RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While the precise timing and intensity of very early rehabilitation (VER) after stroke onset is still under discussion, its beneficial effect on functional disability is generally accepted. The recently published randomized controlled AVERT trial indicated that patients with severe stroke might be more susceptible to harmful side effects of VER, which we hypothesized is contrary to current clinical practice. We analyzed the Baden-Wuerttemberg stroke registry to gain insight into the application of VER in acute ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in clinical practice. METHODS: 99,753 IS patients and 8824 patients with ICH hospitalized from January 2008 to December 2012 were analyzed. Data on the access to physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech therapy (ST), the time from admission to first contact with a therapist and the average number of therapy sessions during the first 7 days of admission are reported. Multiple logistic regression models adjusted for patient and treatment characteristics were carried out to investigate the influence of VER on clinical outcome. RESULTS: PT was applied in 90/87% (IS/ICH), OT in 63/57%, and ST in 70/65% of the study population. Therapy was mostly initiated within 24 h (PT 87/82%) or 48 h after admission (OT 91/89% and ST 93/90%). Percentages of patients under therapy and also the average number of therapy sessions were highest in those with a discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 2 to 5 and lowest in patients with complete recovery or death during hospitalization. The outcome analyses were fundamentally hindered due to biases by individual decision making regarding the application and frequency of VER. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients had access to PT we noticed an undersupply of OT and ST. Only little differences were observed between patients with IS and ICH. The staff decisions for treatment seem to reflect attempts to optimize resources. Patients with either excellent or very unfavorable prognosis were less frequently assigned to VER and, if treated, received a lower average number of therapy sessions. On the contrary, severely disabled patients received VER at high frequency, although potentially harmful according to recent indications from the randomized controlled AVERT trial.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In Europe intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for ischaemic stroke is still not approved for patients aged >80 years. However, elderly patients are frequently treated based on individual decision making. In a retrospective observational study a consecutive and prospective stroke registry in southwest Germany was analysed. METHODS: The data registry collected 101,349 patients with ischaemic stroke hospitalized from January 2008 to December 2012. Of these, 38,575 (38%) were aged 80 years and older and 10 286 (10.1%) underwent IVT. Favourable outcome at discharge was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤1 or not worse than prior to stroke. Multiple logistic regression models stratified by 10-year age groups were used to assess the relationship between IVT and mRS at discharge, adjusted for patient characteristics, admitting facility and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The highest IVT rate was 15% in patients aged <50 years, with a continuous decline down to 8% in patients aged ≥90 years. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for patients 80-89 years of age were 2.20 (1.95-2.47) (P < 0.0001) and 1.25 (0.88-1.78) (P = 0.21) for patients >90 years of age, compared to patients of the same age decade not treated with IVT. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from routine hospital care in southwest Germany indicates that IVT is an effective treatment also for aged patients with ischaemic stroke in an age range between 80 and 89 years. Although no clear evidence for the effectiveness of IVT beyond 90 years was found, treatment should also be carefully considered in these patients. High age should not discourage from treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is sufficiently proven in ischemic stroke patients of middle and older age by means of randomized controlled trials and large observational studies. However, data in young stroke patients ≤50 years are still scarce. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IVT in young adults aged 18-50 years. Data from a consecutive and prospective stroke registry was analyzed that covers a federal state with 10.8 million inhabitants in southwest Germany. METHODS: Our analysis comprises 51,735 ischemic stroke patients aged 18-80 years and hospitalized from January 2008 to December 2012. Of these, 4,140 (8%) were aged 18-50 years and 7,529 (15%) underwent IVT. Data on 8,439 patients (16% of the study population) were missing for National Institutes of Health stroke severity score at admission and/or modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and were excluded from outcome analysis. In sensitivity analysis, patients with incomplete data were also examined. Binary logistic regression models were used adjusted for patient, hospital, and procedural parameters and stratified by age group (18-50 and 51-80 years, subgroup analyses 18-30, 31-40, and 41-50 years) to assess the relationship between IVT and mRS at discharge. RESULTS: IVT appears equally effective in young adults 18-50 years (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.75; p = 0.003), compared to patients 51-80 years of age (1.33, 1.23-1.43; p < 0.001). Age-stratified analyses suggest an inverse relation of age and effectiveness, which appears to be highest in very young patients 18-30 years of age (2.78, 1.10-7.05; p = 0.03). DISCUSSION: Ischemic stroke etiology, vascular dynamics, and recovery in young patients differ from those of middle and older age. The evidence from routine hospital care in Germany indicates that IVT in young stroke patients appears to be at least equally effective as in the elderly.