RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with pan-peritonitis (PP) due to colorectal perforation have high mortality rate because colorectal perforation causes septic shock. The association between total steroid intake (TSI) and hospital mortality of such patients is not clear. METHODS: One hundred forty-two patients who underwent surgery for PP due to colorectal perforation were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups by 8000 mg of TSI. The cut-off value of TSI was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve for hospital mortality. RESULTS: The cut-off value of TSI for hospital mortality was 8000 mg. Patients with TSI>8000 mg had high rate of hemodialysis, hospital mortality, and elevated neutrophil ratio (>95%) compared with those with TSI≤8000 mg. Multivariate analyses revealed that TSI (>8000/≤8000, mg) (OR, 9.669; 95% CI, 1.011-92.49; P = .049) was significantly associated with hospital mortality as well as bleeding volume (>1000/≤1000, mL) (OR, 26.08; 95% CI, 3.566-190.4; P = .001), lymphocyte ratio (≤4/>4, %) (OR, 7.988; 95% CI, 1.498-42.58; P = .015) and C-reactive protein (≤7.5/>7.5, mg/dL) (OR, 41.66; 95% CI, 4.784-33.33; P = .001). DISCUSSION: There was a significant association between TSI and hospital mortality in patients with PP due to colorectal perforation as well as intraoperative bleeding and systemic inflammatory markers.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Colorrectales , Peritonitis , Humanos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esteroides , Peritonitis/etiología

RESUMEN

Oral intake of regorafenib has been shown to have survival benefits in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on standard therapies. However, because of adverse effects, the patients sometimes cannot continue treatment with regorafenib. Currently, there is no established supportive therapy that can be performed to aid in continuing regorafenib intake under these problematic conditions. We report the case of a 59-year-old Japanese woman diagnosed with recurrence after curative operation for sigmoid colon cancer (T3N2aM0, Stage IIIC). Despite undergoing multiple lines of standard chemotherapy, disease control could not be maintained. Consequently, regorafenib was started as a late-line treatment. However, after 2 weeks, the patient experienced regorafenib-induced serious erythema multiforme; thus, regorafenib was discontinued and oral prednisolone was started. Regorafenib administration was resumed when the adverse effects resolved and prednisolone was stopped, but skin rash rapidly reappeared. Prednisolone treatment was reintroduced, which cured the rash; thus, after the third attempt to administer regorafenib, prednisolone was continuously administered. There was no relapse of the rash under prednisolone administration, and the patient received a total of 13 courses of regorafenib. Moreover, the metastatic lesions that had started to regrow at the end of the regorafenib therapy showed good response to the rechallenge chemotherapy of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan therapy with panitumumab. The sequence of therapies possibly had a positive impact on the patient's long survival of 30 months after the regorafenib treatment. Systemic administration of steroid is considered as a promising option as a supportive therapy for continuing regorafenib treatment in patients experiencing a severe skin rash.