RESUMEN
Resumen En este artículo se analiza la forma en que se desarrolló el fenómeno de las fronteras invisibles en las comunas 16 y 70 de Medellín entre los años 2008 y 2013, momento en que se agudizó el conflicto armado ur bano en la ciudad. Con ese objetivo se entrevistaron actores sociales, institucionales y académicos que experimentaron esos enfrentamientos violentos desde diversas posiciones. Estas voces se analizaron a partir de discusiones teóricas en torno al poder, el territorio y la resistencia, que permitieron explicar la territorialización de una violencia que devino en la imposición de barreras imaginarias sobre la población.
Abstract This article analyses the way in which the phenomenon of invisible borders was developed in the Medellin's communes 16 and 70 between the years 2008 and 2013. It was the moment in which the urban armed conflict was intensified in the city. With this objective in mind, social, Institutional, and academic actors, who experienced these violent clashes were interviewed, from different positions. These voices were analyzed from theoretical discussions around power, territory, and resistance, which allowed to explain the territorialization of a violence that became the imposition of imaginary borders on the population.
RESUMEN
This paper develops an analytical framework to investigate the relationship between water and armed conflict, and applies it to the 'Summer War' of 2006 between Israel and Lebanon (Hezbollah). The framework broadens and deepens existing classifications by assessing the impact of acts of war as indiscriminate or targeted, and evaluating them in terms of international norms and law, in particular International Humanitarian Law (IHL). In the case at hand, the relationship is characterised by extensive damage in Lebanon to drinking water infrastructure and resources. This is seen as a clear violation of the letter and the spirit of IHL, while the partial destruction of more than 50 public water towers compromises water rights and national development goals. The absence of pre-war environmental baselines makes it difficult to gauge the impact on water resources, suggesting a role for those with first-hand knowledge of the hostilities to develop a more effective response before, during, and after armed conflict.