RESUMEN

Pain is the predominant symptom troubling patients. Pain management is one of the most important aspects in the management of surgical patients leading to early recovery from surgical procedures or in patients with chronic diseases or malignancy. Various groups of drugs are used for dealing with this; however, they have their own implications in the form of adverse effects and dependence. In this article, we review the concerns of different pain-relieving medicines used postoperatively in gastrointestinal surgery and for malignant and chronic diseases.

RESUMEN

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5 µg, 7.5 µg, and 10 µg doses of dexmedetomidine added to hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine on the duration of analgesia during cesarean section. Furthermore, the onset of sensory and motor block, hemodynamics, sedation, and adverse effects were investigated. Methods: A total of 120 full-term parturients scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into three groups. Group RD5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 5 µg (0.5 mL), group RD7.5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 7.5 µg (0.5 mL), and group RD10 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 10 µg (0.5 mL). Sensorimotor blockade characteristics, analgesia duration, hemodynamic variables, and adverse events were documented. Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used for data analysis. Results: In groups RD5, RD7.5, and RD10, the onset of sensory block was 2.96±1.32 min, 2.26±1.50 min, and 1.96±0.93 min, respectively, while the onset of motor block was 9.63±0.11 min, 8.63±0.58 min, and 6.40±0.14 min, respectively. The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group RD10 compared with groups RD7.5 and RD5 (483.43±76.21 vs. 398.74±73.59 vs. 362.58±79.87 min, respectively, P=0.001). Group RD10 also exhibited significantly higher incidences of sedation, bradycardia, and vomiting. Conclusion: We conclude that increasing dexmedetomidine doses decreases the onset of sensory and motor blockade while prolonging analgesia duration in a dose-dependent manner.

RESUMEN

Shivering is a frequently encountered perioperative complication in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. Numerous different pharmacological agents have been employed to mitigate this issue. This scoping review aims to evaluate the efficacy of ketamine in mitigating the incidence of shivering. This review process utilized PubMed, JAMA, and Cochrane as primary databases. Searches were performed using combinations of key terms: "Ketamine," "Shivering," "Spinal Anesthesia," and "Hypothermia." Reviews of reference lists for additional pertinent data were performed. When ketamine was compared against a saline control, three out of five studies found ketamine to be more effective (p < 0.05, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) in the prevention of shivering. When compared with tramadol, two studies found ketamine to be more effective (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), one found no difference (p = 0.261), and one found tramadol to be more effective (p < 0.001). Two studies found dexmedetomidine more effective (p < 0.022, p < 0.027) than ketamine and tramadol. When comparing ketamine, ondansetron, and meperidine, all three were effective (p < 0.001) versus saline, with no significant difference between the three. Meperidine demonstrated more efficacy (p < 0.05) in reducing the intensity of shivering than ketamine. Ketamine's effects on hemodynamics were shown to be equivocal or more favorable across several studies. While there is mixed evidence on whether it is better than other treatments, ketamine may have advantages from a hemodynamic standpoint. Dosages of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg with or without a subsequent infusion of 0.1 mg/kg per hour may aid in the prevention of perioperative shivering. Overall, ketamine is a safe and effective drug for the prevention of perioperative shivering. However, other drugs may be equally or more effective; therefore, patient population, hemodynamic status, patient preferences, and provider familiarity with different agents should be considered.

RESUMEN

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become a preferred anesthetic technique for elective cesarean sections due to its rapid onset, profound sensory and motor blockade, and minimal impact on the newborn. It lowers the risk of development of thrombus in the veins and pulmonary vessels and permits early ambulation. The most popular technique used to reach the subarachnoid space is the midline technique, though it can be challenging to use in some cases, including those involving elderly patients with degenerative abnormalities in the vertebral column, patients who are unable to flex the vertebral column, noncooperative patients, and hyperesthetic patients. The paramedian technique resolves the challenges posed by the midline technique. It is also relatively easy to carry out. Based on the midline technique's inadequacies, we hypothesized that the paramedian method of SA would be less complicated than the midline approach, with a relatively low occurrence of post-dural puncture headaches (PDPH). Methodology Using the midline and paramedian approaches during cesarean surgeries, we performed an observational descriptive longitudinal study to assess the occurrence and magnitude of PDPH. During an elective cesarean delivery, the seated patient received 2.0-2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine using the midline or paramedian approaches and a 25 G Quincke's needle at the L3-L4 level. Eighty-four pregnant females with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II, aged 18 to 35 (n = 42 in each group), were included in this research. The occurrence and severity of PDPH were compared among the groups during a period of five days. Result In comparison to the paramedian group (7.1%), the midline group had a higher incidence of PDPH (14.3%). There was a significant correlation between the technique and the occurrence of PDPH (p = 0.041). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to quantify pain five days after surgery. Pain levels in Group B (paramedian) were consistently less than those in Group A (midline). On day 1, Group B had a mean score of 0.49 ± 1.16 (p = 0.030) compared to Group A's mean VAS score of 1.27 ± 1.95. Day 5 (p = 0.032): Because this tendency persisted through day 5, the p-values for days 2, 3, 4, and 5 remained significant. These findings suggest that the midline technique is linked to a higher occurrence and magnitude of PDPH than the paramedian approach. Conclusion Employing a paramedian technique has been associated with a noteworthy decline in the frequency of PDPH and a decrease in the need for additional analgesics, which could lead to a less severe case of PDPH. The paramedian approach needed fewer attempts and needle passes, which leads to a lower incidence of headache, backache, and injection site pain and better patient satisfaction.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative pain during Caesarean delivery (PDCD) is the leading cause of successful litigation against obstetric anaesthesiologists. PDCD may require conversion to general anaesthesia (GA). The aim of this analysis is to assess our incidence of PDCD and associated GA conversion. METHODS: Data were collected from electronic patient records. Data included baseline demographics, incidence of PDCD and rates of GA conversion, proportion of PDCD cases attributable to failed epidural (EA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA), and level of sensory and motor blockade in cases of PDCD. Results were audited against current standards set by the Royal College of Anaesthetists 'rates of PDCD should be <5% for category 4, <15% for categories 2-3, and <20 % for category 1 CD ' and that 'rates of conversion to GA due to neuraxial complications should be <1% for category 4, <5% for categories 2-3 and <15% for category 1 patients'. RESULTS: During the 12-month study period, 2,429 patients underwent CD, of whom 52 (2.1%) experienced PDCD. The incidence of PDCD was 3.1% (41/1,309) for category 1-3 patients, while 1% (11/1,120) of category 4 patients experienced PDS. Of the 52 patients with PDCD, 17 patients required GA (33%). SA was used in 24/52 (47%) cases and EA in 28/52 (53%) cases. The median level of sensory block in patients with PDCD was located at the T4 dermatome, the median level of motor block was Bromage level 2. CONCLUSIONS: PDCD occurred in 2.1% of CD, one-third required conversion to GA. Most patients experiencing PDCD met current motor and sensory blockade criteria.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia is a common anaesthetic method for caesarean sections but often results in hypotension, posing potential risks to maternal and neonatal health. Norepinephrine, as a vasopressor, may be effective in preventing and treating this hypotension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for the treatment of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia in caesarean sections. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant studies on prophylactic administration of norepinephrine for the treatment of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery. Reference lists of included articles were also searched. The latest search update was on March 20, 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software. The methods recommended by the Cochrane Handbook, Begge's and Egger's tests were used for risk of bias evaluation of the included literature. RESULTS: Nine studies were finally included in this study. The results showed that prophylactic administration of norepinephrine was superior to the control group in four aspects of treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery: the incidence of hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.34, 95%CI (0.27-0.43), P < 0.01]; the incidence of severe hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.21-0.51), P < 0.01]; and maternal blood pressure was more stable with MDPE [MD = -5.00, 95%CI (-7.80--2.21), P = 0.06] and MDAPE [MD = 4.11, 95%CI (1.38-6.85), P < 0.05], the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced [RR = 0.52, 95%CI (0.35-0.77), P < 0.01]. On the other hand, the incidence of reactive hypertension was higher than the control group [RR = 3.58, 95%CI (1.94-6.58), P < 0.01]. There was no difference between the two groups in one aspects: newborn Apgar scores [MD = -0.01, 95%CI (-0.10-0.09, P = 0.85)]. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of norepinephrine is effective in treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery patients; however, it does not provide improved safety and carries a risk of inducing reactive hypertension.

Hypotension, or low blood pressure, after spinal anaesthesia can threaten the health of both mothers and their babies during caesarean sections. Norepinephrine is a drug that affects heart rate less and does not easily cross the placental barrier, which may reduce its potential negative effects on the baby. However, there are not many studies on using norepinephrine as a preventive measure. Our study systematically evaluated the use of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to prevent hypotension in caesarean section patients. We found that it is effective in preventing low blood pressure but does not show improved safety and carries some risk of causing high pressure as a reaction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the effects of a cup of coffee given to patients before surgery in a cesarean section by means of intraoperative hypotension, ephedrine requirement, and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). METHODS: A total of 140 patients undergoing elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were included in this study. Participants who drank a single cup of filtered coffee two hours before spinal anesthesia were included in the coffee group, and those who drank water were in the control group. In each group, 70 patients were included. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded every three to five minutes after spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative use of ephedrine was recorded. The PDPH was monitored for three days. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was 48.6% in the coffee group and 71.4% in the control group (p = 0.006). The rate of ephedrine usage (25.7%) was significantly lower in the coffee group (p = 0.001). The incidence of PDPH in the first 24 hours (2.9%) was significantly lower in the coffee group (11.4%). The visual analog scale (VAS) score was similar between groups (p = 0.048, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of a single cup of coffee before spinal anesthesia reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypotension and the rate of ephedrine usage in cesarean sections.

RESUMEN

Background In anaesthesiology, intrathecal drugs play pivotal roles in spinal anaesthesia. Despite their ability to induce a high sensory block, bupivacaine alone may not be adequate for postoperative analgesia. It often requires a substantial dose of postoperative rescue analgesia to manage pain effectively. Thus, we studied the efficacy of nalbuphine 1.5 mg injected intrathecally as an adjuvant in endoscopic urological surgery. Materials and methods Sixty patients undergoing endoscopic urological surgery were equally divided into two study groups: group B (injection 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg (3 ml) plus sterile NS 0.15 ml) and group N (injection 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg (3 ml)+nalbuphine 1.5 mg (0.15 ml)). The first appearance of the sensory and motor blockages and duration required to attain complete sensory and motor threshold was noted. All vitals were recorded. After surgery, it was recorded when the patient first needed rescue analgesia (injection paracetamol 1 gm IV). Any adverse effects were recorded and addressed. The statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with p<0.05 indicating significance in both groups' operations. Results Intrathecal nalbuphine as an adjuvant caused an earlier onset of sensory and motor inhibition, delayed two-segment regression, and prolonged postoperative anaesthesia. The control group experienced sensory block at 3.33±0.61 minutes, while the nalbuphine group had a mean onset of 2.66±0.92 minutes (p=0.001). The patient who received nalbuphine had a mean regression time of 119.60±14.549 minutes, whereas the bupivacaine group had a mean regression time of 88.43±17.196 minutes. Group N had a considerably longer duration of postoperative analgesia, lasting 264.97 minutes, compared to group B's 198.50 minutes (p<0.001). Intrathecal nalbuphine did not influence vital indicators such as heart rate, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation. Conclusion To conclude, endoscopic urological surgery patients who received a subarachnoid block with 1.5 mg (0.15 ml) of nalbuphine hydrochloride with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg (3 ml) had longer postoperative pain relief than those who received 3 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine (15 mg). Urinary retention and pruritus were absent. Intrathecal nalbuphine with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine is deemed safe with minimal side effects in endoscopic urology surgery.

RESUMEN

In particular, the application of regional anaesthesia techniques in existing medicine can be characterized as experiencing regular changes in recent decades. It is useful for obtaining accurate and efficient pain management solutions, from the basic spinal and epidural blocks to the novel ultrasound nerve blocks and constant catheter procedures. These advancements do enhance not only the value of the perioperative period but also the patient's rated optimization as enhancing satisfaction, better precision, and the safety of nerve block placement. The use of ultrasound technology makes it even easier to determine the proper positioning of the needle and to monitor nerve block placement. Moreover, the duration and efficiency of regional anaesthesia are being enhanced by state-of-the-art approaches, which come in the form of liposomal bupivacaine, and better recovery plans and protocols, which shorten recovery time and decrease the number of hospital days. As these methods develop further, more improvements in the safety, efficacy, and applicability of regional anaesthesia in contemporary medicine are anticipated through continued research and innovation.

RESUMEN

A 69-year-old female with Crohn's disease was admitted for open ileocecectomy with lysis of adhesions. The plan was to proceed with general endotracheal anesthesia and a thoracic epidural catheter for perioperative analgesia. Epidural access was attempted at the T10-11 and T11-12 interspaces, both of which resulted in accidental dural punctures. On the third attempt, the epidural catheter was inserted at the T9-10 interspace. Both the aspiration and test dose were negative. Thirty minutes later, after induction of general anesthesia, the catheter was again aspirated before the epidural pump was connected. Freely flowing, glucose-positive fluid was obtained, and the catheter was removed for the patient's safety. This case suggests that accidental dural puncture may be a risk factor for inappropriate communication with the subarachnoid space. This can be assumed to increase the risk of unanticipated high or total spinal block and its life-threatening sequelae.

RESUMEN

Emergency laparotomy is a surgical procedure associated with significantly higher mortality rates compared to elective surgeries. Awake laparotomy under neuraxial anaesthesia has recently emerged as a promising approach in abdominal surgery to improve patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of using neuraxial anaesthesia as the primary anaesthetic technique in emergency laparotomies. We conducted a case series involving 16 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for bowel ischemia, perforation, or occlusion. Neuraxial anaesthesia was employed as the main anaesthetic technique. We analysed patient demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome measures included the adequacy of postoperative pain control, the incidence of postoperative complications, and mortality rates. Among the 16 patients, adequate postoperative pain control was achieved, with only 2 patients requiring additional analgesia. Postoperative complications, including sepsis, wound dehiscence, and pneumonia, were observed in seven patients (44%). The observed mortality rate was relatively low at 6% (one patient). Notably, conversion to general anaesthesia was not necessary in any of the cases, and no early readmissions were reported. Our findings highlight the feasibility and potential benefits of using neuraxial anaesthesia in emergency laparotomies. The observed low mortality rate and the avoidance of conversion to general anaesthesia suggest that neuraxial anaesthesia may be a useful alternative in emergency settings. However, the occurrence of postoperative complications in 44% of patients indicates the need for cautious patient selection and close monitoring. Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to fully elucidate the efficacy, safety, and potential impact of this technique on patient outcomes in emergency laparotomies.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery (QoR) are important patient-reported outcomes and quality metrics. The relationship between these two outcomes is complex, with studies showing a weak correlation between them in the non-obstetric population. We sought to evaluate the correlation between patient satisfaction and QoR scores in the obstetric population after caesarean delivery. As secondary aims, we aimed to determine the influence of urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthetic on patient satisfaction and QoR scores as well as determining drivers of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. METHODS: Women were invited to complete the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSCS) and Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) questionnaires at 24 h after caesarean delivery. Correlations were analysed using Spearman's rank tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Data were collected from 300 women. There was a significant but weak positive correlation between ObsQoR-11 and MSCS scores (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Correlation was significantly influenced by mode of anaesthesia (P < 0.001) and urgency of procedure (P = 0.005), with greater satisfaction amongst patients receiving spinal anaesthesia and those undergoing scheduled caesarean deliveries for a given QoR score. Quality of communication, interactions with staff and aspects of the postpartum physical environment were significant determinants of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: Maternal satisfaction and obstetric QoR are distinct entities with a weak correlation between the two variables. Urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthesia are significant predictors of the correlation between satisfaction and quality of recovery scores. Many of the drivers of satisfaction were modifiable including quality of communication and a comfortable physical space for postpartum recovery.

RESUMEN

Background: Phenylephrine (PE) is one of the vasopressor used to treat hypotension during anaesthesia. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effect of prophylactic infusion and rescue bolus of PE on the haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia (SA) for Caesarean section (CS) in obese parturients. Methods: A total of 74 obese parturients scheduled for elective CS under SA were randomised into two groups; Group A (n = 37) received prophylactic PE infusion starting at 50 µg min-1 and adjusted according to the given algorithm and Group B (n = 37) received 100 µg PE bolus to treat hypotension. The measured parameters were systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), the total requirement of PE and neonatal Apgar score. Results: Six patients were excluded from the analysis due to missing data and only 68 were analysed. Group A showed significantly higher SBP, DBP and MAP than Group B (P < 0.05). The requirement of PE was higher in Group A than Group B [817.7 (265.7) µg versus 360.6 (156.0) µg; P = < 0.05]. Both groups had no difference in terms of the neonatal Apgar score. Conclusion: Prophylactic PE infusion provided better haemodynamic control than therapeutic boluses in obese parturients undergoing CS under SA.

RESUMEN

Kyphoscoliosis is a well-known spinal deformity. The abnormal curvature in both the coronal and sagittal planes presents unique challenges during pregnancy. This case discusses the management of a 27-year-old primigravida with thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis, who underwent an emergency cesarean section at 39.3 weeks of gestation. An interdisciplinary team consisting of an obstetrician, pulmonologist, orthopedic surgeon, anesthesiologist, and physiotherapist collaborated in her care. In such cases, successful outcomes require a tailored approach that prioritizes maternal-fetal well-being and minimizes potential complications associated with complex spinal deformity during pregnancy and childbirth.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recommendations suggest favouring regional over general anaesthesia to reduce impact on postoperative sleep apnoea severity, but there is currently no evidence to support this. We compared the impact of general vs spinal anaesthesia on postoperative sleep apnoea severity and assessed the evolution of sleep apnoea severity up to the third postoperative night. METHODS: This post hoc analysis used pooled data from two previous randomised controlled trials in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under general or spinal anaesthesia (n=96), without performing a preliminary power analysis. All participants underwent respiratory polygraphy before surgery and on the first and third postoperative nights. The primary outcomes were the supine apnoea-hypopnea index on the first postoperative night and the evolution of the supine apnoea-hypopnea index up to the third postoperative night. Secondary outcomes included the oxygen desaturation index on the first and third postoperative nights. RESULTS: In the general and spinal anaesthesia groups, mean (95% confidence interval) values for the supine apnoea-hypopnoea index on the first postoperative night were 20 (16-25) and 21 (16-26) events h-1 (P=0.82), respectively; corresponding values on the third postoperative night were 34 (22-45) and 35 (20-49) events h-1 (P=0.91). The generalised estimating equations model showed a significant time effect. Secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia was not associated with a reduction in postoperative sleep apnoea severity, which was worse on the third postoperative night. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02717780 and NCT02566226.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia is standard of care for patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). However, postoperative pain and bladder discomfort remains an issue, and optimising pain management could improve recovery and promote earlier home discharge. The main objective of this trial was to evaluate if patients receiving spinal anaesthesia are more frequently home ready at 8 pm on the same day compared with multimodal pain management following RALP under general anaesthesia. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomised controlled, multicentre trial was performed between January 2019 to December 2021. Patients undergoing RALP under general anaesthesia were randomised to either multimodal analgesia using parecoxib and morphine intra-operatively (Group GM) or spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and sufentanil (Group GS). The primary aim, home readiness, was assessed using a post-anaesthesia discharge scoring system. RESULTS: Of 202 patients analysed, 27% patients reached home readiness criteria after 12 h, 46% after 24 h and 79% after 48 h, without differences between the groups. Urge to pass urine was greater in group GM than in group GS (p ⟨0.001) and lasted for a median of two hours in both groups. More patients expressed satisfaction with postoperative care in group GS (p ⟨0.001). No other significant differences were found between the groups. DISCUSSION: We found no difference in time to home readiness between the groups. Approximately one-fourth of the patients achieved home readiness the same day after surgery without difference between the groups. Fewer patients had urge, and patient satisfaction was greater in group GS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Failure of sub-arachnoid block (SAB), due to resistance to bupivacaine after a recent scorpion sting can lead to multiple block attempts and subsequent conversion to general anaesthesia. We report this case series of 10 patients with successful SAB with newly launched 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine, in patients with recent scorpion sting. Thus, intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine may be considered as the local anaesthetic agent of choice in patients with scorpion sting to prevent failure of SAB.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal diamorphine is believed to provide postoperative analgesia but is associated with adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. There is little evidence of synthesis regarding intrathecal diamorphine in the contemporary literature. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis to determine the magnitude of intrathecal diamorphine efficacy and safety. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for trials comparing intrathecal diamorphine with a control group in patients undergoing all types of surgery. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were intravenous morphine consumption and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24 h following surgery, respectively. RESULTS: Twelve trials were identified, which included data for 712 patients. Intrathecal doses of diamorphine ranged from 100 µg to 2500 µg. Intravenous morphine consumption at 24 h postoperatively was significantly reduced in the intrathecal diamorphine group, with a mean difference (95%CI) of -8 mg (-11 to -6), I2 = 93%, p < 0.001. There was a significant difference between three intrathecal diamorphine dosing subgroups but without correlation: mean differences (95%CI) -1 mg (-3-0), -26 mg (-40 to -11) and -6 mg (-15-4) in patients receiving doses of 0-200 µg, 201-400 µg and > 400 µg, respectively (p = 0.003). Intrathecal diamorphine increased postoperative nausea and vomiting with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 1.37 (1.19-1.58), I2 = 7%, p < 0.001. There were no differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting between the three intrathecal diamorphine dosing subgroups. There was no correlation observed with meta-regression of the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was very low. CONCLUSION: There is very low level of evidence that intrathecal diamorphine provides effective analgesia after surgery, while increasing postoperative nausea and vomiting with doses > 200 µg.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Access to the neuraxial space, including lumbar punctures and neuraxial anaesthesia, is an everyday procedure in clinical practice. Traditionally these procedures rely on manual palpation technique, but ultrasound is a useful tool when patients prove challenging. Presently, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for technical skills acquisition, both with and without ultrasound, and likewise, competency assessment approaches vary globally. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence regarding learning and assessment in neuraxial access ± $$ \pm $$ ultrasound, for future educational recommendations. METHODS: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, together with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search strategy will be based on a PICO approach, focusing on physicians, medical students, or nurses being exposed to education, training, or assessment in procedural neuraxial access ± $$ \pm $$ ultrasound. No comparators are obligated, but outcomes should be assessable using the Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation. The search will be performed in Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Independently, two authors will screen the studies and conflicts will be resolved by a third author. Relevant predefined data will be extracted and analysed using a descriptive approach. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. DISCUSSION: This scoping review will contribute by presenting gathered evidence of an overview of the different approaches to achieving education and training of technical skills in neuraxial access, and how skills are tested, which could guide research and future recommendations for skills development and assessment.