RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy in prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial, with no randomized trials and conflicting observational data. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence comparing systemic thrombolysis and cardiac surgery in PVT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies on treatment strategies in patients with left-sided PVT since 2000. The primary outcome was death, and the secondary outcomes were major bleeding and thromboembolism during follow-up (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews No. CRD42022384092). We identified 2298 studies, of which 16 were included, comprising 1389 patients with PVT (mean age, 50.4±9.3 years; 60.0% women). Among them, 67.2% were New York Heart Association stage III/IV at admission. Overall, 48.1% were treated with systemic thrombolysis and 51.9% with cardiac surgery. The mortality rate was 10.8% in the thrombolysis group and 15.3% in the surgery group. The pooled risk difference for death with systemic thrombolysis was 1.13 (exact CI, 0.74-1.79; ζ2=0.89; P<0.001) versus cardiac surgery. Rates of both transient ischemic attack and non-central nervous system embolism were higher in the thrombolysis group (P=0.002 and P=0.02, respectively). Treatment success, major bleeding, and stroke were similar between groups. Sensitivity analysis including studies that used low-dose or slow-infusion thrombolysis showed that the mortality rate was lower, and treatment success was higher, in patients referred to systemic thrombolysis, with similar rates of other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to suggest that thrombolysis might be the preferred option for the management of PVT without cardiogenic shock, pending future randomized controlled trials or larger observational studies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While surgery still remains the gold standard treatment for mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis (MPVT) by many guidelines, the ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen has been reported as a promising alternative. METHODS: In this prospective single-center cohort, patients with acute MPVT were treated with an ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen consisting of 25 mg infusion of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) over 25 h. The regimen could be repeated in case of failure until resolution/occurrence of adverse events or a maximum cumulative dose of 150 mg. The primary outcome was the complete MPVT resolution rate; other outcomes included first-dose success rate, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, mortality, and total thrombolytic dose/duration. RESULTS: Between April 2018 to January 2024, 135 episodes of acute MPVT were treated with an ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen in 118 patients. In 118/135 (87.4 %) episodes, right-sided prosthetic valve was involved. Complete success was achieved in 88.1 % of cases, with 39.5 % responding after the first dose. The median total dose was 50 mg over a median of 30 h. Only one fatal intracranial hemorrhage occurred (0.7 %), with no other bleeding or thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSION: The ultraslow low-dose thrombolytic regimen appears to exhibit high efficacy and acceptable safety in treating acute MPVT. Further large clinical trials are essential for validating these preliminary findings.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Terapia Trombolítica , Trombosis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/etiología , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) thrombosis may manifest as subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) and clinical valve thrombosis. SLT is relatively common (10%-20%) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, but clinical implications are uncertain. Clinical valve thrombosis is rare (1.2%) and associated with bioprosthetic valve failure, neurologic or thromboembolic events, heart failure, and death. Treatment for TAV thrombosis has been understudied. In principle, anticoagulation may prevent TAV thrombosis. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, as compared to antiplatelet therapy, are associated with reduced incidence of SLT, although at the cost of higher bleeding and all-cause mortality risk. We present an overview of existing literature for management of TAV thrombosis and propose a rational treatment algorithm. Vitamin K antagonists or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of antithrombotic treatment. In therapy-resistant or clinically unstable patients, ultraslow, low-dose infusion of thrombolytics seems effective and safe and may be preferred over redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement or explant surgery.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Trombosis/prevención & control , Trombosis/etiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
A 66-year-old woman with a complex medical history underwent transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVI) owing to mitral insufficiency. Risk factors and noncompliance led to bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT) within 3 years. Emergent surgery indicated by an ad hoc heart team successfully managed the situation, showcasing challenges in BPVT management after TMVI.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In the context of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) following valve replacement surgery, it may be necessary to implant a peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO). This procedure, however, carries a risk of prosthetic valve thrombosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the incidence and outcomes of prosthetic valve thrombosis after VA-ECMO support for PCCS and to report the associated risk factors. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients who received pVA-ECMO for PCCS following a valve replacement procedure between January 2015 and October 2019 in our institution were included in this retrospective study. Outcome variables were prosthetic valve thrombosis, 30-day and hospital survival, pVA-ECMO-associated adverse events and surgery-related adverse events. RESULTS: During the 4-year study period, 549 patients received pVA-ECMO for PCCS. Among them, 152 had undergone a valve replacement procedure and 9 of these developed prosthetic valve thrombosis. The incidence of valve thrombosis at 30 days was 7.5 ± 2%. The cumulative Incidence of prosthetic valve thrombosis was significantly lower with pVA-ECMO + IABP versus VA-ECMO alone (1.4 ± 1.4% vs 13.7 ± 4.7%, p = 0.021, respectively). Intra-aortic balloon pump use associated with pVA-ECMO (versus pVA-ECMO alone) was an independent protective factor against hospital death (OR = 0.180 [0.068-0.478], p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After PCCS following valve replacement surgery, peripheral femoro-femoral VA-ECMO is associated with a low risk of acute valve thrombosis especially when associated with an IABP.
RESUMEN
Left-sided bioprosthesis valve thrombosis (LSBVT) is a challenging complication necessitating invasive interventions. In this study, we introduce a novel, minimally invasive approach. We used a cerebral embolic protection system and an Occlutech cannula connected to an extracorporeal circuit, providing safer thrombus aspiration compared to the AngioVac system. This technique offers a promising alternative for high-risk patients with LSBVT.
RESUMEN
We report a rare case of aortic valve thrombosis in a 55-year-old man. He had reduced urine output and generalized edema four days before admission. He felt sick and had chest pain on the day of admission. Severe hypoalbuminemia and massive proteinuria were present, and a diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome was made. An electrocardiogram showed findings suspicious for acute myocardial infarction, and emergency catheterization was performed. However, no coronary artery stenosis or occlusion was found at that time. A subsequent contrast-enhanced CT scan and transesophageal echocardiography revealed a thrombus in the aortic valve. The thrombus nearly occluded the left coronary artery. Emergency surgery was performed to remove the thrombus. His postoperative course was stable, but nephrotic syndrome persisted. A renal biopsy diagnosed minimal change disease. Treatment with 50 mg/day of prednisolone induced remission, and he was discharged on day 43. There were no aortic valve abnormalities. Nephrotic syndrome was considered the main contributor to thrombus formation. Aortic valve thrombosis associated with nephrotic syndrome is a very rare but potentially fatal condition that requires attention.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left-sided mechanical prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (PVT) occurs because of suboptimal anticoagulation and is common in low-resource settings. Urgent surgery and fibrinolytic therapy (FT) are the two treatment options available for this condition. Urgent surgery is a high-risk procedure but results in successful restoration of valve function more often and is the treatment of choice in developed countries. In low-resource countries, FT is used as the default treatment strategy, though it is associated with lower success rates and a higher rate of bleeding and embolic complications. There are no randomized trials comparing the two modalities. METHODS: We performed a single center randomized controlled trial comparing urgent surgery (valve replacement or thrombectomy) with FT (low-dose, slow infusion tissue plasminogen activator, tPA) in patients with symptomatic left-sided PVT. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a complete clinical response, defined as discharge from hospital with completely restored valve function, in the absence of stroke, major bleeding or non-CNS systemic embolism. Outcome assessment was done by investigators blinded to treatment allocation. The principal safety outcome was the occurrence of a composite of in-hospital death, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal major bleed or non-CNS systemic embolism. Outcomes will be assessed both in the intention-to-treat, and in the as-treated population. We will also report outcomes at one year of follow-up. The trial has completed recruitment. CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized trial to compare urgent surgery with FT for the treatment of left-sided PVT. The results will provide evidence to help clinicians make treatment choices for these patients. (Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2017/10/010159).
Asunto(s)
Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Terapia Trombolítica , Trombosis , Humanos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Trombosis/etiología , Femenino , Masculino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dysfunction and thrombosis of mechanical heart valves, although uncommon, represents a challenge that requires multidisciplinary expertise for diagnosis and management. The aim of this review is to summarize strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies for this uncommon but potentially life-threatening pathology. RECENT FINDINGS: Expeditious diagnosis of mechanical valve thrombosis and exclusion of other diagnostic considerations, often with incorporation of multimodality imaging, can inform the best treatment strategy. Presentation of mechanical valve thrombosis can be asymptomatic or can include heart failure, life-threatening embolic events, or cardiogenic shock. Echocardiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography are important in the evaluation of mechanical valve dysfunction. Therapeutic strategies for thrombosis include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis, and surgery. Choice of treatment depends on multiple factors including thrombus size, degree of valve dysfunction, clinical presentation, and available surgical expertise.
Asunto(s)
Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Trombosis , Humanos , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/terapia , Trombosis/fisiopatología , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Ecocardiografía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Falla de Prótesis , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic strategy early after aortic valve replacement surgery with a biological valve remains controversial due to lack of high-quality evidence. Either oral anticoagulants or acetylsalicylic acid should be considered for the first 3 months. Hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening on cardiac computed tomography has been associated with latent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis and may be prevented with anticoagulation. We hypothesize that anticoagulation with apixaban is superior to single antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid in reducing hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening of bioprosthetic aortic valve prostheses. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, randomized trial, patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement surgery with rapid deployment bioprosthetic valves will be randomized. The treatment group will receive 5 mg of apixaban twice a day for the first 3 months and 100 mg of acetylsalicylic acid thereafter. The control group will be administered 100 mg of acetylsalicylic acid once a day, indefinitely. After the 3-month treatment period, a contrast-enhanced electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography will be performed to identify hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening of the bioprosthetic valve. The primary objective of the study is to assess the impact of apixaban on the prevention of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening at 3 months. The secondary and exploratory endpoints will be clinical outcomes and safety profiles of the two strategies. DISCUSSION: Antithrombotic therapy after aortic valve replacement is used to prevent valve thrombosis and systemic thromboembolism. Latent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a precursor of clinically significant prosthetic valve dysfunction or thromboembolic events. The hallmark feature of latent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening on cardiac computed tomography. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis occurs frequently in bioprosthetic aortic valves, more commonly in transcatheter than in surgical valves. There is no evidence on the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on the incidence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening after surgical aortic valve replacement with rapid deployment bioprostheses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06184113. Registered on December 28, 2023.
Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Aspirina , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Bioprótesis , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trombosis/prevención & control , Trombosis/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) and obstruction are rare and dangerous events often related to inappropriate anticoagulant therapy. High mortality rates occur because of delayed diagnosis, hemodynamic instability, multiple organ failure (MOF), and high perioperative risk. Surgical repair is a first-line treatment for obstructive PVT with hemodynamic instability but is often not readily available or safely performed. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support has been increasingly used in patients with PVT and cardiorespiratory collapse, allowing MOF reversal and safer deferred surgery. The authors present a case of a young female with refractory cardiogenic shock secondary to mitral PVT successfully managed with VA ECMO. Furthermore, the promising role of perioperative VA ECMO support for PVT-related cardiogenic shock is also discussed.
RESUMEN
Aortic stenosis is the most common heart valve disease, especially among the elderly. Symptomatic aortic valve stenosis is linked to a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate if left untreated. The only effective treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis is aortic valve replacement using either a mechanical or a biological prosthesis. Mechanical valve prostheses, while highly durable, are thrombogenic, necessitating lifelong anticoagulation with oral anti-vitamin K agents, such as acenocoumarol. Conversely, bioprosthetic valves, though less durable, carry a minimal thrombogenic risk and do not require anticoagulation. Currently, there is no proven role for direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with mechanical heart valves due to insufficient clinical trial data regarding their safety in this patient population. Herein, we present the case of a 59-year-old female known to have aortic stenosis, who underwent surgical treatment with mechanical aortic valve replacement eight years ago. Post-surgery, acenocoumarol was initiated. However, 18 months prior to presenting at our institution, the patient started taking rivaroxaban (a DOAC) instead of acenocoumarol due to the unavailability of acenocoumarol during the ongoing economic crisis in Lebanon, without consulting her cardiologist. Although she was followed up by her general practitioner and reported having a mechanical valve, her son contradicted this, claiming she had a biological valve. After thorough investigations, including chest X-ray, echocardiography, and fluoroscopy, it was confirmed that the patient indeed had a normally functioning mechanical aortic valve. Immediate corrective measures were taken, starting with IV unfractionated heparin and acenocoumarol, targeting an International Normalized Ratio (INR) between 2.5 and 3, while educating the patient about her condition and the importance of adhering to acenocoumarol therapy.
RESUMEN
A 68-year-old woman with history of aortic valve replacement developed severe heart failure and cardiac arrest. Transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography showed mechanical aortic valve thrombosis. Low-dose, ultraslow infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator was performed while the patient was in a critically ill condition, resulting in the improvement of thrombus burden and structural valve deterioration. Learning objectives: Mechanical valve thrombosis can be an underlying mechanism of severe heart failure, in which systemic thrombolytic therapy in a low-dose, ultraslow, and prolonged manner may improve clinical outcomes, even in critically ill patients.
RESUMEN
Late bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (bPVT) is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication following valve replacement with thrombus formation leading mostly to valvular stenosis or embolic phenomena. Clinically, it manifests as symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, or reduced exercise capacity. The existing treatment guidelines lack clear recommendations for managing this specific presentation. In this case study, we present a distinct clinical scenario wherein the use of anticoagulation, specifically apixaban, successfully reversed very late, severe thrombotic stenosis in a 78-year-old woman with a Medtronic Hancock II porcine mitral valve (Dublin, Ireland). This case highlights the need to consider bPVT as an alternative etiology to valve degeneration in the setting of late bioprosthetic valve stenosis. Additionally, it demonstrates how apixaban therapy may serve as a viable treatment modality in these scenarios.
RESUMEN
A 37-year-old woman with mechanical tricuspid valve thrombosis presented for preconception consultation. Multimodality imaging confirmed a malfunctioning bileaflet mechanical tricuspid valve with both leaflets fixed and open. This case highlights the key discussions held by the multidisciplinary pregnancy heart team.
RESUMEN
Introducción: aunque las bioprótesis son menos trombogénicas que las válvulas mecánicas; la trombosis de estas es una entidad cada vez más reconocida como causa de disfunción protésica potencialmente reversible. No está definido el beneficio de la anticoagulación rutinaria versus antiagregación plaquetaria luego de la sustitución valvular aórtica (SVA) por bioprótesis. La anticoagulación precoz podría asociarse a menores gradientes transprotésicos con similar riesgo de complicaciones. Objetivos: el objetivo primario es determinar si existe una diferencia significativa en la variación del gradiente transprotésico medio al año de la SVA entre las dos estrategias de tratamiento antitrombótico. Los objetivos secundarios son la comparación de la variación del gradiente máximo y del área valvular aórtica, y parámetros clínicos que incluyen la Clase Funcional de la New York Heart Association, las tasas de sangrado mayor y menor y la incidencia de eventos embólicos. Este trabajo representa el análisis interino a 3 meses de un proyecto a más largo plazo, y se propone mostrar los resultados preliminares de los puntos finales previamente definidos. Métodos: se presenta el análisis interino de un ensayo randomizado multicéntrico. Todos los pacientes sometidos a SVA por bioprótesis porcinas fueron sucesivamente reclutados en dos centros de cirugía cardíaca desde el 01/01/2019 hasta el 01/09/2019. El grupo anticoagulación recibió warfarina durante los primeros 3 meses y ambos recibieron aspirina a largo plazo. Se realizaron instancias de seguimiento clínicas y ecocardiográficas antes del alta, a los 3 meses y al año. Resultados: se reclutaron 107 pacientes; 46% de ellos fueron randomizados al grupo anticoagulación y 54% al grupo control. No existieron diferencias en las características basales. Tampoco existieron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en la variación entre el alta y los 3 meses del área valvular protésica, coeficiente de obstrucción, gradiente máximo ni gradiente medio ni en la clase funcional. En cuanto a las complicaciones, no existieron eventos embólicos y los sangrados no difirieron significativamente entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: la anticoagulación no modificó la variación de los gradientes transprotésicos a los 3 meses. Asimismo, no produjo mayor incidencia de efectos adversos. Todavía no está dilucidado si la anticoagulación precoz con warfarina luego de la SVA tiene impacto en los resultados a largo plazo.
Introduction: although bioprostheses are less thrombogenic than mechanical valves, bioprosthesis valve thrombosis is an increasingly recognized entity that can cause potentially reversible prosthetic valve dysfunction. There is a lack of consensus whether to use anticoagulation after aortic valve replacement (AVR) or antiplatelet therapy. Our hypothesis is that early anticoagulation is associated with lower transprosthetic gradients with similar risk of complications. Objective: primary objective is to determine if there is a significant difference in the variation of the mean transprosthetic gradient (ΔGm) one year after SVA between the two antithrombotic treatment strategies. Secondary objectives are the comparison of the variation of maximum gradient and aortic valve area, and clinical parameters including NYHA functional class, major and minor bleeding rates, and the incidence of embolic events. This work represents the 3-month interim analysis of a longer-term project, and is intended to show the preliminary results of the previously defined end points. Methods: this is an interim analysis of a multicenter randomized trial. All patients who underwent AVR by porcine bioprostheses were successively recruited in two cardiac surgery centers in Montevideo between 01/01/2019 and 01/09/2019. The anticoagulation group received warfarin for 3 months. Both groups received aspirin. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up consultations were performed before discharge, at 3 months, and at 1 year. Results: 107 patients were recruited, 46% were randomized to the anticoagulation group and 54% to the control group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the variation between discharge and 3 months of effective orifice area, doppler velocity index, peak gradient and mean gradient. There were also no differences between both groups in functional class. Regarding complications, there were no embolic events and bleeding did not differ significantly. Conclusions: in this study, anticoagulation did not modify the variation of transprosthetic gradients at 3 months. Likewise, it did not produce a higher incidence of adverse effects. It remains unclear whether early anticoagulation with warfarin after AVR has an impact on long-term outcomes.
Introdução: embora as biopróteses sejam menos trombogênicas que as mecânicas, a trombose de biopróteses é uma entidade cada vez mais reconhecida como causa de disfunção protética potencialmente reversível. A anticoagulação de rotina após a substituição da valva aórtica por bioprótese (SVA) não está definida. Nossa hipótese é que a anticoagulação precoce está associada a menores gradientes transprotéticos com risco semelhante de complicações. Objetivo: o objetivo principal é determinar se há uma diferença significativa na variação do gradiente transprotético médio (ΔGm) um ano após SVA entre as duas estratégias de tratamento antitrombótico. Os objetivos secundários são a comparação da variação do gradiente máximo e da área valvar aórtica e parâmetros clínicos, incluindo NYHA CF, taxas de sangramento maior e menor e incidência de eventos embólicos. Este trabalho representa a análise intercalar de 3 meses de um projeto de longo prazo, e pretende mostrar os resultados preliminares dos pontos finais previamente definidos. Métodos: apresenta-se a análise interina de um estudo multicêntrico randomizado. Todos os pacientes submetidos a SVA por biopróteses suínas foram sucessivamente recrutados em dois centros de cirurgia cardíaca em Montevidéu, durante um período de recrutamento de 1/1/2019 a 1/9/2019. O grupo de anticoagulação recebeu warfarina por 3 meses. Ambos os grupos receberam aspirina. Foram realizadas consultas médicas clínicas e ecocardiográficas antes da alta, aos 3 meses e ao 1 ano. Resultados: foram recrutados 107 pacientes, 46% foram randomizados para o grupo anticoagulação e 54% para o grupo controle. Não houve diferenças nas características basais. Não houve diferenças significativas entre os dois grupos da variação entre alta e 3 meses na área valvar, coeficiente de obstrução, gradiente máximo ou gradiente médio. Também não houve diferenças entre os dois grupos na classe funcional. Em relação às complicações, não houve eventos embólicos e sangramentos não diferiram significativamente. Conclusões: neste estudo, a anticoagulação não modificou a variação dos gradientes transprotéticos aos 3 meses. Da mesma forma, não produziu maior incidência de efeitos adversos. Ainda não está claro se a anticoagulação precoce com varfarina após SVA tem impacto nos resultados a longo prazo.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Bioprótesis , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudio Multicéntrico , Ensayo Clínico Controlado Aleatorio , Octogenarios , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
A 27-year-old pregnant woman at 24 weeks of gestation was admitted with cardiogenic shock due to mechanical mitral valve thrombosis. Following discussion with the heart team, thrombolysis was achieved with tissue plasminogen activator therapy followed by heparin infusion. Ultimately, the patient required mitral valve replacement for persistently elevated gradients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Leaflet thrombosis and reduced leaflet motion have become a concern with the expanding use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in lower-risk patients. AIMS: To assess the proportions, predictors and clinical impact of leaflet thrombosis and reduced leaflet motion after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies assessing the proportions of and/or clinical outcomes according to the presence of leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement identified with computed tomography and/or echocardiography. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies, representing 25,258 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, were considered. The proportion of leaflet thrombosis was 5.2% overall, and was higher in computed tomography versus echocardiography (16.4% vs. 1.1%, respectively); reduced leaflet motion was identified in 11% of patients with four-dimensional computed tomography. Intra-annular bioprostheses were associated with a higher proportion of leaflet thrombosis, whereas chronic oral anticoagulation was protective for leaflet thrombosis in both computed tomography and echocardiographic studies (9.7% vs. 17.5%; relative risk [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.37-0.71 and 0.9% vs. 2.7%; RR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06-0.79, respectively) and for reduced leaflet motion (2.5% vs. 12.4%; RR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13-0.76). Leaflet thrombosis was not associated with an increased risk of death, but with a higher risk of stroke in computed tomography studies (2.8% vs. 2.4%; RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.05-2.55), a difference more pronounced when considering reduced leaflet motion (3.5% vs. 1.7%; RR: 2.39, 95% CI: 0.63-8.34). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of leaflet thrombosis is highly variable according to the screening approach, the type of valve and the use of oral anticoagulation. The occurrence of cerebral events is increased when leaflet thrombosis and/or reduced leaflet motion are diagnosed, but leaflet thrombosis has no impact on survival.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Trombosis , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: The use of anticoagulation is mandatory for prevention of prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) worldwide, regardless of the valve type or position in the heart. In case a thrombosis causes symptomatic dysfunction, treatment usually includes the use of thrombolytic therapy or surgery. We report a case of PVT involving a patient with a mechanical aortic valve which was treated entirely with the use of anticoagulation therapy (warfarin). Case Presentation: A 58-year-old man had an aortic valve replacement using a Carbomedics® mechanical valve due to severe aortic stenosis as a result of a calcific bicuspid native aortic valve. He was commenced on warfarin after surgery which was continued thereafter. He presented to our hospital after three years with shortness of breath at rest. On clinical examination, his condition was poor with a New York Heart Association functional classification of IV. He was in sinus rhythm and had an enlarged heart shadow on chest X-ray. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed aortic valve regurgitation with vegetations on the anterior valve leaflet causing reduced hemi leaflet motility and a mean pressure gradient of 50 mmHg. Cinefluoroscopy revealed a dysfunctional mechanical valve leaflet. Surgery was at high risk of mortality due to the patient's clinical status and he was continued on warfarin therapy with close monitoring. Cinefluoroscopy and echocardiography done six months later revealed complete dissolution of thrombus and a normally functioning mechanical aortic valve. Conclusion: Only a few cases of symptomatic, thrombotic mechanical aortic valve were entirely treated with anticoagulation only. Our patient is one such case who had resolution of symptoms and improvement on NYHA functional classification (IV to I).