Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 150
Filtrar
1.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 19: 100534, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39257670

RESUMEN

Background: Pain, disability and progressive kyphosis is a common problem after traumatic injury of the thoracolumbar (TL-) junction. Surgical treatment may include long-segment posterior or short-segment anterior-posterior fusion. We aim to report our experience with the application of short-segment posterior instrumented fusion with anterior column support using lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody (LLIF) cages. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study we included consecutive patients treated surgically for traumatic injury of the TL-junction (Th10/11-L2/3) by posterior instrumentation/fusion and LLIF. We measured segmental kyphosis, complications, and outcomes until last follow-up (about 3 years postoperative). Results: We identified 61 patients (mean age 39.0 years [SD 13.3]; 23 females [37.7%]) with A3 fractures without (n=48; 78.7%) or with additional sagittal split component n=11; 18.0%. Additional posterior tension band injury was present in n=26 (42.6%). The affected levels of injury were Th12/L1 in n=25 (41.0%) and Th11/12 in n=22 (36.1%). The segmental kyphotic angle was 14.6° (6.7°) preoperative and remained significantly reduced at all times of follow-up at discharge (5.4°±5.5°; p<.001), at 90 days (7.2°±5.5°; p<.001), after partial hardware removal (7.2°±6.0°; p<.001) and at last follow-up (8.1°±6.3°; p<.001). We noticed a tendency for less progression of kyphosis in the group with 2-staged, compared to single-staged bisegmental surgery (mean difference (MD) 3.1° after partial hardware removal, p=.064). During follow-up, n=11 experienced complications (18%), n=58 (95.1%) had an excellent or good outcome and solid fusion was noticed in n=60 (98.4%). Conclusions: "Trauma LLIF" should be considered as possibility for short-segment anterior-posterior fusion for injuries of the TL- junction. We observed most reproducible and long-lasting kyphosis reduction with a temporary bisegmental, 2-staged procedure resulting in monosegmental fusion (posterior instrumentation/fusion with delayed LLIF and partial hardware removal to release the noninjured caudal motion segment).

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089628

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (p = 0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (p = 0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (p = 0.011), operation duration (p < 0.0001), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF. CONCLUSIONS: Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.

3.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64351, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39131014

RESUMEN

Introduction Spine fracture in association with traumatic dural tear is a serious injury. A traumatic dural tear is difficult to determine based on initial clinical presentation and radiological imaging even with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, during decompression surgery, cerebrospinal fluid leaks surrounding the injured segments are usually confirmed by directly visualizing them. For preoperative planning and intraoperatively limiting further damage to the dural and neurological structures, early detection of traumatic dural tears before surgery is important. This study aims to determine the prevalence, implication, risk factors, and complications of traumatic dural tears in patients who have undergone surgical treatment for thoracic and lumbar fractures. We believe our retrospective study would identify more accurate risk factors for traumatic dural tears and aid us with preoperative planning and operative precaution. Methods This study retrospectively included all patients who had thoracic and lumbar fractures and had posterior instrumentation and decompression surgery at three hospitals in the Northern region of Malaysia from January 2018 to December 2020. Fractures associated with pathological spine including metastatic, severe osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, metabolic bone disease, those with missing data, and iatrogenic dural tears were excluded from this study. Preoperative and postoperative neurological assessments based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, blood loss volume, duration of the surgery, and post-surgery complications were gathered from medical records. Interpedicular distance, ratio of central canal diameter, laminar fracture gap, and pedicle fractures were identified and measured. The obtained data was analyzed using Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and independent t-test/Mann-Whitney test for numerical variables. Result This study comprised a total of 93 patients who had fractures in their thoracic and lumbar regions. The mean age of the patients was 38 years. The number of patients with traumatic dural tears was 20 (21.5%). There was an association between the presence of dural tears and preoperative neurological deficits (P<0.001). Wider mean interpedicular distance (P=0.004), increased central canal diameter ratio (P<0.001), and displaced laminar fracture (P<0.001) were significantly higher in patients with traumatic dural tears. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed both incomplete (P=0.002) and complete (P=0.037) preoperative neurological deficit, increase of central diameter ratio of encroachment (P=0.011), and presence of >2mm laminar fracture gap (P=0.015) had a significant association with a traumatic dural tear. This study found that patients with traumatic dural tears had longer surgical times and statistically larger mean blood loss volumes when compared to patients without dural tears (P<0.001). There is no significant association between the complications following the surgery and the presence of a dural tear (P>0.05).  Conclusion This study shows that the presence of preoperative neurological deficits, wider interpedicular distance, severe canal encroachment, and wide separation of laminar fracture may indicate the likelihood of traumatic dural tear in spine fracture. These factors will enable surgeons to enhance their operational planning and make early preparations for the management of dural tears.

4.
Eur Spine J ; 2024 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39030322

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The AOSpine classification divides thoracolumbar burst fractures into A3 and A4 fractures; nevertheless, past research has found inconsistent interobserver reliability in detecting those two fracture patterns. This systematic analysis aims to synthesize data on the reliability of discriminating between A3 and A4 fractures. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science for studies reporting the inter- and intra-observer reliability of detecting thoracolumbar AO A3 and A4 fractures using computed tomography (CT). The search spanned 2013 to 2023 and included both primarily reliability and observational comparative studies. We followed the PRISMA guidelines and used the modified COSMIN checklist to assess the studies' quality. Kappa coefficient (k) values were categorized according to Landis and Koch, from slight to excellent. RESULTS: Of the 396 identified studies, nine met the eligibility criteria; all were primarily reliability studies except one observational study. Interobserver k values for A3/A4 fractures varied widely among studies (0.19-86). The interobserver reliability was poor in two studies, fair in one study, moderate in four studies, and excellent in two studies. Only two studies reported intra-observer reliability, showing fair and excellent agreement. The included studies revealed significant heterogeneity in study design, sample size, and interpretation methods. CONCLUSION: Considerable variability exists in interobserver reliability for distinguishing A3 and A4 fractures from slight to excellent agreement. This variability might be attributed to methodological heterogeneity among studies, limitations of reliability analysis, or diagnostic pitfalls in differentiating between A3 and A4. Most observational studies comparing the outcome of A3 and A4 fractures do not report interobserver agreement, and this should be considered when interpreting their results.

5.
Brain Spine ; 4: 102855, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39071452

RESUMEN

Introduction: Assessing the integrity of the posterior ligament complex (PLC), as a key element in the characterization of an unstable Thoracolumbar fracture (TLF), is challenging, but crucial in the choice of treatment. Research question: How to create a reproducible score using combined parameters of Computed Tomography (CT) to predict nonobvious PLC injury. How CT parameters relate with PLC status. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of neurologically intact patients with an acute traumatic TLF, who underwent CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) within 72 h, in the Emergency Department of a single institution between January 2016 and 2022. Four investigators rated independently 11 parameters on CT and PLC integrity on MRI. The interrater reliability of the CT parameters was evaluated, and two risk scores were created to predict PLC injury on CT using the coefficients of the multivariate logistic regression. Results: 154 patients were included, of which 62 with PLC injury. All CT measurements had excellent or good interrater reliability. Patients with Horizontal Fracture of the lamina or pedicle (HLPF), Spinous process fracture (SPF) and Interspinous Distance Widening (IDW) were positively associated with PLC injury (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.045, respectively). Risk Score 2 (RS2), which included only statistically significant variables, had a total of 75.9% of correct classifications (p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 71.0% and specificity of 78.3% to estimate PLC injury detected in the MRI. Discussion and conclusion: Standardized procedures pre-established in the CT measurement protocol were effective. Identically to early findings, those three CT measurements showed a positive relation to PLC injury, thus enhancing the conclusions of previous studies. Comparing to the reliability of the CT findings above mentioned, the score was less precise.

6.
Cureus ; 16(6): e63187, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933343

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the effects of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) on global sagittal alignment (GSA) in surgically managed thoracolumbar fractures. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The optimal treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures (TLF) remains controversial. Both MIS techniques with polyaxial screws and OS techniques with Schanz screws have gained widespread use. The effect of each technique on the global sagittal alignment has not been reported. METHODS: From 2014 to 2021, 22 patients with traumatic TLF underwent open posterior stabilization using an open transpedicular Schanz screw-rod construct and were compared to 15 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery using a polyaxial percutaneous pedicle screw-rod construct. The reported radiological parameters measured on preoperative supine CT scan and immediate postop standing X-ray and on final follow-up whole spine standing X-rays included pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), preoperative segmental kyphosis (Preop-K), immediate post-operative segmental kyphosis (postop-Ki), final post-operative segmental kyphosis (postop-Kf), sagittal-vertica-axis (SVA), and spino-sacral angle (SSA). RESULTS: The average age of the OS group was 42.5 years; 5 patients had AO type B, and 17 patients had AO type A (A3 and A4) fractures. The average follow-up was 16.8 months. The average radiological parameters were: PI = 54.9°, PI-LL = 3°, PT = 17.6°, preop-K = 16.2°, postop-Ki = 8.7°, final postop-Kf = 14.3°, SVA = 4.58 cm, and SSA = 101.8°. The average age of the MIS group was 43.4 years; 5 patients had AO type B, and 10 patients had AO type A fractures. The average follow-up was 25 months. The average radiological parameters were as follows: PI = 51°, PI-LL = 8°, PT = 18°, preop-K = 18.4°, postop-Ki = 11.6°, postop-Kf = 14.3°, SVA = 6.4 cm, SSA = 106°. CONCLUSION: The fixation technique did not significantly affect the final correction of the local kyphosis and global spine alignment parameters.

7.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 484, 2024 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898448

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) mainly present as instability, involving all three columns of the spine, and surgical intervention is often considered necessary. However, in AS patients, the significant alterations in bony structure and anatomy result in a lack of identifiable landmarks, which increases the difficulty of pedicle screw implantation. Therefore, we present the clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous fixation for thoracolumbar fractures in patients with AS. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on a series of 12 patients diagnosed with AS. All patients sustained thoracolumbar fractures between October 2018 and October 2022 and underwent posterior robotic-assisted percutaneous fixation procedures. Outcomes of interest included operative time, intra-operative blood loss, complications, duration of hospital stay and fracture union. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To investigate the achieved operative correction, pre- and postoperative radiographs in the lateral plane were analyzed by measuring the Cobb angle. RESULTS: The 12 patients had a mean age of 62.8 ± 13.0 years and a mean follow-up duration of 32.7 ± 18.9 months. Mean hospital stay duration was 15 ± 8.0 days. The mean operative time was 119.6 ± 32.2 min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50, 250) ml. The VAS value improved from 6.8 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.0 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The ODI value improved from 83.6 ± 6.1% preoperatively to 11.8 ± 6.6% at the latest follow-up (P < 0.05). The average Cobb angle changed from 15.2 ± 11.0 pre-operatively to 8.3 ± 7.1 at final follow-up (P < 0.05). Bone healing was consistently achieved, with an average healing time of 6 (5.3, 7.0) months. Of the 108 screws implanted, 2 (1.9%) were improperly positioned. One patient experienced delayed nerve injury after the operation, but the nerve function returned to normal upon discharge. CONCLUSION: Posterior robotic-assisted percutaneous internal fixation can be used as an ideal surgical treatment for thoracolumbar fractures in AS patients. However, while robot-assisted pedicle screw placement can enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, it should not be relied upon solely.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Vértebras Lumbares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Vértebras Torácicas , Humanos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/cirugía , Espondilitis Anquilosante/complicaciones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Tempo Operativo , Tiempo de Internación , Tornillos Pediculares , Adulto , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Seguimiento
8.
Brain Spine ; 4: 102779, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38560042

RESUMEN

Introduction: Predicting the pre-morbid sagittal profile of the spine or segmental angles could enhance the process of planning the extent of fracture reduction. There is evidence that spinopelvic parameters may be suitable for this purpose. Research question: Is it possible to determine the inflection point and the mono- and bi-segmental endplate angles (EPA) in the thoracolumbar transition (from Th9 to L2) based on age, gender, spinopelvic parameters, and the adjacent EPA in the supine position? Material and methods: Based on Polytrauma CT scans in the supine position, the following spinopelvic parameters were measured using non-fractured spines: pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and the apex of the LL. Results: In this study, a total of 287 patients with a mean age of 42±16 years were included. Age-related changes were observed, where LL, thoracic kyphosis (TK), and PI increase with age. Gender-related comparisons showed that females had a more pronounced LL and reduced TK. Significant correlations between IP and spinopelvic parameters, with the apex of LL providing the best prediction, were found. However, the overall model quality remained low. Predicting mEPA and bEPA showed positive correlations. The prediction for mEPA L2/3 demonstrated the highest correlation. For bisegmental angles, the most caudal bEPA (L2) exhibited the highest correlation, albeit with some notable absolute differences in the values between measured and predicted values. Discussion and conclusion: While this study highlights the complexity of the relationship between the pelvis and thoracolumbar parameters, finding a predictive tool for thoracolumbar reduction and stabilization was not possible.

9.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619584

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: It was aimed to compare the results of long segment posterior instrumentation with intermediate pedicular screw + fusion at the level of the fractured segment including one vertebra above and one below the fractured vertebra (LSPI) and short segment posterior instrumentation with intermediate pedicular screw + fusion at the level of the fractured segment including one vertebra above and one below the fractured vertebra (SSPI) in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. METHODS: Ninety patients with thoracolumbar vertebral (T11-L2) fractures operated between March 2015 and February 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups as those who underwent LSPI (n, 54; age, 40.3) and those who underwent SSPI (n, 36; age, 39.7). Radiological evaluations like vertebral compression angle (VCA), vertebral corpus heights (VCH), intraoperative parameters, and complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Correction in early postoperative VCA was statistically significantly better in LSPI (p = 0.003). At 1-year follow-up, postoperative VCA correction was significantly more successful in LSPI (p = 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of correction loss in VCA measured at 1-year follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative VCH, VCH at 1-year follow-up, and correction loss in VCH. CONCLUSION: LSPI provides better postoperative kyphosis correction of the fractured vertebra than SSPI. Regarding the segment level of posterior instrumentation, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of the loss of achieved correction of VCA, ABH, and PBH at 1-year follow-up. Operating a thoracolumbar fracture with LSPI will lengthen the operation and increase the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies compared to SSPI.

10.
Brain Spine ; 4: 102787, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590587

RESUMEN

Introduction: A recent meta-analysis showed that only four prior studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can change the fracture classification in 17% and treatment decisions in 22% of cases. However, previous studies showed a wide methodological variability regarding the study population, the definition of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, and outcome measures. Research question: How can we standardize the reporting of the impact of MRI for neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar fractures? Material and methods: All available literature regarding the impact of MRI on thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making were reviewed. Estimating the impact of MRI on the TLFs' classification is an exercise of analyzing the CTs' accuracy for PLC injury against MRI as a ''Gold standard''and should follow standardized checklists such as the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Additionally, specific issues related to TLFs should be addressed. Results: A standardized approach for reporting the impact of MRI in neurologically intact TLF patients was proposed. Regarding patient selection, restricting the inclusion of neurologically intact patients with A- and B-injuries is crucial. Image interpretation should be standardized regarding imaging protocol and appropriate criteria for PLC injury. The impact of MRI can be measured by either the rate of change in fracture classification or treatment decisions; the cons and pros of each measure is thoroughly discussed. Discussion and conclusion: We proposed a structured methodology for examining the impact of MRI on neurologically intact patients with TLFs, focusing on appropriate patient selection, standardizing image analysis, and clinically relevant outcome measures.

11.
Eur Spine J ; 33(4): 1556-1573, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430400

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although vertical laminar fracture (VLF) is generally considered a severity marker for thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs), its exact role in decision-making has never been established. This scoping review aims to synthesize the research on VLF's role in the decision-making of TLFs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to  June 11, 2023, for studies examining the association of VLF in thoracolumbar fractures with dural lacerations, neurological deficits, radiographic parameters, or treatment outcomes. Additionally, experimental studies that analyze the biomechanics of burst fractures with VLF were included. The studies extracted key findings, objectives, and patient population. A meta-analysis was performed for the association of VLF with dural laceration and neurological deficit, and ORs were pooled with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included in this systematic review, encompassing 2021 patients, and twelve were included in the meta-analysis. According to the main subject of the study, the association of VLF with a dural laceration (n = 14), neurological deficit (n = 4), radiographic parameters (n = 3), thoracolumbar fracture classification (n = 2), and treatment outcome (n = 2). Seven studies with a total of 1010 patients reported a significant association between VLF and neurological deficit (OR = 7.35, 95% CI [3.97, 14.25]; P < 0.001). The pooled OR estimates for VLF predicting dural lacerations were 7.75, 95% CI [2.41, 24.87]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: VLF may have several important diagnostic and therapeutic implications in managing TLFs. VLF may help to distinguish AO type A3 from A4 fractures. VLF may help to predict preoperatively the occurrence of dural laceration, thereby choosing the optimal surgical strategy. Clinical and biomechanical data suggest VLF may be a valuable modifier to guide the decision-making in burst fractures; however, more studies are needed to confirm its prognostic importance regarding treatment outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Humanos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos
12.
Orthop Rev (Pavia) ; 16: 94279, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38435438

RESUMEN

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) are bone-forming spinal conditions which inherently increase spine rigidity and place patients at a higher risk for thoracolumbar fractures. Due to the long lever-arm associated with their pathology, these fractures are frequently unstable and may significantly displace leading to catastrophic neurologic consequences. Operative and non-operative management are considerations in these fractures. However conservative measures including immobilization and bracing are typically reserved for non-displaced or incomplete fractures, or in patients for whom surgery poses a high risk. Thus, first line treatment is often surgery which has historically been an open posterior spinal fusion. Recent techniques such as minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and robotic surgery have shown promising lower complication rates as compared to open techniques, however these methods need to be further validated.

13.
Global Spine J ; 14(1_suppl): 25S-31S, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38324599

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess radiographic characteristics associated with agreement and disagreement in treatment recommendation in thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures. METHODS: A panel of 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts reviewed 183 cases and were asked to: (1) classify the fracture; (2) assess degree of certainty of PLC disruption; (3) assess degree of comminution; and (4) make a treatment recommendation. Equipoise threshold used was 77% (77:23 distribution of uncertainty or 17 vs 5 experts). Two groups were created: consensus vs equipoise. RESULTS: Of the 183 cases reviewed, the experts reached full consensus in only 8 cases (4.4%). Eighty-one cases (44.3%) were included in the agreement group and 102 cases (55.7%) in the equipoise group. A3/A4 fractures were more common in the equipoise group (92.0% vs 83.7%, P < .001). The agreement group had higher degree of certainty of PLC disruption [35.8% (SD 34.2) vs 27.6 (SD 27.3), P < .001] and more common use of the M1 modifier (44.3% vs 38.3%, P < .001). Overall, the degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group [47.8 (SD 20.5) vs 45.7 (SD 23.4), P < .001]. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement group had a higher degree of certainty of PLC injury and more common use of M1 modifier (more type B fractures). The equipoise group had more A3/A4 type fractures. Future studies are required to identify the role of comminution in decision making as degree of comminution was slightly higher in the equipoise group.

14.
Global Spine J ; 14(1_suppl): 17S-24S, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38324600

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Reliability study utilizing 183 injury CT scans by 22 spine trauma experts with assessment of radiographic features, classification of injuries and treatment recommendations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the AOSpine TL Injury Classification System (TLICS) including the categories within the classification and the M1 modifier. METHODS: Kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficients were produced. Associations of various imaging characteristics (comminution, PLC status) and treatment recommendations were analyzed through regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used for making predictive algorithms. RESULTS: Reliability of the AO Spine TLICS at differentiating A3 and A4 injuries (N = 71) (K = .466; 95% CI .458 - .474; P < .001) demonstrated moderate agreement. Similarly, the average intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) amongst A3 and A4 injuries was excellent (ICC = .934; 95% CI .919 - .947; P < .001) and the ICC between individual measures was moderate (ICC = .403; 95% CI .351 - .461; P < .001). The overall agreement on the utilization of the M1 modifier amongst A3 and A4 injuries was fair (K = .161; 95% CI .151 - .171; P < .001). The ICC for PLC status in A3 and A4 injuries averaged across all measures was excellent (ICC = .936; 95% CI .922 - .949; P < .001). The M1 modifier suggests respondents are nearly 40% more confident that the PLC is injured amongst all injuries. The M1 modifier was employed at a higher frequency as injuries were classified higher in the classification system. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of surgeons differentiating between A3 and A4 injuries in the AOSpine TLICS is substantial and the utilization of the M1 modifier occurs more frequently with higher grades in the system.

15.
Global Spine J ; 14(1_suppl): 41S-48S, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38324603

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the impact of vertebral body comminution and Posterior Ligamentous Complex (PLC) integrity on the treatment recommendations of thoracolumbar fractures among an expert panel of 22 spine surgeons. METHODS: A review of 183 prospectively collected thoracolumbar burst fracture computed tomography (CT) scans by an expert panel of 22 trauma spine surgeons to assess vertebral body comminution and PLC integrity. This study is a sub-study of a prospective observational study of thoracolumbar burst fractures (Spine TL A3/A4). Each expert was asked to grade the degree of comminution and certainty about the PLC disruption from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the intact vertebral body or intact PLC and 100 representing complete comminution or complete PLC disruption, respectively. RESULTS: ≥45% comminution had a 74% chance of having surgery recommended, while <25% comminution had an 86.3% chance of non-surgical treatment. A comminution from 25 to 45% had a 57% chance of non-surgical management. ≥55% PLC injury certainity had a 97% chance of having surgery, and ≥45-55% PLC injury certainty had a 65%. <20% PLC injury had a 64% chance of having non-operative treatment. A 20 to 45% PLC injury certainity had a 56% chance of non-surgical management. There was fair inter-rater agreement on the degree of comminution (ICC .57 [95% CI 0.52-.63]) and the PLC integrity (ICC .42 [95% CI 0.37-.48]). CONCLUSION: The study concludes that vetebral comminution and PLC integrity are major dterminant in decision making of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. However, more objective, reliable, and accurate methods of assessment of these variables are warranted.

16.
Eur Spine J ; 33(4): 1540-1549, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342842

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To provide the first meta-analysis of the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs) classification and decision-making. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from inception to June 30, 2023 for studies evaluating the change in TLFs classification and treatment decisions after MRI. The studies extracted key findings, objectives, and patient population. A meta-analysis was performed for the pooled frequency of change in AO fracture classification or treatment decisions from surgical to conservative or vice versa after MRI. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included four studies comprising 554 patients. The pooled frequency of change in TLFs classification was 17% (95% CI 9-31%), and treatment decision was 22% (95% CI 11-40%). An upgrade from type A to type B was reported in 15.7% (95% CI 7.2-30.6%), and downgrading type B to type A in 1.2% (95% CI 0.17-8.3%). A change from conservative to surgery recommendation of 17% (95% CI 5.0-43%) was higher than a change from surgery to conservative 2% (95% CI 1-34%). CONCLUSIONS: MRI can significantly change the thoracolumbar classification and decision-making, primarily due to upgrading type A to type B fractures and changing from conservative to surgery, respectively. These findings suggest that MRI could change decision-making sufficiently to justify its use for TLFs. Type A subtypes, indeterminate PLC status, and spine regions might help to predict a change in TLFs' classification. However, more studies are needed to confirm the association of these variables with changes in treatment decisions to set the indications of MRI in neurologically intact patients with TLFs. An interactive version of our analysis can be accessed from here: https://databoard.shinyapps.io/mri_spine/ .


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Vértebras Lumbares , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Humanos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/clasificación , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Toma de Decisiones
17.
J Clin Med ; 13(3)2024 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38337399

RESUMEN

Spinal injuries, including cervical and thoracolumbar fractures, continue to be a major public health concern. Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning technologies offer exciting prospects for improving both diagnostic and prognostic approaches in spinal injury care. This narrative review systematically explores the practical utility of these computational methods, with a focus on their application in imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as in structured clinical data. Of the 39 studies included, 34 were focused on diagnostic applications, chiefly using deep learning to carry out tasks like vertebral fracture identification, differentiation between benign and malignant fractures, and AO fracture classification. The remaining five were prognostic, using machine learning to analyze parameters for predicting outcomes such as vertebral collapse and future fracture risk. This review highlights the potential benefit of machine learning and deep learning in spinal injury care, especially their roles in enhancing diagnostic capabilities, detailed fracture characterization, risk assessments, and individualized treatment planning.

18.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 62, 2024 Jan 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263482

RESUMEN

At present, percutaneous surgery is widely used to treat thoracolumbar fractures. However, the actual safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of percutaneous surgery are not clear. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the efficacies of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without nerve root symptoms. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries for articles published on or before June 2023. All results were evaluated by standard methods recommended for meta-analysis, continuous data were expressed by standard mean differences (SMDs), and binary variables were analyzed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We also explored the main sources of heterogeneity and the stability of the results through sensitivity analysis, Begg's funnel plots, and Egger's test. Thirty-five cohort studies with a total of 3039 patients were included. The study found that patients who undergo percutaneous approaches have less intraoperative blood loss (IBL), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS), shorter operation time, and shorter incision. Moreover, percutaneous approaches had more advantages in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and infection rates. However, there was no significant difference in anterior vertebral body height (AVB), Cobb angle (CA), or screw errors between the two groups. In the long run, the clinical and surgical results of the percutaneous approach are better than those of the open approach, but the radiological results of both operations do not seem to show an advantage for any specific approach. Because of publication bias and heterogeneity, our findings must be interpreted with caution. However, this paper will provide some support for clinicians to choose suitable surgical methods for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Tornillos Pediculares , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Tiempo de Internación , Oportunidad Relativa
19.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(1): 239-250, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37838983

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Thoracolumbar spine fractures often require surgical treatment as they are associated with spinal instability. Optimal operative techniques and treatment are discussed controversially. Aim of our prospective cohort study was to investigate the sagittal alignment after reduction, the secondary loss of reduction and the subjective outcome as well as the causal correlation of these parameters after minimally invasive stabilization of thoracic and lumbar fractures with polyaxial pedicle screws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center study, a total of 78 patients with an average age of 61 ± 17 years who suffered a fracture of the thoracic or lumbar spine were included and subjected to a clinical and radiological follow-up examination after 8.5 ± 8 months. The kyphotic deformity was measured by determining the vertebral body angle, the mono- and bi-segmental wedge angle at three time points. The patients' subjective outcome was evaluated by the VAS spine score. RESULTS: After surgical therapy, a significant reduction of the traumatic kyphotic deformity was shown with an improvement of all angles (vertebral body angle: 3.2° ± 4.4°, mono- and bi-segmental wedge angle: 3.1° ± 5.6°, 2.0° ± 6.3°). After follow-up, a significant loss of sagittal alignment was observed for all measured parameters with a loss of correction. However, no correlation between the loss of reduction and the subjective outcome regarding the VAS spine scale could be detected. CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive dorsal stabilization of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures with polyaxial pedicle screws achieved a satisfactory reduction of the fracture-induced kyphotic deformity immediately postoperatively with a floss of reduction in the further course. However, maybe the main goal of this surgical procedure should be the prevention of a complete collapse of the vertebral body instead of a long-lasting restoration of anatomic sagittal alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Ilusiones , Cifosis , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Tornillos Pediculares/efectos adversos , Cuerpo Vertebral , Estudios Prospectivos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Cifosis/etiología , Cifosis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 37(12): 1489-1495, 2023 Dec 15.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130192

RESUMEN

Objective: To explore the safety and effectiveness of one-stage posterior eggshell osteotomy and long-segment pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis combined with acute thoracolumbar vertebral fracture. Methods: A clinical data of 20 patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis combined with acute thoracolumbar spine fracture, who were treated with one-stage posterior eggshell osteotomy and long-segment pedicle screw fixation between April 2016 and January 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 16 cases were male and 4 cases were female; their ages ranged from 32 to 68 years, with an average of 45.9 years. The causes of injury included 10 cases of sprain, 8 cases of fall, and 2 cases of falling from height. The time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 12 days, with an average of 7.1 days. The injured segment was T 11 in 2 cases, T 12 in 2 cases, L 1 in 6 cases, and L 2 in 10 cases. X-ray film and CT showed that the patients had characteristic imaging manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis, and the fracture lines were involved in the anterior, middle, and posterior columns and accompanied by different degrees of kyphosis and vertebral compression; and MRI showed that 12 patients had different degrees of nerve injuries. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, intra- and post-operative complications were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the low back pain and quality of life, and the American spinal cord injury association (ASIA) classification was used to evaluate the neurological function. X-ray films were taken, and local Cobb angle (LCA) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured to evaluate the correction of the kyphosis. Results: All operations were successfully completed and the operation time ranged from 127 to 254 minutes (mean, 176.3 minutes). The amount of intraoperative bleeding ranged from 400 to 950 mL (mean, 722.5 mL). One case of dural sac tear occurred during operation, and no cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred after repair, and the rest of the patients did not suffer from neurological and vascular injuries, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and other related complications during operation. All incisions healed by first intention without infection or fat liquefaction. All patients were followed up 8-16 months (mean, 12.5 months). The VAS score, ODI, LCA, and SVA at 3 days after operation and last follow-up significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05), and the difference between 3 days after operation and last follow-up was not significant ( P>0.05). The ASIA grading of neurological function at last follow-up also significantly improved when compared with that before operation ( P<0.05), including 17 cases of grade E and 3 cases of grade D. At last follow-up, all bone grafts achieved bone fusion, and no complications such as loosening, breaking of internal fixation, and pseudoarthrosis occurred. Conclusion: One-stage posterior eggshell osteotomy and long-segment pedicle screw fixation is an effective surgical procedure for ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis combined with acute thoracolumbar vertebral fracture. It can significantly relieve patients' clinical symptoms and to some extent, alleviate the local kyphotic deformity.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Cifosis , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Cifosis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Osteotomía , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Espondilitis Anquilosante/complicaciones , Espondilitis Anquilosante/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA