RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has gained prominence as one of the most effective therapeutic options in unipolar treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, most studies related to the antidepressant action of ketamine used intravenous (IV) or intranasal (IN) administration. The subcutaneous (SC) route of administration is a promising alternative, as it results in plasma levels comparable to IV, causes fewer side effects, and is easier and cheaper to administer than both IV and/or IN routes. METHODS: In this context, we conducted an open-label clinical trial for investigating the efficacy and safety of 8 weekly sessions of SC esketamine in TRD patients (n = 30). RESULTS: At the end of the treatment, a partial response rate of 26.09 %, a response rate of 52.17 % and remission rate of 34.78 % were observed, assessed by Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Moreover, the self-reported depressive symptoms, as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), significantly decreased from the baseline to the final session, and the improvements were sustained throughout the week. Follow-up evaluations (BDI-II) up to the sixth month consistently showed scores lower than the baseline. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size and the drop-out during the follow-up phase may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the absence of a control group necessitates cautious interpretation of causality. CONCLUSIONS: This groundbreaking study, which addresses SC esketamine treatment for TRD, reported promising response and remission rates, as well as sustained antidepressant effects. It highlights the need for further research to improve and expand our knowledge of this innovative, more accessible, and cost-effective therapeutic approach.

RESUMEN

Cerca de um terço das pessoas com transtornos depressivos não modifica seu estado psíquico após o uso de dois ou mais medicamentos, sendo classificadas com depressão resistente ao tratamento. Nessas pessoas, medos intensos podem agravar a depressão, especialmente em cenários ameaçadores como uma pandemia. Portanto, é crucial validar instrumentos psicométricos que facilitem a detecção de reações às pandemias, como a COVID-19, nessa população. O objetivo principal deste estudo é validar a Escala de Medo da COVID-19 em adultos com depressão resistente ao tratamento. Trata-se de um estudo transversal e analítico, realizado em uma instituição psiquiátrica pública no Rio de Janeiro, envolvendo usuários diagnosticados com depressão resistente ao tratamento que atenderam aos critérios de elegibilidade para participar da pesquisa. Foi realizado um cálculo amostral com parâmetros de precisão de 5% e um nível de confiança de 95%, resultando em uma amostra ideal de, no mínimo, 103 indivíduos. O estudo teve uma taxa de adesão de 79,5%, resultando em 140 participantes. A coleta de dados ocorreu de agosto de 2021 a janeiro de 2023, de forma remota, utilizando a Escala de Medo da COVID-19, o Inventário de Depressão de Beck e um questionário sociodemográfico, via formulário on-line. A análise descritiva dos dados foi feita no SPSS®, enquanto a Análise Fatorial Confirmatória foi realizada no software Jeffreys's Amazing Statistics Program (JASP), utilizando o método robusto DWLS, com a colaboração de um psicometrista. Os resultados da validação indicaram que a Escala de Medo da COVID-19 é uma ferramenta confiável e válida para medir o medo da COVID-19 em adultos com depressão resistente ao tratamento, ampliando seu escopo de utilização. A análise estatística revelou que os itens da escala apresentaram boas cargas fatoriais, demonstrando excelente aderência à variável latente. A unidimensionalidade do instrumento foi confirmada, eliminando a possibilidade de dupla saturação. Os resultados mostraram associações significativas entre a depressão severa e o medo intenso da COVID-19 em algumas variáveis sociodemográficas, indicando que certos grupos de usuários com depressão resistente foram mais vulneráveis ao medo da COVID-19 e ao agravamento da depressão durante a pandemia. Além disso, os participantes com medo intenso da COVID-19 apresentaram níveis mais elevados de sintomas depressivos, sugerindo uma interação entre o medo da COVID-19 e a gravidade da depressão. O medo intenso refletiu mentalmente e fisicamente em sintomas de ansiedade e ataques de pânico. Os cuidados de enfermagem pós-pandemia, à luz da Teoria da Maré, podem criar um sistema de suporte que identifica e lida com esses riscos, e pode apoiar e empoderar a pessoa no enfrentamento da depressão de forma proativa. Assim, os resultados desta tese permitem aos enfermeiros fazer a prospecção de ações em saúde mental para estabelecer relações mais significativas e colaborativas com os usuários, facilitando a construção de uma rede de apoio que trabalhe ativamente para reduzir a agravamento da depressão no período pós pandemia.

About one-third of people with depressive disorders do not change their psychological state after using two or more medications, being classified as having treatment-resistant depression. In these individuals, intense fears can exacerbate depression, especially in threatening scenarios such as a pandemic. Therefore, it is crucial to validate psychometric instruments that facilitate the detection of reactions to pandemics, such as COVID-19, in this population. The main objective of this study is to validate the COVID-19 Fear Scale in adults with treatment-resistant depression. This is a cross-sectional and analytical study conducted in a public psychiatric institution in Rio de Janeiro, involving users diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression who met the eligibility criteria to participate in the research. A sample calculation was performed with 5% precision parameters and a 95% confidence level, resulting in an ideal sample of at least 103 individuals. The study had an adherence rate of 79.5%, resulting in 140 participants. Data collection took place from August 2021 to January 2023, remotely, using the COVID-19 Fear Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and a sociodemographic questionnaire via an online form. Descriptive data analysis was done in SPSS®, while Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed in Jeffreys's Amazing Statistics Program (JASP) software, using the robust DWLS method, with the collaboration of a psychometrician. The validation results indicated that the COVID-19 Fear Scale is a reliable and valid tool for measuring fear of COVID-19 in adults with treatment-resistant depression, expanding its scope of use. The statistical analysis revealed that the scale items presented good factor loadings, demonstrating excellent adherence to the latent variable. The unidimensionality of the instrument was confirmed, eliminating the possibility of double saturation. The results showed significant associations between severe depression and intense fear of COVID-19 in some sociodemographic variables, indicating that certain groups of patients with treatment-resistant depression were more vulnerable to fear of COVID-19 and worsening depression during the pandemic. Additionally, participants with intense fear of COVID-19 showed higher levels of depressive symptoms, suggesting an interaction between fear of COVID-19 and the severity of depression. Intense fear manifested mentally and physically in symptoms of anxiety and panic attacks. Post-pandemic nursing care, in light of the Tidal Model, can create a support system that identifies and addresses these risks, and can support and empower individuals to proactively cope with depression. Thus, the results of this thesis allow nurses to prospect mental health actions to establish more meaningful and collaborative relationships with patients, facilitating the construction of a support network that actively works to reduce the worsening of depression in the post-pandemic period.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) presents a significant challenge, affecting approximately 30% of individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder and leading to poor treatment responses. Innovations in digital mental health, especially online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (eMBCT), offer promising avenues for enhancing access to effective mental health care for individuals with TRD in a clinical setting. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of eMBCT in an individual clinical context to decrease depressive symptoms for TRD. Methods: Conducted at the Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, this parallel-arm, randomized controlled feasibility trial involved outpatients diagnosed with TRD, aged 18 and above. Of the 39 outpatients invited, 28 were randomized into two groups: an intervention group receiving the eMBCT program (n = 15) and a control group (n = 13). The intervention, consisting of an 8-week course, was delivered via live video sessions. Following the assessment period, participants in the control group were offered the eMBCT intervention. Assessments using standardized questionnaires were conducted at the start and end of the study. Results: Within the eMBCT group, improvements were observed in depression symptoms (Z = -3.423; p = 0.001; effect size r = 0.78), anxiety symptoms (Z = -3.361; p = 0.001; effect size r = 0.77), with no significant changes in the control group. Comparatively, the eMBCT group showed significant reductions in depression symptoms and improvements in clinical global impressions over the control group (BDI2: U = 30.5; p = 0.015; effect size r = 0.47, CGI1: U = 21.0; p = 0.004; effect size r = 0.56). Conclusion: eMBCT in an individual format combined with medication, appears to be a feasible treatment for TRD, decreasing symptoms of depression. In a future trial the control group may have a manualized intervention. Clinical trial registration: The Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry: (https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-6zndpbv) and RBR-6zndpbv.

RESUMEN

Therapeutics for suicide management is limited, taking weeks to work. This open-label clinical trial with 18 treatment-resistant depressive patients tested subcutaneous esketamine (8 weekly sessions) for suicidality. We noted a rapid and enduring effect of subcutaneous esketamine, lasting from one week to six months post-treatment, assessed by the Beck Inventory for Suicidality (BSI). There was an immediate drop in suicidality, 24 h following the initial dose, which persisted for seven days throughout the eight-week dosing period. Additionally, this study is the first to examine a six-month follow-up after multiple administrations of subcutaneous esketamine, finding consistently lower levels of suicidality throughout this duration. Conversely, suicidality also was measured along the 8-weeks of treatment by a psychiatrist using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which showed significant reduction only after two treatment sessions expanding until the last session. Moreover, notably, 61% of patients achieved remission on suicidality (MADRS). These results suggest that weekly subcutaneous esketamine injections offer a cost-effective approach that induces a rapid and sustained response to anti-suicide treatment. This sets the stage for further, more controlled studies to corroborate our initial observations regarding the effects of SC esketamine on suicidality. Registered trial at: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-1072m6nv.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

There is an increasing demand for effective treatments for depression, particularly for individuals grappling with treatment-resistant depression. Over recent years, a surge of interest has focused on exploring the safety and efficacy of psilocybin as a potential treatment for depression. However, preliminary findings from phase 2 studies have been inconclusive, prompting critical examination of issues such as maintaining blinding and the role of adjunctive psychotherapy. The maintenance of double-blinding and the role of adjunctive psychotherapy introduce biases that complicate the attainment of conclusive results in clinical research. Examining historical data reveals a recurrent pattern linked to the use of psychoactive substances, which starts with an excess of optimism and ends with general addictive behaviors and a heightened risk of serious public health problems. Considering these findings, a cautious and measured approach is imperative, given that the efficacy and safety of psilocybin treatment have yet to be unequivocally established. The potential for excessive optimism among researchers is a notable concern, as unwarranted enthusiasm may inadvertently facilitate the widespread adoption of this treatment without sufficient empirical support. In navigating the complexities of depression treatment, it is necessary to strike a balance between innovation and prudence to ensure evidence-based advancement of therapeutic approaches.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that induces action potentials in the stimulated cortical area and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The prevalence of MDD in Mexico almost tripled after the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we evaluated the safety and therapeutic effects of low-intensity TMS (Li-TMS) - characterized by inducing electric currents below the action potential threshold on the cerebral cortex - in 41 subjects diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A Li-TMS device dispensed repetitive magnetic pulses at 30 mT for 60 minutes during 20 sessions (once daily from Monday to Saturday) with the theta burst pattern. Our results suggest that Li-TMS is a safe therapy with antidepressant effects, demonstrated by the decrease in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores and lessening of depressive symptoms.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown to improve response and remission in patients with treatment resistant depression. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of two bilateral rTMS protocols with different protocols in patients with treatment resistant depression and comorbid severe anxiety. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 67 patients who underwent two different bilateral TMS protocols and who met the specified eligibility criteria was conducted. Group 1 received stimulation with 85% RMT intermittent theta burst (iTBS) in the left DLPFC + 120% RMT (1 Hz) in the right DLPFC. Group 2 received stimulation with 100% RMT (iTBS) in the left DLPFC + 110% RMT (1 Hz) in the left DLPFC. RESULTS: After the magnetic stimulation treatment, 55% (n=22) achieved response to depression symptoms in group 1 and 62% (n=18) in group 2. Remission of depression symptoms was achieved in 13% in group 1 (n=5) and 24% in group 2 (n=7). There were no significant differences between the two protocols after TMS CONCLUSIONS: Different bilateral protocol parameters in individuals undergoing TMS may have an impact on symptom response and remission. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Clozapine, a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA), is considered the gold standard medication to treat patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Despite its efficacy, clozapine is associated with adverse effects, notably neutropenia and agranulocytosis. Other hematological adverse effects are less common. Severe anemia is a rare adverse effect seldom reported in the literature and is typically associated with pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). Nevertheless, the benefits of clozapine in managing TRS make rechallenge a reasonable option. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 35-year-old man with TRS, resistant to previous antipsychotics, who experienced severe anemia during clozapine treatment. An investigation for clozapine-induced anemia revealed PRCA on myelogram. After discontinuing clozapine, the patient's hemoglobin levels recovered. Subsequent treatments with olanzapine, zuclopenthixol, and aripiprazole proved ineffective, leading us to consider a clozapine rechallenge. The rechallenge, monitored for 58 days, resulted in improved psychiatric symptoms and stable hemoglobin levels. The patient remained stable during 6 months of follow-up, with no hematological changes. DISCUSSION: PRCA is a very rare adverse effect of clozapine. The cause of drug-induced PRCA is still unknown; for clozapine, there are no studies. Rechallenge after a severe and rare adverse effect is a complex decision. This case is the first to report a successful clozapine rechallenge following severe anemia without other blood dyscrasias, emphasizing the imperative need for close monitoring during the rechallenge process. Further study is warranted to understand the predictive factors for a successful outcome in clozapine rechallenges.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.764776.].

RESUMEN

Introduction: Depressive Disorders are on the rise worldwide. This is also the case in Latin America (LatAm). Treatment-Resistant Depressive Disorder (TRD) poses additional burden to patients with depression. Impacts quality of life (QoL) and other dimensions, and standard of care (SOC) is insufficient to achieve the desired clinical outcomes. Evidence from LatAm is, however, lacking. The present study was devised as a 1-year follow-up of the SOC in TRD patients in LatAm to explore the burden of TRD. Methods: This was an observational, multinational, longitudinal study. Patients with clinical diagnosis of TRD in LatAm were included in a 1-year follow-up with SOC. Beyond the Sociodemographic characterization, outcome measures were QoL (EQ-5D-5L), disability (Sheehan Disability Scale - SDS), work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Incapacity Questionnaire: depression - WPAI:D) and depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-PHQ9). Patients were assessed every 3-months and comparison was performed based on change from baseline to each visit and end of study (EOS - 12 months). Results: Patients averaged 48 (± 13.12) years, mostly female (80.9%) and married/consensual union (42.5%) or single patients (34.4%). Despite the SOC treatment, three-quarters of the patients remained symptomatic at EOS, regardless of the significant longitudinal decrease (p ≤ 0.001). Similar trends were found for disability (p ≤ 0.001) -82.2% of the patients reporting work/school disruption at EOS-, percentage of work (34%) and activity impairment (40%) at EOS (p ≤ 0.001) and only 29.2% of patients with depressive severity "none" at EOS (p ≤ 0.001). The results portray the need to improve clinical outcomes in this complex and burdensome disease in LatAm. Discussion: Here we show that the burden of TRD remains significant in essential dimensions of everyday life at EOS underlining the need for better therapeutic solutions. The improvements in most patients do not provide the desired outcome of return to the state before the condition. Further research should focus on identifying which treatments provide better outcomes in a real-world context.

RESUMEN

This document constitutes the third and last part of the Third Argentine Consensus on the Management of Bipolar Disorders carried out by the Argentine Association of Biological Psychiatry (AAPB). Continuing with the initial objective, this section of the Consensus on the Management of Bipolar Disorders is focused on the management of bipolar disorders in special populations. This section constitutes a comprehensive review and expert consideration of the scientific evidence on: a) the management of bipolar disorders in treatment-resistant patients; b) the management of bipolar disorder in childhood and adolescence; c) the management of bipolar disorders in women during their perinatal period and, d) the management of bipolar disorders in older adults.

Este documento constituye la tercera y última parte del Tercer Consenso Argentino sobre el Manejo de los Trastornos Bipolares llevada a cabo por la Asociación Argentina de Psiquiatría Biológica (AAPB). Siguiendo con el objetivo propuesto por el comité de expertos, en la actual versión del Consenso sobre el manejo de los trastornos bipolares, esta sección está enfocada al abordaje de los Trastornos Bipolares en situaciones especiales. Esto configura una revisión exhaustiva de la evidencia científica  sobre: a) el manejo de los trastornos bipolares en pacientes resistentes al tratamiento, b) el manejo de los trastornos bipolares en la mujer en el período perinatal, c) el manejo del trastorno bipolar en la etapa infantojuvenil y d) el manejo de los trastornos bipolares en los adultos mayores.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Literature concerning patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) treatment response and patient report outcomes (PROs) -such as QoL or disability- in Argentina is scarce. In the scope of the Treatment-Resistant Depression in America Latina (TRAL) study which previous results highlighted the burden of TRD compared to non-TRD patients as well as essential epidemiological data in the region, this paper reports on the outcomes of Standard-of-Care (SOC) over a 1-year follow-up of TRD patients in the subsample for Argentina. From a sample of 220 MDD patients identified in 5 sites in Argentina, 72 patients were diagnosed with TRD. Exclusion criteria included patients with psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, with severe chemical dependence or currently participating in another clinical trial. MADRS, PHQ-9 and PROs (EQ-5D and SDS) were used as outcomes. Patients' mean age was 54.7 years and 70.3% of the patients were female. Around 61% of the patients achieved a response (reduction of MADRS score ≥ 50%), but over 33% did not achieve a remission (MADRS total score ≤12). Almost 67% of the patients still felt anxious/depressed at the end of the study (EQ-5D), while disruption affected patients in diverse areas -71% in work/school, 69.7% in social life/leisure and 66.6% in their family life/personal responsibilities. The burden of TRD is significant in Argentina, and more effort should be put in the implementation of treatment protocols with better outcomes.

La literatura disponible en relación a la respuesta al tratamiento de los pacientes con Depresión Resistente al Tratamiento (TRD) y los resultados del informe del paciente (PRO) -como la calidad de vida o la discapacidad- es escasa en Argentina. A partir de la submuestra de Argentina del estudio de depresión resistente al tratamiento en América Latina (TRAL), cuyos resultados anteriores destacaron la carga de TRD en comparación con los pacientes sin DRT, así como datos epidemiológicos esenciales en la región, este documento informa sobre los resultados del estándar de atención (Standard-of-Care, SOC) durante un seguimiento de 1 año de pacientes con DRT De una muestra de 220 pacientes con TDM de 5 centros de Argentina, 72 pacientes fueron diagnosticados con DRT. El criterio de exclusión excluyó a los pacientes con psicosis, esquizofrenia, trastorno bipolar, trastorno esquizoafectivo, demencia, dependencia química grave o que estaban participando en otro ensayo clínico. La MADRS, el PHQ-9 y los PRO (EQ-5D y SDS) se utilizaron como resultados. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 54,7 años y el 70,3 % de los pacientes eran mujeres. Alrededor del 61 % de los pacientes lograron una respuesta (reducción del ≥50 % en el puntaje total de MADRS), pero más del 33 %  no logró una remisión (puntuación total MADRS ≤12). Casi el 67 % de los pacientes seguían sintiéndose ansiosos/ deprimidos al final del estudio (EQ-5D), mientras que dicho trastorno afectó a los pacientes en diversas áreas: el 71 % en el trabajo/la escuela, el 69,7 % en la vida social/el tiempo libre y el 66,6 % en su vida familiar/las responsabilidades personales. La carga de la DRT es significativa en Argentina, y se debe hacer más esfuerzo en la implementación de protocolos de tratamiento con mejores resultados.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been studied as a biomarker of major depressive disorder (MDD). Besides diagnostic biomarkers, clinically useful biomarkers can inform response to treatment. We aimed to review all studies that sought to relate BDNF baseline levels, or BDNF polymorphisms, with response to treatment in MDD. In order to achieve this, we performed a systematic review of studies that explored the relation of BDNF with both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. Finally, we reviewed the evidence that relates peripheral levels of BDNF and BDNF polymorphisms with the development and management of treatment-resistant depression.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Depression is one of the main public health problems in the world, having a high prevalence and being considered the main cause of disability. An important portion of patients does not respond to treatment with the initial trial of conventional antidepressants in the current depressive episode of moderate to severe intensity, which characterizes treatment-resistant depression. In this context, non-invasive neuromodulation procedures use an electric current or magnetic field to modulate the central nervous system, and they represent a new option for patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Diabetic patients are more affected by depression than non-diabetics, and this is related to greater treatment resistance and associated with poorer outcomes. This increase in the prevalence of depression in diabetics is also related to hyperglycemia and hypercortisolism. In diabetics, the hyperactivity of the HPA axis occurs in parallel to gut dysbiosis, weakness of the intestinal permeability barrier, and high bacterial-product translocation into the bloodstream. Diabetes also induces an increase in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression in the hippocampus. Furthermore, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced depression behaviors and neuroinflammation are exacerbated in diabetic mice. In this context, we propose here that hypercortisolism, in association with gut dysbiosis, leads to an exacerbation of hippocampal neuroinflammation, glutamatergic transmission, and neuronal apoptosis, leading to the development and aggravation of depression and to resistance to treatment of this mood disorder in diabetic patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and correlates of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, an electronic search was performed in PubMed and Embase through May 17, 2022. All study designs that assessed a minimum of 20 schizophrenia-spectrum patients and provided data on TRS prevalence or allowed its calculation were included. Estimates were produced using a random-effects model meta-analysis. Results: The TRS prevalence across 50 studies (n = 29,390) was 36.7% (95%CI 33.1-40.5, p < 0.0001). The prevalence ranged from 22% (95%CI 18.4-25.8) in first-episode to 39.5% (95%CI 32.2-47.0) in multiple-episode samples (Q = 18.27, p < 0.0001). Primary treatment resistance, defined as no response from the first episode, was 23.6% (95%CI 20.5-26.8) vs. 9.3% (95%CI 6.8-12.2) for later-onset/secondary (≥ 6 months after initial treatment response). Longer illness duration and recruitment from long-term hospitals or clozapine clinics were associated with higher prevalence estimates. In meta-regression analyses, older age and poor functioning predicted greater TRS. When including only studies with lower bias risk, the TRS prevalence was 28.4%. Conclusion: Different study designs and recruitment strategies accounted for most of the observed heterogeneity in TRS prevalence rates. The results point to early-onset and later-onset TRS as two separate disease pathways requiring clinical attention. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42018092033.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and correlates of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, an electronic search was performed in PubMed and Embase through May 17, 2022. All study designs that assessed a minimum of 20 schizophrenia-spectrum patients and provided data on TRS prevalence or allowed its calculation were included. Estimates were produced using a random-effects model meta-analysis. RESULTS: The TRS prevalence across 50 studies (n = 29,390) was 36.7% (95%CI 33.1-40.5, p < 0.0001). The prevalence ranged from 22% (95%CI 18.4-25.8) in first-episode to 39.5% (95%CI 32.2-47.0) in multiple-episode samples (Q = 18.27, p < 0.0001). Primary treatment resistance, defined as no response from the first episode, was 23.6% (95%CI 20.5-26.8) vs. 9.3% (95%CI 6.8-12.2) for later-onset/secondary (≥ 6 months after initial treatment response). Longer illness duration and recruitment from long-term hospitals or clozapine clinics were associated with higher prevalence estimates. In meta-regression analyses, older age and poor functioning predicted greater TRS. When including only studies with lower bias risk, the TRS prevalence was 28.4%. CONCLUSION: Different study designs and recruitment strategies accounted for most of the observed heterogeneity in TRS prevalence rates. The results point to early-onset and later-onset TRS as two separate disease pathways requiring clinical attention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Traditional psychedelics, such as LSD, psilocybin, or DMT, are psychoactive compounds that exert their effects mainly through agonism over serotonergic receptors. In appropriate doses and contexts, they produce profound changes in the subjective experience, configuring altered states of consciousness that, upon reaching a critical point, involve the appearance of phenomena of mystical, transcendental, or ego dissolution experiences. These events are associated with diverse therapeutic effects in several mental conditions. Psychedelics are safe substances, with minimal risk of serious or long-lasting adverse effects and without addictive potential. Current evidence comes from systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on phase II clinical studies, with small groups of subjects, strict exclusion criteria, and difficulties in applying the double-blind methodology. Worldwide there is a growing number of clinical trials, which seek to promote the approval of psychedelic-assisted therapies as therapeutic tools in the coming years. In this bibliographic review, we will address the phenomenological characteristics of the psychedelic experience, its potential therapeutic uses, and the mechanisms that underlie them.

Los psicodélicos tradicionales, como el LSD, la psilocibina, o el DMT, son compuestos psicoactivos que ejercen sus efectos, principalmente, a través del agonismo sobre receptores serotoninérgicos. En dosis y contextos adecuados, se caracterizan por producir cambios profundos en la experiencia subjetiva, configurando estados alterados de consciencia que al alcanzar un punto crítico implican la aparición de fenómenos que se agrupan dentro de la categoría de experiencia mística, trascendental o de disolución yoica. Estos eventos se asocian a diversos efectos terapéuticos en una variedad de padecimientos mentales. Los psicodélicos son drogas seguras, con mínimo riesgo de efectos adversos graves o duraderos y sin potencial adictivo. Por el momento, contamos con revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis basados en estudios clínicos de fase II, con grupos pequeños de personas, criterios de exclusión estrictos y marcada dificultad para aplicar metodología de doble ciego. Actualmente, existen en desarrollo un creciente número de ensayos clínicos alrededor del mundo, que buscan propiciar la aprobación de las terapias asistidas por psicodélicos como herramientas terapéuticas en los próximos años. En esta revisión bibliográfica abordaremos las características fenomenológicas de la experiencia psicodélica, sus potenciales usos terapéuticos y los mecanismos que los subyacen.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Depression is one of the most prevalent mental health disorders globally, causing severe emotional suffering, reducing life expectancy and increasing the risk of suicide. Recently, the use of dissociative psychedelic substances such as ketamine and esketamine for depressive disorders has expanded treatment options. We sought to analyze, through a systematic review, the existing protocols for the treatment of depression with ketamine and esketamine. The search adopted PRISMA criteria and was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases. Procedures in each study were compared, focusing on the sample recruited, therapeutic approaches, including the clinical team and professionals engaged in treatment, medical procedures, description of the setting (including music) and factors such as specific medication (ketamine or esketamine), route of administration and dosage employed. Results indicated the predominance of a medical approach, with a limited number of studies on ketamine assisted psychotherapy (KAP) and other modalities of psychedelic assisted therapy. Additionally, there is limited information on psychosocial elements such as preparation, psychological support during session and integration of experience. Altogether these findings suggest that treatment of depression with ketamine or esketamine diverges in relation to the practices employed with psychedelic substances. This is discussed considering future research directions in the field.

RESUMEN

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD), characterized by the failure to achieve symptomatic remission despite multiple pharmacotherapeutic treatments, poses a significant challenge for clinicians. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective but limited option due to its cognitive side effects. In this context, magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has emerged as a promising alternative, offering comparable antidepressant efficacy with better cognitive outcomes. However, the clinical outcomes and cognitive effects of MST require further investigation. This double-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority study aims to compare the efficacy, tolerability, cognitive adverse effects, and neurophysiological biomarkers of MST with bilateral ECT (BT ECT) in patients with TRD. This study will employ multimodal nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and serum neurotrophic markers to gain insight into the neurobiological basis of seizure therapy. Additionally, neurophysiological biomarkers will be evaluated as secondary outcomes to predict the antidepressant and cognitive effects of both techniques. The study design, recruitment methods, ethical considerations, eligibility criteria, interventions, and blinding procedures are described. The expected outcomes will advance the field by offering a potential alternative to ECT with improved cognitive outcomes and a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of depression and antidepressant therapies.