RESUMEN

Congenital melanocytic nevus is a benign proliferation seen from birth. However, malignant transformation can be observed in later ages, so the removal of especially large and giant nevi is recommended during childhood. Nevertheless, there are no cases reported in the literature regarding excision of giant congenital melanocytic nevi in advanced age. This article presents the first case of a 39-year-old patient with a giant congenital melanocytic nevus covering 10% of the total body surface area, who underwent treatment with a 2-step operation. The nevus was located on the back, covering 10% of the total body surface area. The patient underwent en-bloc excision. A bilayer dermal matrix was applied over the fascia. Subsequently, a split-thickness skin graft was applied to the entire area. Full re-epithelialization was achieved within a total of 35 days. Thanks to the applied dermal scaffold, the area became pliable.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A common treatment for large deep-to-full-thickness burns is excision and grafting with a widely meshed split-thickness skin graft (mSTSG). Due to the differential healing of the interstices and adhered split-thickness skin graft, wound patterning and delayed wound healing are common outcomes of this treatment. Delayed healing may increase infection rates and wound care requirements, while wound patterning may be psychologically and aesthetically consequential for patients. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) can be used to "over spray" a meshed autograft. It was hypothesized that the use of ASCS combined with mSTSG would increase the rate of wound healing and decrease patterning in healed burn wounds. METHODS: Full-thickness burns or excisional wounds (n = 8 each) were created in red Duroc pigs and received 4:1 mSTSGs after wound bed preparation. Half of the wounds received ASCS and half did not at the time of grafting. Percent re-epithelialization, patterning, rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal and epidermal thickness, immunofluorescent S100ß staining, and melanin index were assessed for each scar. RESULTS: Wounds that received ASCS exhibited increased rates of re-epithelialization (burn +ACSC versus burn-ASCS; day 3 (53.9 ± 3.1 versus 34.3 ± 3.3, P = 0.009): day 5 (68.1 ± 1.6 versus 40.8 ± 3.2, P < 0.001)). Excision +ASCS versus excision-ASCS; day 7 (98.1 ± 1.2 versus 86.4 ± 2.0, day 7 P = 0.022) compared to wounds not treated with ASCS. There was no difference in rete ridge ratio, cellularity, dermal thickness, epidermal thickness, S100ß staining, melanin index, or patterning was measured between wounds that received ASCS and those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ASCS to 4:1 mSTSGs leads to increased rate of wound healing but does not impact the degree of patterning in this model, suggesting that ASCS application likely robustly transfers keratinocytes but not functioning melanocytes at acute timepoints.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Compare full-thickness skin grafts versus split-thickness skin grafts in scalp reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent scalp reconstruction with skin grafts performed at a single institution from 2011 to 2016. METHODS: χ2 or Fisher exact tests were used to compare graft integration and complication rates. The effects of graft type, defect type, graft size, and patient comorbidities on the likelihood of graft success and complications were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A hundred and twenty-five full-thickness and 93 split-thickness grafts were performed in 200 patients, including 68 defects (31.2%) with exposed calvarium. Full-thickness grafts required fewer average reconstructions (P = 0.002). A 92.8% of full-thickness grafts had complete graft integration compared with 78.5% of split-thickness grafts (P = 0.002). This difference was more evident in defects with exposed calvarium (87.2% vs. 47.6%, P ≤ 0.001). Despite higher rates of minor debridement, full-thickness grafts had less postoperative bone exposure and wound breakdown than split-thickness grafts on intact pericranium and exposed calvarium defects. Preoperative radiation, immunosuppression, and increased graft sizes were significant predictors of graft outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Skin grafts, especially full-thickness, provide a versatile, reliable, and simple approach for reconstructing medium to large scalp defects in the appropriate patient. Even on defects with bare calvarium, full-thickness grafts can succeed when a vascularized recipient bed is prepared. Defects with exposed bone, larger graft sizes, preoperative radiation, and immunosuppression may result in decreased graft take and increased complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Fournier gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening necrotizing soft-tissue infection of the perineum and external genitalia, which primarily occurs in obese, diabetic males. The mainstay of treatment is source control via early aggressive surgical excision. Wide surgical excision can result in significant soft tissue defects that can be disfiguring and difficult to close. The most common method of closure is split-thickness skin grafting (STSG). Recently, autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) technology has been used in addition to STSG to provide better wound healing and closure. This patient experienced excellent wound progression, following FG, through the application of ASCS with STSG, despite challenges related to the wounds, anatomical location, comorbidities, size, and the patient's medical history.

RESUMEN

We review a case of total penile skin replacement with split-thickness micromesh skin graft (micromesh STSG) due to paraffinoma.

RESUMEN

Aplasia cutis congenita (ACC) is a rare congenital disease defined by the absence of skin, most commonly on the scalp. While the exact incidence remains uncertain, ACC presents a significant challenge in clinical management due to its variable presentation and associated complications. We present the case of a newborn male with a large scalp defect attributed to ACC, complicated by a life-threatening scalp hemorrhage. Despite challenges in management, including recurrent infections and failed skin grafts, the patient ultimately achieved satisfactory healing following a series of surgical interventions, including local transposition flap procedures. This case underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing ACC, tailored to individual patient characteristics and associated risks. While discrete lesions of ACC typically have a favorable prognosis, extensive defects pose significant risks of morbidity and mortality, highlighting the need for careful consideration of treatment options and close clinical monitoring of affected individuals.

RESUMEN

Penile strangulation secondary to utilization of a constrictive ring is a rare urologic emergency that requires urgent decompression to prevent prolonged vascular obstruction resulting in necrosis and gangrene. Current literature is mainly comprised of case presentations that focus on management in the acute setting via removal of the ring. Herein, we describe surgical management of a patient who presents in delayed fashion after self-removal of the constrictive ring. We discuss our penectomy-sparing technique of debridement and split thickness skin graft.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study compares patient-reported functional and aesthetic outcomes of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) versus hatchet flap closure of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site. METHODS: Patients with RFFF (2015-2020) were retrospectively identified. Those willing to participate in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) filled out Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ). RESULTS: 198 patients met our inclusion criteria and 81 participated in PRO. There was a higher rate of tendon exposure in STSG versus hatchet flap (11 vs. 1, p = 0.0019), but a lower rate of skin necrosis (5 vs. 16, p = 0.0190) and epidermolysis (1 vs. 12, p = 0.0028). Scar quality in STSG was superior to hatchet flap in all domains of POSAS. MHOQ scores were similar between both groups with no statistical difference in overall scores (p = 0.2165). CONCLUSIONS: STSG appeared to have less compromise in activities of daily living, better satisfaction and improved scar quality than hatchet flap, but a higher rate of tendon exposure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In this paper, we present our experience with acute and chronic penile ulcers resulting from injection of an exogenous substance and their surgical treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Distal lower extremity reconstruction is challenging. This study aims to propose a protocol for the treatment of traumatic soft tissue defects. The key concept is to combine the surgical armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon with the advantages provided by hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data of 57 patients affected with unilateral or bilateral lower extremity trauma distal to the knee and involving soft tissues with no indication of immediate reconstruction between 2010 and 2021. Before the reconstructive procedure, all the patients underwent a stick swab procedure for the collection of microbiological samples and debridement. Patients were divided into two treatment groups and only one group underwent a combined therapeutic procedure with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was employed only if deemed necessary according to the defect's depth and wound exudate. Surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications were discussed. Results: All patients achieved a complete recovery with no major complications and only minor complications observed. The study group treated with HBOT had a lower complication rate and lower percentages of minimal and partial graft loss compared with the same complications observed in the control group. No patients experienced HBOT-related complications. Significant reductions in the time to complete healing and the time from reconstruction to healing were found (p = 0.002 and p < 0.00001, respectively). Conclusions: A lower complication rate was observed in the group treated with HBOT. The administration of HBOT prior to soft tissue reconstruction significantly reduced the time to complete healing and the time interval from skin grafting to healing. However, prospective studies and randomized trials with larger cohorts should be designed to investigate the efficacy of HBOT for the treatment of lower extremity injuries with extensive soft tissue defects.

RESUMEN

Background: In the United States, acquired buried penis deformity is an increasingly more common condition. Management of the buried penis deformity is accomplished with removal of macerated skin and subcutaneous tissue from the panniculus and prepubic region, and replacement of denuded penile skin. If local tissue advancement is insufficient to cover the defect, a skin graft may be required. Though the anterior thigh is commonly used, this creates a second defect. Here we describe 2 cases of split-thickness skin grafts harvested from the panniculus to cover buried penis deformities. Methods: Two patients with a buried penis deformity were identified. The denuded suprapubic tissue was elevated. Using inferior traction, split-thickness skin grafts were harvested and placed onto the shaft of the penis. The remaining excess tissue was resected. Results: One patient had a fungal rash that resolved with topical treatment. The other patient had a hematoma requiring surgical evacuation. Neither patient had any other complications, and both had over 95% take of the split-thickness skin grafts. Conclusions: These cases demonstrate the successful use of pannicular skin grafts for buried penis deformity correction. This donor site avoids creation of a second defect. As demonstrated here, the grafts are a durable option, even in the setting of local infection and hematoma.

RESUMEN

Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a frontline treatment for challenging surgical wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and post-surgical defects. This study explores the use of STSG employing the pinch graft technique for hard-to-heal surgical wounds following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). An 83-year-old patient with a non-improving post-MMS defect on the left lower leg underwent STSG from the right inner thigh using the pinch graft technique. The grafts were secured with a mesh dressing, adhesive strips, and compression bandaging. The patient experienced complete re-epithelialization and reduced pain within five weeks, emphasizing the efficacy of STSG for challenging cases. This case underscores the importance of considering STSG, especially in challenging locations, as a rapid and efficient treatment with improved quality of life. The pinch graft technique is presented as a useful option following MMS. This study encourages Mohs surgeons to consider STSG for reconstruction in challenging locations, especially on the lower leg.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) serves as a workhorse for a variety of reconstructions. Although there are a variety of surgical techniques for donor site closure after RFFF raising, the most common techniques are closure using a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) or a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). The closure can result in wound complications and function and aesthetic compromise of the forearm and hand. The aim of the planned systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the wound-related, function-related and aesthetics-related outcome associated with full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) and split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) in radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site closure. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines will be followed. Electronic databases and platforms (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)) and clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, the German Clinical Trials Register, the ISRCTN registry, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) will be searched using predefined search terms until 15 January 2024. A rerun of the search will be carried out within 12 months before publication of the review. Eligible studies should report on the occurrence of donor site complications after raising an RFFF and closure of the defect. Included closure techniques are techniques that use full-thickness skin grafts and split-thickness skin grafts. Excluded techniques for closure are primary wound closure without the use of skin graft. Outcomes are considered wound-, functional-, and aesthetics-related. Studies that will be included are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies. Case-control studies, studies without a control group, animal studies and cadaveric studies will be excluded. Screening will be performed in a blinded fashion by two reviewers per study. A third reviewer resolves discrepancies. The risk of bias in the original studies will be assessed using the ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. Data synthesis will be done using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.1. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Between-study variability will be assessed using the I2 index. If necessary, R will be used. The quality of evidence for outcomes will eventually be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. DISCUSSION: This study's findings may help us understand both closure techniques' complication rates and may have important implications for developing future guidelines for RFFF donor site management. If available data is limited and several questions remain unanswered, additional comparative studies will be needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol was developed in line with the PRISMA-P extension for protocols and was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 17 September 2023 (registration number CRD42023351903).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Despite differing etiologies, acute thermal burn injuries and full-thickness (FT) skin defects are associated with similar therapeutic challenges. When not amenable to primary or secondary closure, the conventional standard of care (SoC) treatment for these wound types is split-thickness skin grafting (STSG). This invasive procedure requires adequate availability of donor skin and is associated with donor site morbidity, high healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs related to prolonged hospitalization. As such, treatment options that can facilitate effective healing and donor skin sparing have been highly anticipated. The RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device facilitates preparation of an autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) for the treatment of acute thermal burns and FT skin defects. In initial clinical trials, the approach showed superior donor skin-sparing benefits and comparable wound healing to SoC STSG among patients with acute thermal burn injuries. These findings led to approval of RECELL for this indication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018. Subsequent clinical evaluation in non-thermal FT skin wounds showed that RECELL, when used in combination with widely meshed STSG, provides donor skin-sparing advantages and comparable healing outcomes compared with SoC STSG. As a result, the device received FDA approval in June of 2023 for treatment of FT skin defects caused by traumatic avulsion or surgical excision or resection. Given that health economic advantages have been demonstrated for RECELL ± STSG versus STSG alone when used for burn therapy, it is prudent to examine similarities in the burn and FT skin defect treatment pathways to forecast the potential health economic advantages for RECELL when used in FT skin defects. This article discusses the parallels between the two indications, the clinical outcomes reported for RECELL, and the HCRU and cost benefits that may be anticipated with use of the device for non-thermal FT skin defects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Severe soft tissue damage with destruction of the dermis requires plastic reconstructive treatment. For multimorbid patients or patients unable to undergo major reconstructive surgery, use of dermal substitutes, such as a collagen-elastin matrix (CEM) with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG), instead of local or free flap surgery, may be a valid and easy treatment option. We aimed to investigate and compare the outcomes and rate of successful defect reconstruction using CEM plus STSG, using either a one-step approach (simultaneous CEM and STSG) or a two-step approach (CEM and negative wound pressure therapy (NPWT), with secondary STSG transplantation). METHOD: A single-centre, retrospective follow-up study of patients who had received CEM was conducted. Wounds had been treated with an STSG transplantation covering a CEM (MatriDerm, MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG, Germany). Previous attempts at wound closure with conventional methods had failed in the selected patient population, which would usually have resulted in flap surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 46 patients were included (mean age 60.9±20.0 years), with a total of 49 wound sites. We analysed 38 patients with wounds that did not require flap coverage; 18 patients received the one-step approach and 20 patients received the two-step approach. The mean follow-up in these patients was 22±11.5 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Overall, 29 (78.4%) wounds remained closed. Wounds which did not successfully heal were related to comorbidities, such as diabetes, alcohol misuse and smoking. Using the one-step approach, long-term defect coverage was achieved in 13 (76.5%) wounds and 16 (80.0%) wounds were closed using the two-step approach. However, there was no statistically significant differences between the one- or two-step approaches regarding the rate of development of a wound healing disorder. CONCLUSION: Wound closure was achieved in 38 complex wounds using CEM plus STSG, while 11 wounds needed secondary flap coverage. In the flap-free wounds, there were no statistically significant differences between the one-step versus two-step approach. Using a simple defect reconstruction algorithm, we successfully used CEM plus STSG to treat complex wounds.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to introduce a novel radially pedicled in-situ split-thickness skin graft (STSG). The morbidity, esthetic, and functional outcomes of the radially pedicled in-situ STSG were in comparison with those of the distal STSG. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A single-institution review. METHODS: Seventy patients with oral cancer who underwent radical surgical resection and simultaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction from July 2021 to March 2022 were included. De-epithelialized RFFFs and traditional RFFFs were used to repair oral defects of 35 patients in Group A and Group B, respectively, while radially pedicled in-situ STSGs and distal STSGs taken from abdomens were used to repair donor site defects in the above groups, respectively. Patient demographics, wound healing complications, and esthetic and functional outcomes of the forearms were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No significant difference between Group A and Group B was observed in terms of donor site and recipient site complications. The esthetic outcome was superior in Group A compared to Group B (P = .011). The extension range, sensation, and pinch strength of operated forearms were significantly reduced in both groups after surgery (P < .05), however, intergroup differences were not observed. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results suggest that radially pedicled in-situ STSG is an applicable technique for direct closure and better esthetic outcomes in the forearm donor site.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site is the commonest used during burn surgery which has its own complications and as such the focus should be on minimizing it. Modifications to practice in our unit which we believe aid this include limiting the amount of STSG taken and the harvest of super-thin STSGs, with 0.003-0.005 in. (0.08-0.13 mm) being the commonest dermatome settings used. A patient-reported survey via a mobile phone link to a questionnaire was sent to 250 patients who had a STSG for an acute burn between 1st August 2020 and 31st July 2021. Patient demographics were collected from electronic records including the thickness of the FTSG taken when recorded. Patient responses were statistically analyzed and logistic regression with backwards elimination was performed to explore which contributing factors led to an improved experience of the donor site. Questionnaire responses were obtained from 107 patients (43%). These were between one and two and a half years after the injury. Concerning early donor site issues, itch was a problem for 52% of patients, pain was a problem for 48% of patients. Less common problems (fewer than 25% of patients) were leaking donor sites, wound breakdown, and over-granulation. Regarding long-term outcomes, increased, decreased or mixed pigmentation at the donor site was reported by 32% patients at the time of the survey. Hyper-vascular donor sites were reported by 24% patients. Raised or uneven feeling donor sites were reported by 19% patients, firm or stiff donor sites by 13% patients, and altered sensation by 10% patients. At the time of the survey, 70% responders reported their donor site looked "the same or about the same as my normal skin". Of these, 62 reported how long it took for this to happen, and it equates to a third looking normal at 6 months and half looking normal at a year. For the 32 patients who reported their donor site looking abnormal, 72% were "not bothered" by it. Patients with super-thin grafts (0.003-0.005 in.) were significantly more likely to have normal sensation, normal stiffness, and be less raised at their donor sites than those who had thin grafts (0.006-0.008 in.). This survey gives important information on patients' experiences of donor site morbidity that may form part of an informed consent process and allow tailored advice. Furthermore, it suggests that super-thin grafts may provide a superior donor site experience for patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most commonly used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) has traditionally been used for closure of the forearm. However, full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) has gained in popularity to achieve more satisfactory results. The aim of the study is to identify the best RFF donor site closure technique by comparing the functional and aesthetic outcomes of STSG and FTSG. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried. Only studies comparing complications rate, functional and aesthetic outcomes between STSG and FTSG were included. The primary outcome was graft failure rate. Secondary outcomes included the aesthetic result and functionality of the forearm/wrist. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in this review, accounting for a total of 712 patients with mean age of 60.7 years. Overall, 348 patients underwent FTSG and 377 underwent STSG. The mean follow-up was 14.7 months. The rate of graft failure in FTSG was significantly higher compared to STSG (OR: 2.79, 95 % CI 1.38-5.65, p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in rate of tendon exposure (OR: 0.83, p = 0.65) and infection (OR: 1.37, p = 0.42). Regarding the aesthetic outcome, no significant difference between FTSG and STSG based on observer (SMD = -0.37, p = 0.17) and patient (SMD = -0.016, p = 0.93) assessment, respectively. Overall postoperative functional assessment showed a not severely impaired hand and arm function in both groups. Subjective evaluation of pain was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: FTSG is associated with higher risk of graft failure than STSG in RFF donor site closure, without significant improvement in aesthetic results.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is a surgical technique for addressing intraoral reconstruction. However, with the limitation of an unavoidable defect at the RFFF donor site, split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) have been a solution for repairing these defects, but they are not without challenges. This study aimed to evaluate an approach using full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs), comparing their effectiveness in terms of aesthetics, pain, complications, and scarring. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing FTSG with STSG for RFFF donor site repair in head and neck cancer patients were included. Primary outcomes measured were appearance and pain at the RFFF site, and secondary outcomes were infection, tendon exposure, graft loss, and scar assessment. A meta-analysis and systematic review of eight studies demonstrated that FTSG provided a superior aesthetic appearance at the RFFF donor site compared to STSG (p = 0.001), with low heterogeneity among the studies. The analysis found no significant difference in donor site pain between techniques. There were no significant differences in infection, tendon exposure, or skin graft loss between the two graft methods. This study suggests that FTSG is comparable to STSG in terms of donor site pain, scarring, and infection while offering superior aesthetic outcomes.