the ZES. Higher MI and target vessel revascularization occurrence was observed with PF-BES. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing coronary bifurcation PCI, the occurrence of MACE was non-statistically different with the use of PF-BES and ZES devices. However, differences favoring the ZES device that may entail clinical relevance were observed. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore whether they remain valid when a short dual antiplatelet therapy is adopted.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Polímeros , Diseño de Prótesis , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Stents , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at a higher risk of ischemic events compared with patients without DM. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) followed by 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is safe and effective in patients with high bleeding risk. However, outcomes in patients with DM are not fully understood. Methods: Onyx ONE Clear was a prospective, multicenter study that included patients receiving the Resolute Onyx ZES during PCI and 1-month DAPT. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death (CD) or myocardial infarction from 1 month to 12 months. Results: Among the Onyx ONE Clear population (N = 1506), 39% had DM. Patients with DM had a higher incidence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and previous PCI and a higher body mass index than patients without DM. Patients with diabetes were also younger, more likely to be anemic, and experience renal failure. After adjusting for baseline differences between the groups, the Kaplan-Meier rates of CD or myocardial infarction (9.3% vs 6.1%; P = .122, unadjusted P = .010) and target lesion failure (10.2% vs 7.7%; P = .294, unadjusted P = .056) between 1 month and 12 months were not significantly different in patients with and without DM. The rates of target lesion revascularization were also similar in both groups, and stent thrombosis was very low and comparable in both arms after adjusting for baseline differences. Non-CD and bleeding were more frequent in patients with DM. Conclusions: Patients with diabetes treated with the Resolute Onyx ZES followed by 1-month DAPT had favorable 12-month ischemic outcomes after accounting for baseline differences between patients with and without DM, supporting the safety and efficacy of the treatment in selected patients with DM at high bleeding risk.
RESUMEN
Among drug-eluting stents (DESs), the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) are widely used in clinical practice and have contributed to improve the outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Few studies addressed their long-term comparative performance in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to investigate the 5 year comparative efficacy of EES and R-ZES in ACS. We queried ACTION-ACS, a large-scale database of ACS patients undergoing PCI. The treatment groups were analyzed using propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat PCI, and definite or probable stent thrombosis, which was addressed at the five-year follow-up. A total of 3497 matched patients were analyzed. Compared with R-ZES, a significant reduction in the primary endpoint at 5 years was observed in patients treated with EES (hazard ratio (HR) [95%CI] = 0.62 [0.54-0.71], p < 0.001). By landmark analysis, differences between the two devices emerged after the first year and were maintained thereafter. The individual endpoints of mortality (HR [95%CI] = 0.70 [0.58-0.84], p < 0.01), MI (HR [95%CI] = 0.55 [0.42-0.74], p < 0.001), and repeat PCI (HR [95%CI] = 0.65 [0.53-0.73], p < 0.001) were all significantly lower in the EES-treated patients. Stroke risk did not differ between EES and R-ZES. In ACS, a greater long-term clinical efficacy with EES vs. R-ZES was observed. This difference became significant after the first year of the ACS episode and persisted thereafter.
RESUMEN
Background: The clinical efficacy and safety of second-generation drug-eluting stents in complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are not well established. Objectives: The clinical influence of the lesion complexity after PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) was evaluated. Methods: From a prospective multicenter observational study, a total of 926 patients that underwent successful PCIs with ZES were included. Complex PCIs were defined as patients with ≥3 lesions treated, 3 vessels treated, severe calcified lesions, bifurcated lesions with 2 stents implanted, left main disease, chronic total occlusion lesions, and/or diffuse long (total stent length ≥60 mm) lesions and were compared to the noncomplex group. The primary outcome was incidence of target lesion failures at 2 years, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion-myocardial infarctions, and target lesion revascularization. Results: The patients were divided into complex PCI (n = 249) and noncomplex (n = 677) groups. In the complex PCI group, the 2-year risk of a target lesion failure was not significantly higher than in the noncomplex PCI group (4.8% vs 3.7%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.373; 95% confidence interval: 0.689-2.738; P = 0.367). The same trend was observed for all composites of the clinical outcomes. Older age and advanced chronic kidney disease were independent predictors for the primary outcome. Conclusions: Up to 2 years after a ZES implantation, the clinical outcomes did not differ according to lesion complexity.
RESUMEN
Background: There are limited data on the long-term stent-related adverse events as related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in second-generation (G2) drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with first-generation (G1) DES. Objectives: This study sought to compare the long-term stent-related outcomes of G2-DES with those of G1-DES. Methods: The study group consisted of 15,009 patients who underwent their first coronary revascularization with DES from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) Registry Cohort-2 (first-generation drug-eluting stent [G1-DES] period; n = 5,382) and Cohort-3 (second-generation drug eluting stent [G2-DES] period; n = 9,627). The primary outcome measures were definite stent thrombosis (ST) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: The cumulative 5-year incidences of definite ST and TVR were significantly lower in the G2-DES group than in the G1-DES group (0.7% vs 1.4%; P < 0.001; and 16.2% vs 22.1%; P < 0.001, respectively). The lower adjusted risk of G2-DES relative to G1-DES for definite ST and TVR remained significant (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.76; P < 0.001; and HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68-0.81; P < 0.001, respectively). In the landmark analysis that was based on the DAPT status at 1 year, the lower adjusted risk of on-DAPT status relative to off-DAPT was significant for definite ST beyond 1 year in the G1-DES stratum (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.76; P = 0.004) but not in the G2-DES stratum (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.26-1.68; P = 0.38) (P interaction = 0.14). Conclusions: G2-DES compared with G1-DES were associated with a significantly lower risk for stent-related adverse events, including definite ST and TVR. DAPT beyond 1 year was associated with a significantly lower risk for very late ST of G1-DES but not for that of G2-DES.
RESUMEN
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) has been the focus of much discussion. The risk of late stent thrombosis appears less with newer-generation stents, and polymer-free drug-coated stents (DCS) may improve clinical efficacy relative to a bare metal stent without the potential long-term hazards associated with a durable polymer. Based on the outcomes of recent clinical trials, risk stratification to identify high bleeding risk patients and appropriate selection of a polymer-free drug-coated or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent may optimize clinical outcomes in patients who require an abbreviated DAPT regimen.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Salud Global , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Hyperglycemia is an important risk factor for poor clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The relative superiority of the long-term clinical outcomes of durable-polymer (DP) -based and biodegradable-polymer (BP) -based newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with AMI and prediabetes is not well established. We compared the clinical outcomes in such patients between DP-based and BP-based newer-generation DESs.A total of 4,377 patients with AMI and prediabetes were divided into the following two groups: the DP-DES group (n = 3,775; zotarolimus-eluting stents [ZES; n = 1,546] and everolimus-eluting stents [EES; n = 2,229]) and the BP-DES group (n = 602; biolimus-eluting stents [BES]). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), or any repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of stent thrombosis (ST).The 2-year adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of MACEs for ZES versus EES, ZES versus BES, EES versus BES, and ZES/EES versus BES (aHR: 1.125; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.834-1.518; P = 0.440) were similar. The cumulative incidence of ST was also comparable between the DP-DES and BP-DES groups (aHR: 1.407; 95% CI, 0.476-4.158; P = 0.537). Moreover, the 2-year aHRs of all-cause death, CD, re-MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR were similar.Patients with AMI and prediabetes who received DP-DES or BP-DES during PCI showed comparable safety and efficacy during the 2-year follow-up period.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles/estadística & datos numéricos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
Introduction: The increasing complexity of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) regarding both coronary anatomy and comorbidities requires dedicated devices. The Resolute Onyx (R-Onyx, Medtronic, CA, USA) stent is a novel durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) promising better deliverability, increased radiopacity and lower thrombogenicity.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss device features, preclinical evidence, and clinical studies including patients treated with R-Onyx. The BIONYX and Onyx ONE studies were two major landmark trials demonstrating non-inferiority of R-Onyx as compared to other latest generation devices. We also elaborate on alternative innovations in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology and how R-Onyx fits into this field.Expert opinion: R-Onyx is designed to address the challenges of contemporary PCI, but evidence on its clinical performance is largely derived from studies on older generation devices from the ZES family. Nonetheless, all clinical studies on R-Onyx consistently show excellent outcomes, with particularly low rates of stent thrombosis, making it a promising candidate for short dual antiplatelet regimens. In addition, R-Onyx is available with a wide range of stent diameters allowing accurate sizing for both very small and very large coronary vessels.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Diseño de Prótesis , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). BACKGROUND: The R-ZES has been associated with low rates of adverse events over short-intermediate term follow-up. However, reliable assessment of the safety and efficacy of any implanted device requires long-term evaluation. METHODS: The RESOLUTE US trial was a prospective, observational study conducted at 116 U.S. sites and enrolled patients with de novo coronary lesions. Patients were followed clinically for 5 years with independent event adjudication and data monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 1,402 patients (1,573 lesions) were enrolled; 34% had diabetes mellitus and 75% had ACC type B2/C lesions. The 5-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF) was 12.3%, target lesion revascularization was 6.5%, target vessel myocardial infarction was 3.2%, and cardiac death was 4.1%. Dual antiplatelet therapy usage was 94% at 1 year and 47% at 5 years, with a 0.1% and 0.5% respective incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. The 5-year rate of TLF was 16.9% among patients with diabetes mellitus and 14.7% in patients with at least one small (≤2.5 mm) vessel treated. Covariates independently associated with 5-year TLF in multivariable analysis included diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, p < .001), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 2.28, p < .001), prior myocardial infarction (OR 1.85, p = .002), and smaller reference vessel diameter (OR 1.75, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Results from the fully adjudicated and monitored RESOLUTE US trial demonstrate long-term 5-year safety and efficacy of the R-ZES stent among a relatively low-risk population of patients, including a 0.5% rate of stent thrombosis at 5 years.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Trombosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To date the early strut coverage with the second-generation durable-polymer ONYX zotarolimus-eluting stent (O-ZES) is unknown. AIM: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessed the strut coverage of O-ZES at thirty-day follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: OCT was performed after implantation and at 1-month follow-up in 15 patients treated with O-ZES. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 67 ±7 years (73% males). The clinical presentation consisted of acute coronary syndromes (n = 13) and stable coronary disease (n = 2). Four (26%) patients had diabetes. OCT analysis was performed at baseline and 1-month follow-up in all stents. 378 cross-sections with 3582 struts were assessed at baseline and 3661 at follow-up. At follow-up, 88% struts were covered by tissue with a median thickness 37.91 µm (IQR: 22.32-64.15). Median in-stent area obstruction by neointima was 2.64% (IQR: 1.70-4.84). From the total stent covered area, 92.3% showed complete strut coverage. Homogeneous tissue was observed in 74% of cases. There were no differences in minimal lumen area (5.07 ±1.08 mm2 vs. 4.81 ±0.94 mm2, p = 0.125) or minimal stent area (4.95 ±1.22 mm2 vs. 4.92 ±0.99 mm2) at baseline and at follow-up. There were no differences in the rate of strut malapposition (4.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.417). For all stents, malapposition volume was 47.9 mm3 at baseline and 51.7 mm3 at follow-up, giving the late acquired stent malapposition volume of 3.8 mm3. CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation durable polymer O-ZES showed favorable vessel healing at 30-day OCT follow-up.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the long-term outcome of platinum chromium-based everolimus-eluting stents (PtCr-EES) vs. cobalt chromium-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-ZES).MethodsâandâResults:A total of 3,755 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized 2:1 to PtCr-EES or CoCr-ZES, and 96.0% of patients completed the 3-year clinical follow-up. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). At 3 years, TLF occurred in 5.3% and in 5.4% of the PtCr-EES and CoCr-ZES groups, respectively (hazard ratio 0.978; 95% confidence interval 0.730-1.310, P=0.919). There were no significant differences in the individual components of TLF. Routine angiographic follow-up was performed in 38.9% of the total patients. In a landmark analysis of the subgroup that had follow-up angiography, the clinically-driven TLR rate of CoCr-ZES was significantly higher than PtCr-EES group during the angiography follow-up period (P=0.009). Overall definite and probable stent thrombosis rates were very low in both groups (0.5% vs. 0.6%, P=0.677). CONCLUSIONS: PtCr-EES and CoCr-ZES had similar and excellent long-term outcomes in both efficacy and safety after PCI in an all-comer population.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Cromo , Aleaciones de Cromo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Platino (Metal) , Estudios Prospectivos , Falla de Prótesis , Sirolimus/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) extension/complexity on outcomes and on the comparative benefits/risks of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) remains unclear in patients at high risk of bleeding or thrombosis or at low restenosis risk. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the ZEUS trial. The impact of coronary anatomic complexity measured by the SYNTAX score on the differences in outcomes following ZES and BMS was assessed at 1â¯year. RESULTS: The mean SYNTAX score was 16.3⯱â¯13.1 with a median of 12 (IQR: 7 to 22). We stratified patients according to SYNTAX tertiles (0-8: nâ¯=â¯563; >8-19 nâ¯=â¯532; >19: nâ¯=â¯511), and observed that the higher the score, the correspondingly higher was the rate of the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and other ischemic events, but not bleeding after adjustment. The superior efficacy of ZES versus BMS for MACE was consistent across SYNTAX tertiles (tertile 1: HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-1.13; tertile 2: HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.46-1.09; tertile 3: HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.10) without significant heterogeneity (p for trendâ¯=â¯0.55). This between-groups difference mainly reflected a reduction in MI and TVR without effect on mortality. There was no significant interaction between the SYNTAX score and allocated stent type with respect to ischemic and bleeding endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The SYNTAX score was predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events but not bleeding and ZES provided superior efficacy and safety than BMS across the whole spectrum of CAD complexity. SYNTAX score may be routinely used for the assessment of the ischemic risk (but not bleeding) after PCI and should not guide the decision-making for DES versus BMS in patients undergoing PCI.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/tendencias , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/tendencias , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Stents/efectos adversos , Stents/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The study sought to evaluate for the first time the 5-year outcomes after treating an all-comers population with newer-generation cobalt chromium-based Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) versus platinum chromium-based PROMUS Element everolimus eluting stents (EES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). BACKGROUND: The DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) (DUrable polymer-based sTent CHallenge of Promus ElemEnt versus ReSolute integrity: TWENTE II) trial is a randomized, multicenter, single-blinded, investigator-initiated all-comers trial that found at its main analysis similar 1-year safety and efficacy for both drug-eluting stents. It is the first randomized trial ever to investigate the Resolute Integrity ZES and the first trial to compare both devices. METHODS: In total, 1,811 patients were 1:1 randomized to ZES versus EES. We performed a pre-specified assessment of the 5-year clinical outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy. The main endpoint target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of TVF, and stent thrombosis. The study was independently monitored, and adverse clinical events were independently adjudicated. RESULTS: Five-year clinical follow-up data was available in 1,798 (99.3%) patients. The ZES and EES groups showed favorable outcomes, with similar 5-year incidence of TVF (13.2% vs. 14.2%; plog-rank = 0.62) and its individual components: cardiac death (4.5% vs. 4.9%; plog-rank = 0.69), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (3.1% vs. 2.6%; plog-rank = 0.47), and target vessel revascularization (7.6% vs. 8.6%; plog-rank = 0.46). The 5-year incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was similar (1.5% vs. 1.3%; plog-rank = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: At 5-year follow-up, the Resolute Integrity ZES and PROMUS Element EES showed similar and sustained results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating a broad population of all-comers.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Everolimus/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Países Bajos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Drug-eluting stents revolutionized the treatment of coronary artery disease with vastly improved outcomes compared with bare metal stents. As stent technology has evolved, a wide variety of antiproliferative drugs have been developed to prevent stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. The Resolute stent system (Medtronic, CA, USA) elutes zotarolimus from a multipolymer blend to prevent early and late stent-related complications. The Resolute stents have evolved from the initial Resolute stent, to the Resolute Integrity™ and most recently, the Resolute Onyx™. These stents have been studied across a wide range of patients and coronary syndromes. They compare similarly in performance to their contemporary second generation stents. We present a review of the major trials involving these zotarolimus-eluting stents.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Humanos , Diseño de Prótesis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial. To investigate efficacy and safety of short-duration DAPT, we performed a detailed comparison of intra-stent conditions by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation with short-term and standard DAPT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-two consecutive patients with stable angina pectoris who received Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZESs; Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) were enrolled. Patients were assigned to 3-month (3M group: 41 patients) and standard (standard group: 41 patients) DAPT. In the 3M group, clopidogrel was discontinued 3 months after stent implantation. In the standard group, DAPT was maintained until follow-up OCT. At 9 months, neointimal proliferation was significantly larger in the 3M group, but there were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of uncovered and malapposed strut. The prevalence of abnormal intra-stent tissue (AIT) at 9 months was equivalent between groups. A multiple regression analysis revealed malapposition at 9 months as the strongest independent predictor of AIT at 9 months, and the prevalence of AIT was not associated with DAPT duration. Over 2 years, cardiac events were equal between groups; however, major bleeding was higher tendency in the standard group than in the 3M group. CONCLUSION: This OCT study indicated that reducing DAPT's duration may provide acceptable arterial healing in patients with implanted R-ZESs.
Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/terapia , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Trombosis/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the 1-year clinical outcomes of patients who received the Resolute Onyx™ stent. Methods This was a single-centre, retrospective registry analysis that reviewed the clinical data from all patients who were implanted with a Resolute Onyx™ stent between March 2015 and February 2016. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 year post-implantation. Results A total of 252 patients received a Resolute Onyx™ stent and two patients were lost to follow-up. The mean age of the cohort was 66.9 years and 113 (45.2%) had diabetes mellitus. Thirty-eight patients (15.2%) had left main disease and 73 (29.2%) had three-vessel disease. A total of 175 patients (70.0%) had small vessel disease (<2.75 mm) and 210 (84.0%) had long lesions (>20 mm). The 1-year target lesion failure was 4.4% (11 of 250), cardiovascular death occurred in eight patients (3.2%), ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization was undertaken in five patients (2.0%) and stent thrombosis occurred in one patient (0.4%). Conclusion The Resolute Onyx™ stent showed a favourable 1-year clinical performance in a real-world population.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Trombosis Coronaria/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico por imagen , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sirolimus/farmacocinética , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
It is not clear if anti-restonotic effect of cilostazol is consistent for different types of drug-eluting stents (DES).The purpose of this study was to compare the anti-proliferative effect of cilostazol between DAT and TAT with consideration of confounding influences of DES type.Nine hundred and fifteen patients were randomized to either dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin and clopidogrel) or triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT; aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol) in the previous CILON-T trial. After excluding 70 patients who received both or neither stents, we analyzed 845 patients who received exclusively PES or ZES, and compared in-stent late loss at 6 months between both antiplatelet regimens (DAT versus TAT).Baseline angiographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the DAT (656 lesions in 425 patients) and the TAT group (600 lesions in 420 patients). The 6-month follow-up angiography was completed in 745 patients (88.2%). Quantitative coronary angiography showed that TAT significantly reduced in-stent late loss (DAT 0.62 ± 0.62 mm versus TAT 0.54 ± 0.49 mm, P = 0.015). Stent type, diabetes or lesion length did not interact with difference of late loss. However, reduction of late loss by cilostazol did not lead to a significant reduction in the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (DAT 7.8% versus TAT 6.9%, P = 0.69) due to a nonlinear relationship found between late loss and TLR.The TAT group showed less in-stent late loss as compared to the DAT group. This was consistently observed regardless of DES type, lesion length, or diabetic status. However, reduction of late loss by cilostazol did not lead to a significant reduction in TLR.
Asunto(s)
Reestenosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cilostazol , Angiografía Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Estudios Prospectivos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Sirolimus/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Limited data is available on the long-term outcome of patients with increased cardiovascular event risk, treated with newer-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS: We therefore assessed 3-year follow-up data of high-risk versus low- to intermediate-risk patients of the randomized DUTCH PEERS trial (NCT01331707). In both risk groups we also compared patients treated with Resolute Integrity versus Promus Element DES. Patients were categorized as "high-risk" if they met ≥1 of the following criteria: (1) diabetes (17.9%); (2) previous myocardial infarction (21.9%); (3) previous coronary revascularization (25.8%); (4) chronic renal failure (3.5%); (5) left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% (1.5%); and (6) age ≥75 years (17.3%). RESULTS: At the 3-year follow-up, the incidence of the composite endpoint target vessel failure (TVF) (13.2 vs. 7.5%; logrank p < 0.001) and 2 of its components - cardiac death (4.7 vs. 1.5%; logrank p < 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (7.3 vs. 4.7%; logrank p = 0.03) - was higher in high-risk (n = 957) versus low- to intermediate-risk patients (n = 854). Among high-risk patients, treatment with Resolute Integrity (n = 481) and Promus Element stents (n = 476) was similarly safe and efficacious (TVF: 13.3 vs. 13.1%; logrank p = 0.95; definite-or-probable stent thrombosis: 1.7 vs. 1.7%; logrank p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The newer-generation Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents showed similar results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating high-risk patients, who had significantly higher event rates than patients with low-to-intermediate risk.