RESUMEN
Background: There is limited information on the performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SNPT) and rifampicin resistance (RR) in the same-day diagnosis approach. The effects of sputum quality and other factors affecting the Xpert performance are also under-investigated. Objective: This study aimed to determine the performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF test for detection of SNPT and RR in the same-day diagnosis strategy and the effect of sputum quality and other factors on its performance. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2017 to January 2018 across 16 health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Two spot sputum samples were collected from 418 presumptive SNPT patients, tested with Xpert® MTB/RIF, then compared to tuberculosis culture. Additionally, culture isolates were tested for RR by BACTEC MGIT™ 960 drug susceptibility testing (DST) and MTBDRplus version 2. Results: The Xpert® MTB/RIF test detected 24 (5.7%) SNPT cases, with a sensitivity of 92.3% (75.9% - 97.9%) and specificity of 99.2% (97.8% - 99.7%) compared with tuberculosis culture. Xpert® MTB/RIF also detected three (11.58%) RR strains with 100.0% concordance with BACTEC MGIT™ 960 DST and MTBDRplus results. Three blood-stained SNPT samples were positive by Xpert (30.0%), which was 6.9 times higher compared to salivary sputum (odds ratio: 6.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.36-34.96, p = 0.020). Conclusion: The performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF to detect SNPT and RR in same-day diagnosis is high. However, SNPT positivity varies among sputum qualities, and good sample collection is necessary for better test performance.
RESUMEN
Background: Microorganisms of tuberculosis (TB) are frequently difficult to identify from the airway specimen; therefore, lung biopsy for further histologic and microbiologic study is required. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) is used for the diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy, but is rarely in the TB population. The purpose of this study was to verify the effectiveness and safety of EBUS-TBB with histologic study and tissue culture in the diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB. Methods: Patients who underwent EBUS-TBB with histologic study and TB tissue culture for clinically suspected, but sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB from January 2016 to December 2018, were included. The accuracy of each diagnostic modality was calculated, respectively. Factors that might influence the positive rate of TB culture (washing fluid and tissue specimen) were also evaluated. Results: One hundred sixty-one patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for clinically suspected, but sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB, were enrolled, and 43 of them were finally diagnosed as having pulmonary TB. The sensitivity of washing fluid (a combination of smear, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for TB) and tissue specimen (a combination of pathology and tissue culture) via EBUS-TBB for TB diagnosis were 48.8 and 55.8%, respectively. The sensitivity for TB diagnosis would be elevated to 67.4% when both washing fluid and tissue specimens are used. The positive TB culture rate would not statistically increase with a combination of tissue specimens and washing fluid. Univariate analysis revealed that TB microorganisms would be more easily cultivated when lesions had an abscess or cavity on the computed tomography (CT) image (presence vs. absence; 62.5 vs. 26.3%, p = 0.022), heterogeneous echogenicity on the EBUS finding (heterogeneous vs. homogeneous; 93.3 vs. 21.4%, p = 0.001), or a necrotic pattern via histologic study (presence vs. absence; 70.6 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.013). Heterogeneous echogenicity in the EBUS finding was the independent predictor according to the results of multivariate analysis. None of our patients encountered major adverse events or received further intensive care after EBUS-TBB. Conclusion: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy is safe and effective for use in diagnosing sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB. EBUS echoic feature is also a predictor of the positive TB culture rate in pulmonary TB. However, tissue culture via EBUS-TBB has little effect in improving the positive TB culture rate.
RESUMEN
To assess the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting epididymal tuberculosis. METHODS: We analyzed 84 samples from patients with suspected epididymal TB or chronic epididymitis who received surgical treatment (epididymal resection or epididymis-testicular resection) at our hospital between July 1, 2016 and July 1, 2020. A composite reference standard (CRS) was used in this study. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for epididymal TB and compared its diagnostic accuracy with that of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture test in detecting epididymal TB. RESULTS: Three patients were excluded because of incomplete data. Comparing with the composite reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for epididymal TB were 80.95% (69.09-89.75%); 94.44% (72.71-99.86%); 98.08% (89.74-99.95%); and 58.62% (38.94-76.48%), respectively, with an AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.94). The diagnostic sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay was significantly higher than that of the MTB culture test for epididymal TB. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the Xpert MTB/RIF assay as a diagnostic method for the detection of epididymal TB.
Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Epidídimo , Humanos , Masculino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Esputo/microbiología , Tuberculosis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
A retrospective review of liquid mycobacterial cultures was performed at a laboratory in South Africa from 01 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 to assess the increased yield in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex following sample re-decontamination. Only 9 of 99 (9%) re-decontaminated samples were culture positive for M. tuberculosis complex. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, concurrently performed on 7 of the 9 samples, detected M. tuberculosis complex in all but 1 sample. Re-decontamination of non-sterile samples did not increase the M. tuberculosis complex yield enough to offset the financial costs and additional labour in a laboratory that utilises the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra system as a first-line diagnostic modality.
RESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate the performence of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 on detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance for pneumoconiosis-associated tuberculosis patients. Methods: The recruited 133 suspected active pneumoconiosis-associated tuberculosis hospitalized cases, morning sputum samples were collected to do modified L-J culture, conventional proportion method drug susceptibility test, GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960. Analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the 133 sputum from patients, the positive rates of patients with tuberculosis in GeneXpert MTB/RIF test, BACTEC-MGIT 960 and modified L-J culture were 37.59%, 34.59% and 30.08% respectively. There was no significant difference among the three tests respectively (P>0.05) . According to the modified L-J culture, the sensitivity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 in detecting tuberculosis were 92.5% and 95.0% respectively, and specificity in rifampicin resistance were 86.0% and 91.4% respectively. There was no significant difference between GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 (P>0.05) . According to conventional proportion method drug susceptibility test, the sensitivity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 in detecting rifampicin resistance were 90.0% and 100%, and specificity were 92.6% and 96.4%. There was no significant difference between GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 (P>0.05) . Conclusion: The GeneXpert MTB/RIF has good performence of detecting tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. It has good application value among pneumoconiosis-associated tuberculosis patients.
Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Neumoconiosis/complicaciones , Neumoconiosis/microbiología , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Humanos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Rifampin , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , EsputoRESUMEN
Objective@#To evaluate the performence of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 on detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance for pneumoconiosis-associated tuberculosis patients.@*Methods@#The recruited 133 suspected active pneumoconiosis-associated tuberculosis hospitalized cases, morning sputum samples were collected to do modified L-J culture, conventional proportion method drug susceptibility test, GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960. Analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the 133 sputum from patients, the positive rates of patients with tuberculosis in GeneXpert MTB/RIF test, BACTEC-MGIT 960 and modified L-J culture were 37.59%, 34.59% and 30.08% respectively. There was no significant difference among the three tests respectively (P>0.05) . According to the modified L-J culture, the sensitivity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 in detecting tuberculosis were 92.5% and 95.0% respectively, and specificity in rifampicin resistance were 86.0% and 91.4% respectively. There was no significant difference between GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 (P>0.05) . According to conventional proportion method drug susceptibility test, the sensitivity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 in detecting rifampicin resistance were 90.0% and 100%, and specificity were 92.6% and 96.4%. There was no significant difference between GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC-MGIT 960 (P>0.05) .@*Conclusion@#The GeneXpert MTB/RIF has good performence of detecting tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. It has good application value among pneumoconiosis-associated tuberculosis patients.
RESUMEN
Methods used for the laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis are continually evolving in order to achieve more rapid, less expensive, and accurate results. Acid-fast staining and culture for mycobacteria remain at the core of any diagnostic algorithm. Following growth in culture, molecular technologies such as nucleic acid hybridization probes, MALDI-TOF MS, and DNA sequencing may be used for definitive species identification. Nucleic acid amplification methods allow for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex within respiratory specimens without relying on culture growth, leading to more rapid diagnoses and appropriate patient care.
RESUMEN
Tuberculosis is a global health problem which has been compounded by the emergence and rapid spread of drug resistant strains. Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis usually requires homogenization of cultures using 3-5mm glass beads. In resource limited settings, these important material may either not be readily available in the country as in our case requiring that one orders them from abroad or they may be too expensive. In both situations, this would impact on the usually lean budget. In our centre were we recently introduced tuberculosis culture and drug susceptibility testing using the Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility (MODS) technique, we successfully used glass fragments from a broken car windshield obtained from a mechanic workshop to homogenize solid cultures to prepare positive controls. All cultures homogenized with these local beads gave consistent MODS results. The challenge of the limited availability of resources for research in resource limited settings can be met by adapting available materials to achieve results.
RESUMEN
La tuberculosis continúa siendo un problema de salud pública en el mundo, principalmente en los países en vía de desarrollo, donde ocurre el 95% de los casos. Estos países no tienen fácil acceso a los métodos de diagnóstico rápido actualmente disponibles, debido al alto costo que tienen. Por tanto, se hace necesario el desarrollo de técnicas rápidas de más bajo costo que sean accesibles a estas regiones. Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo comparar un medio de cultivo rápido y de bajo costo, el agar de capa delgada (CD7H11), con el medio de Lowenstein-Jensen. Para esto se procesaron 1.809 muestras clínicas de pacientes con diagnóstico presuntivo de tuberculosis y que requirieron cultivo. Las muestras se procesaron según los métodos estándar recomendados y se sembraron en ambos medios de cultivo. Se comparó la rapidez para la detección de cultivos positivos y la sensibilidad, la especificidad, los valores predictivos (VPP y VPN) y la concordancia de CD7H11 con respecto al método de referencia. CD7H11 mostró una sensibilidad del 73,5% (IC95%:69,6-80,4) y una especificidad del 99,2% (IC95%: 98,8-99,6), valor predictivo positivo de 90,4% (IC95%: 85,3-95,6) y valor predictivo negativo de 97,6% (IC95%: 96,8-98,3). La concordancia entre los dos métodos fue de 0,52 (coeficiente kappa). CD7H11 tuvo un tiempo promedio para la detección de las micobacterias de 11 días (DE±4,9), frente a 26,5 (DE±8.6) días del LJ. Se obtuvieron resultados similares al comparar las muestras pulmonares y multibacilares. CD7H11 mostró una sensibilidad menor en muestras extrapulmonares, comparada con las pulmonares (65,8; IC95%: 55,1-76,5 vs. 81,0; IC95%: 72,4-89,7). El uso concomitante de los medios de cultivo aumentó la sensibilidad pues 24,1% de las muestras se detectaron sólo por LJ y 7,1% por CD7H11. El medio de capa delgada demostró ser un método rápido de cultivo para micobacterias que es fácilmente accesible a los sistemas de salud de los países en desarrollo, en ...
Five year experience with thin layer agar medium for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis Tuberculosis represents a public health problem worldwide, mainly in developing countries where 95% of the cases occur. New technologies that support rapid diagnosis are not available in these settings because of high cost. New, rapid, and less expensive techniques are necessary before diagnosis can be improved in these areas. The present work compared the performance of a rapid and costly culture media, thin layer agar (CD7H11), with the traditional Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture method. For this comparison, 1,809 clinical specimens were processed for diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. Clinical samples were processed according to standard procedures and cultured concomitantly in LJ and CD7H11. The times required to obtain an isolate were compared for culture media. Sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), predictive values (PPV, NPV) and agreement (kappa coefficient) were calculated for CD7H11, with LJ serving as the gold standard. CD7H11 showed S to be 73.5% (C.I.95%: 69.6-80.4), Sp to be 99.2% (C.I.95%: 98.8-99.6), PPV 90.4% (C.I.95%: 85.3-95.6) and NPV 97.6% (C.I.95%: 96.8-98.3). Agreement had a kappa coefficient of 0.52. The mean time for CD7H11 was 11 days (SD±4.9) compared with 26.5 (SD±8.6) days for LJ. Similar results were obtained in a comparison of respiratory and multibacillary clinical samples. In extrapulmonary samples and those with lowered bacillus count, CD7H11 demonstrated a lower sensitivity. The concomitant use of both culture media enhanced sensitivity of detection. CD7H11 proved a simple and rapid technique for culturing mycobacteria and can be combined with traditional methods for improving laboratory capability for diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Agar , Medios de Cultivo , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/microbiología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mycobacterial false-positive cultures have rarely been recognized in Korea, even though the rate of false-positive cultures of Mycobaterium tuberculosis has ranged from 0.4% to 4.0%. We estimated the false-positive rates by the review of medical records from whom mycobacterial cultures were requested, retrospeaively, after a bout of false-positive cultures was discovered in specimens treated in a single day. METHODS: Of the total 2,245 specimens, including 337 positive cultures of mycobacteria, during the period of January and June 1999, seventy-two specimens that showed colonies less than or equal to 5 colonies were reviewed, and classified as tuberculosis-likely group, tuberculosis-unlikely group and unclassifiable group by the clinical and radiological evidences, anti-tuberculosis therapy, and microbiological results. RESULTS: Tuberculosis-unlikely group was 21 specimens from 20 patients, and unclassifiable group was five specimens from four patients. So, the false-positive rates were estimated as 0.9- 1.1% of total cultures and 6.2-7.7% of positive cultures, according to excluding or including the unclassifiable group. CONCLUSION: Care should be taken for lowering false-positive mycobacterial cultures. Especially when a culture turned out to be positive with low colony isolates, more careful interpretations should be preceded before reporting the results by the review of medical records and communication with physician in charge.