RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 outbreak rapidly spread since early 2020 leading to the implementation of nationwide lockdowns. To cope with this sudden change, management guidelines were quickly published to adapt oncological care, with potential impact on cancer outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study to assess the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 on cancer outcomes in metastatic patients. Two cohorts of metastatic patients receiving intravenous (iv) therapy in a French oncological day care hospital were assessed: a 2020 cohort during the first French lockdown, and a 2018 historical cohort before the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a propensity score analysis to match patients from the two cohorts. After one-year follow-up, we compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between cohorts. Adaptations of medical oncological treatments in 2020 were also analysed. RESULTS: The 376 patients of the 2020 cohort were matched with 376 of the 2018 cohort. No SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in the 2020 cohort. The adjusted PFS was significantly shorter in 2020 compared to 2018 (HR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03-1.46), as well as among patients without treatment adaptation compared to matched patients of the 2018 cohort (HR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.10-1.61). We did not observe any significant difference of PFS among the group with treatment adaptations. OS was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Metastatic cancer patients treated during the first lockdown had a higher risk of disease progression 1 year after COVID-19 outbreak. However, oncological treatment adaptations or SARS-CoV-2 infections do not explain these results. A longer follow-up is needed to observe the impact on OS.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There are limited real-world data on the effectiveness of strategies used to manage adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with axitinib. This retrospective chart review examined the AE profile and effect of axitinib modifications on AE resolution/improvement and treatment discontinuation. METHODS: A retrospective physician-administered chart review was conducted. Adult patients with advanced RCC treated with first-line axitinib plus checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy (ie, avelumab or pembrolizumab) and who had documented frequently reported axitinib-related AEs of fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, hypertension, or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were included. Physician characteristics, patient characteristics, AE characteristics, AE management strategies used, AE resolution/improvement, and treatment duration were described. The effect of strategies used to manage AEs (axitinib dose reduction or treatment interruption) on AE resolution/improvement was evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 219 patients (median age: 62 years, 65% male), 70 (32%) were treated with axitinib + avelumab and 149 (68%) received axitinib + pembrolizumab. Axitinib modifications increased the likelihood of AE resolution/improvement compared with no modifications (adjusted odds ratio: 6.34, P < .001). In the subset of patients who discontinued treatment among those with or without axitinib modifications, mean treatment duration was 7.0 and 1.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Toxicities experienced by patients with advanced RCC treated with first-line axitinib-CPI in the real world can be effectively managed by axitinib modifications, thereby prolonging treatment duration. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04682587).

Asunto(s)

Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Axitinib/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diarrea/inducido químicamente

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In addition to clinical trials, real-world data is needed to verify the effectiveness of the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. The primary aim was to examine real-world variation in treatment modification strategies for neutropenia and its relation to progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary aim was to assess if there is a gap between real-world and clinical trial outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study 229 patients were analyzed who started palbociclib and fulvestrant as second- or later-line therapy for HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the Santeon hospital group in the Netherlands between September 2016 and December 2019. Data were manually retrieved from patients' electronic medical records. PFS was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare neutropenia-related treatment modification strategies within the first three months after neutropenia grade 3 - 4 occurred, as well as patients' eligibility to have participated in the PALOMA-3 clinical trial or not. RESULTS: Even though treatment modification strategies differed from those in PALOMA-3 (dose interruptions: 26 vs 54%, cycle delays: 54 vs 36%, and dose reductions: 39 vs 34%), these did not influence PFS. Patients who were PALOMA-3 ineligible experienced a shorter median PFS than those who were eligible (10.2 vs. 14.1 months; HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.12 - 2.07). An overall longer median PFS was found compared to PALOMA-3 (11.6 vs. 9.5 months; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54 - 0.90). CONCLUSION: This study suggests no impact of neutropenia-related treatment modifications on PFS and confirms inferior outcomes outside clinical trial eligibility.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama , Neutropenia , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Receptor ErbB-2 , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following evidence from randomized controlled trials, patients with bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis receive long-term azithromycin to reduce acute respiratory exacerbations. However, the period when azithromycin is effective and which patients are likely to most benefit remain unknown. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: (i) What is the period after its commencement when azithromycin is most effective? and (ii) Which factors may modify azithromycin effects? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of our previous randomized controlled trial involving 89 indigenous children with bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis. Semi-parametric Poisson regression identified the azithromycin efficacy period. Multivariable Poisson regression identified factors that modify azithromycin effect. RESULTS: Azithromycin was associated with fewer exacerbations per child-week during weeks 4 through 96, with the most effective period observed between weeks 17 and 62. Eleven factors were associated with different azithromycin effects; four were significant at the P < .05 level. Compared with their counterparts, higher reduction in exacerbations was observed in children with nasopharyngeal carriage of bacterial pathogens (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.57-1.14] vs 0.29 [0.20-0.44]; P < .001); New Zealand children (IRR = 0.73 [0.51-1.03] vs 0.39 [0.28-0.55]; P = .012); and those with higher weight-for-height z scores (interaction IRR = 0.82 [0.67-0.99]; P = .044). Compared with their counterparts, lower reduction was observed in those born preterm (IRR = 0.41 [0.30-0.55] vs 0.74 [0.49-1.10]; P = .012). INTERPRETATION: Regular azithromycin is best used for at least 17 weeks and up to 62 weeks, as these periods provide maximum benefit for indigenous children with bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis. Several factors modified azithromycin benefits; however, these traits need confirmation in larger studies before being adopted into clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12610000383066.

Asunto(s)

Bronquiectasia , Fibrosis Quística , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Bronquiectasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquiectasia/complicaciones , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego

RESUMEN

A 59-year-old man with relapsed pulmonary TB developed rifampin resistance. He presented with chronic untreated hepatitis B, which developed into liver cirrhosis, type 2 diabetes with diabetic retinopathy, and osteoarthritis of right knee. His initial MDR regimen included levofloxacin, cycloserine, bedaquiline, linezolid, and high-dose isoniazid. He developed episodes of linezolid-induced myelosuppression, resulting in temporary discontinuation and dose reduction, and ultimately, substitution of linezolid. On the seventh month of treatment, he developed severe depression with visual hallucination, resulting in cycloserine dose reduction. We maintained the principle of at least 4 active drugs throughout his treatment. He was considered cured after 26 months of treatment.

RESUMEN

Suicide is among the leading causes of death for adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Given a paucity of evidence-based interventions tailored for psychosis, we sought to modify a promising Cognitive-Behavioral Suicide Prevention for psychosis (CBSPp) treatment for adults in US community mental health (CMH) settings using community-based participatory research methods. This article presents our modification methodology, stakeholder data and scholarly expert input, and CBSPp adaptations prior to future intervention testing. Stakeholder data (n = 25) were collected from clients, providers, and peer advocates in a CMH setting in Michigan. Findings were subsequently presented to a panel of scholarly experts in the fields of suicide and psychosis research, intervention research, and implementation science for input. Emerging themes from stakeholders include logistic, perceptual, and clinical challenges in the process of introducing this treatment in a CMH setting. Consistent with literature, buy-in and support for the delivery of a new treatment emerged as important factors in modifying and implementing CBSPp. A final modification list is presented in this paper and collaborations among stakeholders, researchers, and scholarly experts are essential to navigate psychosocial treatment innovation barriers with an overall goal of improving access, feasibility, and quality of this suicide prevention treatment.

Asunto(s)

Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Prevención del Suicidio , Adulto , Cognición , Humanos , Salud Mental , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Esquizofrenia/terapia

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines do not recommend FDG-PET CT for the staging of MIBC as a standard. The objectives of the study are to assess the accuracy of the FDG-PET CT for LN staging and to determine the rate of treatment modification according to FDG-PET CT results in MIBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2017, we carried out a retrospective analysis of patients with MIBC who had a FDG-PET CT for staging in two expert centres in Bordeaux, France, and analyzed its clinical value in this setting. Nodal and metastatic staging on CT scan (CT) and FDG-PET CT were done independently. RESULTS: Accuracy of LN staging from CT and FDG-PET CT at initial diagnosis was analyzed in 85 patients (including 70 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)) and compared to pathological examination of resected LN. Sensitivity of FDG-PET CT was better than CT (80.8% versus 26.9%) but the specificity was low (54.2% vs. 83.1%). The Youden index was better for FDG-PET CT (0.35; 0.1 for CT) and FDG-PET CT appeared to be more accurate for determining LN staging of MIBC. FDG-PET CT findings enabled a treatment decision modification in 34/130 patients (26.1%): a therapeutic intensification (9.2%), including surgery not previously planned and/or modified fields of radiotherapy; or a de-escalation (16.9%), mostly avoiding surgery. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET CT was more sensitive for detection of LN involvement at initial diagnosis of MIBC than CT alone. In our study, treatment decisions were modified, according to FDG-PET CT results, in almost a quarter of patients.

Asunto(s)

Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Músculos/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiofármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To define patterns of prescription and factors associated with choice of pharmacotherapy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), namely metformin, glyburide and insulin, during a period of evolving professional guidelines. DESING: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: US commercial insurance beneficiaries from Market-Scan (late 2015 to 2018). STUDY DESIGN: We included women with GDM, singleton gestations, 15-51 years of age on pharmacotherapy. The exposure was pharmacy claims for metformin, glyburide and insulin. MAIN OUTCOMES: Pharmacotherapy for GDM with either oral agent, metformin or glyburide, compared with insulin as the reference, and secondarily, consequent treatment modification (addition and/or change) to metformin, glyburide or insulin. RESULTS: Among 37 762 women with GDM, we analysed data from 10 407 (28%) with pharmacotherapy, 21% with metformin (n = 2147), 48% with glyburide (n = 4984) and 31% with insulin (n = 3276). From late 2015 to 2018, metformin use increased from 17 to 29%, as did insulin use from 26 to 44%, whereas glyburide use decreased from 58 to 27%. By 2018, insulin was the most common pharmacotherapy for GDM; metformin was more likely to be prescribed by 9% compared with late 2015/16, but glyburide was less likely by 45%. Treatment modification occurred in 20% of women prescribed metformin compared with 2% with insulin and 8% with glyburide. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin followed by metformin has replaced glyburide as the most common pharmacotherapy for GDM among a privately insured US population during a time of evolving professional guidelines. Further evaluation of the relative effectiveness and safety of metformin compared with insulin is needed. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Insulin followed by metformin has replaced glyburide as the most common pharmacotherapy for gestational diabetes mellitus in the USA.

Asunto(s)

Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Gliburida/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple changes to the provision of cancer care has been introduced to maximize patient safety and protect staff. We aimed to identify factors influencing clinicians' decision on treatment modification during the initial phase of the pandemic, and to assess its impact on outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Electronic records of patients seen in a large United Kingdom tertiary cancer center was reviewed. The frequency and type of changes to systemic anticancer therapy , as well as the factors predicting clinicians' decision were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients; mean age 63 ± 12 years and 57% male were included. More than half of the patients had modification to their treatment; with treatment delay (21%) or cancellation (10%), being the most common. Majority of patients on neoadjuvant treatment (97%) proceeded with treatment, with some form of treatment modification in 20%. Half of patients on adjuvant treatment had their treatment plan modified. Overall, a change in treatment was more likely in older patients (OR 1.028 [95% CI 1.010-1.047]; P = .002), and in patients who had already received higher number of cycles of systemic anticancer therapy (OR 1.040 [95% CI 1.016-1.065]; P = .001). A change in treatment was less likely further out of the first national lockdown (OR 0.837 [95% CI 0.758-0.925]; P < .001). Patients on third-line treatment were most likely to have alterations to their treatment plan (69%, n=33/48). CONCLUSION: During the first wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom, clinicians adapted clinical practice in accordance to local and national guidance, especially amongst older patients and those on third-line treatment. Further real-world data are needed to document the important impact of changes to treatment on outcomes in patients with cancer.

Asunto(s)

COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pandemias

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate humoral responses and safety of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic disease (SAARD) patients subjected or not to treatment modifications during vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide, multicenter study, including 605 SAARD patients and 116 controls, prospectively evaluated serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody titers, side-effects, and disease activity, one month after complete vaccination, in terms of distinct treatment modification strategies (none, partial and extended modifications). Independent risk factors associated with hampered humoral responses were identified by data-driven multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with extended treatment modifications responded to vaccines similarly to controls as well as SAARD patients without immunosuppressive therapy (97.56% vs 100%, p = 0.2468 and 97.56% vs 97.46%, p > 0.9999, respectively). In contrast, patients with partial or without therapeutic modifications responded in 87.50% and 84.50%, respectively. Furthermore, SAARD patients with extended treatment modifications developed higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels compared to those without or with partial modifications (median:7.90 vs 7.06 vs 7.1, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0195, respectively). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX) and methotrexate (MTX) negatively affected anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses. In 10.5% of vaccinated patients, mild clinical deterioration was noted; however, no differences in the incidence of deterioration were observed among the distinct treatment modification SAARD subgroups. Side-effects were generally comparable between SAARD patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In SAARD patients, mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective and safe, both in terms of side-effects and disease flares. Treatment with MMF, RTX and/or MTX compromises anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses, which are restored upon extended treatment modifications without affecting disease activity.

Asunto(s)

Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinflamatorias Hereditarias/inmunología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Grecia , Enfermedades Autoinflamatorias Hereditarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with cancer in the current era of the COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant challenge to health care systems. Breast cancer is the most common cancer internationally. Breast cancer is a disease that involves surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and, more recently, immunotherapy in its management plan. The immune system requires months to recover from these medications, and this condition is even worse in patients with metastatic breast cancer who need ongoing treatment with these drugs. Some of these drugs, such as inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, can cause rare but life-threating lung inflammation. Patients with breast cancer who have metastatic disease to the lungs can experience deterioration of disease symptoms with COVID-19 infection. Oncologists treating patients with breast cancer are facing a difficult situation regarding treatment choice. The impact that COVID-19 has had on breast cancer care is unknown, including how to provide the best care possible without compromising patient and community safety. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the views of oncologists regarding the management of patients with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A web-based SurveyMonkey questionnaire was submitted to licensed oncologists involved in breast cancer management in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and United Arab Emirates. The survey focused on characteristics of the participants, infection risk among patients with cancer, and possible treatment modifications related to different types of breast cancer. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 82 participants. For early hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, 61 of the 82 participants (74%) supported using neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in selected patients, and 58% (48/82) preferred giving 6 over 8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy when indicated. Only 43% (35/82) preferred inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 with hormonal therapy as the first-line treatment in all patients with metastatic HR-positive disease. A total of 55 of the 82 participants (67%) supported using adjuvant trastuzumab for 6 instead of 12 months in selected patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. For metastatic HER2-positive, HR-positive breast cancer, 80% of participants (66/82) supported the use of hormonal therapy with dual anti-HER2 blockade in selected patients. The preferred choice of first-line treatment in metastatic triple negative patients with BRCA mutation and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1% was poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor according to 41% (34/82) of the participants, and atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel was preferred for PD-L1 >1% according to 71% (58/82) of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Several modifications in breast cancer management were supported by the survey participants. These modifications need to be discussed on a local basis, taking into account the local infrastructure and available resources.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is a key agent in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but no validated factors predicting longer survival are available. PATIENTS AND METHODS: REALITY was a retrospective multicenter trial in regorafenib-treated mCRC patients with overall survival (OS) ≥ 6 months. We aimed to assess the association between clinical parameters and outcome to define a panel identifying long term survivors among regorafenib candidates. Primary and secondary endpoints were OS and progression free survival (PFS), respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with MedCalc (survival distribution: Kaplan-Meier; survival comparison: log-rank test; independent role of significant variables at univariate analysis: logistic regression). RESULTS: Hundred regorafenib-treated mCRC patients with OS ≥ 6 months were enrolled. Median OS was 11.5 m (95%CI:9.60-12.96); median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI:3.43-43.03). The absence of liver progression and of dose and/or schedule changes during the first 4 cycles (mainly for good tolerability) were independently correlated at multivariate analysis with OS (Exp(b)1.8869, P= .0277and Exp(b)2.2000, P = .0313) and PFS (Exp(b)2.1583, P = .0065 and Exp(b)2.3036, P= .0169). Patients with neither of these variables had a significantly improved OS (n = 14, 20.8 months; 95% CI:12.967-55.267) versus others (n = 86, 10 months; 95% CI:8.367-12.167; HR = 0.4902, P = .0045) and PFS (11.3 months, 95%CI:4.267-35.8 vs. 3.9 months, 95% CI:3.167-43.033; HR = 0.4648, P = .0086). CONCLUSION: These 2 factors might allow clinicians to better identify patients more likely to benefit from regorafenib. Toxicity management remains crucial.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridinas , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment toxicities are common in older adults with cancer and consequently, treatment modifications are sometimes considered. We evaluated the prevalence and factors associated with treatment modifications at the first cycle in older patients receiving palliative systemic treatment. METHODS: Patients (n = 369) from the GAP 70+ Trial (NCT02054741; PI: Mohile) usual care arm were included. Enrolled patients were aged 70+ with advanced cancer and ≥ 1 Geriatric Assessment (GA) domain impairment. Treatment modification was defined as any change from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines or published clinical trials. Baseline variables included: 1) sociodemographic factors; 2) clinical variables; 3) GA domains; and 4) physician beliefs about life expectancy. Bivariate analyses and multivariable cluster-weighted generalized estimating equation model were conducted to assess the association of baseline variables with cycle 1 treatment modifications. RESULTS: Mean age was 77.2 years (range: 70-94); 62% had lung or gastrointestinal cancers, and 35% had treatment modifications at cycle 1. Increasing age by one year (odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.2), receipt of ≥second line of chemotherapy (OR 1.8, CI 1.1-3.0), functional impairment (OR 1.6, CI 1.1-2.3) and income ≤$50,000 (OR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.4) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of cycle 1 treatment modification. CONCLUSION: Treatment modifications occurred in 35% of older adults with advanced cancer at cycle 1. Increasing age, receipt of ≥second line of chemotherapy, functional impairment, and lower income were independently associated with treatment modifications. These findings emphasize the need for evidence-based regimens in older adults with cancer and GA impairments.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores Sociodemográficos

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 global pandemic has drastically affected the health care facility worldwide, posing unprecedented challenges in front of the caregivers. All hospitals need adopt measures to protect patients and health professionals and to safely triage patients (according to country/regional directives) for identifying those infected with coronavirus. As very few guidelines are available for care of cancer patients during COVID times, institutes have had to make their own strategies, based on their own expertise keeping in mind local directives and their effect on available resources and routine processes to offer best possible care. In this article, we have discussed in-house protocols for modification and prioritization of radical and palliative multimodality treatment of cancer patients along with our infection control measures in accordance with national and local guidelines during COVID emergency to stay safe and health. Also, the current study aims to modify cancer treatment and care during the COVID-19 pandemic adhering and fulfilling all protective measures.

RESUMEN

Nanocellulose isolation from lignocellulose is a tedious and expensive process with high energy and harsh chemical requirements, primarily due to the recalcitrance of the substrate, which otherwise would have been cost-effective due to its abundance. Replacing the chemical steps with biocatalytic processes offers opportunities to solve this bottleneck to a certain extent due to the enzymes substrate specificity and mild reaction chemistry. In this work, we demonstrate the isolation of sulphate-free nanocellulose from organosolv pretreated birch biomass using different glycosyl-hydrolases, along with accessory oxidative enzymes including a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (LPMO). The suggested process produced colloidal nanocellulose suspensions (ζ-potential -19.4 mV) with particles of 7-20 nm diameter, high carboxylate content and improved thermostability (To = 301 °C, Tmax = 337 °C). Nanocelluloses were subjected to post-modification using LPMOs of different regioselectivity. The sample from chemical route was the least favorable for LPMO to enhance the carboxylate content, while that from the C1-specific LPMO treatment showed the highest increase in carboxylate content.

Asunto(s)

Betula/metabolismo , Celulasa/metabolismo , Celulosa/metabolismo , Lignina/metabolismo , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/metabolismo , Nanofibras , Biomasa , Celulasa/genética , Celulosa/aislamiento & purificación , Hidrólisis , Lacasa/genética , Lacasa/metabolismo , Lignina/aislamiento & purificación , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/genética , Phanerochaete/enzimología , Phanerochaete/genética , Saccharomycetales/enzimología , Saccharomycetales/genética , Sordariales/enzimología , Sordariales/genética , Especificidad por Sustrato , Xilosidasas/genética , Xilosidasas/metabolismo

RESUMEN

Purpose Radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an effective standard therapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Nonetheless, toxicity is common, with patients often requiring dose modifications. Methods To investigate associations of RCT toxicities according to CTCAE version 5.0 and subsequent therapy modifications with short- and long-term treatment outcomes, we studied all 193 patients with HNSCC who received RCT (70 Gy + platinum agent) at an academic center between 03/2010 and 04/2018. Results During RCT, 77 (41%, 95% CI 34–49) patients developed at least one ≥ grade 3 toxicity, including seven grade 4 and 3 fatal grade 5 toxicities. The most frequent any-grade toxicities were xerostomia (n = 187), stomatitis (n = 181), dermatitis (n = 174), and leucopenia (n = 98). Eleven patients (6%) had their radiotherapy schedule modified (mean radiotherapy dose reduction = 12 Gy), and 120 patients (64%) had chemotherapy modifications (permanent discontinuation: n = 67, pause: n = 34, dose reduction: n = 7, change to other chemotherapy: n = 10). Objective response rates to RCT were 55% and 88% in patients with and without radiotherapy modifications (p = 0.003), and 84% and 88% in patients with and without chemotherapy modifications (p = 0.468), respectively. Five-year progression-free survival estimates were 20% and 50% in patients with and without radiotherapy modifications (p = < 0.001), and 53% and 40% in patients with and without chemotherapy modifications (p = 0.88), respectively. Conclusions Reductions of radiotherapy dose were associated with impaired long-term outcomes, whereas reductions in chemotherapy intensity were not. This suggests that toxicities during RCT should be primarily managed by modifying chemotherapy rather than radiotherapy (AU)

Asunto(s)

Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dosis de Radiación

RESUMEN

Aim: To evaluate toxicity risk in carriers of four DPYD variants using an institutional genetic repository. Materials & methods: Of over 65,000 patients in the repository, 582 were evaluated for the primary composite end point of grade 3 or higher toxicity or treatment modification due to toxicity. Results: The primary end point was more common in DPYD variant carriers (36.5 vs 18.1%, adjusted odds ratio 2.42, 95% CI: 1.05-5.55, p = 0.04), and in patients with decreased DPD activity (≤1 vs 2) (75.6 vs 17.0%, adjusted odds ratio 16.31, 95% CI: 2.64-100.68, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Patients carrying any of the four DPYD variants are at increased risk of severe toxicity or subsequent treatment modifications, suggesting such patients may benefit from genotype-informed treatment.

Asunto(s)

Alelos , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP)/genética , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Variación Genética/genética , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/genética , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the modification or stopping of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens, including novel antiretroviral drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the discontinuation of first ART before and after the availability of better tolerated and less complex regimens by comparing the frequency, reasons and associations with patient characteristics. METHODS: A total of 3019 ART-naive patients registered in the HIV-TR cohort who started ART between Jan 2011 and Feb 2017 were studied. Only the first modification within the first year of treatment for each patient was included in the analyses. Reasons were classified as listed in the coded form in the web-based database. Cumulative incidences were analysed using competing risk function and factors associated with discontinuation of the ART regimen were examined using Cox proportional hazards models and Fine-Gray competing risk regression models. RESULTS: The initial ART regimen was discontinued in 351 out of 3019 eligible patients (11.6%) within the first year. The main reason for discontinuation was intolerance/toxicity (45.0%), followed by treatment simplification (9.7%), patient willingness (7.4%), poor compliance (7.1%), prevention of future toxicities (6.0%), virologic failure (5.4%), and provider preference (5.4%). Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based (aHR = 4.4, [95% CI 3.0-6.4]; p < 0.0001) or protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens (aHR = 4.3, [95% CI 3.1-6.0]; p < 0.0001) relative to integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens were significantly associated with ART discontinuation. ART initiated at a later period (2015-Feb 2017) (aHR = 0.6, [95% CI 0.4-0.9]; p < 0.0001) was less likely to be discontinued. A lower rate of treatment discontinuation for intolerance/toxicity was observed with InSTI-based regimens (2.0%) than with NNRTI- (6.6%) and PI-based regimens (7.5%) (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients who achieved HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL within 12 months of ART initiation was 91% in the ART discontinued group vs. 94% in the continued group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: ART discontinuation due to intolerance/toxicity and virologic failure decreased over time. InSTI-based regimens were less likely to be discontinued than PI- and NNRTI-based ART.

Asunto(s)

Fármacos Anti-VIH , Antirretrovirales , Infecciones por VIH , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Carga Viral

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an effective standard therapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Nonetheless, toxicity is common, with patients often requiring dose modifications. METHODS: To investigate associations of RCT toxicities according to CTCAE version 5.0 and subsequent therapy modifications with short- and long-term treatment outcomes, we studied all 193 patients with HNSCC who received RCT (70 Gy + platinum agent) at an academic center between 03/2010 and 04/2018. RESULTS: During RCT, 77 (41%, 95% CI 34-49) patients developed at least one ≥ grade 3 toxicity, including seven grade 4 and 3 fatal grade 5 toxicities. The most frequent any-grade toxicities were xerostomia (n = 187), stomatitis (n = 181), dermatitis (n = 174), and leucopenia (n = 98). Eleven patients (6%) had their radiotherapy schedule modified (mean radiotherapy dose reduction = 12 Gy), and 120 patients (64%) had chemotherapy modifications (permanent discontinuation: n = 67, pause: n = 34, dose reduction: n = 7, change to other chemotherapy: n = 10). Objective response rates to RCT were 55% and 88% in patients with and without radiotherapy modifications (p = 0.003), and 84% and 88% in patients with and without chemotherapy modifications (p = 0.468), respectively. Five-year progression-free survival estimates were 20% and 50% in patients with and without radiotherapy modifications (p = < 0.001), and 53% and 40% in patients with and without chemotherapy modifications (p = 0.88), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions of radiotherapy dose were associated with impaired long-term outcomes, whereas reductions in chemotherapy intensity were not. This suggests that toxicities during RCT should be primarily managed by modifying chemotherapy rather than radiotherapy.

Asunto(s)

Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Anciano , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis/etiología , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Leucopenia/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Fármacos Sensibilizantes a Radiaciones/efectos adversos , Fármacos Sensibilizantes a Radiaciones/uso terapéutico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Estomatitis Aftosa/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Xerostomía/etiología

RESUMEN

Changes in HIV treatment guidelines over the last two decades reflect the evolving challenges in this field. Our study examined treatment change patterns throughout a 7-year period in a large Italian cohort of HIV patients as well as the reasons and direction of changes. Treatment-naïve and -experienced HIV patients managed by Cotugno Hospital of Naples between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed. During the period, the proportion of single-tablet regimen treatment sharply increased for the naïve and experienced patients. Regimens containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors rapidly replaced those containing protease inhibitor and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The use of the tenofovir alafenamide fumarate/emtricitabine backbone increased rapidly after its introduction in the Italian pharmaceutical market, making up 63.7 and 54.9% of all treatments in naïve and experienced patients, respectively, in 2020. The main reason for treatment changes was optimization and/or simplification (90.6% in 2018; 85.3% in 2019; 95.5 in 2020) followed by adverse effects and virological failure. Our real-world analysis revealed that the majority of treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients received antiretroviral drugs listed as preferred/recommended in current recommendations. Regimen optimization and/or simplification is a leading cause of treatment modification, while virologic failure or adverse effects are less likely reasons for modification in the current treatment landscape.