RESUMEN

Introduction: Measurement of reactive balance is critical for fall prevention but is severely underrepresented in the clinical setting due to the lack of valid assessments. The Stepping Threshold Test (STT) is a newly developed instrumented test for reactive balance on a movable platform, however, it has not yet been validated for fall-prone older adults. Furthermore, different schemes of observer-based evaluation seem possible. The aim of this study was to investigate validity with respect to fall risk, interpretability, and feasibility of the STT using two different evaluation strategies. Methods: This study involved 71 fall-prone older adults (aged ≥ 65) who underwent progressively increasing perturbations in four directions for the STT. Single and multiple-step thresholds for each perturbation direction were determined via two observer-based evaluation schemes, which are the 1) consideration of all steps (all-step-count evaluation, ACE) and 2) consideration of those steps that extend the base of support in the direction of perturbation (direction-sensitive evaluation, DSE). Established balance measures including global (Brief Balance Evaluations Systems Test, BriefBEST), proactive (Timed Up and Go, TUG), and static balance (8-level balance scale, 8LBS), as well as fear of falling (Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International, FES-I) and fall occurrence in the past year, served as reference measurements. Results: The sum scores of STT correlated moderately with the BriefBEST (ACE: r = 0.413; DSE: r = 0.388) and TUG (ACE: r = -0.379; DSE: r = -0.435) and low with the 8LBS (ACE: r = 0.173; DSE: r = 0.246) and Short FES-I (ACE: r = -0.108; DSE: r = -0.104). The sum scores did not distinguish between fallers and non-fallers. No floor/ceiling effects occurred for the STT sum score, but these effects occurred for specific STT thresholds for both ACE (mean floor effect = 13.04%, SD = 19.35%; mean ceiling effect = 4.29%, SD = 7.75%) and DSE (mean floor effect = 7.86%, SD = 15.23%; mean ceiling effect = 21.07%, SD = 26.08). No severe adverse events occurred. Discussion: Correlations between the STT and other balance tests were in the expected magnitude, indicating convergent validity. However, the STT could not distinguish between fallers and non-fallers, referring to a need for further studies and prospective surveys of falls to validate the STT. Current results did not allow a definitive judgment on the advantage of using ACE or DSE. Study results represented a step toward a reactive balance assessment application in a clinical setting.

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between meeting step count recommendations during the weekday and weekend and the weight status in school-aged children. A convenience sample of 855 fourth and fifth grade students (9.7 ± 1.0 years) was recruited from 4 elementary schools located in the Western United States. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated using standard procedures and then stratified to weight status categories (healthy weight, overweight/obese) using age- and sex-specific percentiles. Step counts were monitored for seven consecutive days using NL-1000 piezoelectric pedometers. A multilevel generalized linear mixed effect model was used to estimate the odds ratios of meeting segmented step counts recommendations and weight status. Students meeting weekday step count recommendations associated with 39% lower odds of overweight/obesity compared to those not meeting any recommendations (P = 0.02). Those meeting both weekday and weekend recommendations associated with 67% lower odds of overweight/obesity compared to children not meeting any recommendations (P = 0.01). Meeting weekend step count recommendations did not associate with weight status. This study supports the positive relationship between segmented step counts and the healthy weight status of school-aged children.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Step-recovery responses are critical in preventing falls when balance is lost unexpectedly. We investigated the kinematics and strategies of balance recovery in older adults with a varying history of falls. METHODS: In a laboratory study, 51 non-fallers (NFs), 20 one-time fallers (OFs), and 12 recurrent-fallers (RFs) were exposed to random right/left unannounced underfoot perturbations in standing of increasing magnitude. The stepping strategies and kinematics across an increasing magnitude of perturbations and the single- and multiple-step threshold trials, i.e., the lowest perturbation magnitude to evoke single step and multiple steps, respectively, were analyzed. Fall efficacy (FES) and self-reported lower-extremity function were also assessed. RESULTS: OFs had significantly lower single- and multiple-step threshold levels than NFs; the recovery-step kinematics were similar. Surprisingly, RFs did not differ from NFs in either threshold. The kinematics in the single-step threshold trial in RFs, however, showed a significant delay in step initiation duration, longer step duration, and larger center of mass (CoM) displacement compared with NFs and OFs. In the multiple-step threshold trial, the RFs exhibited larger CoM displacements and longer time to fully recover from balance loss. Interestingly, in the single-stepping trials, 45% of the step-recovery strategies used by RFs were the loaded-leg strategy, about two times more than OFs and NFs (22.5 and 24.2%, respectively). During the multiple-stepping trials, 27.3% of the first-step recovery strategies used by RFs were the loaded-leg strategy about two times more than OFs and NFs (11.9 and 16.4%, respectively), the crossover stepping strategy was the dominated response in all 3 groups (about 50%). In addition, RFs reported a lower low-extremity function compared with NFs, and higher FES in the OFs. CONCLUSIONS: RFs had impaired kinematics during both single-step and multiple-step recovery responses which was associated with greater leg dysfunction. OFs and NFs had similar recovery-step kinematics, but OFs were more likely to step at lower perturbation magnitudes suggesting a more "responsive" over-reactive step response related from their higher fear of falling and not due to impaired balance abilities. These data provide insight into how a varying history of falls might affect balance recovery to a lateral postural perturbation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered prospectively on November 9th, 2011 at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01439451 ).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background. Persons with stroke (PwS) are at increased risk of falls, especially toward the paretic side, increasing the probability of a hip fracture. The ability to recover from unexpected loss of balance is a critical factor in fall prevention. Objectives. We aimed to compare reactive balance capacity and step kinematics between PwS and healthy controls. Methods. Thirty subacute PwS and 15 healthy controls were exposed to forward, backward, right, and left unannounced surface translations in 6 increasing intensities while standing. Single step threshold, multiple step threshold, and fall threshold (ie, perturbation intensity leading to a fall into harness system) were recorded as well as reactive step initiation time, step length, and step velocity. Results. Twenty-five PwS fell into harness system during the experiment while healthy controls did not fall. Fourteen out of 31 falls occurred in response to surface translations toward the nonparetic side, that is, falling toward the paretic side. Compared with healthy controls, PwS demonstrated significantly lower fall threshold and multiple step threshold in response to forward, backward, and lateral surface translations. Impairments were more pronounced in response to forward surface translation and toward the nonparetic side (ie, loss of balance toward the paretic side). A trend toward significant shorter step length in response to lateral surface translations was found in PwS compared with healthy controls. Conclusions. Findings highlight the importance of assessing reactive balance capacity in response to perturbations in different directions and intensities in addition to the routine assessment in PwS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reactive balance responses are critical for fall prevention. Perturbation-based balance training (PBBT) has shown a positive effect in reducing the risk of falls among older adults and persons with Parkinson's disease. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of a short-term PBBT on reactive balance responses, performance-based measures of balance and gait and balance confidence. METHODS: Thirty-four moderate-high functioning, subacute persons with stroke (PwS) (lower extremity Fugl-Meyer score 29.2 ± 4.3; Berg Balance Scale [BBS] score 43.8 ± 9.5, 42.0 ± 18.7 days after stroke onset) hospitalized in a rehabilitation setting were randomly allocated to PBBT (n = 18) and weight shifting and gait training (WS>) (n = 16). Both groups received 12 training sessions, 30 minutes each, for a period of 2.5 weeks. PBBT included unexpected balance perturbations during standing and treadmill walking, WS> included weight shifting in standing and treadmill walking without perturbations. The main outcome measures, that is, multiple step-threshold and fall-threshold were examined at baseline, immediately postintervention, and about 5 weeks postintervention. The secondary outcome measures, that is, BBS, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale were examined at baseline and immediately postintervention. RESULTS: Compared with the WS> group, immediately postintervention participants in the PBBT group showed higher multiple-step thresholds in response to forward and backward surface translations (effect size [ES] = 1.07 and ES = 1.10, respectively) and moderate ES in the ABC scale (ES = 0.74). No significant differences were found in fall-threshold, BBS, 6MWT, and 10MWT between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of perturbation training during rehabilitation of PwS improved reactive balance and balance confidence.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-observer reliability and agreement of balance recovery responses, step and multiple-steps thresholds, and kinematic parameters of stepping responses. Older and younger adults were exposed to 36 progressively challenging right and left unannounced surface translations during quiet standing. Subjects were instructed to "react naturally". Step threshold and multiple-step threshold were defined as the minimum disturbance magnitude that consistently elicited one and more than one recovery step, respectively. Fall threshold is defined as the minimum disturbance magnitude from which a fall resulted (i.e., fall into harness system or grasped one of the anchor straps of the harness, or grasped the research assistant to maintain balance). The inter-observer reliability of balance recovery responses for older adults were excellent, especially for step and multiple-step thresholds (ICC2,1 = 0.978 and ICC2,1 = 0.971, respectively; p < 0.001). Also kinematic parameters of stepping responses such as step recovery duration and step length were excellent (ICC2,1 > 0.975 and ICC2,1 = 0.978, respectively; p < 0.001), substantial reliability was found for swing phase duration (ICC2,1 = 0.693, p < 0.001). Younger adults showed similar ICCs. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated excellent limits of agreement (LOA > 90%) for most kinematic step parameters and stepping thresholds. These results suggest that balance recovery responses and kinematic parameters of stepping including step threshold and multiple-step threshold are extremely reliable parameters. The measure of balance recovery responses from unexpected loss of balance is feasible and can be used in clinical setting and research-related assessments of fall risk.

Asunto(s)