RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To judge the injury mode and injury severity of the real human body through the measured values of anthropomorphic test devices (ATD) injury indices, the mapping relationship of lumbar injury between ATD and human body model (HBM) was explored. METHODS: Through the ATD model and HBM simulation, the mapping relationship of lumbar injury between the 2 subjects was explored. The sled environment consisted of a semi-rigid seat with an adjustable seatback angle and a 3-point seat belt system with a seatback-mounted D-ring. Three seatback recline states of 25°, 45°, and 65° were designed, and the seat pan angle was maintained at 15°. A 23 g, 47 km/h pulse was used. The validity of the finite element model of the sled was verified by the comparison of ATD simulation and test results. ATD model was the test device for human occupant restraint for autonomous vehicles (THOR-AV) dummy model and HBM was the total human model for safety (THUMS) v6.1. The posture of the 2 models was adjusted to adapt to the 3 seat states. The lumbar response of THOR-AV and the mechanical and biomechanical data on L1-L5 vertebrae of THUMS were output, and the response relationship between THOR-AV and THUMS was descriptive statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Both THOR-AV and THUMS were submarined in the 65° seatback angle case. With the change of seatback angle, the lumbar spine axial compression force (Fz) of THOR-AV and THUMS changed in the similar trend. The maximum Fz ratio of THOR-AV to THUMS at 25° and 45° seatback angle cases were 1.6 and 1.7. The flexion moment (My) and the time when the maximum My occurred in the 2 subjects were very different. In particular, the form of moment experienced by the L1 - L5 vertebrae of THUMS also changed. The changing trend of My measured by THOR-AV over time can reflect the changing trend of maximum stress of L1 and L2 of THUMS. CONCLUSION: The Fz of ATD and HBM presents a certain proportional relationship, and there is a mapping relationship between the 2 subjects on Fz. The mapping function can be further clarified by applying more pulses and adopting more seatback angles. It is difficult to map My directly because they are very different in ATD and HBM. The My of ATD and stress of HBM lumbar showed a similar change trend over time, and there may be a hidden mapping relationship.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of information on return to sport and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in amateur athletes after isolated spine injuries. METHODS: A single-center cohort study in amateur athletes aged 18 to 60 with isolated spine injuries; clinical data collection and follow-up via telephone interview and standardized PROMs (Short-Form 36, Oswestry and Neck Disability Index, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Visual Analog Scale). Bivariate analyses of potential influencing factors on PROMs were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of the 80 included participants, 78% (n = 62) were active in sport at follow-up. PROMs were slightly worse than those described for the age-adjusted general population. There were consistent associations of better PROMs with having reached the subjective preinjury level of performance in sport, while injury severity and surgical or conservative therapy did not show consistent associations with PROMs. CONCLUSION: Most amateur athletes resume their sports activity after a spine injury. Better outcomes are associated with individuals' resumption of sport and subjective level of performance, while injury severity and surgical or conservative therapy do not show consistent associations with PROMs, highlighting the importance of patient education, rehabilitation, and encouragement.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fiberoptic intubation is an important method for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine injury. How to effectively and safely complete fiberoptic intubation while maintaining the stability of the cervical spine is very important. This study compared the efficiency and safety of fiberoptic intubation after anesthesia induction under different types of air pressure in patients with simulated cervical spinal injury. METHODS: In total, 59 adult patients who underwent fiberoptic intubation with a cervical collar for simulated cervical spinal injury were randomly allocated to continuous positive-pressure oxygen, normal-pressure, or intermittent negative-pressure suction groups. After the induction of anesthesia and adequate 100% oxygenation, which confirmed effective neuromuscular blockade, it was deemed appropriate to begin fiberoptic intubation. In the continuous positive-pressure oxygen group, the fiberoptic device was connected through the negative-pressure suction path with 5 L/min oxygen. In the intermittent negative-pressure suction group, the fiberoptic device was connected to the negative-pressure suction device. In the normal-pressure group, the flexible fiberoptic device was not connected to either the oxygen source or the negative-pressure suction device. The intubation time was recorded as the primary outcome measure. The intubation success rate, number of attempts, minimum SpO2, objective lens contamination rate, and incidence of complications were also compared among the groups. RESULTS: Compared with those in the other groups, the median (range) intubation time in the continuous positive-pressure group was 59 (36-181) seconds, which was significantly shorter than that in the normal-pressure group, 167 (46-181) seconds, and the intermittent negative-pressure suction group, 132.5 (38-181) seconds (P=0.04). The success rate of nasotracheal intubation was significantly greater in the continuous positive-pressure group (94.7%, 18/19) than in the normal-pressure group (50%, 10/20) and intermittent negative-pressure suction group (50%, 10/20) (P=0.004). There was a significant difference among the three groups (P=0.043). The median (range) minimum SpO2 during fiberoptic intubation was 100% (99-100%) in the continuous positive-pressure group, 100% (90-100%) in the normal-pressure group, and 99% (88-100%) in the intermittent negative-pressure suction group (P=0.029). However, no statistically significant difference was detected among the groups with complications. CONCLUSION: The continuous use of positive-pressure oxygen via the negative-pressure suction pathway can improve the efficiency and safety of fiberoptic intubation in patients with simulated cervical spinal injury after anesthesia induction.

RESUMEN

Background: Accidental injuries sustained during helocasting remain unexamined. Methods: Conditions prevalent during a helocasting exercise performed at a still water body and the resulting casualties were analyzed. Results: Despatch from greater-than-ideal height (>7 m) and speed (>5 knots) causes a high-velocity impact of the body with water in a non-aerodynamic configuration, exposing maximal body area at penetration. The brunt is borne by the torso/back, specifically, the lungs, ribs, and posterior aspect of the spine. The injuries result from direct trauma, sudden deceleration, barotrauma, and hyperflexion. Computerized tomography (CT) is the imaging of choice in the assessment of these injuries. Prompt evacuation to an equipped center, whilst stabilizing the spine in the suspected, proves pivotal to the outcome. Conclusions: Adverse slamming dynamics cause accidental injuries in helocasting. Thorax and spine are predominantly traumatized, both directly and indirectly, and are assessed best using CT. Timely spine stabilization and evacuation prove vital. Accurate assessment of height/speed and adherence to their ideal limits, at despatch, may avert such injuries.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) from blunt trauma carry a high risk of neurological damage. Accurate diagnosis is vital for preventing harm and aiding recovery, yet the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of triage tools for detecting CSI in pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: A summary of the Cochrane Review by Tavender et al. (2024), with comments from a rehabilitation perspective. RESULTS: Five studies with 21,379 participants assessed seven CDRs. Direct comparisons showed high sensitivity but low specificity across different CDRs. Indirect comparison studies also demonstrated varying sensitivities and specificities. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient evidence exists to determine the best tools for deciding if imaging is necessary for diagnosing potential CSI in children. Better quality studies are needed to assess the accuracy of CDRs for cervical spine clearance in this population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cervical spine injuries (CSIs) in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) pose unique diagnostic and management challenges. Current studies on the intricate overlap between pediatric TBI and CSI are limited. This paper explores the existing literature as well as the epidemiology, mechanisms of injury, diagnostic criteria, treatment strategies, and outcomes associated with CSI in pediatric TBI patients.

RESUMEN

Low back pain (LBP) is a common medical condition worldwide, though the etiology of injuries causing most LBP is unknown. Flexion and repeated compression increase lumbar injury risk, yet the complex viscoelastic behavior of the lumbar spine has not been characterized under this loading scheme. Characterizing the non-injurious primary creep behavior in the lumbar spine is necessary for understanding the biomechanical response preceding injury. Fifteen porcine lumbar spinal units were loaded in repeated flexion-compression with peak compressive stresses ranging from 1.41 to 4.68 MPa. Applied loading simulated real loading exposures experienced by high-speed watercraft occupants. The strain response in the primary creep region was modeled for all tests using a generalized Kelvin-Voigt model. A quasilinear viscoelastic (QLV) approach was used to separate time-dependent (creep) and stress-dependent (elastic) responses. Optimizations between the models and experimental data determined creep time constants, creep coefficients, and elastic constants associated with this tissue under repeated flexion-compression loading. Average R2 for all fifteen models was 0.997. Creep time constants optimized across all fifteen models were 24 s and 580 s and contributed to 20 ± 3% and 30 ± 3% of the overall strain response, respectively. The non-transient behavior contributed to 50 ± 0% of the overall response. Elastic behavior for this porcine population had an average standard deviation of 24.5% strain across the applied stress range. The presented primary creep characterization provides the response precursor to injurious behavior in the lumbar spine. Results from this study can further inform lumbar injury prediction and kinematic models.

RESUMEN

Neck injury fractures are commonly associated with high-impact trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or falls from heights. However, this case underscores that it is possible to sustain such a fracture even from minor falls. As of now, there are no such reported cases. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough medical history when assessing patients with neck pain following falls. A 59-year-old male experienced a fainting episode after suffering from vomiting and diarrhea, resulting in him hitting his head. The patient attributed his neck pain to a sudden twisting of his neck. The pain originated from the base of his skull, primarily on the left side, extending to the scalp and the left shoulder. After enduring four days of intense pain that limited his ability to rotate his neck and bend to tie his shoes, he sought medical attention and underwent a neck CT scan, which led to the diagnosis of a "hangman's fracture." This injury was diagnosed in a clinical setting. Healthcare providers should inquire about the circumstances of the fall, the patient's position, associated symptoms, and any relevant pre-existing conditions. This approach ensures an accurate diagnosis and timely treatment. Comprehensive history-taking is essential for identifying high-risk situations and preventing complications that may arise from overlooked minor falls, ultimately enhancing patient safety, especially in cases of neck and spine injuries.

RESUMEN

Cervical spine injuries (CSIs) are heterogeneous in nature and often lead to long-term disability and morbidity. However, there are few recent and comprehensive epidemiological studies on CSI. The objective of this study was to characterize recent trends in CSI patient demographics, incidence, etiology, and injury level. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was used to extract data on CSIs from 2002 to 2022. Weighted national estimates of CSI incidence were computed using yearly population estimates interpolated from U.S. census data. Data analysis involved extracting additional information from patient narratives to categorize injury etiology (i.e., fall) and identify CSI level. K-means clustering was performed on cervical levels to define upper versus lower cervical injuries. Appropriate summary statistics including mean with 95% confidence intervals and frequency were reported for age, sex, race, ethnicity, etiology, and disposition. Age between groups was compared using an independent weighted Z-test. All categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-squared tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Ordinary least squares linear regression was used to quantify the rate of change of various metrics with time. A total of 11,822 patient records met the study criteria. The mean age of patients was 62.4 ± 22.7 years, 52.4% of whom were male and 61.4% of whom were White, 7.4% were Black, 27.8% were not specified, and the remaining comprised a variety of ethnicities. The most common mechanism of CSI was a fall (67.3%). There was a significant increase in the incidence of cervical injuries between 2003 and 2022 (p < 0.001). Unbiased K-means clustering defined upper cervical injuries as C1-C3 and lower cervical injuries as C4-C7. The mean age of patients with upper CSIs was 72.3 ± 19.6, significantly greater than the age of those with lower CSIs (57.1 ± 23.1, p < 0.001). Compared with lower CSI, White patients were more likely to have an upper CSI (67.4% vs. 73.7%; p < 0.001). While Black/African American (7.5% vs. 3.8%) and Hispanic (2.5% vs. 1.0%) patients were more likely to have a lower CSI (p < 0.001). Our study identified a significant increase in the incidence of CSIs over time, which was associated with increasing patient age. Our study detected a pragmatic demarcation of classifying upper injuries as C1-C3 and lower cervical injuries as C4-C7. Upper injuries were seen more often in older, White females who were treated and admitted, and lower injuries were seen more often in young, Black male patients who were released without admission.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) are both common surgical procedures in the management of pathologies of the subaxial cervical spine. While recent reviews have demonstrated ACCF to provide better decompression results compared to ACDF, the procedure has been associated with increased surgical risks. Nonetheless, the use of ACCF in a traumatic context has been poorly described. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of ACCF as compared to the more commonly performed ACDF. METHODS: All patients undergoing ACCF or ACDF for subaxial cervical spine injuries spanning over 2 disc-spaces and 3 vertebral-levels, between 2006 and 2018, at the study center, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were matched based on age and preoperative ASIA score. RESULTS: After matching, 60 patients were included in the matched analysis, where 30 underwent ACDF and ACCF, respectively. Vertebral body injury was significantly more common in the ACCF group (p = 0.002), while traumatic disc rupture was more frequent in the ACDF group (p = 0.032). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of surgical complications, including implant failure, wound infection, dysphagia, CSF leakage between the groups (p ≥ 0.05). The rates of revision surgeries (p > 0.999), mortality (p = 0.222), and long-term ASIA scores (p = 0.081) were also similar. CONCLUSION: Results of both unmatched and matched analyses indicate that ACCF has comparable outcomes and no additional risks compared to ACDF. It is thus a safe approach and should be considered for patients with extensive anterior column injury.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Unplanned readmissions after spine surgery are undesired, and cause significant functional, and financial distress to the patients and healthcare system. Though critical, knowledge about readmissions after surgery for traumatic spinal injuries (TSI) is scarce and under-evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive patients surgically treated for TSI and who had unplanned readmission within 90 days post-discharge were studied. Peri-operative demographic and surgical variables, surgical treatment, level of injury, delay in surgery, ASIA score, other organ injuries, peri-operative complications, smoking, ICU stay, co-morbidity, and the length of hospital stay were studied and correlated with the causes for readmission. RESULTS: Among 884 patients, 4.98% (n = 44) had unplanned readmissions within 90 days of discharge. Notably, 50% (n = 22) patients were readmitted within the first 30 days. The common causes of readmissions were urinary tract related problems (27%, n = 12), pressure ulcers (20.4%, n = 9), respiratory problems (13.6%, n = 6), surgical wound related problems (14%, n = 7,) limb injuries (11.4%, n = 5), and others (11%, n = 5). The total beds lost secondary to readmissions was 314 days, and the mean bed-days lost per patient was 7.2 ± 5.1. Thirteen peri-operative risk factors were associated with unplanned readmissions, among which, smoking (OR 2.2), diabetes (OR 2.4), and pressure sore during index admission (OR 16.7) were strong independent predictors. CONCLUSION: The incidence of unplanned readmissions after TSI was 5%, which was similar to elective spine surgeries but the causes and risk factors are different. Non-surgical complications related to urinary tract, respiratory care and pressure sores were the most common causes. Pre-operative smoking status, diabetes mellitus and pressure sores noted in the index admission were important independent risk factors.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC) score has not been previously validated for a pediatric population. The authors compared the SLIC treatment recommendations for pediatric subaxial cervical spine trauma with real-world pediatric spine surgery practice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at a pediatric level 1 trauma center was conducted in patients < 18 years of age evaluated for trauma from 2012 to 2021. An SLIC score was calculated for each patient, and the subsequent recommendations were compared with actual treatment delivered. Percentage misclassification, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three pediatric patients with trauma were included. Twenty-five patients (10.3%) underwent surgery and 218 were managed conservatively. The median SLIC score was 2 (interquartile range = 2). Sixteen patients (6.6%) had an SLIC score of 4, for which either conservative or surgical treatment is recommended; 27 children had an SLIC score ≥ 5, indicating a recommendation for surgical treatment; and 200 children had an SLIC score ≤ 3, indicating a recommendation for conservative treatment. Of the 243 patients, 227 received treatment consistent with SLIC score recommendations (p < 0.001). SLIC sensitivity in determining surgically treated patients was 79.2% and the specificity for accurately determining who underwent conservative treatment was 96.1%. The PPV was 70.3% and the NPV was 97.5%. There was a 5.7% misclassification rate (n = 13) using SLIC. Among patients for whom surgical treatment would be recommended by the SLIC, 29.6% (n = 8) did not undergo surgery; similarly, 2.5% (n = 5) of patients for whom conservative management would be recommended by the SLIC had surgery. The ROC curve for determining treatment received demonstrated excellent discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.96 (OR 3.12, p < 0.001). Sensitivity decreased when the cohort was split by age (< 10 and ≥ 10 years old) to 0.5 and 0.82, respectively; specificity remained high at 0.98 and 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: The SLIC scoring system recommended similar treatment when compared with the actual treatment delivered for traumatic subaxial cervical spine injuries in children, with a low misclassification rate and a specificity of 96%. These findings demonstrate that the SLIC can be useful in guiding treatment for pediatric patients with subaxial cervical spine injuries. Further investigation into the score in young children (< 10 years) using a multicenter cohort is warranted.

RESUMEN

Background: Head-down tackling has been associated with higher rates of head and neck injuries and less successful tackles compared with head-up tackling in American football. In rugby, head and neck injuries have been associated with tackling, with the tackler's head positioned in front of the ball carrier. Purpose: To assess the success and risks of tackling techniques used in the English Rugby Premiership matches. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Three reviewers analyzed 1000 consecutive solo defensive tackling attempts during the 2022 to 2023 season in 6 English Rugby Premiership matches. Slow-motion replays were used to analyze the success of the tackling attempt in terms of head angulation (head up vs head down), head position relative to the offensive player's waist at point of contact, and tackling method (inside shoulder, arm, head across the bow, and head-to-head). The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical data, and the 2-tailed Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous data. Results: The mean interrater reliabilities for analyzing the tackles were good across all groups (κ = 0.715). Head-up and head-down tackling occurred in 848 tackle attempts (84.8%) and 152 tackle attempts (15.2%), respectively. Head-up tackles were successful in 80.7% of the tackle attempts compared with 71.1% of the head-down tackle attempts (P = .0072). Tackles made at or above the waist were successful in 80.7% of the tackle attempts compared with 73.1% of tackles below the waist (P = .0193). The inside-shoulder technique had the highest successful tackle rate at 90.8%, compared with 44.2% with the arm technique (P < .0001) and 72.4% with the head-across-the-bow technique (P < .0001). The inside-shoulder technique resulted in head-up tackling in 84.8% of players compared with 59.8% with the head-across-the-bow technique (P < .0001) and 94.9% with arm tackling (P = .0001). There were 4 recorded injuries to the tackler: 2 neck injuries, 1 shoulder injury, and 1 wrist/hand injury. Conclusion: Head-up tackling, tackles made at or above the level of the offensive player's waist, and inside-shoulder tackling were found to be more efficient in producing successful tackles. The head-down, tackling below the waist, and head-across-the-bow techniques were associated with poor tackling and lower success rates.

RESUMEN

Background: Traumatic cervical spine injury is common among spinal cord injury which requires an intensive, multidisciplinary approach which can affect the immediate postoperative hospital survival rate. By identifying the risk factors leading to early mortality in cervical spine trauma patients, the prognosis of patients with TCSCI can be better predicted. Objective: The study aims to analyze the variables influencing in-hospital mortality in cervical spine trauma patients treated at a Level I trauma Center. Methods: Prospective study was conducted on subaxial cervical spine injuries from July 2019 to March 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A, with in-hospital mortality, and Group B, who got discharged from hospital, and mortality predictors were reviewed and analyzed for as potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Results: Out of 105 patients, 83.8 % were male with mean age of 40.43 ± 12.62 years. On univariate analysis, AIS (p-value: <0.01), ICU stay (p-value: <0.01), level of injury (p-value: <0.01), and MRI parameters like the extent of Parenchymal damage (p-value: <0.01), MSCC (p-value: <0.01), and MCC (p-value: <0.01) were potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality. On multivariate regression analysis AIS at presentation (p-value: 0.02) was the only significant independent parameter for in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: AIS grading at presentation, duration of ICU stay, level of injury, rate of tracheostomy, and MRI parameters like the extent of parenchymal damage, MCC, and MSCC influence and predicts in-hospital mortality, whereas AIS is the only independent risk factor.

RESUMEN

The inclination angle of the spacecraft seat is related to the astronaut's reentry angle, which in turn affects the safety of the astronauts. This study quantitatively analyzed the effects of different seat inclination angles on astronauts' lumbar spine injuries using the finite element method during the Lunar-Earth reentry. Firstly, a finite element model of the astronaut's lumbar spine was constructed based on reverse engineering technology, and the effectiveness of the model was verified through mesh sensitivity, vertebral range of motion, and spinal impact experiments. Then, simulation calculations were carried out for different seat inclination angles (0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°) under the typical reentry return loads of Chang'e 5T1 (CE-5T1) and Apollo 10, and the prediction and evaluation of lumbar spine injuries were conducted in conjunction with the biological tissue injury criteria. The results indicated that the stress on the vertebrae and annulus fibrosus increased under both reentry loads with the rise of the seat inclination angle, but the increasing rates decreased. When the acceleration peak of CE-5T1 approached 9G, the risk of tissue injury was higher under the seat angle exceeded 20°. According to the Multi-Axis Dynamic Response Criteria for spinal injury, neither of the two load conditions would directly cause injury to the astronauts' lumbar spine when the seat inclination angle was below 30°. The study findings provide a numerical basis for designing and improving the spacecraft's inclination angle in crewed lunar missions, ensuring the safety of astronauts.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To develop a predictive scoring system to identify traumatic cervical spine injury patients at a high risk of having multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. METHODS: This 12-year retrospective observational cohort study included 588 traumatic cervical spine-injured patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures and patients without this remote injury. Potential risk factors were examined using multivariable analysis to derive a predictive risk score from independent predictors. Results are presented as odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The accuracy of the calculated predicted score was demonstrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC). RESULTS: The incidence of noncontiguous fracture among the patients was 17% (100 of 588). The independent risk factors associated with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures were motor weakness, intracranial injury, intrathoracic injury, and intraabdominal injury. The AuROC of the prediction score was 0.74 (95% CI 0.69, 0.80). The patients were classified into three groups, low-risk group (score< 1), moderate-risk group (score 1-2.5), and high-risk group (score≥ 3), based on the predicted risk of multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This tool can potentially help preventing the missed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries with multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. CT scans or MRI of the entire spine to investigate remote multilevel noncontiguous spinal fractures may have a role in cervical spine-injured patients who have at least one of the independent risk factors and are strongly suggested for patients with scores in the high-risk group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The PEDSPINE I and PEDSPINE II scores were developed to determine when patients require advanced imaging to rule out cervical spine injury (CSI) in children younger than 3 years of age with blunt trauma. This study aimed to evaluate these scores in an institutional cohort. METHODS: The authors identified patients younger than 3 years with blunt trauma who received cervical spine MRI from their institution's prospective database from 2012 to 2015. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and imaging were compared between patients with and without CSI using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were identified, 8 (9%) of whom had CSI on MRI. The PEDSPINE I system had a higher sensitivity (50% vs 25%) and negative predictive value (93% vs 92%), whereas PEDSPINE II had a higher specificity (91% vs 65%) and positive predictive value (22% vs 13%). Patients with CSI missed by the scores had mild, radiologically significant ligamentous injuries detected on MRI. Both models would have recommended advanced imaging for the patient who required halo-vest fixation (risk profile: no CSI, 81.9%; ligamentous, 10.1%; osseous, 8.0%). PEDSPINE I would have prevented 52 (65%) of 80 uninjured patients from receiving advanced imaging, whereas PEDSPINE II would have prevented 73 (91%). Using PEDSPINE I, 10 uninjured patients (13%) could have avoided intubation for imaging. PEDSPINE II would not have spared any patients intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Current cervical spine clearance algorithms are not sensitive or specific enough to determine the need for advanced imaging in children. However, these scores can be used as a reference in conjunction with physicians' clinical impressions to reduce unnecessary imaging.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a significant public health issue, leading to physical, psychological, and social complications. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown potential in diagnosing and predicting the functional and neurologic outcomes of subjects with SCI. ML algorithms can predict scores for SCI classification systems and accurately predict outcomes by analyzing large amounts of data. This systematic review aimed to examine the performance of ML algorithms for diagnosing and predicting the outcomes of subjects with SCI. METHODS: The literature was comprehensively searched for the pertinent studies from inception to May 25, 2023. Therefore, electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched with individual search syntax. RESULTS: A total of 9424 individuals diagnosed with SCI across multiple studies were analyzed. Among the 21 studies included, 5 specifically aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, while the remaining 16 focused on exploring prognostic factors or management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: ML and deep learning (DL) have shown great potential in various aspects of SCI. ML and DL algorithms have been employed multiple times in predicting and diagnosing patients with SCI. While there are studies on diagnosing acute SCI using DL algorithms, further research is required in this area.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Military personnel are commonly at risk of lower back pain and thoracolumbar spine injury. Human volunteers and postmortem human subjects have been used to understand the scenarios where injury can occur and the tolerance of the warfighter to these loading regimes. Finite element human body models (HBMs) can accurately simulate the mechanics of the human body and are a useful tool for understanding injury. In this study, a HBM thoracolumbar spine was developed and hierarchically ï»¿validated as part of the Incapacitation Prediction for Readiness in Expeditionary Domains: an Integrated Computational Tool (I-PREDICT) program. Constitutive material models were sourced from literature and the vertebrae and intervertebral discs were hexahedrally meshed from a 50th percentile male CAD dataset. Ligaments were modeled through attaching beam elements at the appropriate anatomical insertion sites. 94 simulations were replicated from experimental PMHS tests at the vertebral body, functional spinal unit (FSU), and regional lumbar spine levels. The BioRank (BRS) biofidelity ranking system was used to assess the response of the I-PREDICT model. At the vertebral body level, the I-PREDICT model showed good agreement with experimental results. The I-PREDICT FSUs showed good agreement in tension and compression and had comparable stiffness values in flexion, extension, and axial rotation. The regional lumbar spine exhibited "good" biofidelity when tested in tension, compression, extension, flexion, posterior shear, and anterior shear (BRS regional average = 1.05). The validated thoracolumbar spine of the I-PREDICT model can be used to better understand and mitigate injury risk to the warfighter.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of traumatic vertebral artery injury (VAI) associated with cervical spine trauma varies widely in published trauma series. The primary aim of this study was to determine the incidence of traumatic VAI in patients who suffered cervical spine injuries by means of routine magnetic resonance imaging, and the secondary objective was to identify any associations with injury mechanism, level of injury, and neurologic injury severity.  Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 96 patients who suffered cervical spine fracture dislocation with or without an associated spinal cord injury (SCI) in Indian Spinal Injuries Center (ISIC), New Delhi, India from January 2013 to April 2023. Cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to diagnose VAI. Patient's age, sex, cervical injury level, mechanism of injury, neurologic level of injury, association with foraminal fracture, facet dislocation, and clinical sequelae of vertebral artery injury were analyzed. RESULTS: In this study, of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 18 patients (18.75%) had VAI on the MRI study. Thirteen (72.22%) of the eighteen patients had right-sided injuries, four (22.22%) had left-sided injuries, and one (5.55%) had bilateral injuries. There was an associated SCI in every VAI patient. VAI was significantly more common in patients who had ASIA A (61%, n = 11) and ASIA B (22%, n = 4) injuries, and no VAI was noted in neurologically intact patients (p<0.001). The incidence of VAI was higher in the flexion distraction type of injury (n = 12, 66%). The most commonly involved cervical spine injury level was C5-C6 (27%, n = 5), followed by 22% (n = 4) at C4-C5 and C6-C7 levels. About 27.8% (n = 5) of VAI was associated with foraminal fractures, and 72% (n = 13) of VAI was associated with facet dislocations, of which 44% (n = 8) were bifacetal and 28% (n = 5) were unifacetal dislocations. On clinical symptoms, only one (5.56%) patient had a headache, and 17 (94.4%) had no clinical features due to VAI. CONCLUSION: The incidence of traumatic vertebral artery disease is not very uncommon and requires careful and meticulous screening and management. Otherwise, complications like pseudoaneurysm, neurologic deficit, late-onset hemorrhage, infarction, and death can happen. Mostly, it is associated with high-velocity injuries and neurological injuries. MRI can be used as a good screening tool, which can be aided by a CT angiogram or digital subtraction angiography for confirmation. Proper pre-operative evaluation of vascular injury in cervical spine fracture dislocation is very important for patient counseling, patient management, and surgical planning.