RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Large congenital neck tumors can cause neonatal death due to airway obstruction. The aim of this study was to report outcomes of the first cohort of fetuses with neck masses and suspected airway obstruction managed with fetal laryngoscopy (FL) and fetal endoscopic tracheal intubation (FETI) to secure fetal airways and avoid ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort of consecutive fetuses with neck masses that were candidates for an EXIT procedure due to suspicion of laryngeal and/or tracheal occlusion on ultrasonographic (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination were recruited for FL in a tertiary referral center in Queretaro, Mexico. FETI was performed if the obstruction was confirmed by FL. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and March 2023, 35 cases with neck masses were evaluated. Airway obstruction was suspected in 12/35 (34.3%), either by US in 10/35 (28.6%) or by fetal MRI in 2/35 (5.7%). In all cases, FL was successfully performed at the first attempt at a median gestational age (GA) of 36+5 (range, 33+5-39+6) weeks+days, with a median surgical time of 22.5 (12-35) min. In 4 cases, airway patency was confirmed during FL and an EXIT procedure was avoided. In 8/12 cases (66.7%), airway obstruction was confirmed during fetoscopy and FETI was successfully performed at a median GA of 36+3 (33+2-38+5) weeks+days, with a median surgical time of 25.0 (range, 12-45) min. No case required an EXIT procedure. All patients underwent conventional cesarean delivery with no maternal complications and all neonates were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with a correctly positioned endotracheal tube (ETT) immediately after delivery. Three neonatal deaths (37.5%) were reported due to postnatal unplanned extubation, failed ETT replacement, and tumoral bleeding. CONCLUSION: In fetuses with neck masses and suspected airway obstruction, FL and FETI are feasible and could replace EXIT procedures with good maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract A male patient was scheduled for urgent amputation of his right forearm. His right forearm was stuck inside the insertion slot of a meat grinder, resulting in severe pain to his injured arm. His upper body could not move to sit in a semi-upright position. An endotracheal tube was successfully placed after rapid sequence intubation using a video laryngoscope from behind the patient on the first attempt. This case report is the first documentation of successful anesthetic induction with subsequent endotracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope from behind an injured patient whose upper body was upright with limited positioning.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A male patient was scheduled for urgent amputation of his right forearm. His right forearm was stuck inside the insertion slot of a meat grinder, resulting in severe pain to his injured arm. His upper body could not move to sit in a semi-upright position. An endotracheal tube was successfully placed after rapid sequence intubation using a video laryngoscope from behind the patient on the first attempt. This case report is the first documentation of successful anesthetic induction with subsequent endotracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope from behind an injured patient whose upper body was upright with limited positioning.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Videolaryngoscopes improve tracheal intubation in adult patients, but we currently do not know whether they are similarly beneficial for children. We designed this ranking systematic review to compare individual video and direct laryngoscopes for efficacy and safety of orotracheal intubation in children. METHODS: We searched PubMed and five other databases on January 27, 2021. We included randomized clinical trials with patients aged ≤18 years, comparing different laryngoscopes for the outcomes: failed first intubation attempt; failed intubation within two attempts; failed intubation; glottic view; time for intubation; complications. In addition, we assessed the quality of evidence according to GRADE recommendations. RESULTS: We included 46 studies in the meta-analyses. Videolaryngoscopy reduced the risk of failed first intubation attempt (RR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.31-0.61; p = .001) and failed intubation within two attempts (RR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.33-0.33; p < .001) in children aged <1 year. Videolaryngoscopy also reduced the risk of major complications in both children aged <1 year (RR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12-0.96; p = .046) and children aged 0-18 years (RR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.25-0.65; p = .002). We did not find significant difference between videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for time to intubation in children aged <1 year (MD = -0.95 s; 95% CI: -5.45 to 3.57 s; p = .681), and children aged 0-18 years (MD = 1.65 s; 95% CI: -1.00 to 4.30 s; p = .222). Different videolaryngoscopes were associated with different performance metrics within this meta-analysis. The overall quality of the evidence ranged from low to very low. CONCLUSION: Videolaryngoscopes reduce the risk of failed first intubation attempts and major complications in children compared to direct laryngoscopes. However, not all videolaryngoscopes have the same performance metrics, and more data is needed to clarify which device may be better in different clinical scenarios. Additionally, care must be taken while interpreting our results and rankings due to the available evidence's low or very low quality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction Endotracheal intubation is a procedure associated with a high level of exposure to the COVID-19 virus. This has led to the search of alternatives to reduce the risk of contamination, including the so-called aerosol box. Objective To compare time and difficulty of orotracheal intubation when using the aerosol box in a simulated setting. Methodology Observational study conducted with the participation of 33 anesthetist physicians and anesthesia residents; groups were compared in terms of time and intubation difficulty using a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and the McGRATH™ MAC (Medtronic) videolaryngoscope with or without aerosol box. In order to determine performance with the intubation maneuver, crude hazard ratios were estimated, and a Cox multivariate regression model was built, adjusted by anesthetist years of experience and difficulties during the procedure. Results On average, the aerosol box increased intubation time by 7.57 seconds (SD 8.33) when the videolaryngoscope was used, and by 6.62 (SD 5.74) with the Macintosh. Overall, 132 intubations were performed, with 121 successful and 6 failed first-time attempts (4 with the use of the aerosol box); 16 participants (48.48%) reported difficulty handling the box. With the use of the Macintosh, intubation was found to be faster than with the videolaryngoscope (cHR: 1.36 [95% CI 0.64-2.88]; adjusted HR: 2.20 [95% CI 0.73-6.62]). Conclusions The use of the aerosol box and personal protective equipment in a simulation setting hinders the intubation maneuver and may result in protracted execution time.

Resumen Introducción La intubación endotraqueal es un procedimiento que se relaciona con alto nivel de exposición al virus de COVID-19, llevando a la búsqueda de alternativas para disminuir el riesgo de contaminación, entre ellas la llamada Caja de aerosoles. Objetivo Comparar el tiempo y dificultad en la intubación orotraqueal usando la caja de aerosoles en escenarios simulados. Metodología Estudio observacional, con participación de 33 médicos anestesiólogos y residentes de anestesia; se compararon los grupos en tiempo y dificultad de intubación con uso de laringoscopio convencional Macintosh y videolaringoscopio McGRATH™ MAC (Medtronic) utilizando la caja de aerosoles y sin ella. Para determinar el rendimiento en la maniobra de intubación se calcularon Hazard ratios crudos, se construyó modelo multivariado de Regresion de Cox ajustado por años de experiencia como anestesiólogo y dificultades durante el procedimiento. Resultados La caja de aerosoles aumentó en promedio el tiempo en segundos para la intubación con video-laringoscopio en 7,57 (DE: 8,33) y con Macintosh 6,62 (DE: 5,74). Se llevaron a cabo 132 intubaciones, 121 exitosas en el primer intento y 6 fallidas (4 con el uso de la caja de aerosoles). 16 participantes reconocieron alguna dificultad al manipular la caja (48,48 %). Con el uso de Macintosh se identificó tendencia a la intubación más rápido que con el videolaringoscopio (HRc: 1,36 [IC 95 %: 0,64-2,88]; HR ajustado: 2,20 [IC 95 %: 0,73-6,62]). Conclusiones Utilizar la caja de aerosoles y equipo de protección personal en un escenario simulado dificulta la maniobra de intubación y puede prolongar el tiempo de ejecución.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Videolaryngoscopes are thought to improve glottic view and facilitate tracheal intubation compared with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. However, we currently do not know which one would be the best choice in most patients undergoing anaesthesia. We designed this systematic review with network meta-analyses to rank the different videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. We conducted searches in PubMed and a further five databases on 11 January 2021. We included randomised clinical trials with patients aged ≥16 years, comparing different videolaryngoscopes, or videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for the outcomes: failed intubation; failed first intubation attempt; failed intubation within two attempts; difficult intubation; percentage of glottic opening seen; difficult laryngoscopy; and time needed for intubation. We assessed the quality of evidence according to GRADE recommendations and included 179 studies in the meta-analyses. The C-MAC and C-MAC D-Blade were top ranked for avoiding failed intubation, but we did not find statistically significant differences between any two distinct videolaryngoscopes for this outcome. Further, the C-MAC D-Blade performed significantly better than the C-MAC Macintosh blade for difficult laryngoscopy. We found statistically significant differences between the laryngoscopes for time to intubation, but these differences were not considered clinically relevant. The evidence was judged as of low or very low quality overall. In conclusion, different videolaryngoscopes have differential intubation performance and some may be currently preferred among the available devices. Furthermore, videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope may be considered clinically equivalent for the time taken for tracheal intubation. However, despite the rankings from our analyses, the current available evidence is not sufficient to ensure significant superiority of one device or a small set of them over the others for our intubation-related outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Difficulties in airway management turn out to be the leading cause of cardiac arrest in anesthesia and they represent 50% of severe non-fatal anesthesiological complications. The main obstacle lies in the difficulties to predict it. Difficult intubation occurs in 1.5 to 8% of general anesthesia procedures and it can be defined as one requiring more than three attempts at laryngoscopy or more than 10 minutes of laryngoscopy. In order to identify and prevent an adverse event in patients at risk of presenting a difficult intubation, several parameters have been investigated. Anatomical factors that can predict difficult direct laryngoscopy require a complete pre-anesthetic evaluation and physical examination by the anesthesiologist. These include: the Mallampati scale, the thyromental distance (of Patil), the sternomental distance, the mandibular protrusion test and the atlanto- occipital extension; which combined have a high positive predictive value to anticipate difficult airway management.

Las dificultades en el abordaje de la vía aérea resultan ser la primera causa de paro cardíaco en anestesia y, a su vez, representan al 50% de las complicaciones severas no fatales de causa anestesiológica. El principal obstáculo a superar radica en las dificultades para predecirla[]. La intubación dificultosa se define como la necesidad de tres o más intentos o el empleo de más de 10 minutos para lograr la intubación traqueal, situación que ocurre en 1,5 a 8% de los procedimientos de anestesia gene- ral[]. Con el fin de identificar pacientes con riesgo de presentar una intubación dificultosa, se han investigado diversos parámetros capaces de anticipar un evento adverso. La caracterización de factores anatómicos que puedan dificultar la laringoscopia directa y la consecuente intubación orotraqueal, requieren de un examen e interrogatorio completo y minucioso por parte del anestesiólogo. Entre estos factores anatómicos encontramos la escala de Mallampati, la distancia tiromentoniana (de Patil)[],[], la distancia esternomentoniana, el test de protrusión mandibular y la extensión atlantooccipital; que combinados tienen un alto valor predictivo positivo para anticipar una vía aérea dificultosa

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción. La causa más común de estenosis laringotraqueal benigna es iatrogénica, secundaria a intubación orotraqueal. El manejo quirúrgico sigue siendo la alternativa que ha mostrado mejores resultados a largo plazo. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la experiencia en el manejo quirúrgico de la estenosis laringotraqueal durante 15 años en un hospital de alta complejidad en Colombia.Métodos. En este estudio se revisaron las historias clínicas de todos los pacientes tratados con reconstrucción de estenosis traqueal benigna, entre los años 2005 y 2020. Para el análisis estadístico se usaron métodos de estadística descriptiva, con análisis de frecuencias y medidas de tendencia central o de dispersión.Resultados. Se identificaron 38 pacientes con estenosis laringotraqueal, con un grado variable de estenosis. La nasofibrolaringoscopia fue bien tolerada y segura para determinar el grado y la longitud de la estenosis. El uso de tomografía sirvió para determinar la extensión y las características anatómicas. Los resultados del presente estudio son similares a los de la literatura en cuanto a complicaciones, mortalidad y falla de la anastomosis. Las complicaciones más frecuentemente reportadas son reestenosis, infección del sitio operatorio, lesión nerviosa y fístula, que en general se presentan en un tercio de los pacientes. Conclusiones. La experiencia de manejo quirúrgico de estenosis laringotraqueal en este hospital permite concluir que la reconstrucción traqueal es una opción segura en nuestro medio. Las tasas de éxito y de falla del tratamiento son equiparables a las reportadas en la literatura.

Introduction. The most common cause of benign laryngotracheal stenosis is iatrogenic, secondary to orotracheal intubation. Surgical management continues to be the alternative that has shown better long-term results. The objective of this study was to analyze the experience in the surgical management of laryngotracheal stenosis for 15 years in a high-level complexity hospital in Colombia.Methods. Medical records of patients treated with reconstruction of benign tracheal stenosis between 2005 and 2020 were reviewed. Descriptive statistical methods were used, with frequency analysis and measures of central tendency or dispersion.Results. Thirthy-eight patients with laryngotracheal stenosis were identified, with a variable degree of stenosis. Nasofibrolaryngoscopy was well tolerated and safe to determine the degree and length of the stenosis. The use of tomography served to determine the extension and anatomical characteristics. The results of the present study are similar to those of the literature in terms of complications, mortality and failure of the anastomosis. The most frequently reported complications are restenosis, surgical site infection, nerve injury, and fistula, which generally occur in one third of patients.Conclusions. The experience of surgical management of laryngotracheal stenosis in our hospital allows us to conclude that tracheal reconstruction is a safe option in our environment. Treatment success and failure rates are comparable to those reported in the literature.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 outbreak brings a challenge to healthcare systems. The sex, age, and cardiometabolic comorbidities have been considered risk factors for disease severity. To evaluate the association between risk factors with death as well the risk of death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: The present cross-sectional cohort study, includes hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases. Data analysis was performed using the National COVID-19 Cases Report Database. Pearson's χ2 test and odds ratios (95% CI) were calculated to determine the association between variables. Thereafter, risk of death was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 67 328 inpatients were included; mean age 55.29 years (±15.97). Of total, 42 164 (62.62%) were men, 6 349 (9.43%) were intubated, and 23 873 (35.46%) died. Male sex, age older than 60 years, and cardiometabolic comorbidities were associated with death. Hazard ratio for death in older intubated patients was lower than in non-intubated (HR 1.242, 95%CI, 1.167-1.322; P < 0.001) and (HR 2.128, 95%CI, 2.066-2.193; P < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal intubation or not is the most important predictor for death in COVID-19 infected patients in this Mexican cohort. Already known risk factors for COVID-19 severity may become less relevant once patients require tracheal intubation.

RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction: In the management of the anticipated difficult airway (DA), awake intubation is the strategy of choice. In this context, flexible fibroscopy is the tool most widely used as the first choice. However, there is always the rare case where it may fail. Important findings: Six successful rescue cases using videolaryngoscopy following failed fibroscopy in patients with anticipated DA, and 1 case of rescued extubation of an airway previously secured with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Conclusion: Videolaringoscopy may be an adequate tool to use as a backup plan for the management of an anticipated DA.

Resumen Introducción: En el manejo de vía aérea difícil anticipada la estrategia de elección es la intubación con el paciente despierto. En este contexto, la fibroscopia flexible es la herramienta más utilizada como plan A; sin embargo, en raras ocasiones puede fallar. Hallazgos importantes: Se presentan seis casos de rescates exitosos con videolaringoscopia luego de fibroscopia fallida en pacientes con vía aérea difícil anticipada, y un caso de rescate de extubación de vía aérea asegurada previamente con fibrobroncoscopio. Conclusión: La videolaringoscopia puede ser una adecuada herramienta como plan B para el manejo de la vía aérea difícil anticipada.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Poor monitoring of tracheal tube cuff pressure may result in patient complications. The objective method of using a manometer is recommended to keep safe cuff pressure values (20-30 cm H2O). However, as manometers are not readily available, anesthesiologists use subjective methods. We aimed to assess appropriateness of a subjective method for attaining cuff pressure and the expertise level of manometer handling among anesthesiology staff and residents in a university teaching hospital. METHODS: Prospective observational study, recruiting participants that performed tracheal intubation and the subjective method for tube cuff inflation. Patients with difficult airway, larynx and trachea anatomic abnormality and emergency procedures were not included. Up to 60 minutes after tracheal intubation, an investigator registered the cuff pressure using an aneroid manometer (AMBU®) connected to the tube pilot balloon. RESULTS: Forty-seven anesthesiologists were included in the study - 24 residents and 23 staff. Mean (SD) and medians (IQR) measured in cm H2O were, respectively, 52.5 (27.1) and 50 (30-70). We registered 83% of measurements outside the recommended pressure range, with no difference between specialists and residents. The level of expertise with the objective method was also similar in both groups. Pressure adjustments were performed in 76.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: The subjective method for inflating the tracheal tube cuff resulted in a high rate of inadequate cuff pressures, with no difference in performance between anesthesiology specialists and residents.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Background and objectives: Poor monitoring of tracheal tube cuff pressure may result in patient complications. The objective method of using a manometer is recommended to keep safe cuff pressure values (20‒30 cm H2O). However, as manometers are not readily available, anesthesiologists use subjective methods. We aimed to assess appropriateness of a subjective method for attaining cuff pressure and the expertise level of manometer handling among anesthesiology staff and residents in a university teaching hospital. Methods: Prospective observational study, recruiting participants that performed tracheal intubation and the subjective method for tube cuff inflation. Patients with difficult airway, larynx and trachea anatomic abnormality and emergency procedures were not included. Up to 60 minutes after tracheal intubation, an investigator registered the cuff pressure using an aneroid manometer (AMBU®) connected to the tube pilot balloon. Results: Forty-seven anesthesiologists were included in the study - 24 residents and 23 staff. Mean (SD) and medians (IQR) measured in cmH2O were, respectively, 52.5 (27.1) and 50 (30‒70). We registered 83% of measurements outside the recommended pressure range, with no difference between specialists and residents. The level of expertise with the objective method was also similar in both groups. Pressure adjustments were performed in 76.6% of cases. Conclusion: The subjective method for inflating the tracheal tube cuff resulted in a high rate of inadequate cuff pressures, with no difference in performance between anesthesiology specialists and residents.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: O controle inadequado da pressão dos balonetes dos tubos traqueais pode resultar em complicações. A técnica objetiva com uso de manômetro é a recomendada para manutenção de valores seguros de pressão (20-30 cm H2O). Mas como ese instrumento é pouco disponível, os anestesiologistas recorrem a técnicas subjetivas. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a adequação da técnica subjetiva para obtenção das pressões dos balonetes e o nível de experiência com uso do manômetro entre médicos especialistas e residentes de anestesiologia de um Hospital Universitário. Método: Estudo observacional prospectivo, com participantes que realizaram intubação traqueal e técnica subjetiva para insuflação dos balonetes. Pacientes com via aérea difícil, anormalidades anatômicas de laringe e traqueia, risco de broncoaspiração e os casos de emergência não foram incluídos. Até 60 minutos após a intubação, um investigador registrava a pressão do balonete utilizando um manômetro aneroide (AMBU®) conectado ao balonete guia do tubo. Resultados: Quarenta e sete anestesiologistas foram incluídos no estudo - 24 residentes e 23 especialistas. As pressões (cm H2O) média (DP) e mediana (IQR) encontradas foram, respectivamente, 52,5 (27,1) e 50 (30-70). Da amostra, 83% estavam fora da faixa adequada de pressão, sem diferença entre especialistas e residentes. O nível de experiência com a técnica objetiva também foi semelhante entre os grupos. Correção da pressão foi realizada em 76,6% dos casos. Conclusões: A técnica subjetiva para insuflar os balonetes dos tubos traqueais resultou em alta prevalência de pressões inadequadas, sem diferença no desempenho entre especialistas e residentes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective To simulate different diameters of endotracheal tubes and to verify the fluid dynamics aspects by means of flow and resistance measurements. Methods Fluid dynamics software was used to calculate mean flow and airway resistance in endotracheal tube with a diameter of 6.0, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 9.0 and 10.0mm at normal body temperature and under constant pressure. The same measurements were taken in the fusion of the first 22cm of a 9.0mm endotracheal tube with 10.0mm diameter, and with the end part in 12cm of a 6.0mm endotracheal tube with 7.0mm diameter. Results The fusion of the first 22cm of an endotracheal tube of 10.0mm diameter with the terminal part in 12cm of an endotracheal tube of 6.0mm diameter, preserving the total length of 34cm, generated average flow and airway resistance similar to that of a conventional 7.5mm endotracheal tube. Conclusion This simulation study demonstrates that a single-sized endotracheal tube may facilitate endotracheal intubation without causing increased airway resistance.

RESUMO Objetivo Simular diferentes diâmetros de tubos endotraqueais e verificar os aspectos fluidinâmicos, considerando medições de fluxo e resistência. Métodos Foi utilizado um software de fluidinâmica para calcular o fluxo médio e a resistência das vias aéreas nos tubos endotraqueais com diâmetro de 6,0, 7,0, 7,5, 8,0, 9,0 e 10,0mm, em temperatura corporal normal e pressão constante. As mesmas medidas foram realizadas na fusão dos primeiros 22cm de um tubo endotraqueal de 9,0 e 10,0mm de diâmetro, com a parte terminal em 12cm de um tubo endotraqueal de 6,0 e 7,0mm de diâmetro. Resultados A fusão dos primeiros 22cm de um tubo endotraqueal de diâmetro 10,0 mm com a parte terminal em 12cm de um tubo endotraqueal de 6,0mm de diâmetro, preservando o comprimento total de 34cm, gerou fluxo médio e resistência de vias aéreas semelhantes aos de um tubo endotraqueal convencional de 7,5mm. Conclusão Um tubo endotraqueal de tamanho único pode facilitar a intubação endotraqueal, sem causar aumento de resistência na via aérea.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

"O estudo a seguir descreve em detalhes a abordagem da via aérea difícil, desde o momento que precede a cirurgia até os cuidados pós-operatórios. Focando em praticidade e eficiência nos momentos de decisões cruciais, este trabalho se baseia principalmente em evidências científicas e guidelines atualizados pela American Society of Anesthesiologists, procurando estabelecer padrões de ações que possam impactar na morbidade e mortalidade de forma significativa. A avaliação préoperatória é de fundamental importância para o anestesiologista de modo a antecipar possíveis intercorrências e dificuldade no momento de acessar uma via aérea definitiva. No momento da indução anestésica, o anestesiologista, precisa ter ao seu alcance, principalmente quando se depara com uma via aérea difícil não antecipada, alternativas à laringoscopia direta em que este tenha prática e, em casos de hipoxemia sanguínea um plano B imediato de forma a poder administrar oxigênio ao paciente durante os momentos críticos, sem aumentar a chance de complicações. Diversos são os equipamentos e técnicas disponíveis na anestesia moderna, usados como alternativa ao método convencional de intubação traqueal, que serão especificados adiante. Gestantes, politraumatizados e pacientes pediátricos exigem uma atenção especial devido a alterações fisiológicas presentes. Cuidados pós-operatórios incluem o registro em prontuário sobre as dificuldades observadas e os meios utilizados para solucioná-las, além da pronta comunicação ao paciente e familiares com o objetivo de passar adiante a informação e evitar complicações em futuros procedimentos anestésicos."(AU)

"The following study describes in detail the difficult airway approach, from the time before surgery to postoperative care. Focusing on practicality and efficiency at crucial decision moments, this paper is based primarily on scientific evidence and guidelines updated by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, seeking to establish standards of action that can have significant impact on morbidity and mortality. The preoperative evaluation is of fundamental importance for the anesthesiologist in order to anticipate possible intercurrences and difficulties in the moment of assessing a definitive airway. At the time of anesthetic induction, the anesthesiologist must have within his reach, especially when faced with an unanticipated difficult airway, alternatives to direct laryngoscopy in which he has practice, and in cases of blood hypoxemia, an immediate B plane aiming to administer oxygen to the patient at critical moments, without increasing the chance of complications. Several equipment and techniques are available in modern anesthesia as an alternative to the conventional method of tracheal intubation, which will be further specified below. Pregnant women, polytrauma patients and pediatric patients require special attention due to physiological changes present. Postoperative care includes keeping records of the established difficulties and the means used to solve them, as well as prompt communication with the patient and family with the purpose of passing this on and avoid complications in future anesthetic procedures."(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Background and objectives Aortic stenosis is the most common type of heart valve disease. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement has become the alternative for patients considered at high risk for surgery. Controlled mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation has been the choice for this type of procedure, however the use of noninvasive ventilation in cardiac patients has shown to be beneficial. Janus is a novel full-face mask that allows application of noninvasive ventilation support during anesthesia. Our main objective was to evaluate the feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with prolonged transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring under deep inhalational sedation delivered through a new mask for noninvasive ventilation. Methods A case series observational study that included five patients with critical aortic stenosis that underwent inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a hybrid room of a teaching hospital. Standard monitors and bispectral index were used, followed by inhalational induction and placement of the Janus mask. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. Patients were transferred to intensive care unit after the procedure. Complications related to the mask use, transesofageal echocardiography accessibility and respiratory implications to the patients were recorded. Results All procedures were uneventful and no major complications were observed intraoperatively. One patient presented CO2 retention (50 mmHg) and sevoflurane leak around the central opening of the mask, both without clinical significance. Conclusions The use of inhalational anesthesia with the facial mask Janus is a safe and efficient alternative to general anesthesia with tracheal intubation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and can easily accommodate the use of transesophageal echocardiography intraoperatively.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos A estenose aórtica é o tipo mais comum de doença valvular cardíaca. A substituição percutânea de válvula aórtica tornou-se a alternativa para pacientes cirúrgicos considerados de alto risco. A ventilação mecânica controlada com intubação traqueal tem sido a escolha para esse tipo de procedimento; porém, o uso de ventilação não invasiva em pacientes cardíacos mostrou ser benéfico. Janus é uma nova máscara facial que permite a aplicação de suporte à VNI durante a anestesia. Nosso objetivo primário foi avaliar a viabilidade da substituição transcateter de valva aórtica com monitoração ecocardiográfica transesofágica prolongada sob sedação inalatória profunda através de uma nova máscara para ventilação não invasiva. Métodos Estudo observacional de série de casos que incluiu cinco pacientes com estenose aórtica em fase crítica, submetidos à anestesia inalatória com sevoflurano para substituição transcateter de valva aórtica em uma sala híbrida de um hospital universitário. Monitores padrão e índice bispectral foram usados, seguidos de indução inalatória e colocação da máscara Janus. A anestesia foi mantida com sevoflurano. Os pacientes foram transferidos para a unidade de terapia intensiva após o procedimento. As complicações relacionadas ao uso da máscara, a acessibilidade da ecocardiografia transesofágica e as implicações respiratórias para os pacientes foram registradas. Resultados Todos os procedimentos transcorreram sem incidentes e não foram observadas complicações maiores no intraoperatório. Um paciente apresentou retenção de CO2 (50 mmHg) e vazamento de sevoflurano em torno da abertura central da máscara, ambos sem significância clínica. Conclusões O uso de anestesia inalatória com a máscara facial Janus é uma opção segura e eficiente à anestesia geral com intubação traqueal para substituição transcateter de valva aórtica e pode facilmente acomodar o uso de ecocardiografia transesofágica no intraoperatório.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción: La ventilación al paciente durante la microcirugía laríngea confronta varios problemas. La ventilación a chorro tipo jet con frecuencias ventilatorias convencionales permite usar catéteres endotraqueales de pequeño diámetro para aportar volúmenes adecuados de oxígeno y proporciona mejores condiciones operatorias que el método tradicional. Objetivo: Evaluar la seguridad y efectividad de la ventilación jet con frecuencias ventilatorias convencionales para microcirugía laríngea electiva en comparación con la ventilación convencional. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio comparativo, a simple ciego, aleatorizado y paralelo. Se trabajó con un prototipo de dispositivo de ventilación jet con permiso de uso excepcional en seres humanos (autorización excepcional No: 004/17 para realización de estudio piloto, con fecha 2 de agosto de 2017, conferido por el CECMED). Se utilizó un grupo estudio de 45 pacientes (grupo E) y se comparó con un grupo control (grupo C) de 15 pacientes ventilados mediante el método tradicional. Resultados: La oxigenación resultó superior dentro del grupo E. El grupo C requirió eventualmente de extubación, apnea transitoria y reintubación, lo que repercutió en contra de la integridad anatomofisiológica de los pacientes, del campo operatorio y la docencia. Fue evidente una mayor estabilidad hemodinámica entre los sujetos del grupo E. Las presiones intrapulmonares producidas por la ventilación jet no provocaron lesiones ni repercusión clínica evidentes. Conclusiones: Aplicar la ventilación a chorro con frecuencias ventilatorias convencionales fue seguro y efectivo. Por primera vez se obtienen experiencias de utilización de un método de ventilación jet en el país. El grupo en el que se aplicó la ventilación convencional sufrió complicaciones más frecuentes y peligrosas. Es necesario asimilar las tecnologías de ventilación jet para elevar la calidad de la atención médica en tiempos de paz, de guerra o desastres, en contextos electivos, o emergentes como el desafío de una vía respiratoria difícil(AU)

Introduction: Ventilation to the patient during microlaryngeal surgery confronts several problems. Jet ventilation with conventional ventilatory frequencies allows the use of small diameter endotracheal catheters to provide adequate oxygen volumes and provide better operating conditions than the traditional method. Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of jet ventilation with conventional ventilatory frequencies for elective microlaryngeal surgery in comparison to conventional ventilation. Methods: A comparative, single-blind, randomized and parallel study was performed. It was used a prototype of jet ventilation device with an exceptional use permit in humans (exceptional authorization No: 004/17 for conducting a pilot study, dated August 2, 2017, conferred by the CECMED). A study group of 45 patients (group E) was used and compared with a control group (group C) of 15 patients using the traditional ventilation method. Results: Oxygenation was higher in group E. Group C eventually required extubation, transitory apnea and reintubation, which impacted against the anatomophysiological integrity of patients, the operative field and teaching. A greater hemodynamic stability was evident among the subjects of group E. The intrapulmonary pressures produced by jet ventilation did not cause obvious injuries or clinical repercussions. Conclusions: Applying jet ventilation with conventional ventilatory frequencies was safe and effective. For the first time, experiences of using a jet ventilation method in the country were obtained. The group in which conventional ventilation was applied suffered more frequent and dangerous complications. It is necessary to assimilate jet ventilation´s technologies to raise the quality of medical attention in times of peace, war or disasters, in elective or emerging contexts as the challenge of a difficult airway(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Aortic stenosis is the most common type of heart valve disease. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement has become the alternative for patients considered at high risk for surgery. Controlled mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation has been the choice for this type of procedure, however the use of noninvasive ventilation in cardiac patients has shown to be beneficial. Janus is a novel full-face mask that allows application of noninvasive ventilation support during anesthesia. Our main objective was to evaluate the feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with prolonged transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring under deep inhalational sedation delivered through a new mask for noninvasive ventilation. METHODS: A case series observational study that included five patients with critical aortic stenosis that underwent inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a hybrid room of a teaching hospital. Standard monitors and bispectral index were used, followed by inhalational induction and placement of the Janus mask. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. Patients were transferred to intensive care unit after the procedure. Complications related to the mask use, transesofageal echocardiography accessibility and respiratory implications to the patients were recorded. RESULTS: All procedures were uneventful and no major complications were observed intraoperatively. One patient presented CO2 retention (50mmHg) and sevoflurane leak around the central opening of the mask, both without clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inhalational anesthesia with the facial mask Janus is a safe and efficient alternative to general anesthesia with tracheal intubation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and can easily accommodate the use of transesophageal echocardiography intraoperatively.

RESUMEN

O cuidado oral em pacientes intubados internados em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva é uma atividade da Enfermagem que se constitui num conjunto de competências fundamentadas em evidências científicas. A saúde oral refere-se ao ótimo estado da cavidade oral e o bom funcionamento de suas estruturas, obtido por meio da higiene oral adequada, estratégia crucial de prevenção para excluir o risco de problemas bucais e promover o conforto físico e psicológico dos pacientes. A higiene oral inadequada traz vulnerabilidade a cavidade oral potencializando focos de infecções propícias à pneumonia nosocomial. Objetiva identificar e analisar na literatura as melhores evidências disponíveis referentes ao produto, dispositivo e frequência do cuidado oral para prevenção de pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica em pacientes intubados e em ventilação mecânica internados em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, na qual foi realizada buscas de estudos primários nas bases de dados eletrônicas PubMed, EMBASE e CINAHL, utilizando descritores controlados e os respectivos vocabulários destas bases de dados: MeSh, EMTREE e TÍTULOS. Das 184 referências identificadas, 52 foram selecionados após leitura de título e resumo para serem lidos na íntegra, 18 constituíram a amostra final. A extração e análise dos dados foram realizadas por dois revisores independentes. As publicações dos 18 estudos ocorreram no período de 2009 a 2017. O controle do biofilme e prevenção de lesões na cavidade oral constituem ações importantes para a obtenção da boa saúde oral. Para esse controle, são necessárias intervenções que promovam a remoção mecânica e/ou farmacológica do mesmo. Essas intervenções constituem a combinação de produtos, dispositivos e frequência do cuidado oral. As melhores evidências indicaram a combinação dos seguintes produtos, dispositivos e frequência: creme dental Biotene® combinado com a escovação dentária e também Biotene® enxaguante bucal, para promover a hidratação da cavidade oral, reduzindo a xerostomia; clorexidina 0,12%, melhor evidência como antisséptico; lubrificantes a base de água e hidrossolúveis para mucosa oral e lábios; escova de dentes elétrica de cabeça pequena e cerdas macias, como melhor evidência de dispositivo, porém seu custo pode ser um fator que pode impedir sua larga utilização, em sua indisponibilidade, as evidências apontam para a escova de dentes pediátrica com cerdas macias; raspadores de língua para a remoção do biofilme local; frequência a cada oito horas. Citadas as escalas de avaliação da cavidade oral, sustentando a verificação da saúde oral e como fator determinante da frequência da intervenção, respeitando assim a individualidade do paciente. Recomenda-se implementar o uso de escalas de avaliação da saúde oral para a determinação segura da frequência da intervenção; sugere-se novos estudos que abordem esta temática para comparar as escalas de avaliação da cavidade oral, os produtos, dispositivos e frequência; capacitar os profissionais para que a assistência seja realizada com qualidade e segurança, mitigando eventos adversos aos pacientes

Oral care in intubated patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit is a nursing activity that is a set of competencies based on scientific evidence. Oral health refers to the excellent state of the oral cavity and the proper functioning of its structures, obtained through proper oral hygiene, a crucial prevention strategy to exclude the risk of oral problems and to promote the physical and psychological comfort of patients. Inadequate oral hygiene brings vulnerability to the oral cavity potentiating foci of infections conducive to nosocomial pneumonia. Aims to identify and analyze, in the literature, the best available evidence regarding the product, device and frequency of oral care for the prevention of pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation in intubated patients and mechanical ventilation admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. It is an integrative review of the literature, in which searches of primary studies in the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were carried out using controlled descriptors and the respective vocabularies of these databases: MeSh, EMTREE and TITLES. Of the 184 references identified, 52 were selected after reading the title and abstract to be read in their entirety, 18 constituted the final sample. Data extraction and analysis were carried out by two independent reviewers. The publications of the 18 studies occurred between 2009 and 2017. Biofilm control and prevention of oral cavity lesions are important actions to achieve good oral health. For this control, interventions that promote the mechanical and / or pharmacological removal of the same are necessary. These interventions are the combination of products, devices and frequency of oral care.The best evidences indicated the combination of the following products, devices and frequency: Biotene® toothpaste combined with toothbrushing and also Biotene® mouthwash, to promote hydration of the oral cavity, reducing xerostomia; chlorhexidine 0.12%, better evidence as an antiseptic; water-based and water-soluble lubricants for oral mucosa and lips; small electric toothbrush and soft bristles, as best evidence of device, however its cost may be a factor that may prevent its wide use, in its unavailability, the evidence points to the pediatric toothbrush with soft bristles; tongue scrapers for local biofilm removal; every eight hours. Cited scales of assessment of the oral cavity, supported the verification of oral health and as a determinant factor of the frequency of intervention, thus respecting the individuality of the patient. It is recommended that the use of oral health assessment scales for the safe determination of the frequency of intervention be implemented; new studies that address this theme are suggest to compare oral cavity evaluation scales, products, devices and frequency; to enable professionals to carry out quality and safe care, mitigating adverse events to patients

Asunto(s)