RESUMEN
Background: Patients with chronic myocardial infarction (MI) and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction have poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) leads to further improvement in long-term patient outcomes compared with isolated CABG (I-CABG). Methods: From April 2010 to June 2013, 140 consecutive patients with chronic MI and severe LV dysfunction who received contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CE-CMR) within 1 month before surgery were enrolled in this study. The cardiovascular events (CVEs) and long-term survival of patients who underwent CABG and SVR were compared with those who met the criteria for SVR but received I-CABG. Results: A total of 140 patients were included in the final analysis, including 70 patients who underwent CABG and SVR and 70 patients who underwent I-CABG. No differences were observed in the baseline characteristics, LV function, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) between the two groups. CABG+SVR patients experienced a longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (116.0±35.0 vs. 100.2±23.8 minutes, P=0.002) and ventilation time [median (interquartile range): 22.0 (17.0, 37.0) vs. 20.0 (15.0, 24.0) hours, P=0.019] than I-CABG patients. During a mean follow-up of 123.1±12.7 months (range, 102-140 months), the CABG+SVR group had fewer rehospitalizations for congestive heart failure (CHF) (4.3% vs. 19.1%, P=0.007), but no statistical difference in the mortality rate was observed (2.9% vs. 4.4%, P=0.987). The cumulative CVE-free survival rate was significantly higher in CABG+SVR patients (87.0% vs. 67.6%, P=0.007). Conclusions: Our findings indicated that patients with chronic MI and severe LV dysfunction experienced similar perioperative outcomes after CABG+SVR or I-CABG. However, the CABG+SVR group resulted in fewer rehospitalizations for CHF and a higher cumulative CVE-free survival rate.
RESUMEN
Background: Surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) has been used to control adverse ventricular remodeling and improve cardiac function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to collect and analyze all available evidence on the utilization and efficacy of SVR. Methods: An electronic database search was performed to identify all retrospective and prospective studies on SVR for ischemic cardiomyopathy in the English literature from 2000 through 2020. A total of 92 articles with a collective 7,685 patients undergoing SVR were included in the final analysis. Results: The mean patient age was 61 years (95% CI: 59-63) and 80% (78-82%) were male. Congestive heart failure was present in 66% (54-78%) and angina in 58% (45-70%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was undertaken in 92% (90-93%) while 21% (18-24%) underwent mitral valve repair. Pre vs. post-SVR, significant improvement was seen in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [29.9% (28.8-31.2%) vs. 40.9% (39.4-42.4%), P<0.01], left ventricular end-systolic (LVESD) and end-diastolic diameters (LVEDD) [LVESD: 49.9 mm (48.1-51.7) vs. 45 mm (42.8-47.3), P<0.01, LVEDD: 63.8 mm (62-65.6) vs. 58.23 mm (56.6-60), P<0.01], and left ventricular end-systolic (LVESVI) and end-diastolic volume indices (LVEDVI) [LVESVI: 83.9 mL/m2 (79.3-88.4) vs. 46.8 mL/m2 (43.5-50.1), P<0.01; LVEDVI: 119.9 mL/m2 (112.1-127.6) vs. 79.6 mL/m2 (73.6-85.7), P<0.01]. Mean New York Heart Association class improved from 3 (2.8-3.1) to 1.8 (1.5-2) (P<0.01). The 30-day mortality was 4% (3-5%) while late mortality was 19% (9-34%) at a mean follow-up of 27.5 [21-34] months. Conclusions: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, SVR reduces left ventricular volumes and improves systolic function leading to symptomatic improvement.
RESUMEN
Left ventricular (LV) enlargement is a mechanical adaptation to accommodate LV systolic inefficiency following an acute damage or a progressive functional deterioration, which fails to correct the decline of stroke volume in the long term, leading to progressive heart failure (HF). Surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) is a treatment for patients with severe ischemic HF aiming to restore LV efficiency by volume reduction and LV re-shaping. Recently, a new minimally-invasive hybrid technique for ventricular reconstruction has been developed by means of the Revivent™ system (BioVentrix Inc., San Ramon, CA, USA). The device for ventricular reconstruction consists of anchor pairs that enable plication of the anterior and free wall LV scar against the right ventricular (RV) septal scar of anteroseptal infarctions to decrease cardiac volume without ventriculotomy in a beating-heart minimally-invasive procedure, consisting of a transjugular and left thoracotomy approach. Patients with severe (Grade 4) functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) or with previous cardiac surgery procedures were excluded. Outcome of the reconstruction procedure: from 2012 until 2019, it has been applied to 203 patients, with 5 (2.5%) in-hospital deaths. LV volume reduction varied according to experience gained along years: LV end-systolic volume index decreased from baseline 43% (post-market registry) vs. 27% (CE-mark study); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from baseline 25% (post-market registry) vs. 16% (CE-mark study). Clinical status (NYHA class, HF questionnaire, 6-minute walking test) improved significantly compared to baseline, and re-hospitalization rate was only 13% at 6-month follow-up (60% of patients in NYHA =3). FMR grade decreased at follow-up in 63%, while it was unchanged in 37% of patients. The hybrid ventricular reconstruction (HVR) seems a promising treatment for HF patients who may benefit from LV volume reduction, with reasonable mortality and good results at follow-up. A baseline less severe clinical profile was not associated to better outcome at follow-up, which makes the procedure feasible in patients with very large ventricles and depressed ejection fraction (EF). LV reshaping has no detrimental effect on FMR, that may, on the contrary, benefit owing to less papillary muscle displacement, partial recovery of torsion dynamics and of myofibers re-orientation. A controlled study on top of optimal medical treatment is warranted to confirm its role in the management of HF patients.