RESUMEN

Introduction: Data on the management of patients aged more than 85 years with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) sequential infections are lacking. Methods: The current study described the management of an older couple aged more than 85 years with these above-mentioned two diseases treated with 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (Epclusa®) and 5 days of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid®) sequentially. The effectiveness and safety profiles were closely monitored during therapy and till 9 months posttreatment. Results: In late March 2023, the husband with the main complaint of repeated gingival bleeding and asymptomatic wife were 86 and 85 years old, and had HCV RNA levels of 91,800 and 6,630,000 IU/mL, respectively. On the fourth day of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment, the husband had a moderate headache, and the wife had severe headache and moderate fever and dizziness. We then found that their SARS-CoV-2 test results were positive. After careful consideration, the expert panel decided to treat the couple with oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (300 mg/100 mg, twice daily) beginning on the fifth day of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment for 5 days. During the 5 days of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, the patient's symptoms and signs gradually improved, and the patient was negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA on the fifth day of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy. Meanwhile, the husband's HCV RNA was not detectable after one week of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment till posttreatment month 9, and his ALT level was normal beginning at week 1 of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment. Moreover, the wife's HCV RNA was not detectable after week 4 of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment till posttreatment month 9. Notably, no other symptoms or signs occurred during the treatment or follow-up period, and other serum biochemical parameters remained stable until 9 months after the discontinuation of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir treatment. Conclusion: The older couple aged more than 85 years with chronic HCV and SARS-CoV-2 sequential infection were safely cured by the sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir sequential treatment. Discussion: This study suggested that old age should not be a barrier to HCV/SARS-CoV-2 treatment. Given that the proportion of older HCV-infected patients is increasing, clinical trials of direct-acting antiviral agents should include older HCV-infected individuals.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacotherapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has tremendously improved since the advent of interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Additionally, fixed-dose pangenotypic DAAs, which are safe, potent, easy for use, and can cover a wide spectrum of patients, have been recommended by professional guidelines for DAA-naïve and DAA-experienced patients with HCV. AREAS COVERED: We review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of fixed-dose pangenotypic DAA regimens, including glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Additionally, we summarize the efficacy and safety of these regimens in clinical trials as well as real-world studies for treating different populations. Lastly, we discuss unmet medical needs in managing HCV in the era of fixed-dose pangenotypic DAAs. EXPERT OPINION: Protease inhibitors (PIs), including GLE and VOX, are prone to have more frequent DDIs, compared to the non-structural (NS) 5A and 5B inhibitors. These regimens are generally well tolerated and can be applied to different populations, except for the contraindicated use of PI-containing DAA regimens in decompensated cirrhosis. Using the first-line GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL can eradicate HCV in more than 95% of DAA-naïve patients across different populations. The viral cure usually exceeds 95% when using the rescue SOF/VEL/VOX regimen for prior DAA failures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is still common in patients with chronic renal failure, even those on maintenance dialysis. A bidirectional association exists between HCV infection and chronic renal disease. Objective To assess the efficacy of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination in the treatment of chronic HCV in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Methodology This descriptive, cross-sectional study was undertaken at the departments of Gastroenterology and Nephrology Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from April 7, 2021, to October 7, 2021. Patients with chronic HCV and chronic renal disease at stage 4 or 5 were included while patients with decompensated cirrhosis liver, hepatoma, hepatitis B virus/HCV (HBV/HCV) coinfection, and post liver transplant patients were excluded. HCV infection was diagnosed based on detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) by PCR (polymerase chain reaction). In contrast, CKD was diagnosed based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for CKD. Sofosbuvir 400 mg orally daily and velpatasvir 100 mg orally with meals were given daily for 12 weeks. Effectiveness was defined as negative HCV RNA by PCR 12 weeks after treatment completion called sustained virological response rate 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12). Results A total of 73 patients including 67 (91.78%) males and six (8.22%) females between the ages of 20 years and 70 years were included in this study. The mean age of the participants was 48.77±8.0 years. Twelve weeks after the treatment completion, 69 (94.52%) had negative HCV RNA, whereas four (5.48%) patients had detectable HCV RNA. Conclusion It can be concluded from our study that a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir 400 mg and velpatasvir 100 mg is quite effective and recommended for treating chronic hepatitis C infection in patients with chronic renal disease in our local setup.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) represented a paradigm shift. In 2017, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL-Epclusa®) was approved, which showed a high cure rate in all patient, contributing to HCV elimination. The analysis aimed to quantify the clinical and economic value of SOF/VEL in HCV chronic patients since its approval in Spain. METHODS: An economic evaluation was elaborated adapting a Markov model that simulated the lifetime disease progression in of all HCV chronic patients treated with SOF/VEL (30,488 patients) since its launch (5-years), compared to previous therapies. Patients entered the model and were distributed between the fibrosis states (F0-to-F4) in treated and untreated. All patients (100%) were treated with SOF/VEL regardless of their fibrosis, and 49% with previous therapies in ≥F2. The average sustained viral response (SVR) rates 98.9% SOF/VEL versus 61.0% previous therapies. All parameters for the analysis were obtained from real-life data and literature. Only direct healthcare costs associated with disease management were included. The SOF/VEL value was measured as the number of hepatic complications avoided and their associated cost, and hepatic mortality compared to previous therapies. National Health System perspective and a 3% discount rate was applied. RESULTS: SOF/VEL decreased the number of liver complications, avoiding 92% decompensated cirrhosis, 80% hepatocellular carcinomas, and 87% liver transplants, as well as 85% liver-related mortality. Their cost associated was reduced, amounting to savings of 197M€. CONCLUSION: SOF/VEL adds relevant value to the HCV treatment, reducing the clinical and economic disease burden and contributing to HCV elimination in Spain.

RESUMEN

Background: The burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in India is alarming, with a major share of this virus being witnessed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A pan-genotypic combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir is found to be safe, effective, and economical in resource-constraint countries such as ours. However, there are scanty data on the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination in patients with ESRD. Hence, we performed this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir in patients of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with ESRD. Methods: This is an observational study comprising of 40 CHC patients with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis. All patients were treated with a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for 12 weeks in case of non-cirrhotic or compensated cirrhosis and 24 weeks in case of decompensated cirrhosis. The efficacy was assessed by sustained virological response defined by negative HCV RNA at 12 weeks (sustained virological response [SVR] 12) post treatment, and safety was assessed by recording any side-effects of all patients. Results: Out of the 40 patients enrolled in our study, majority were non-cirrhotic (77%), and all were treatment-naive. The mean age was 49.87 ± 12.13 years, and 80% patients were male. The mean baseline HCV RNA was 2.61 ± 7.83 × 106 IU/ml. All the 40 patients (100%) achieved undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment; however, 39 patients (97.5%) achieved SVR 12. There was no significant deterioration of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after completion of antiviral therapy as compared to the baseline eGFR (13.27 ± 10.32 vs13.54 ± 11.38, P = 0.54). None of the patients reported any serious adverse effects during treatment. Conclusion: The fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir is effective and has showed excellent safety profile in patients of CHC with ESRD.

RESUMEN

Background & Aims: Voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) is highly effective for re-treatment of direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-experienced patients with chronic HCV infection. In the present study, predictors of virologic treatment response were analyzed in an integrative analysis of three large real-world cohorts. Methods: Consecutive patients re-treated with VOX/VEL/SOF after DAA failure were enrolled between 2016 and 2021 in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. Results: A total of 746 patients were included: median age was 56 (16-88) years and 77% were male. Most patients were infected with HCV genotype 1 (56%) and 3 (32%). 86% of patients carried resistance-associated substitutions in the NS3, NS5A or NS5B regions. Overall, 95.4% (683/716) of patients achieved a sustained virologic response. Treatment effectiveness was significantly affected by advanced liver disease (p <0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (p <0.001), higher baseline ALT levels (p = 0.02), HCV genotype 3 (p <0.001), and prior VEL/SOF treatment (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, only HCV genotype 3, hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis turned out to be independent predictors of treatment failure. Resistance-associated substitutions, as well as the presence of rare genotypes, did not impact treatment outcome. The effectiveness of rescue therapy with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and SOF, with or without ribavirin, for 12 to 24 weeks was found to be high (100%). Conclusions: Infection with HCV genotype 3, the presence of liver cancer and cirrhosis are independently associated with failure of VOX/VEL/SOF re-treatment. It is unclear whether the addition of ribavirin and/or extension of treatment duration may be effective to avoid virologic relapse on VOX/VEL/SOF. However, rescue treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF seems to be effective. Impact and implications: Representative data on the effectiveness of voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) in clinical practice are still scarce and the collection of a larger number of patients with difficult-to-treat cofactors including the assessment of resistance-associated substitution profiles is required before more specific recommendations for optimal re-treatment in these patients can be given. Thus, we aimed to analyze treatment effectiveness and predictors of virologic response to VOX/VEL/SOF in an integrative analysis of three large real-word cohorts. The study results, derived from a multicenter cohort consisting of 746 patients, demonstrated that re-treatment with VOX/VEL/SOF is an effective salvage therapy associated with an overall per protocol sustained virologic response rate of 95%. Hepatocellular carcinoma onset, cirrhosis and HCV genotype 3 were identified as independent negative predictors of treatment response, whereas resistance-associated substitutions, as well as rare genotypes and chimera, did not impact sustained virologic response rates following re-treatment with VOX/VEL/SOF.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (Epclusa, ECS) is the first pan-genotype direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and Danoprevir (DNV) is the first DAA developed by a Chinese local enterprise, which is suitable for combined use with other drugs to treat genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C. However, previous reports have never compared the real-world data of ECS and DNV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 178 chronic hepatitis C patients were retrospectively recruited, and 94cases were accepted with Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir ± Ribavirin (ECS group), and others (n = 84 treated with DNV combination therapy (DNV group). The HCV genotype, virological response, adverse effects and some laboratory biochemical indexes were contrasted between above two groups in the real world study. RESULTS: DNV group had significantly lower level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), lower rates of decompensated cirrhosis ( P < 0.05). ECS group possessed more 6a (31.91% vs.13.10%) while DNV group was provided with more 1b (48.81% vs. 22.34%) patients. Significantly poor liver function was detected in ECS group at 4-week treatment (ALT and AST) and 12-week follow-up (AST) (all P < 0.05). The SVR12 undetectable rates of both groups were 100%, and no serious event was observed during the treatment and follow-up in both groups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective real-world study, the efficacy of DNV combined therapy is similar to Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir ± Ribavirin for chronic HCV infection, and the safety is comparable. DNV based therapy is a promising regimen for chronic hepatitis C.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and aim: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment fails to achieve sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) in 5-10 % and requires retreatment with second-line drugs. We report our experience of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir use for HCV retreatment in a small cohort of difficult-to-treat Indian patients. Methods: We reviewed our HCV databases to identify the patients who had failed to achieve SVR12 after treatment with sofosbuvir in combination with either daclatasvir, ledipasvir, or velpatasvir with/without ribavirin on one or more occasions. Participants were excluded if they had (i) decompensated cirrhosis, (ii) HIV coinfection or (iii) chronic kidney disease, or (iv) prior organ transplantation. All the participants were treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks. Treatment outcome was categorized as successful or failure if HCV RNA was undetectable or detectable at SVR12, respectively. Results: Fifteen patients (male 67 %; genotype-3 80 %) were included in the analysis. Ten (67 %) had cirrhosis. Five, eight, and two participants had previously failed one, two, and three courses of pegylated-interferon free, sofosbuvir containing direct acting antiviral (DAA) regimens respectively. Fourteen participants had failed to at least one course of the sofosbuvir/velpatasvir combination. Fourteen patients achieved SVR12, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Treatment was successful in 100 % and 93.3 % of per-protocol (PP) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses, respectively. Conclusion: Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir combination is an effective second-line therapy in India for difficult-to-treat HCV patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Both European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) guidelines recommend simplified hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with pan-genotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for eligible patients. This observational study used real-world data to assess these regimens' safety in eligible patients and develop an algorithm to identify patients suitable for simplified treatment by non-specialists. METHODS: 7,677 HCV-infected patients from Taiwan Hepatitis C Registry (TACR) who received at least one dose of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and fulfilled the EASL/AASLD-IDSA criteria for simplified treatment were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was conducted on patient characteristics and safety data. RESULTS: Overall, 92.8% (7,128/7,677) of patients achieved sustained virological response and only 1.9% (146/7,677) experienced Grades 2-4 laboratory abnormalities in key liver function parameters (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin), with only 18 patients (0.23%) experiencing Grades 3-4 abnormalities. Age > 70 years old, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, total bilirubin > 1.2 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and Fibrosis-4 > 3.25 were associated with higher risks of Grades 2-4 abnormalities. Patients with any of these had an odds of 4.53 times than that of those without in developing Grades 2-4 abnormalities (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data from Taiwan confirmed that simplified HCV treatment for eligible patients with pan-genotypic regimens is effective and well tolerated. The TACR algorithm, developed based on this study's results, can further identify patients who can be safely managed by non-specialist care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of children with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: In the non-commercial, non-randomized, open-label PANDAA-PED study, 50 children aged 6-18 years with chronic hepatitis C were treated with a fixed dose of SOF/VEL. All patients achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Evaluation of HRQL was performed twice: at baseline (before the treatment) and during the SVR12 analysis using the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaires, which included 5 dimensions of HRQL, for child self-reporting and parent proxy reporting. The normal range for the population was set to T values of 50 ± 10 points. Child-parent agreement was analysed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman test. RESULTS: Mean T values were within the normal range for all dimensions, both before and after treatment. There was a significant improvement in physical well-being based on the children's self-assessment (from 48.53 to 51.21, p = .03). In addition, a trend towards better scores in the 'social support & peers' part of the parent proxy evaluation (from 45.98 to 48.66, p = .06) was noticed. After the treatment, the proportion of children self-assessing their physical well-being as below normal significantly decreased from 17% to 5% (p = .007). HRQL scores were not associated with patients' sex, but in most cases, younger age correlated with better HRQL. Evaluation of the ICC for child self-reports versus parent proxy reports revealed poor to moderate agreement for most single measures. Bland-Altman analysis showed that in all dimensions, both before and after treatment, the limits of agreement (LoAs) exceeded ±5 points (half of the SD and considered a maximum allowed difference). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of children with chronic hepatitis C have decreased HRQL in all dimensions, but effective treatment with SOF/VEL leads to an improvement in some areas of well-being. As the effect of HCV on HRQL is more pronounced in older patients, treatment of younger children should be indicated to prevent them from experiencing decreased HRQL due to ongoing HCV infection in the future.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir alone or in combination with ribavirin in Chinese patients with genotype 3B HCV/HIV infection. MethodsA total of 299 patients with genotype 3B HCV/HIV infection who attended The Third People’s Hospital of Kunming from January 2017 to December 2020 were enrolled and treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir alone or in combination with ribavirin for 12 weeks， and they were followed up for 12 weeks after drug withdrawal. The patients were evaluated in terms of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment （SVR12） and adverse reactions. The independent-samples t test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups， and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups； the Agresti-Coull method was used to evaluate the 95% confidence interval （CI） of SVR12； univariate and multivariate non-conditional logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the influencing factors for SVR. ResultsThe 299 patients with genotype 3B HCV/HIV infection had a mean age of 43.92±6.84 years， among whom the male patients accounted for 77.3% （231/299）， the patients with liver cirrhosis accounted for 36.5% （109/299）， the patients with a history of antiviral therapy accounted for 13.4% （40/299）， and the patients receiving sofosbuvir/velpatasvir combined with ribavirin accounted for 27.8% （83/299）. The overall SVR was 87.0% （260/299） for all patients， and there was no significant difference in SVR12 between the patients receiving sofosbuvir/velpatasvir alone and those receiving sofosbuvir/velpatasvir combined with ribavirin （87.5% vs 85.5%， χ2=0.203， P=0.653）. There was a significant difference in SVR12 between the patients without liver cirrhosis and those with liver cirrhosis （90.0% vs 81.7%， χ2=4.256， P=0.039）， and the patients receiving antiviral therapy for the first time had a significantly higher SVR12 than the treatment-experienced patients （93.4% vs 45.0%， χ2=71.670， P<0.001）. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that platelet count （odds ratio ［OR］=0.957， 95%CI： 0.931 — 0.984， P=0.002）， liver stiffness measurement （OR=1.446， 95%CI： 1.147 — 1.822， P=0.002）， and experience in treatment （OR=13.807， 95%CI： 2.970 — 64.174， P=0.001） were independent influencing factors for SVR in patients with genotype 3B HCV/HIV infection. There were 41 cases of serious adverse events， all of which occurred within 2 weeks after antiviral therapy， and 28 cases were resolved without drug withdrawal or active treatment， while 13 cases were not resolved after active treatment and were resolved after the antiviral drugs were stopped for 2‍ ‍—‍ ‍5 days， with no similar reactions observed when the drugs were used again after remission. ConclusionSofosbuvir/velpatasvir alone or in combination with ribavirin has relatively good efficacy and safety in patients with genotype 3B HCV/HIV infection.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization proposed targets to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) by 2030, aiming to treat ≥80% of people with HCV, decreasing new chronic infections by 90% and liver-related mortality by 65%. While children/adolescents represent a minority of cases, the true burden is underestimated. Advances in drug development have resulted in simplified treatments that are well-tolerated, effective, and pangenotypic in activity. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, a combined nucleotide analog NS5B polymerase inhibitor and NS5A inhibitor, respectively, is approved for HCV treatment for individuals ≥3 years, supported by safety data using lower-dose, novel formulations. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses chemistry, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, dosing, efficacy, and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir highlighting pediatric data. Literature review included publications/conference abstracts from PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar. Information from key clinical trials/regulatory approvals is reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of pangenotypic chronic HCV infection with limited cases of virologic relapse and adverse events among pediatric populations aged 3 years and older. However, the tolerability among children less than 6 years could be improved by alternative formulations, if not, shorter treatment durations. An aspirational role of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) that should be explored is for the prevention of infection in exposed and at-risk pediatric populations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There have been no reports of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) during treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). CASE SUMMARY: We report a 50-year-old male patient with CHC. The patient sought medical attention from the Department of Infectious Diseases at our hospital due to severe yellowing of the skin and sclera, which developed 3 mo previously and attended two consecutive hospitals without finding the cause of liver damage. It was not until 1 mo ago that he was diagnosed with CHC at our hospital. After discharge, he was treated with DAAs. During treatment, ACLF occurred, and timely measures such as liver protection, enzyme lowering, anti-infective treatment, and suppression of inflammatory storms were implemented to control the condition. CONCLUSION: DAA drugs significantly improve the cure rate of CHC. However, when patients have factors such as autoimmune attack, coinfection, or unclear hepatitis C virus genotype, close monitoring is required during DAA treatment.

RESUMEN

Background Patients on hemodialysis (HD) are most likely to contract hepatitis C (HCV) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity and disease progression. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are safe and tolerable in chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a 90-100% cure rate, and limited data exist regarding their efficacy in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), particularly for HD patients in South Asia. The study aimed to assess the outcome of a 12-week sofosbuvir (SOF) and velpatasvir (VEL) treatment regimen on ESRD patients with chronic HCV infection undergoing HD in the Pakistani Asian population. Methodology This prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2022 and January 2023 at the outpatient nephrology and gastroenterology clinic of Sheikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. This study included a total of 220 ESRD patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, aged 20-55 years, who had been undergoing weekly HD sessions for at least two years, with acquired HCV infection. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics were collected through patient interviews. Laboratory and dialysis profiling was executed to assess ESRD and discover the underlying cause by ultrasound abdomen, blood pressure measurement by sphygmomanometer, random blood sugar for diabetes, and taking note of the duration and frequency of dialysis. HCV RNA PCR was done at selected intervals to evaluate the virological response to treatment. Sustained virological response (SVR), liver cirrhosis status, and number of weekly HD sessions were compared at one year of SOF/VEL regimen. Results The mean age of patients with ESRD was 41.8 with a standard deviation (SD) of 9.3 years, and HCV diagnosis was 1.3 years with SD of 0.4 years; 52.7% (n=116) were males, 47.3% (n=104) were females, 75% (n=165) were urban dwellers, and 93.6% (n=206) were married. CKD that requires dialysis was caused mainly by hypertension (78, 35%), diabetes mellitus type 2 (52, 24%), bilateral small kidney disease (40, 18%), and others (34, 16%). One hundred and six (48.2%) received dialysis thrice weekly, 83 (37.7%) twice, and 31 (14.1%) once weekly. The study monitored the rapid virological response (RVR) at four weeks of SOF/VEL regimen in 89.5% of ESRD patients, observed end-of-treatment response (ETR) at 12 weeks in 93.2%, and noted 91.4% SVR response at one year. Only four (1.8%) relapses were observed in the study, which was statistically insignificant. The status of liver cirrhosis showed a 50% improvement, decreasing from 40% to 20%. The frequency of weekly HD sessions decreased from thrice to twice-thrice a week. Conclusion The prevalence of contracting HCV is high among CKD and dialysis ESRD patients. All-oral DAA therapy has revolutionized HCV treatment with co-morbidities. Renal functions improved after the SOF/VEL regimen for chronic HCV infection in ESRD patients undergoing HD, with the number of weekly dialysis sessions reduced and SVR reaching 91.4%. Thus, a single-tablet, pan-genotypic DAA regimen of SOF/VEL for 12 weeks is safe, effective, and tolerable regardless of the underlying etiology of ESRD, complications of cirrhosis, HCV genotype, or previous treatment exposure. The successful treatment of HCV and achieving SVR lowers the risk of ESRD complications, improves extra-hepatic manifestations, and greatly enhances survival. Further studies are warranted after the availability of other DAAs to confirm findings with no limitations.

RESUMEN

A fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) plus weight-based ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks is recommended for the treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated decompensated cirrhosis. However, large global studies, while confirming the effectiveness of SOF/VEL in a broad range of patients, often exclude these patients. This Phase 2, single-arm, open-label study in adult patients with HCV-associated decompensated cirrhosis in France and the USA aimed to provide further data on the safety and efficacy of SOF/VEL plus RBV for 12 weeks in this population. Patients were treated with a fixed-dose combination of SOF 400 mg/VEL 100 mg plus weight-based RBV once daily for 12 weeks. The inclusion criteria were chronic HCV infection (≥6 months), quantifiable HCV RNA at screening, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B or C cirrhosis, and liver imaging within 6 months of Day 1 to exclude hepatocellular carcinoma. Among 32 patients who initiated treatment, 78.1% achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Failure to achieve SVR12 was due to non-virologic reasons (investigator discretion, n = 1; death, n = 6). All 25 patients in the per-protocol population achieved SVR12 and all but one achieved sustained virologic response 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were as expected for a patient population with advanced liver disease. All Grade 3-4 and serious AEs and deaths were deemed unrelated to treatment. In patients with HCV-associated decompensated cirrhosis, SOF/VEL plus RBV achieved high SVR12 rates and was generally well tolerated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of cirrhosis is clearly stratified by liver function. Although direct-acting antiviral (DAA) has recently been used to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV), it is not clear whether liver function stratifies the prognosis of decompensated cirrhotic patients treated with DAA. METHODS: A total of 206 HCV-associated decompensated cirrhotic patients who started DAA from February 2019 to December 2021 at 31 Japanese hospitals were prospectively registered. RESULTS: The median age was 68, and the proportions of patients with Child-Pugh class A (CP-A), CP-B and CP-C were 10% (20/206), 76% (156/206) and 15% (30/206), respectively. Twenty-six patients died, and two patients underwent liver transplantation (LT); the 2- and 3-year LT-free survival rates were 90.0% and 83.2%, respectively. We examined factors associated with LT-free survival using 2 models including either CP class (Model 1) or MELD score (Model 2). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, CP class at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (EOT) in Model 1 and MELD score at 12 weeks after the EOT in Model 2 were significant factors, while baseline CP class or MELD score was not. Two-year LT-free survival rates were 100%, 91.6% and 60.4% for patients with CP-A, CP-B and CP-C at 12 weeks after the EOT and 95.2% and 69.6% for patients with MELD < 15 and MELD ≥ 15 at 12 weeks after the EOT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of decompensated cirrhotic patients receiving DAA was stratified by liver function at 12 weeks after the EOT, not by baseline liver function.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: Sofosbuvir (S), daclatasvir (D), ledipasvir, or velpatasvir (V) containing first-line hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment regimens fail to cure viremia in 5-10%. We report our experience of HCV retreatment using these first-line drugs, in a setting where second-line anti-HCV drugs are not available. Methods: Adults, who had relapsed after first complete course of a sofosbuvir-containing first-line, pegylated interferon free, anti-HCV treatment regimen with or without ribavirin (Riba) were included. Retreatment regimen, tailored to the failed anti-HCV regimen, was based on principle of using first-line drugs for 24 weeks with ribavirin and swapping between pangenotypic and genotype-specific regimens. Retreatment outcome was categorized as successful (achieved undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment [ETR] and sustained viral response at week 12 [SVR12]), non-responder (failed to achieve ETR), or relapse (achieved ETR but not achieved SVR12). Results: Twelve patients (9 male; 7 cirrhosis; all genotype 3) who had relapsed to prior anti-HCV treatment (4 SD12, 4 SD24, 1 SDRiba12, 1 SDRiba24, 2 SV12) were included. Following retreatment (2 SDRiba24, 10 SVRiba24), all achieved ETR but only 9 (75%) achieved SVR12. Two among three, in whom retreatment failed, achieved SVR12 following another course of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/ribavirin for 24 weeks. Overall, 11/12 (92%) patients achieved SVR12 following retreatment with the first-line anti-HCV drugs. Conclusion: HCV retreatment could be a treatment option if second-line anti-HCV drugs are not available. Successful retreatment could be achieved, in a large proportion, with the use of first-line drugs for 24 weeks with ribavirin and swapping of pangenotypic/genotype-specific regimens (NCT03483987).

RESUMEN

Background: The direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection. However, a simple and feasible treatment strategy with high efficacy and safety for HCV in patients coinfected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) remains an unmet medical need, especially in areas with limited health resource. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir in patients with chronic HCV/HIV-1 coinfection. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study in China, which involved chronic HCV/HIV-1 coinfected patients who are receiving an antiretroviral regimen of a combination tablet consisting of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide, (EVG/c/FTC/TAF) once daily. Patients with liver cirrhosis or experienced to DAAs treatment were excluded. All patients received combined sofosbuvir (400 mg) and velpatasvir (100 mg) tablet once daily for 12 weeks regardless of HCV genotype. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response, defined as HCV RNA <15 IU/mL at 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12). The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of patients who prematurely discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed with an intention-to-treat (ITT) population (last observation carried forward) and per-protocol (PP) population. This trial is registered on ChiCTR.org.cn with number being ChiCTR1800020246. Findings: Of the 243 patients enrolled, 78% were male, 9% had been previously treated for HCV with interferon, and none had pre-defined cirrhosis, although 8% had Fibrosis 4 score (FIB-4) >3.25. A total of 233 patients completed 12-week post-treatment follow-up. Overall, 227/233 patients (97%) achieved SVR12: 100% (63/63) in those with HCV genotype 1, 67% (2/3) in those with genotype 2, 95% (84/88) in those with genotype 3, 99% (78/79) in those with genotype 6. Rates of SVR12 were lower among those with baseline FIB-4 >3.25 than those without (78% [14/18] vs. 99% [211/212], P < 0.001). HIV-1 suppression was not compromised. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (5%), cough (3%), abnormal renal function (2%), abnormal liver function (2%), constipation (2%), urinary tract infection (2%) and sleep disorders (2%). No participant discontinued treatment because of adverse events or death. Interpretation: Twelve weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir provide high rates of SVR and is well-tolerated in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV regardless of HCV genotypes. Non-invasive liver fibrosis score may help to further distinguish patients at greater likelihood of a suboptimal response. Funding: The 13th Five Year Plan of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China for the prevention and treatment of major infectious diseases such as AIDS and viral hepatitis, the National Key Research and Development Program of China, Medical Key Discipline Program of Guangzhou-Viral Infectious Diseases (2021-2023), Basic research program on people's Livelihood Science and technology of Guangzhou, and National Natural Science Foundation of China.

RESUMEN

Hepatitis C is a global health issue. Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) induces fibrosis by redox reactions, which involve the deposition of collagen in extracellular matrix (ECM). This study aimed to examine the antifibrotic effect of direct-acting antivirals; Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir, per se and in combination against carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced fibrosis in rats. Carbon tetrachloride (intraperitoneal; 0.5 ml/kg) twice weekly for six weeks was used to induce hepatic fibrosis in rats. After two weeks of CCl4, oral administration of Sofosbuvir (20 mg/kg/d) and Velpatasvir (10 mg/kg/d) was administered to rats for the last four weeks. Liver function tests (LFTs), renal function tests (RFTs), oxidative stress markers, and the levels of TNF-a, NF-κB, and IL-6 were measured through ELISA and western blotting at the end of the study. CCl4 significantly ameliorated the values of RFTs, LFTs and lipid profiles in the diseased group, which were normalized by the SOF and VEL both alone and in combination. These drugs produced potent antioxidant effects by significantly increasing antioxidant enzymes. From the histopathology of hepatic tissues of rats treated with drugs, the antifibrotic effect was further manifested, which showed suppression of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in treated rats, as compared to the disease control group. The antifibrotic effect was further demonstrated by significantly decreasing the levels of TNF-a, NF-κB and IL-6 in serum and hepatic tissues of treated rats as compared to the disease control group. Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir alone and in combination showed marked inhibition of fibrosis in the CCl4-induced non-HCV rat model, which was mediated by decreased levels of TNF-a/NF-κB and the IL-6 signaling pathway. Thus, it can be concluded that Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir might have an antifibrotic effect that appears to be independent of their antiviral activity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The manufacturer of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir recommends avoiding coadministration with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) due to decreased velpatasvir serum concentrations which could translate to an increased risk of HCV treatment failure. A recent open-label study in healthy adults reported overcoming this interaction through co-administration of velpatasvir and a PPI with soda, but there is no clinical outcome data in HCV-infected patients. SUMMARY: A 64 year-old male with a past medical history significant for decompensated cirrhosis, chronic HCV infection, upper gastrointestinal bleed, anemia, esophagitis, and previous HCV treatment failures required HCV treatment. The patient's medications included a PPI but no other significant DDI were present. The patient was instructed to take one sofosbuvir/velpatasvir tablet, soda, and pantoprazole 40 mg tablet at the same time once daily. Treatment was well tolerated, and clinical cure of HCV was achieved. CONCLUSION: Scenarios may arise during HCV treatment that necessitate coadministration of a PPI. Interfering with optimal absorption of HCV treatment could lead to development of resistance or treatment failure. Future studies should include this strategy for overcoming this common DDI. This case demonstrates sofosbuvir/velpatasvir administered orally with soda and a PPI is potentially safe and effective for treatment of chronic HCV infection.