RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fluconazole (FLCZ) inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4 and has a drug-drug interaction that potentiates the effects of warfarin and prolong the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR). Although a drug-drug interaction have been reported between FLCZ and warfarin, the effects of the timing of their administration on this interaction have not yet been investigated. CASE PRESENTATION: A female patient in her 30s with Marfan syndrome had undergone the Bentall procedure with a mechanical valve and total arch replacement for acute aortic dissection Stanford A type and rupture of the ascending aorta. Warfarin was administered to prevent thromboembolism. She was hospitalized 1 year ago for graft infection caused by Candida albicans, and treatment with FLCZ was initiated. She received FLCZ 200 mg once a day in the morning and warfarin 1.75 mg once a day in the evening, and the PT-INR remained stable at approximately 2.0 and within the therapeutic range. However, 42 days after changing the timing of administration of warfarin from evening to morning, the PT-INR was prolonged by approximately 3-fold to 6.25. The PT-INR then decreased to the previous level by changing the timing of administration of warfarin from morning to evening. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of administration of FLCZ and warfarin may affect the magnitude of drug-drug interaction.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetes control without developing hypoglycemia is challenging in Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, with few studies evaluating the effect of insulin glargine timing on glucoregulation. OBJECTIVES: The aim is to compare glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in children with T1D receiving bedtime versus morning glargine and to assess CGM effect on glycemia. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 30 pediatric patients with T1D receiving glargine (19 at bedtime and 11 in the morning). CGM sensor was applied for 3-5 days using the I-Pro2 blood glucose sensor. RESULTS: Total daily dose of glargine showed a significant correlation with HbA1C (p=0.006) and percentage of glucose readings within average (p=0.039). HbA1C correlated significantly with time in range (TIR) (p=0.049). Nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly higher in the bedtime glargine group than in the morning one (p=0.016). The morning glargine group showed better control in terms of lower HbA1C and higher TIR, but these did not reach statistical significance. Follow- up after 3 months revealed significant improvement in the percentage of hyperglycemia, BG readings within average, as well as HbA1c (p:0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bedtime glargine administration was associated with a higher frequency of occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. No statistically significant difference in glycemic control between both groups was found. CGM use improved glycemic control.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical trials have demonstrated that REGEN-COV (casirivimab and imdevimab) decreases the risk of hospitalization and death among COVID-19 patients. However, these trials did not evaluate the optimal timing of its administration, and evidence is limited regarding the relationship between the timing of administration and progression to severe COVID-19 among patients who receive REGEN-COV in a real-world setting. We examined the association between the timing of REGEN-COV administration and progression to severe COVID-19 among patients who received REGEN-COV in Japan. METHODS: We included a total of 342 COVID-19 patients (37 hospitals) who received REGEN-COV between July 19 and September 30, 2021. We calculated the difference between the date of symptom onset and the date of administration as an indicator of the timing of REGEN-COV administration and determined progression to severe COVID-19 after REGEN-COV administration. We conducted a logistic regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The proportion of cases progressing to severe COVID-19 increased daily from symptom onset and sharply increased from day 5 of onset. The early administration (days 0-4) decreased the risk of progression to severity compared with late administration (after day 5), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.29 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The early administration of REGEN-COV was associated with a decreased risk of progression to severe COVID-19 when the delta variant was dominant. The present epidemiological findings indicate that this monoclonal antibody therapy should be implemented very early in the clinical course probably even for emerging variants such as omicron BA.2.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that requires aggressive and rapid intervention. However, data on the association between antibiotic administration timing in neonatal sepsis and neonatal outcomes is limited, particularly in the gulf area. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of antibiotic administration and the outcome of neonatal sepsis. DESIGN AND SETTING: This retrospective comparative study was conducted through data collection from medical records of patients with neonatal sepsis. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the time interval between antibiotic prescription and drug administration: non-delayed group consisted of patients who received antibiotics within 3 h and the delayed group consisted of those who received antibiotics after 3 h. RESULTS: A total of 237 neonates diagnosed with sepsis were included, of which 9.3% had necrotizing enterocolitis, 35% had bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and 6.3% had maternal chorioamnionitis. Additionally, 18.6% of the neonates' mothers were prescribed with antibiotics during labor, and 5.5% had maternal fever. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly isolated strain (24.1%). Of the total neonates, 87.3% received antibiotics within the first 3 h from the prescription. Survival rate was significantly higher and the risk of complications such as necrotizing enterocolitis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia was significantly lower in the non-delayed group. Moreover, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the non-delayed group. CONCLUSION: Early antibiotic administration in patients with neonatal sepsis can improve the survival rate and reduce the incidence of complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Recent evidence showed greater efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in the subgroups of COVID-19 patients who presented with symptoms for less than 7 days and in those only receiving oxygen. We retrospectively analyzed a compassionate use cohort to determine the best timing for TCZ injection. We showed no association between the timing of injection after symptom onset and the efficacy of TCZ on mortality. We then investigated whether the oxygen level at the time of TCZ injection impacted the mortality rate. Our study finally suggested that TCZ could be less effective when oxygen requirement is >11L/min and we hypothesized that earlier administration could be associated with better outcome. However, randomized clinical trials are required to confirm this hypothesis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to improve low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level control in patients ineffectively treated with statins, we evaluated the effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg rosuvastatin and ezetimibe and its relation to the timing of drug administration. METHODS: A randomized, open label, single center, crossover study involving 83 patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia with baseline LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. In arm I the FDC drug was administered in the morning for 6 weeks, then in the evening for the following 6 weeks and vice versa in arm II. The primary endpoint was the change in LDL-C after 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: The median LDL-C concentration at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks respectively was: 98.10 mg/dL (Q1;Q3: 85.10;116.80), 63.14 mg/dL (50.70;77.10) and 59.40 mg/dL (49.00;73.30); p < 0.001. LDL-C levels were similar regardless of the timing of drug administration (morning 62.50 mg/dL [50.70;76.00] vs. evening 59.70 mg/dL [48.20;73.80]; p = 0.259], in both time points: 6 week: 63.15 mg/dL (50.75;80.65) vs. 63.40 mg/dL (50.60;74.00), p = 0.775; and 12 week: 62.00 mg/dL (50.20;74.40) vs. 59.05 mg/dL (47.65;66.05), p = 0.362. The absolute change in LDL-C concentration for the morning vs. evening drug administration was - 6 week: -34.6 mg/dL (-56.55; -19.85) (-34.87%) vs. -31.10 mg/dL (-44.20; -16.00) (-35.87%) (p not significant); 12. week: -34.20 mg/dL (-47.8; -19.0) (-37.12%) vs. -37.20 mg/dL (-65.55; -23.85) (-40.06%) (p not significant). The therapy was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe significantly and permanently decreases LDL-C regardless of the timing of drug administration.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Following extensive, positive results in pre-clinical experiments, Bone Marrow Derived-Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (BM-MSCs) are now being tested as a novel therapy for ischemic stroke in ongoing clinical trials. However, multiple critical questions relating to their translational application remain to be clarified. We performed a comprehensive, systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies to evaluate the efficacy of BM-MSCs on functional outcomes after ischemic stroke, as well as the independent role of translational factors on their effect size. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature and identified articles using BM-MSCs in animal models of focal ischemic stroke. After abstraction of all relevant data, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the combined effect size of behavioral endpoints after BM-MSC administration. To describe the effect size across many behavioral outcomes, we divided these outcomes into four categories: (1) Composite scores, (2) Motor Tests, (3) Sensorimotor Tests, and (4) Cognitive Tests. We also performed a meta-regression analysis for measuring the effect of individual characteristics of BM-MSC administration on the effect size. Results: Our results from 141 articles indicate a significant beneficial effect on composite, motor, and sensorimotor outcomes after treatment with BM-MSCs compared to control groups. We found no major differences in treatment effect based on delivery route, dose, fresh vs. frozen preparation, or passage number. There were no consistent findings supporting a difference in treatment effect based on time windows from acute periods (0-6 h) vs. later windows (2-7 days). Furthermore, these positive treatment effects on functional outcome were consistent across different labs in different parts of the world as well as over the last 18 years. There was a negative correlation between publication year and impact factor. Conclusions: Our results show worldwide efficacy of BM-MSCs in improving functional outcomes in pre-clinical animal models of stroke and support testing these cells in clinical trials in various ranges of time windows using different delivery routes. The continued growing number of publications showing functional benefit of BM-MSCs are now adding limited value to an oversaturated literature spanning 18 years. Researchers should focus on identifying definitive mechanisms on how BM-MSCs lead to benefit in stroke models.

RESUMEN

AIM: Hypothyroidism is a common clinical problem that is successfully treated with hormone substitutes in the form of levothyroxine (LT4). LT4 is a drug with a narrow therapeutic index and is usually administered by strict rules, standardly at least half an hour before breakfast. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible effect of different timings of administration on thyroid function status and lipid profile. METHODS: The study included patients with the diagnosis of primary hypothyroidism, which were using a stable dose of levothyroxine. They were randomized into three different groups regarding the timing of LT4 administration in a crossover fashion. Each timing regimen lasted for at least 8 weeks; timing regimen A-half an hour before breakfast; timing regimen B-an hour before the main meal of the day; timing regimen C-at bedtime (minimally 2 h after dinner). The hormones (TSH, fT3, fT4) and lipid profile (triglycerides, HDL-, LDL-, and total cholesterol) were measured before the study, at the beginning of every timing regimen and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Altogether, 84 patients finished the study. Different timings of LT4 administration were non-inferior in comparison to the standard one and between each other. Median differences in TSH level between baseline and timing regimens were: baseline vs. A = -0.017 95% C.I. (-0.400-0.192); baseline vs. B = -0.325 95% C.I. (-0.562-0.023); baseline vs. C = -0.260 95% C.I. (-0.475-0.000). There were no statistically significant differences in either TSH, fT4, or fT3 when compared between all three timing regimens of LT4 administration and the baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the lipid profile parameters (triglycerides, HDL-, LDL-, and total cholesterol) when compared between all three timing regimens of LT4 administration and the baseline. CONCLUSION: The three investigated timing regimens of LT4 administration were equally efficient and offer additional options regarding the treatment individualization.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute lung injury and respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by uncontrolled inflammation of the lungs after a severe inflammatory stimulus. We have previously demonstrated an ameliorated syndrome and improved survival in mice with early administration of valproic acid (VPA), a broad-spectrum histone deacetylase inhibitor, while studies in humans have shown no benefit when anti-inflammatories are administered late. The current study tested the hypothesis that early treatment would improve outcomes in our gram-negative pneumonia-induced acute lung injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice (C57BL/6) had 50 × 106 Escherichia coli (strain 19,138) instilled endotracheally and VPA (250 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally 3, 4, 6, and 9 h (n = 12/group) later. Six hours after VPA administration, the animals were sacrificed, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor, neutrophils and macrophages as well as the E coli colony-forming units were quantified. Plasma IL-6 was also measured. A separate group of mice (n = 12/group) were followed prospectively for 7 days to assess survival. RESULTS: BAL IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor as well as plasma IL-6 were significantly lower in the animals administered VPA within 3 h (P < 0.05) but not when administered later (4, 6, 9 h). There was no difference in the BAL E coli colony-forming units, macrophage, or neutrophil numbers at any time point. Survival improved only when VPA was administered within 3 h. CONCLUSIONS: A narrow therapeutic window exists in this murine model of gram-negative pneumonia-induced acute lung injury and likely explains the lack of response in studies with late administration of anti-inflammatory therapies in clinical studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the effect of flurbiprofen administration time on inflammatory factors in patients with acute suppurative appendicitis after laparoscopic resection. Methods 60 patients with acute suppurative appendicitis resection treated in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2017 were divided into two groups according to the different administration time. The control group received flurbiprofen at the time of operation, and the observation group received flurbiprofen before operation induction; The changes of the indexes of operation and inflammatory factors before and after the operation were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in each operation index; The level of inflammatory factors in the observation group was better than that in the control group 24 hours after the operation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of flurbiprofen is significant before the induction of anesthesia, and the control effect of inflammatory factors is good after the operation, and the time will not affect the postoperative analgesia.

RESUMEN

The appropriate timing of eptifibatide initiation for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the impact of timing of eptifibatide administration on infarct-related artery (IRA) patency in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Acute STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI (n = 324) were enrolled in this retrospective study; 164 patients received eptifibatide bolus ≤ 30 minutes after emergency department (ED) admission (group A) and 160 patients received eptifibatide bolus > 30 minutes after ED admission (group B). The primary endpoint was preprocedural IRA patency. Most patients in group A (90%) and group B (89%) were late presenters (> 2 hours after symptom onset). The two groups had similar preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 2 or 3 flow of the IRA (26 vs. 24%, p = not significant [NS]), similar creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) levels at 8 hours after admission (339 vs. 281 U/L, p = NS), similar left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (52 vs. 50%, p = NS), and similar 30-day mortality (2 vs. 7%, p = NS). Compared with group B, patients in group A had shorter door-to-device time (p < 0.001) and shorter procedural time (p = 0.004), without increased bleeding risk (13 vs. 18%, p = NS). Earlier intravenous administration of eptifibatide before primary PCI did not improve preprocedural IRA patency, CK-MB level at 8 hours after admission, LVEF and 30-day mortality compared with patients who received intravenous eptifibatide that was administered later.