RESUMEN

Insertable cardiac monitor (ICM), used for long-term heart rhythm monitoring, often experiences diagnostic challenges such as T-wave oversensing, leading to false positives. This case report presents a novel approach to rectifying T-wave oversensing in ICM implantations. In this case, we are sharing a 38-year-old female with recurrent syncopal episodes who underwent ICM implantation (LUX-Dx™, ICM-Boston Scientific, Marlborough, United States). Post-implantation, T-wave oversensing was detected. Instead of the usual readjustment or reinsertion, we employed a non-invasive method of repositioning the ICM at a 45-degree angle toward the right side of the heart through the existing incision. This effectively resolved the oversensing issue without complications or the need for a new incision. ICMs are vital in linking symptoms to arrhythmias, especially in cases where standard diagnostic tools fall short. Despite their utility, ICMs are susceptible to T-wave oversensing due to subcutaneous placement. Our case demonstrates a successful alternative approach to address this, enhancing ICM's diagnostic accuracy without invasive procedures. This case highlights the potential of repositioning ICMs as a simple, non-invasive solution to overcome T-wave oversensing issues. It calls for further research and discussion within the medical community to explore its wider applicability, thereby improving ICM efficacy in clinical practice. The patient experienced no complications following the procedure during the three-month visit with appropriate sensing, validating this approach as a feasible option in similar cases.

RESUMEN

A 66-year-old female with end-stage renal disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, status post implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) presented to the emergency department with dizziness and fatigue. An electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm, complete atrioventricular block, and ventricular paced rhythm at 30 beats per minute (bpm). Device interrogation revealed a programmed VVI mode with a lower rate limit of 40 bpm and evidence of T wave oversensing. Serologic studies were remarkable for hyperkalemia (7.9 mmol/dL). The device was initially reprogrammed to provide a higher pacing rate and symptomatic improvement. Both complete AV block and T wave oversensing resolved after correction of hyperkalemia. This case highlights the need for vigilant monitoring of electrolyte imbalances in ICD patients.

RESUMEN

T-wave oversensing in pacemakers is rare because the set sensitivity is generally fixed. However, several models of pacemaker employ automatic sensitivity adjustment. Here, we present two cases of atrioventricular block treated by implantation of the pacemaker with automatic sensitivity adjustment. After implanting the pacemaker with automatic sensitivity adjustment, ventricular pacing suppression due to T-wave oversensing occurred. In both cases, T-wave oversensing disappeared after adjusting the setting sensitivity from 0.9 to 2.0 mV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been suggested as an alternative modality for biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-eligible patients. As it provides stable R-wave sensing, LBBP has been recently used to provide sensing of ventricular arrhythmia in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) with CRT. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term safety and efficacy of the LBBP lead for appropriate detection of ventricular arrhythmia and delivery of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in patients requiring defibrillator therapy with CRT. METHODS: CRT-eligible patients who underwent successful LBBP-optimized ICD and LBBP-optimized CRT with defibrillator were enrolled. The LBBP lead was connected to the right ventricular-P/S port after capping the IS-1 connector plug of the DF-1-ICD lead. LBBP-optimized ICD or LBBP-optimized CRT with defibrillator was decided on the basis of correction of conduction system disease. Documented arrhythmic episodes and therapy delivered were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. The mean age was 59.7 ± 10.5 years. LBBP resulted in an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 29.9% ± 4.6% to 43.9% ± 11.2% (P < .0001). During a mean follow-up of 22.9 ± 12.5 months, 254 ventricular arrhythmic events were documented. Appropriate events (n = 225 [89%]) included nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 212 episodes [94%]), VT (n = 8 [3.5%]), and ventricular fibrillation (n = 5 [2.5%]). ATP efficacy in terminating VT was 75%. Eleven percent of episodes (n = 29) were inappropriately detected because of T-wave oversensing. Inappropriate therapy (ATP) was delivered for 14 episodes (5.5%). Three patients (10%) had worsening of tricuspid regurgitation. CONCLUSION: Sensing from the LBBP lead for arrhythmia detection is safe as ∼90% of the episodes were detected appropriately. Future studies with a dedicated LBBP-defibrillator lead along with algorithms to avoid oversensing can help in combining defibrillation with conduction system pacing.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) reduces mortality in individuals at high risk of sudden arrhythmic death, by rapid defibrillation of life-threatening arrhythmia. Unfortunately, S-ICD recipients are also at risk of inappropriate shock therapies, which themselves are associated with increased rates of mortality and morbidity. The commonest cause of inappropriate shock therapies is T wave oversensing (TWOS), where T waves are incorrectly counted as R waves leading to an overestimation of heart rate. It is important to develop a method to reduce TWOS and improve the accuracy of R-peak detection in S-ICD system. METHODS: This paper introduces a novel algorithm to reduce TWOS based on phase space reconstruction (PSR); a common method used to analyse the chaotic characteristics of non-linear signals. RESULTS: The algorithm was evaluated against 34 records from University Hospital Southampton (UHS) and all 48 records from the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. In the UHS analysis we demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.88%, a positive predictive value of 99.99% and an accuracy of 99.88% with reductions in TWOS episodes (from 166 to 0). Whilst in the MIT-BIH analysis we demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.87%, a positive predictive value of 99.99% and an accuracy of 99.91% for R wave detection. The average processing time for 1 min ECG signals from all records is 2.9 s. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm is sensitive for R-wave detection and can effectively reduce the TWOS with low computational complexity, and it would therefore have the potential to reduce inappropriate shock therapies in S-ICD recipients, which would significantly reduce shock related morbidity and mortality, and undoubtedly improving patient's quality of life.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Combined implantation of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) appears a suitable option to reduce the amount of intracardiac leads and complications for patients. Here we report on a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy carrying an S-ICD in which a CCM device was implanted. During crosstalk testing post-CCM implantation, the S-ICD misannotated QRS complexes and T waves. The problem was solved through reprogramming the CCM, while preserving S-ICD functionality and improving heart failure symptoms. In conclusion, S-ICD combined with CCM seems to be a good and safe option for patients when device interference is being ruled out.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: The present study aims at analyzing the role of a preimplantation 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) on the prediction of inappropriate S-ICD® episodes. METHODS: N=116 screened patients (pts) with an S-ICD® and a follow-up of at least 6 months were included. A preimplantation 12-lead ECG (50 mm/s, 10 mm/mV) was analyzed with regard to QRS and T-wave amplitude, T wave concordance or discordance and QRS/T wave ratio in all 12 leads. To ensure an exact determination of parameters Datinf® Measure software was used. Results were correlated to the occurrence of oversensing of cardiac signals during follow-up. RESULTS: N = 116 pts. (63,8% male, mean age 40,9 ± 15,5 years) were included (primary prevention in 47.4% of pts). The most frequent cardiac diseases were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in n = 25 (21,6%), electrical heart disease in n = 20 (17,2%), and dilated cardiomyopathy in n = 17 (14,7%). Mean follow-up was 740 ± 549 days. During follow- up n = 17 (14.7%) pts. experienced n = 27 inappropriate episodes due to T-wave oversensing. Besides HCM (OR 6.16, CI 1.79-21.15, p = 0.004) a discordance of QRS to T-wave in lead I (OR 6.5, CI 1.86-22.67, p = 0.003) was found to be a strong predictor for inappropriate shocks. In multivariate analysis the pts. with a combination of both had an 8.4-fold higher risk of misclassification of intracardiac signals (p = 0.003) with consecutive inappropriate therapy. CONCLUSION: A discordance of QRS to T-wave in lead I turned out to be a strong predictor for future inappropriate shocks in a typical S-ICD® cohort with special impact on HCM pts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the main therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) can eliminate lead-associated complications compared with transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). However, S-ICD is susceptible to T-wave oversensing (TWOS) and may result in more frequent inappropriate shocks in patients with BrS. This study aimed to compare inappropriate shocks between TV-ICD and S-ICD in patients with BrS. We enrolled 32 patients with BrS (including one woman; mean age 52 ± 18 years) who were implanted with ICD (23 TV-ICDs and 9 S-ICDs) between January 2002 and November 2018 in Oita University Hospital. We carried out a standard surface electrocardiogram (ECG) screening tests in both supine and standing positions prior to S-ICD implantation. The patients received routine clinical review every month and device monitoring every 4 months. The period of follow-up was 129 ± 51 months. Six patients with BrS and TV-ICDs experienced inappropriate shocks (26%) with their ICD therapy. In contrast, two patients with BrS and S-ICDs experienced inappropriate shocks (22%). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.82). Although one case in the S-ICD group experienced TWOS-induced inappropriate shock, SMART Pass (new high-pass filter) prevented the subsequent recurrence of inappropriate shocks during ICD therapy. Our results suggest that S-ICD is not inferior to TV-ICD in the incidence of inappropriate shocks. SMART Pass may be a useful tool to prevent inappropriate ICD shocks by TWOS in patients with BrS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A 48-year-old man who was previously a responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) presented with worsening of heart failure and reduction in the percentage biventricular (BiV) pacing. Device interrogation revealed T-wave oversensing that was eliminated by optimizing the interventricular (VV) delay. Compared to simultaneous BiV pacing, both sequential left ventricle-right ventricle (LV-RV) and univentricular LV pacing shortened the QTc, T peak-end intervals and reduced the T wave amplitude. Modification of VV delays can result in changes in wavefront of activation and thereby affect ventricular repolarization patterns.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

T-wave oversensing (TWOS) is a relatively common occurrence in pacemakers and defibrillators that can lead to pauses and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. We present a case of TWOS that triggered the Lead Integrity Alert (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) without evidence of actual lead failure.

RESUMEN

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome have been associated with sudden cardiac death. A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an effective device used to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in these patients. The most common cause of inappropriate shocks with S-ICD is T-wave oversensing. We present the case of a 19-year-old man with repeated shocks from his S-ICD. This case highlights some of the sensing issues related to the S-ICD that can result in inappropriate shocks. A vector change may have occurred after T-wave remodeling, post accessory pathway ablation, and loss of R-waves due to HCM scar progression, leading to this consequence.

RESUMEN

A 62-year-old pacemaker-dependent patient presented to our department with a sudden onset of reduced physical capacity. While initial physical and pacemaker evaluations remained without specific findings, Holter-ECG monitoring revealed an abnormal rate response with unusual pauses during physical exercise. Consequently, closer evaluation of the pacemaker system revealed intermittent, exercise-related T-wave oversensing (TWOS). While TWOS remains a significant burden in ICD-patients, it might be an underestimated but clinically significant event in pacemaker patients. Further studies should evaluate the impact of TWOS in this patient population.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compared to screening ECG before implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD), selectable vectors without T-wave oversensing increase after S-ICD implantation. Newer algorithms have recently become available to reduce T-wave oversensing, such as SMART pass (SP). With this function, more selectable vectors are identified after S-ICD implantation. However, this improvement in eligibility utilizing SP has not yet been well validated. We aimed to clarify S-ICD eligibility before and after S-ICD implantation with and without SP. METHODS: Participants comprised 34 patients implanted with an S-ICD at Okayama University Hospital and its affiliated hospitals between February 2016 and August 2017. A total of 102 S-ICD vectors were assessed for eligibility before and after S-ICD implantation, at rest and during exercise testing. Vector availability was evaluated in the presence and absence of SP after S-ICD implantation. RESULTS: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator eligibility was significantly better after implantation even without SP than S-ICD screening before S-ICD implantation, both at rest (before 65.7% vs after 95.1%, P < 0.01) and during exercise (before 59.3% vs after 90.6%, P < 0.01). SP improved S-ICD eligibility during exercise (SP on 97.9% vs off 90.6%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed the prevalence of S-ICD eligibility increased significantly after S-ICD implantation compared to screening before implantation. SP further increased selectable vectors in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Available vectors increased significantly after S-ICD implantation compared to preoperative vectors as assessed by S-ICD screening ECG. T-wave oversensing during exercise has been an unresolved issue for S-ICD, but SP will help prevent inappropriate operation with S-ICD.