RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of cervical drains to prevent cervical hematoma or seroma after thyroidectomy remains a controversial issue. OBJECTIVE: Identify clinical and surgical risk factors for hematoma or seroma and evaluate the usefulness of routine use of drains following thyroid surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective multicentric study related to consecutive patients submitted to thyroid surgery in seven Portuguese hospitals between January 2018 and December 2020 (n=945). The data collected included the following parameters: age and gender of the patients, anticoagulation or anti-aggregating therapy, histological diagnoses, type of surgery, the presence or absence of postoperative drains, thyroid weight, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and reinterventions. In this study, surgical complications evaluated were limited to the presence of hematoma or seroma. A total of 945 patients who underwent thyroid surgery were included in the study. Twenty-seven patients (2.9%, n=27) experienced complications classified as hematomas or seromas. In the series, significant differences were observed between the two groups according to hypocoagulation or anti-aggregation status (OR=3.62; 95% CI 1.14-11.4) (p=0.001) and the nature of histological diagnosis (toxic vs. non-toxic benign disease) (OR=6.59; 95% CI 1.83-23.7). Hypocoagulation or anti-aggregation status were independently associated with a higher risk of complications. The presence of drains was associated with longer hospitalization periods (p<0.001) and not a decreased need for reintervention. CONCLUSION: Cervical hematoma or seroma are rare complications associated with both hypocoagulation and anti-aggregation therapy and with the presence of benign toxic pathology. The use of drains does not decrease the need for reintervention and is even associated with a longer length of hospital stay; therefore, their routine use should not be advised.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) is a purulent disease caused by microbial contamination of liver parenchyma and includes amoebic liver abscess, fungal liver abscess, and the most common bacterial liver abscess. OBJECTIVE: Explore the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) via vessels and surgical drain guidance percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 86 PLA patients who underwent PCD treatment in our hospital from May 2018 to February 2023 were retrospectively selected. Of them, 41 patients were treated under intravenous CEUS guidance (Control group), and 45 patients were treated under CEUS via vessels and surgical drain guidance (study group). Perioperative characteristics, treatment effectiveness, and incidence of complications were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The duration of surgery, drainage, white blood cell recovery, body temperature recovery, and hospitalization in the study group were longer than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate of the study group (95.56%) was higher than that of the control group (80.49%) (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group (4.44%) was lower than that in the control group (19.51%) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with intravenous CEUS alone, treatment under CEUS via vessels and surgical drains-guided PCD was associated with shorter surgical time, faster recovery, better treatment effect, lower risk of complications, and ensured treatment safety in PLA patients.

RESUMEN

Surgical drains are commonly used to manage intraperitoneal fluid after major surgeries, but their prophylactic use has been controversial due to potential complications. One rarely reported complication is small bowel obstruction (SBO), primarily seen in post-colorectal surgeries. We present a case of SBO following open radical cystectomy due to surgical drain placement, a complication not previously reported in urologic surgeries. The case highlights the importance of considering the risks and benefits of prophylactic drain placement. It emphasizes the need for a higher index of suspicion for SBO in patients with surgical drains who develop post-operative nausea and distention. Timely radiological imaging and clinical examination are crucial for accurate diagnosis and proper treatment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paraspinal muscle (PSM) flaps can be mobilized with superficial undermining and lateral release from the thoracolumbar fascia and/or deep undermining and medial release from the transverse processes and ribs. The objective of the study was to compare the effect of the PSM flap technique on drain use, retention, and complication rates. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent spinal coverage with PSM flaps at a single institution from April 2020 to June 2021. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, surgical technique, drain usage, and postoperative complications were analyzed to compare the effects of different PSM flap surgical techniques on postoperative drain use and complications. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included. Both superficial and deep releases were performed in half (47%) of the cases, while the remainder was split between superficial (25%) and deep (28%) releases. Drains were used less frequently for the deep release (35%) than the superficial (93%) or both releases (96%, p < 0.01). The deep release had shorter mean drain retention time (5.8 days) than the superficial (30.3 days) or both releases (24.8 days, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the techniques in terms of complications. For the deep release, the use of drains was not associated with a reduction in complications (odds ratio 0.91 [0.84 - 0.98], p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: In a selected patient population, a "deep release only" PSM flap technique may allow for drainless spinal closure without an increased risk of seroma or other complications.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Closed suction drains, often used after posterior spinal surgery, pose a potential risk of infection. To combat this risk, many surgeons opt for a prolonged prophylactic antibiotic regimen. Since 2015, several studies have shown that prolonged prophylactic systemic antibiotics (PPSA) for drains provides no additional benefit in reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates. However, most of these studies lacked sufficient power to make reliable conclusions. To date, there has been no meta-analysis conducted to further investigate this issue. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a regimen of PPSA reduces the incidence of deep SSIs in adult patients with closed suction drains following posterior spinal surgeries. METHODS: The protocol of the current systematic review was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic review of the literature in PubMed (Medline), Europe PMC, Embase, and Cochrane Review databases was conducted for all relevant literature with the keywords "spine," "antibiotics," "surgical site infection," "prophylaxis," and "drain." Retrospective and prospective studies investigating the effectiveness of PPSA in patients 18 years or older who underwent posterior cervical or thoracolumbar surgery and had postoperative wound drains were included. The primary outcome was the odds ratio for deep SSI based on the intervention (PPSA vs non-PPSA). The secondary outcomes were the rates of superficial and overall SSIs. RESULTS: From a total of 2558 titles identified from the search, 7 studies were chosen for final analysis. Three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 4 were retrospective reviews. A total of 2446 patients were analyzed; 1149 received a PPSA regimen and 1297 received a non-PPSA regimen. Deep SSIs occurred in 45 patients (3.9%) and 46 patients (3.5%) in the PPSA and non-PPSA groups, respectively. The odds ratio for deep SSIs in the PPSA group compared with the non-PPSA group was 1.10 (95% CI 0.69-1.74), which was not statistically significant. Additionally, there were no differences in the rates of superficial and overall SSIs. There was a trend toward increased infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in the PPSA group; however, it was not possible to perform a durable statistical analysis because of the small number of reported organisms in the selected publications. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that there is no reduction in rate of deep, superficial, and overall SSIs with prolonged prophylactic antibiotics after posterior spinal surgery involving the use of closed suction drains.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Bleeding after total thyroidectomy remains a rare event that affects early postoperative morbidity, occurring in 0.3% to 4.2% of cases. Intraoperative bleeding is an unpleasant complication, and it is often easily manageable, although postoperative bleeding may represent a life-threatening condition for the patient. The purpose of our study was to clarify the role of the Valsalva manoeuvre to reduce postoperative bleeding. Between January 2019 to February 2022, 250 consecutive patients were listed for thyroid surgery at our surgical department. The study cohort consisted of 178 patients, divided into two groups based on the execution of the Valsalva manoeuvre. There was no difference in the duration of surgery between groups. Group B had fewer reinterventions for bleeding. Group A had a significantly greater volume of drainage output than Group B. Cervical haematoma can compromise a patient's life, so bleeding control is crucial. Our results show that using a simple and safe Valsalva manoeuvre can improve the postoperative course with a significant reduction in drainage output, but does not prevent the risk of reoperation for hemorrhage.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In contrast to other breast surgeries, modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with axillary lymph node clearance involves intense tissue dissection, with postoperative seroma formation and pain being the major complaints affecting patients. Among these, 40% of females experience acute postoperative pain, and between 25 to 60% develop persistent chronic postsurgical pain. The rationale of this study was that minimally invasive procedures can result in immediate pain relief in patients undergoing mastectomy, which has been proven to satisfy their needs and lead to early discharge in the local population. OBJECTIVE: This study determined to find out the efficacy of instilling bupivacaine on wounds by means of surgical drains in controlling pain after MRM. METHODOLOGY: This was a randomized control study trial that was carried out in Surgical Unit 1, Ward 3, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, from November 2020 to April 2021. All patients tested negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by PCR test before randomly allocating them into two groups. Thirty women in Group B received 40 ml of 0.25% injection bupivacaine, and 30 in Group C received no drug. Duration of analgesia was recorded as time in hours when the patient was received after surgery in the post-anesthesia care unit until the patient felt ache and discomfort of > three scores according to the visual analog pain score chart (VAS). RESULTS: The average age was 52.48±4.76 years. The mean period of time during which analgesia was observed was significantly higher in Group B as compared to Group C (10.93±1.84 vs 5.03±1.35 hours, p=0.0005). CONCLUSION: There is improvement in postoperative analgesia after instilling bupivacaine through surgical drains on wound beds in MRM patients.

RESUMEN

Background: For centuries, surgeons have relied on surgical drains during postoperative care. Despite all advances in modern medicine and the area of digitalization, as of today, most if not all assessment of abdominal secretions excreted via surgical drains are carried out manually. We here introduce a novel integrated Smart Sensor System (Smart Drain) that allows for real-time characterization and digitalization of postoperative abdominal drain output at the patient's bedside. Methods: A prototype of the Smart Drain was developed using a sophisticated spectrometer for assessment of drain output. The prototype measures 10 × 6 × 6 cm and therefore easily fits at the bedside. At the time of measurement with our Smart Drain, the drain output was additionally sent off to be analyzed in our routine laboratory for typical markers of interest in abdominal surgery such as bilirubin, lipase, amylase, triglycerides, urea, protein, and red blood cells. A total of 45 samples from 19 patients were included. Results: The measurements generated were found to correlate with conventional laboratory measurements for bilirubin (r = .658, P = .000), lipase (r = .490, P = .002), amylase (r = .571, P = .000), triglycerides (r = .803, P = .000), urea (r = .326, P = .033), protein (r = .387, P = .012), and red blood cells (r = .904, P = .000). Conclusions: To our best knowledge, for the first time we describe a device using a sophisticated spectrometer that allows for real-time characterization and digitalization of postoperative abdominal drain output at the patient's bedside.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in colorectal surgery is high, which can complicate and delay postoperative recovery. This study mainly aims to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous drains in decreasing superficial surgical site infection in colorectal surgery patients.  Study design This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients over 16 years old who underwent colorectal surgery from the 1st of January 2015 till the 31st of December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups, with and without a subcutaneous drain. The incidence of superficial SSI was measured as the primary objective, and the incidence of other complications like seromas, hematomas, and wound dehiscence was measured as the secondary objectives or outcomes. Chi-square and Fisher's exact were used to analyze the data, and a p-value less than 0.05 was accepted for significance. Results A total of 208 patients who underwent colorectal surgery in our hospital were included. Of these, 29 had a subcutaneous drain, and 179 did not have a subcutaneous drain. Although the incidence of dehiscence was higher in the drain group, the overall incidence of superficial SSI (20.7%) and seroma/hematoma (3.4%) in patients with subcutaneous drains was lower than without subcutaneous drains (25.7% and 7.8%, respectively). However, no statistical significance was found between drain presence and complications. Conclusion In conclusion, this study demonstrated a lower incidence of superficial SSI and seroma/hematoma in patients with a subcutaneous drain than those who did not have a drain.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Drains' role after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is debated by proponents of no drain, draining selected cases, and early drain removal. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of "standard" and "draining-tract-targeted" management of abdominal drains still in situ after diagnosing a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched for "pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy or duodenopancreatectomy," "Whipple," "proximal pancreatectomy," "pylorus-preserving pancreatectomy," and "postoperative pancreatic fistula or POPF.". Main outcomes included clinically relevant (CR) POPF, grade-C POPF, overall mortality, POPF-related mortality, and CR-POPF-related mortality. Secondary outcomes were incidence of radiological and/or endoscopic interventions, reoperations, and completion pancreatectomies. RESULTS: Overall, 12,089 studies were retrieved by the search of the English literature (01/01/1990-31/12/2018). Three hundred and twenty-six studies (90,321 patients) reporting ≥ 100 PDs and ≥ 10 PD/year were finally included into the study. Average incidences were obtained by averaging the incidence rates reported in the single articles. Pooled incidences were calculated by combining the number of events and the total number of patients considered in the various studies. These were then meta-analyzed using DerSimonian and Laird's (1986) method. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare pooled incidences between groups. Post hoc testing was used to see which groups differed. The meta-analyzed incidences were compared using a fixed effect for moderators. "Draining-tract-targeted" management showed a significant advantage over "standard" management in four clinically relevant outcomes out of eight according to pool analysis and in one of them according to meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Clinically, "draining-targeted" management of POPF should be preferred to "standard" management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

To asses drains amylase (DA) cut-offs for the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and define the optimal timing of drains removal based on daily DA assay and abdominal CT scan finding after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Different algorithms able to identify patients at higher risk of POPF and to assess the optimal time for drains removal after PD have been proposed. The most accurate DA cut-offs in the assessment of the risk of clinically relevant POPF were retrospectively identified. Data from a prospective trial for optimal timing of drains removal were analyzed. Then, to validate the cut-offs identified in the first phase, they were applied to the patients enrolled in the prospective trial. Patients with POD1 DA ≥ 666 U/L were at higher risk of clinically relevant POPF (p 0.0001). POD3 DA value ≥ 252 U/L predicted 88% of clinical relevant fistulas. POD3 DA level ≥ 207 U/L was able to predict 68% of biliary fistulas. Patients with abdominal collection ≥ 5 cm, showed a significantly higher rate (60% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) of biliary fistula. Timing of drains removal did not influence complications. Drains amylase levels predict clinically relevant POPF. Drains should be maintained up to POD3; in case of POD1 DA levels < 666 U/L and POD3 DA levels < 252 U/L drains could be removed. In case of POD3 DA levels, ≥ 207 the routine use of abdominal CT scan in the same day could be justified to detect collections ≥ 5 cm and maintain drains beyond the POD3.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of fibrin sealant tissue adhesives during lateral neck dissections is associated with a change in postoperative outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Institutionally affiliated tertiary care center. METHODS: Various demographic, disease, and surgical data were collected for patients who underwent lateral neck dissections. Univariate regression analysis was performed with the following outcomes: total drain output and duration of drain placement, as well as incidence of postoperative infection, hematoma, seroma, chyle leak, and salivary leak. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients underwent lateral neck dissections. Fibrin sealant was used in 35% of cases (n = 46). Its use was not associated with differences in total drain output (P = .77) or the number of days that the drains were in place (P = .83). On secondary analysis, the use of fibrin sealant was not associated with a difference in postoperative incidence of hematoma (P = .65), seroma (P = .68), chyle leak (P = .42), or salivary leak (P = .73). These results were consistent when stratified by the presence of intraoperative complications. Its use accompanied an average cost of $674 per case. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrin sealant use during lateral neck dissections was not associated with a reduction in drain output or days that the drains remained in situ. Although the current study was limited by sample size, fibrin sealant use was not associated with a decreased risk of postoperative adverse events. The evidence in this report suggests that the routine use of these products adds cost without clear benefit.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics after spine instrumentation are often extended while the surgical drain is in place, particularly for traumatic injuries. We sought to study if continuing antibiotics past 24 hours affected outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of all patients who underwent spine fixation with hardware and surgical drains for trauma at our institution. We compared the effect of perioperative (≤24 hours of antibiotics) versus prolonged (>24 hours) antibiotics on surgical outcomes. Bivariate and multivariable logistic and linear regression statistics were performed. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-six patients were included in the analysis. On multivariate analysis, antibiotic duration >24 hours did not predict surgical site infection (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-8.10, P = 0.08) or mortality (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-3.44; P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing antibiotics past 24 hours after traumatic spine instrumentation was not associated with improved outcomes. A prospective study to verify these findings may be warranted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical drains are widely used despite limited evidence in their favor. This study describes the associations between drains and surgical site infections (SSI). METHODS: This prospective observational double center study was performed in Switzerland between February 2013 and August 2015. RESULTS: The odds of SSI in the presence of drains were increased in general (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.32-4.30, p = 0.004), but less in vascular and not in orthopedic trauma surgery. In addition to the surgical division, the association between drains and SSI depended significantly on the duration of surgery (p = 0.01) and wound class (p = 0.034). Furthermore, the duration of drainage (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.15-1.35, p < 0.001), the number (OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.09-2.74, p = 0.019) and type of drains (open versus closed: OR 3.68, 95%CI 1.88, 6.89, p < 0.001) as well as their location (overall p = 0.002) were significantly associated with SSI. CONCLUSIONS: The general use of drains is discouraged. However, drains may be beneficial in specific surgical procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Drains are essential in most surgeries. Primary need is elimination of dead space and related consequences but drains per se do have their share of complications, one of them being dislodgment. Complications related to dislodgment can range from inactive drains to damage to critical areas like anastomosis sites. Securing drains using this technique was described by Jayaraj et al. in 1988. Since then, no study was done to determine the efficacy and outcomes of this method. An audit was conducted from 2009 to 2014 at SDM Craniofacial unit to determine the utility of drain fixation. Data was collected of a total of 143 patients from the medical records. This useful technique has the advantage of preventing the drain from displacement and its consequent complications.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To unveil the real effect of surgical drains on the outcomes of thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disorders. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted at Abha Private Hospital, Saudi Arabia on 108 patients suffered from benign thyroid disorders undergoing elective thyroidectomy from 1 August 2015 to 28 February 2017. Patients were allocated randomly into drainage group (A) and non-drainage group (B). The demographic data, operation (type and duration), postoperative complications, histopathological results and length of stay were assessed, documented and statistically verified to check its significance. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were enrolled in the study; 94 females and 14 males with mean age of 38.02 years, two patients developed hematoma (1.85%); one in each group and another two patients had seroma with no significant difference between both groups, the mean length of stay was significantly higher in group (A) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This prospective study verified that routine drainage adds no significant advantage in the prevention of post-thyroidectomy bleeding, but it prolongs hospitalization. This aids in changing the concept from the "wide" use of drains into the "wise" use in selected patients with risk factors of bleeding.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To utilize body fluid creatinine analysis to determine which patients will require a surgical drain following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty consecutive RAPN performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. Postoperative day (POD) 1 drain creatinine was compared to serum creatinine to calculate the drain to serum creatinine ratio (D/S ratio). Elevated D/S ratio was defined as any value >1.2. RESULTS: From February 2008 to April 2015, 140 patients underwent RAPN and had a drain placed (124 had D/S ratio available on POD 1). In the 103 patients with a D/S ratio of <1.2 and the 21 with D/S ratio of >1.2, the mean tumor size was 3.0 and 3.9 cm (P = .001) and mean RENAL score was 7.6 and 8.1 (P = .270), respectively. Collecting system entry occurred in 68.2% of patients with a D/S ratio of <1.2 and 71.4% of patients with a D/S ratio of >1.2. Mean drain time was 2.4 and 4.2 days (P = .001), hospital stay was 2.7 and 3.3 days (P = .036) for the D/S ratio <1.2 and D/S ratio >1.2 groups, respectively. Those with renal mass size of 4-7 cm had increased likelihood of D/S ratio >1.2 (OR 2.78; P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: Most RAPN do not require a surgical drain. A POD 1 elevated D/S ratio is more likely to occur with larger masses (those approaching or greater than 4 cm) and can be associated with prolonged drain time and hospital stay.

Asunto(s)