RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the possibility of using a lower imaging rate while maintaining acceptable accuracy by applying motion prediction to minimize the imaging dose in real-time image-guided radiation therapy. METHODS: Time-series of three-dimensional internal marker positions obtained from 98 patients in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy were used to train and test the long-short-term memory (LSTM) network. For real-time imaging, the root mean squared error (RMSE) of the prediction on three-dimensional marker position made by LSTM, the residual motion of the target under respiratory-gated irradiation, and irradiation efficiency were evaluated. In the evaluation of the residual motion, the system-specific latency was assumed to be 100 ms. RESULTS: Except for outliers in the superior-inferior (SI) direction, the median/maximum values of the RMSE for imaging rates of 7.5, 5.0, and 2.5 frames per second (fps) were 0.8/1.3, 0.9/1.6, and 1.2/2.4 mm, respectively. The median/maximum residual motion in the SI direction at an imaging rate of 15.0 fps without prediction of the marker position, which is a typical clinical setting, was 2.3/3.6 mm. For rates of 7.5, 5.0, and 2.5 fps with prediction, the corresponding values were 2.0/2.6, 2.2/3.3, and 2.4/3.9 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the irradiation efficiency with and that without prediction of the marker position. The geometrical accuracy at lower frame rates with prediction applied was superior or comparable to that at 15 fps without prediction. In comparison with the current clinical setting for real-time image-guided radiation therapy, which uses an imaging rate of 15.0 fps without prediction, it may be possible to reduce the imaging dose by half or more. CONCLUSIONS: Motion prediction can effectively lower the frame rate and minimize the imaging dose in real-time image-guided radiation therapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aims to externally validate a predictive model for distant metastasis (DM) with computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics features in prospectively enrolled non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing dynamic tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy (DTT-SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study collected retrospective data from 567 patients across 11 institutions as the training dataset and prospectively enrolled 42 patients from four institutions as the external test dataset. Four clinical features were collected, and 944 CT-based radiomic features were extracted from gross tumor volumes. After standardization and feature selection, DM predictive models were developed using fine and gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF), incorporating clinical and radiomic features, and their combinations within the training dataset. Then, the model was applied to the test dataset, dividing patients into high- and low-risk groups based on medians of risk scores. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), and the statistical significance between groups was evaluated using Gray's test. RESULTS: In the training dataset, 122 of 567 patients (21.5%) developed DM, compared to 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) in the test dataset. In the test dataset, the C-indices of the clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models with FG were 0.559, 0.544, and 0.560, respectively, whereas those with RSF were 0.576, 0.604, and 0.627, respectively. The hybrid model with RSF, which exhibited the best predictive performance of all models, identified 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) as high risk and 2 of 19 patients (10.5%) as low risk for DM incidence in the test dataset (p = 0.116). CONCLUSION: Although predictive models for DM lack significance when applied to prospectively enrolled cases undergoing DTT-lung SBRT, the model with RSF exhibits a consistent capacity to effectively classify patients at a high risk of developing DM.

RESUMEN

Background: Evaluation of treatment response for brain metastases (BMs) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) becomes complex as the number of treated BMs increases. This study uses artificial intelligence (AI) to track BMs after SRS and validates its output compared with manual measurements. Methods: Patients with BMs who received at least one course of SRS and followed up with MRI scans were retrospectively identified. A tool for automated detection, segmentation, and tracking of intracranial metastases on longitudinal imaging, MEtastasis Tracking with Repeated Observations (METRO), was applied to the dataset. The longest three-dimensional (3D) diameter identified with METRO was compared with manual measurements of maximum axial BM diameter, and their correlation was analyzed. Change in size of the measured BM identified with METRO after SRS treatment was used to classify BMs as responding, or not responding, to treatment, and its accuracy was determined relative to manual measurements. Results: From 71 patients, 176 BMs were identified and measured with METRO and manual methods. Based on a one-to-one correlation analysis, the correlation coefficient was R2 = 0.76 (P = .0001). Using modified BM response classifications of BM change in size, the longest 3D diameter data identified with METRO had a sensitivity of 0.72 and a specificity of 0.95 in identifying lesions that responded to SRS, when using manual axial diameter measurements as the ground truth. Conclusions: Using AI to automatically measure and track BM volumes following SRS treatment, this study showed a strong correlation between AI-driven measurements and the current clinically used method: manual axial diameter measurements.

RESUMEN

MRI-guided radiotherapy systems enable beam gating by tracking the target on planar, two-dimensional cine images acquired during treatment. This study aims to evaluate how deep-learning (DL) models for target tracking that are trained on data from one fraction can be translated to subsequent fractions. Cine images were acquired for six patients treated on an MRI-guided radiotherapy platform (MRIdian, Viewray Inc.) with an onboard 0.35 T MRI scanner. Three DL models (U-net, attention U-net and nested U-net) for target tracking were trained using two training strategies: (1) uniform training using data obtained only from the first fraction with testing performed on data from subsequent fractions and (2) adaptive training in which training was updated each fraction by adding 20 samples from the current fraction with testing performed on the remaining images from that fraction. Tracking performance was compared between algorithms, models and training strategies by evaluating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) between automatically generated and manually specified contours. The mean DSC for all six patients in comparing manual contours and contours generated by the onboard algorithm (OBT) were 0.68 ± 0.16. Compared to OBT, the DSC values improved 17.0 - 19.3% for the three DL models with uniform training, and 24.7 - 25.7% for the models based on adaptive training. The HD95 values improved 50.6 - 54.5% for the models based on adaptive training. DL-based techniques achieved better tracking performance than the onboard, registration-based tracking approach. DL-based tracking performance improved when implementing an adaptive strategy that augments training data fraction-by-fraction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) is a motion management technique where the radiation beam follows a moving tumor in real time. Not modelling DTT beam motion in the treatment planning system leaves an organ at risk (OAR) vulnerable to exceeding its dose limit. This work investigates two planning strategies for DTT plans, the "Boolean OAR Method" and the "Aperture Sorting Method," to determine if they can successfully spare an OAR while maintaining sufficient target coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (sIMRT) treatment plan was re-optimized for 10 previously treated liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy patients who each had one OAR very close to the target. Two planning strategies were investigated to determine which is more effective at sparing an OAR while maintaining target coverage: (1) the "Boolean OAR Method" created a union of an OAR's contours from two breathing phases (exhale and inhale) on the exhale phase (the planning CT) and protected this combined OAR during plan optimization, (2) the "Aperture Sorting Method" assigned apertures to the breathing phase where they contributed the least to an OAR's maximum dose. RESULTS: All 10 OARs exceeded their dose constraints on the original plan four-dimensional (4D) dose distributions and average target coverage was V100% = 91.3% ± 2.9% (ranging from 85.1% to 94.8%). The "Boolean OAR Method" spared 7/10 OARs, and mean target coverage decreased to V100% = 87.1% ± 3.8% (ranging from 80.7% to 93.7%). The "Aperture Sorting Method" spared 9/10 OARs and the mean target coverage remained high at V100% = 91.7% ± 2.8% (ranging from 84.9% to 94.5%). CONCLUSIONS: 4D planning strategies are simple to implement and can improve OAR sparing during DTT treatments. The "Boolean OAR Method" improved sparing of OARs but target coverage was reduced. The "Aperture Sorting Method" further improved sparing of OARs and maintained target coverage.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Real-time tumor tracking is one motion management method to address motion-induced uncertainty. To date, fiducial markers are often required to reliably track lung tumors with X-ray imaging, which carries risks of complications and leads to prolonged treatment time. A markerless tracking approach is thus desirable. Deep learning-based approaches have shown promise for markerless tracking, but systematic evaluation and procedures to investigate applicability in individual cases are missing. Moreover, few efforts have been made to provide bounding box prediction and mask segmentation simultaneously, which could allow either rigid or deformable multi-leaf collimator tracking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to implement a deep learning-based markerless lung tumor tracking model exploiting patient-specific training which outputs both a bounding box and a mask segmentation simultaneously. We also aimed to compare the two kinds of predictions and to implement a specific procedure to understand the feasibility of markerless tracking on individual cases. METHODS: We first trained a Retina U-Net baseline model on digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from a public dataset containing 875 CT scans and corresponding lung nodule annotations. Afterwards, we used an independent cohort of 97 lung patients to develop a patient-specific refinement procedure. In order to determine the optimal hyperparameters for automatic patient-specific training, we selected 13 patients for validation where the baseline model predicted a bounding box on planning CT (PCT)-DRR with intersection over union (IoU) with the ground-truth higher than 0.7. The final test set contained the remaining 84 patients with varying PCT-DRR IoU. For each testing patient, the baseline model was refined on the PCT-DRR to generate a patient-specific model, which was then tested on a separate 10-phase 4DCT-DRR to mimic the intrafraction motion during treatment. A template matching algorithm served as benchmark model. The testing results were evaluated by four metrics: the center of mass (COM) error and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation masks, and the center of box (COB) error and the DSC for bounding box detections. Performance was compared to the benchmark model including statistical testing for significance. RESULTS: A PCT-DRR IoU value of 0.2 was shown to be the threshold dividing inconsistent (68%) and consistent (100%) success (defined as mean bounding box DSC > 0.6) of PS models on 4DCT-DRRs. Thirty-seven out of the eighty-four testing cases had a PCT-DRR IoU above 0.2. For these 37 cases, the mean COM error was 2.6 mm, the mean segmentation DSC was 0.78, the mean COB error was 2.7 mm, and the mean box DSC was 0.83. Including the validation cases, the model was applicable to 50 out of 97 patients when using the PCT-DRR IoU threshold of 0.2. The inference time per frame was 170 ms. The model outperformed the benchmark model on all metrics, and the comparison was significant (p < 0.001) over the 37 PCT-DRR IoU > 0.2 cases, but not over the undifferentiated 84 testing cases. CONCLUSIONS: The implemented patient-specific refinement approach based on a pre-trained baseline model was shown to be applicable to markerless tumor tracking in simulated radiographs for lung cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using the diaphragm as a surrogate for liver targets during MDTT. METHODS: Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: a dome-shaped phantom with implanted markers was fabricated and underwent dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy sequences on the Vero4DRT linac. Ten patients participated in an IRB-approved, feasibility study to assess the MDTT workflow. All images were analyzed using an in-house program to back-project the diaphragm/markers position to the isocenter plane. ExacTrac imager log files were analyzed. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: The phantom "diaphragm" was contoured as a markerless tracking structure (MTS) and exported to Vero4DRT/ExacTrac. A single field plan was delivered to the phantom film plane under static and MDTT conditions. In the patient study, the diaphragm tracking structure was contoured on CT breath-hold-exhale datasets. The MDTT workflow was applied until just prior to MV beam-on. RESULTS: Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: phantom data confirmed the in-house 3D back-projection program was functioning as intended. In patients, the diaphragm/marker relative positions had a mean ± RMS difference of 0.70 ± 0.89, 1.08 ± 1.26, and 0.96 ± 1.06 mm in ML, SI, and AP directions. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: Building a respiratory-correlation model using the diaphragm as surrogate for the implanted markers was successful in phantom/patients. During the tracking verification imaging step, the phantom mean ± SD difference between the image-detected and predicted "diaphragm" position was 0.52 ± 0.18 mm. The 2D film gamma (2%/2 mm) comparison (static to MDTT deliveries) was 98.2%. In patients, the mean difference between the image-detected and predicted diaphragm position was 2.02 ± 0.92 mm. The planning target margin contribution from MDTT diaphragm tracking is 2.2, 5.0, and 4.7 mm in the ML, SI, and AP directions. CONCLUSION: In phantom/patients, the diaphragm motion correlated well with markers' motion and could be used as a surrogate. MDTT workflows using the diaphragm as the MTS is feasible using the Vero4DRT linac and could replace the need for implanted markers for liver radiotherapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Both geometric and dosimetric components are commonly considered when determining the margin for planning target volume (PTV). As dose distribution is shaped by controlling beam aperture in peripheral dose prescription and dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost techniques, adjusting the margin by incorporating the variable dosimetric component into the PTV margin is inappropriate; therefore, geometric components should be accurately estimated for margin calculations. PURPOSE: We introduced an asymmetric margin-calculation theory using the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) and intra-fractional motion. The margins in fiducial marker-based real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) for lung, liver, and pancreatic cancers were calculated and were then evaluated using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. METHODS: A total of 74 705, 73 235, and 164 968 sets of intra- and inter-fractional positional data were analyzed for 48 lung, 48 liver, and 25 pancreatic cancer patients, respectively, in RTTT clinical trials. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the positional error were considered representative values of each fraction of the disease site. The population-based statistics of the probability distributions of these representative positional errors (PD-RPEs) were calculated in six directions. A margin covering 95% of the population was calculated using the proposed formula. The content rate in which the clinical target volume (CTV) was included in the PTV was calculated through MC simulations using the PD-RPEs. RESULTS: The margins required for RTTT were at most 6.2, 4.6, and 3.9 mm for lung, liver, and pancreatic cancer, respectively. MC simulations revealed that the median content rates using the proposed margins satisfied 95% for lung and liver cancers and 93% for pancreatic cancer, closer to the expected rates than the margins according to van Herk's formula. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed formula based on the GUM and motion probability distributions (MPD) accurately calculated the practical margin size for fiducial marker-based RTTT. This was verified through MC simulations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The SyncTraX series enables real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy through the real-time recognition of a fiducial marker using fluoroscopic images. In this system, the isocenter should be located within approximately 5-7.5 cm from the marker, depending on the version, owing to the limited field of view. If the marker is placed away from the tumor, the isocenter should be shifted toward the marker. This study aimed to investigate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) outcomes of primary liver tumors treated with SyncTraX in cases where the isocenter was shifted marginally or outside the planning target volume (PTV). Twelve patients with 13 liver tumors were included in the analysis. Their isocenter was shifted toward the marker and was placed marginally or outside the PTV. The prescribed doses were generally 40 Gy in four fractions or 48 Gy in eight fractions. The overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All patients completed the scheduled SBRT. The median distance between the fiducial marker and PTV centroid was 56.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 52.7-66.7) mm. By shifting the isocenter toward the marker, the median distance between the marker and isocenter decreased to 34.0 (IQR: 33.4-39.7) mm. With a median follow-up period of 25.3 (range: 6.9-70.0) months, the 2-year OS and LC rates were 100.0% (95% confidence interval: 100-100). An isocenter shift makes SBRT with SyncTraX feasible in cases where the fiducial marker is distant from the tumor.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: For many thoracic tumors, patient respiration can introduce a significant amount of variability in tumor position that must be accounted for during radiotherapy. Of all existing techniques, real-time dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) represents the most ideal motion management strategy but can be limited by the treatment delivery technique. Our objective was to analyze the dosimetric performance of a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach to tumor tracking on standard linear accelerators that may offer similar dosimetric benefit, but with less complexity compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS: Ten patients who previously received free-breathing VMAT for lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patient 4D-CT and respiratory traces were simultaneously acquired prior to treatment and re-planned with DCA and VMAT using the Eclipse v15.6 Treatment Planning System with gated, deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), and motion encompassment techniques taken into consideration, generating seven new plans per patient. DTT with DCA was simulated using an in-house MATLAB script to parse the radiation dose into each phase of the 4D-CT based on the patient's respiratory trace. Dose distributions were normalized to the same prescription and analyzed using dose volume histograms (DVHs). DVH metrics were assessed using ANOVA with subsequent paired t-tests. RESULTS: The DCA-based DTT plans outperformed or showed comparable performance in their DVH metrics compared to all other combinations of treatment techniques while using motion management in normal lung sparing (p < 0.05). Normal lung sparing was not significantly different when comparing DCA-based DTT to gated and DIBH VMAT (p > 0.05), while both outperformed the corresponding DCA plans (p < 0.05). Simulated treatment times using DCA-based DTT were significantly shorter than both gating and DIBH plans (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A DCA-based DTT technique showed significant advantages over conventional motion encompassment treatments in lung cancer radiotherapy, with comparable performance to stricter techniques like gating and DIBH while conferring greater time-saving benefits.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Radiotherapy serves as a pivotal treatment modality for malignant tumors. However, the accuracy of radiotherapy is significantly compromised due to respiratory-induced fluctuations in the size, shape, and position of the tumor. To address this challenge, we introduce a deep learning-anchored, volumetric tumor tracking methodology that employs single-angle X-ray projection images. This process involves aligning the intraoperative two-dimensional (2D) X-ray images with the pre-treatment three-dimensional (3D) planning Computed Tomography (CT) scans, enabling the extraction of the 3D tumor position and segmentation. Prior to therapy, a bespoke patient-specific tumor tracking model is formulated, leveraging a hybrid data augmentation, style correction, and registration network to create a mapping from single-angle 2D X-ray images to the corresponding 3D tumors. During the treatment phase, real-time X-ray images are fed into the trained model, producing the respective 3D tumor positioning. Rigorous validation conducted on actual patient lung data and lung phantoms attests to the high localization precision of our method at lowered radiation doses, thus heralding promising strides towards enhancing the precision of radiotherapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and purpose: Patients with brain metastases (BMs) are surviving longer and returning for multiple courses of stereotactic radiosurgery. BMs are monitored after radiation with follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging every 2-3 months. This study investigated whether it is possible to automatically track BMs on longitudinal imaging and quantify the tumor response after radiotherapy. Methods: The METRO process (MEtastasis Tracking with Repeated Observations was developed to automatically process patient data and track BMs. A longitudinal intrapatient registration method for T1 MR post-Gd was conceived and validated on 20 patients. Detections and volumetric measurements of BMs were obtained from a deep learning model. BM tracking was validated on 32 separate patients by comparing results with manual measurements of BM response and radiologists' assessments of new BMs. Linear regression and residual analysis were used to assess accuracy in determining tumor response and size change. Results: A total of 123 irradiated BMs and 38 new BMs were successfully tracked. 66 irradiated BMs were visible on follow-up imaging 3-9 months after radiotherapy. Comparing their longest diameter changes measured manually vs. METRO, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.88 (p < 0.001); the mean residual error was -8 ± 17%. The mean registration error was 1.5 ± 0.2 mm. Conclusions: Automatic, longitudinal tracking of BMs using deep learning methods is feasible. In particular, the software system METRO fulfills a need to automatically track and quantify volumetric changes of BMs prior to, and in response to, radiation therapy.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To develop a prediction model (PM) for target positioning using diaphragm waveforms extracted from CBCT projection images. METHODS: Nineteen patients with lung cancer underwent orthogonal rotational kV x-ray imaging lasting 70 s. IR markers placed on their abdominal surfaces and an implanted gold marker located nearest to the tumor were considered as external surrogates and the target, respectively. Four different types of regression-based PM were trained using surrogate motions and target positions for the first 60 s, as follows: Scenario A: Based on the clinical scenario, 3D target positions extracted from projection images were used as they were (PMCL ). Scenario B: The short-arc 4D-CBCT waveform exhibiting eight target positions was obtained by averaging the target positions in Scenario A. The waveform was repeated for 60 s (W4D-CBCT ) by adapting to the respiratory phase of the external surrogate. W4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PM4D-CBCT ). Scenario C: The Amsterdam Shroud (AS) signal, which depicted the diaphragm motion in the superior-inferior direction was extracted from the orthogonal projection images. The amplitude and phase of W4D-CBCT were corrected based on the AS signal. The AS-corrected W4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PMAS-4D-CBCT ). Scenario D: The AS signal was extracted from single projection images. Other processes were the same as in Scenario C. The prediction errors were calculated for the remaining 10 s. RESULTS: The 3D prediction error within 3 mm was 77.3% for PM4D-CBCT , which was 12.8% lower than that for PMCL . Using the diaphragm waveforms, the percentage of errors within 3 mm improved by approximately 7% to 84.0%-85.3% for PMAS-4D-CBCT in Scenarios C and D, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the prediction errors of PM4D-CBCT and PMAS-4D-CBCT . CONCLUSION: PMAS-4D-CBCT outperformed PM4D-CBCT , proving the efficacy of the AS signal-based correction. PMAS-4D-CBCT would make it possible to predict target positions from 4D-CBCT images without gold markers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dynamic tumor motion tracking is used in robotic radiosurgery for targets subject to respiratory motion, such as lung and liver cancers. Different methods of measuring tracking error have been reported, but the differences among these methods have not been studied, and the optimal method is unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare tracking errors encountered with individual patients using different evaluation methods for method optimization. METHODS: We compared the beam's eye view (BEV), machine learning (ML), log (addition error: AE), and log (root sum square: RSS) methods. Log (AE) and log (RSS) were calculated from log files. These tracking errors were compared, and the optimal evaluation method was ascertained. A t-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Here, the significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: The mean values of BEV, log (AE), log (RSS), and ML were 2.87, 3.91, 2.91, and 3.74 mm, respectively. The log (AE) and ML were higher than BEV (p < 0.001), and log (RSS) was equivalent to the BEV, suggesting that the log (RSS) calculated with the log file method can substitute for the BEV calculated with the BEV method. As RSS error calculation is simpler than BEV calculation, using it may improve clinical practice throughput. CONCLUSION: This study clarified differences among three tracking error evaluation methods for dynamic tumor tracking radiotherapy using a robotic radiosurgery system. The log (RSS) calculated by the log file method was found to be the best alternative to BEV method, as it can calculate tracking errors more easily than the BEV method.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose and Aim: The Vero4DRT (Brainlab AG) linear accelerator is capable of dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) by panning/tilting the radiation beam to follow respiratory-induced tumor motion in real time. In this study, the panning/tilting motion is modeled in Monte Carlo (MC) for quality assurance (QA) of four-dimensional (4D) dose distributions created within the treatment planning system (TPS). Materials and Methods: Step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were optimized for 10 previously treated liver patients. These plans were recalculated on multiple phases of a 4D computed tomography (4DCT) scan using MC while modeling panning/tilting. The dose distributions on each phase were accumulated to create a respiratory-weighted 4D dose distribution. Differences between the TPS and MC modeled doses were examined. Results: On average, 4D dose calculations in MC showed the maximum dose of an organ at risk (OAR) to be 10% greater than the TPS' three-dimensional dose calculation (collapsed cone [CC] convolution algorithm) predicted. MC's 4D dose calculations showed that 6 out of 24 OARs could exceed their specified dose limits, and calculated their maximum dose to be 4% higher on average (up to 13%) than the TPS' 4D dose calculations. Dose differences between MC and the TPS were greatest in the beam penumbra region. Conclusion: Modeling panning/tilting for DTT has been successfully modeled with MC and is a useful tool to QA respiratory-correlated 4D dose distributions. The dose differences between the TPS and MC calculations highlight the importance of using 4D MC to confirm the safety of OAR doses before DTT treatments.

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study assesses the impact of intra-fraction motion and PTV margin size on target coverage for patients undergoing radiation treatment of pelvic oligometastases. Dosimetric sparing of the bowel as a function of the PTV margin is also evaluated. Materials and methods: Seven patients with pelvic oligometastases previously treated on our MR-linac (35 Gy in 5 fractions) were included in this study. Retrospective adaptive plans were created for each fraction on the daily MRI datasets using PTV margins of 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm. Dosimetric constraint violations and GTV coverage were measured as a function of PTV margin size. The impact of intra-fraction motion on GTV coverage was assessed by tracking the GTV position on the cine MR images acquired during treatment delivery and creating an intra-fraction dose distribution for each IMRT beam. The intra-fraction dose was accumulated for each fraction to determine the total dose delivered to the target for each PTV size. Results: All OAR constraints were achieved in 85.7%, 94.3%, and 100.0% of fractions when using 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins while scaling to 95% PTV coverage. Compared to plans with a 5 mm PTV margin, there was a 27.4 ± 12.3% (4.0 ± 2.2 Gy) and an 18.5 ± 7.3% (2.7 ± 1.4 Gy) reduction in the bowel D0.5cc dose for 2 mm and 3 mm PTV margins, respectively. The target dose (GTV V35 Gy) was on average 100.0 ± 0.1% (99.6 - 100%), 99.6 ± 1.0% (97.2 - 100%), and 99.0 ± 1.4% (95.0 - 100%), among all fractions for the 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins on the adaptive plans when accounting for intra-fraction motion, respectively. Conclusion: A 2 mm PTV margin achieved a minimum of 95% GTV coverage while reducing the dose to the bowel for all patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) is involved in about 50% of all cancer patients, making it a very important treatment modality. The most common type of RT is external beam RT, which consists of delivering the radiation to the tumor from outside the body. One novel treatment delivery method is volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), where the gantry continuously rotates around the patient during the radiation delivery. PURPOSE: Accurate tumor position monitoring during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumors can help to ensure that the tumor is only irradiated when it is inside the planning target volume. This can maximize tumor control and reduce uncertainty margins, lowering organ-at-risk dose. Conventional tracking methods are prone to errors, or have a low tracking rate, especially for small tumors that are in close vicinity to bony structures. METHODS: We investigated patient-specific deep Siamese networks for real-time tumor tracking, during VMAT. Due to lack of ground truth tumor locations in the kilovoltage (kV) images, each patient-specific model was trained on synthetic data (DRRs), generated from the 4D planning CT scans, and evaluated on clinical data (x-rays). Since there are no annotated datasets with kV images, we evaluated the model on a 3D printed anthropomorphic phantom but also on six patients by computing the correlation coefficient with the breathing-related vertical displacement of the surface-mounted marker (RPM). For each patient/phantom, we used 80% of DRRs for training and 20% for validation. RESULTS: The proposed Siamese model outperformed the conventional benchmark template matching-based method (RTR): (1) when evaluating both methods on the 3D phantom, the Siamese model obtained a 0.57-0.79-mm mean absolute distance to the ground truth tumor locations, compared to 1.04-1.56 mm obtained by RTR; (2) on patient data, the Siamese-determined longitudinal tumor position had a correlation coefficient of 0.71-0.98 with the RPM, compared to 0.07-0.85 for RTR; (3) the Siamese model had a 100% tracking rate, compared to 62%-82% for RTR. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we argue that Siamese-based real-time 2D markerless tumor tracking during radiation delivery is possible. Further investigation and development of 3D tracking is warranted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and purpose: Radiotherapy is commonly chosen to treat thoracic and abdominal cancers. However, irradiating mobile tumors accurately is extremely complex due to the organs' breathing-related movements. Different methods have been studied and developed to treat mobile tumors properly. The combination of X-ray projection acquisition and implanted markers is used to locate the tumor in two dimensions (2D) but does not provide three-dimensional (3D) information. The aim of this work is to reconstruct a high-quality 3D computed tomography (3D-CT) image based on a single X-ray projection to locate the tumor in 3D without the need for implanted markers. Materials and Methods: Nine patients treated for a lung or liver cancer in radiotherapy were studied. For each patient, a data augmentation tool was used to create 500 new 3D-CT images from the planning four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). For each 3D-CT, the corresponding digitally reconstructed radiograph was generated, and the 500 2D images were input into a convolutional neural network that then learned to reconstruct the 3D-CT. The dice score coefficient, normalized root mean squared error and difference between the ground-truth and the predicted 3D-CT images were computed and used as metrics. Results: Metrics' averages across all patients were 85.5% and 96.2% for the gross target volume, 0.04 and 0.45 Hounsfield unit (HU), respectively. Conclusions: The proposed method allows reconstruction of a 3D-CT image from a single digitally reconstructed radiograph that could be used in real-time for better tumor localization and improved treatment of mobile tumors without the need for implanted markers.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of megavoltage (MV) scatter on the accuracy of markerless tumor tracking (MTT) for lung tumors using dual energy (DE) imaging and to consider a post-processing technique to mitigate the effects of MV scatter on DE-MTT. METHODS: A Varian TrueBeam linac was used to acquire a series of interleaved 60/120 kVp images of a motion phantom with simulated tumors (10 and 15 mm diameter). Two sets of consecutive high/low energy projections were acquired, with and without MV beam delivery. The MV field sizes (FS) ranged from 2 × 2 cm2 -6 × 6 cm2 in steps of 1 × 1 cm2 . Weighted logarithmic subtraction was performed on sequential images to produce soft-tissue images for kV only (DEkV ) and kV with MV beam on (DEkV+MV ). Wavelet and fast Fourier transformation filtering (wavelet-FFT) was used to remove stripe noise introduced by MV scatter in the DE images ( DE kV + MV Corr ${\rm{DE}}_{{\rm{kV}} + {\rm{MV}}}^{{\rm{Corr}}}$ ). A template-based matching algorithm was then used to track the target on DEkV, DEkV+MV , and DE kV + MV Corr ${\rm{DE}}_{{\rm{kV}} + {\rm{MV}}}^{{\rm{Corr}}}$ images. Tracking accuracy was evaluated using the tracking success rate (TSR) and mean absolute error (MAE). RESULTS: For the 10 and 15 mm targets, the TSR for DEkV images was 98.7% and 100%, and MAE was 0.53 and 0.42 mm, respectively. For the 10 mm target, the TSR, including the effects of MV scatter, ranged from 86.5% (2 × 2 cm2 ) to 69.4% (6 × 6 cm2 ), while the MAE ranged from 2.05 mm to 4.04 mm. The application of wavelet-FFT algorithm to remove stripe noise ( DE kV + MV Corr ${\rm{DE}}_{{\rm{kV}} + {\rm{MV}}}^{{\rm{Corr}}}$ ) resulted in TSR values of 96.9% (2 × 2 cm2 ) to 93.4% (6 × 6 cm2 ) and subsequent MAE values were 0.89 mm to 1.37 mm. Similar trends were observed for the 15 mm target. CONCLUSION: MV scatter significantly impacts the tracking accuracy of lung tumors using DE images. Wavelet-FFT filtering can improve the accuracy of DE-MTT during treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Internal tumor motion is commonly predicted using external respiratory signals. However, the internal/external correlation is complex and patient-specific. The purpose of this study was to develop various models based on the radiomic features of computed tomography (CT) images to predict the accuracy of tumor motion tracking using external surrogates and to find accurate and reliable tracking algorithms. Methods: Images obtained from a total of 108 and 71 patients pathologically diagnosed with lung and liver cancers, respectively, were examined. Real-time position monitoring motion was fitted to tumor motion, and samples with fitting errors greater than 2 mm were considered positive. Radiomic features were extracted from internal target volumes of average intensity projections, and cross-validation least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LassoCV) was used to conduct feature selection. Based on the radiomic features, a total of 26 separate models (13 for the lung and 13 for the liver) were trained and tested. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to assess performance. Relative standard deviation was used to assess stability. Results: Thirty-three and 22 radiomic features were selected for the lung and liver, respectively. For the lung, the AUC varied from 0.848 (decision tree) to 0.941 [support vector classifier (SVC), logistic regression]; sensitivity varied from 0.723 (extreme gradient boosting) to 0.848 [linear support vector classifier (linearSVC)]; specificity varied from 0.834 (gaussian naive bayes) to 0.936 [multilayer perceptron (MLP), wide and deep (W&D)]; and MLP and W&D had better performance and stability than the median. For the liver, the AUC varied from 0.677 [light gradient boosting machine (Light)] to 0.892 (logistic regression); sensitivity varied from 0.717 (W&D) to 0.862 (MLP); specificity varied from 0.566 (Light) to 0.829 (linearSVC); and logistic regression, MLP, and SVC had better performance and stability than the median. Conclusions: Respiratory-sensitive radiomic features extracted from CT images of lung and liver tumors were proved to contain sufficient information to establish an external/internal motion relationship. We developed a rapid and accurate method based on radiomics to classify the accuracy of monitoring a patient's external surface for lung and liver tumor tracking. Several machine learning algorithms-in particular, MLP-demonstrated excellent classification performance and stability.