RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sinonasal malignancies with orbital invasion have dismal prognosis even when treated with orbital exenteration (OE). Sugawara et al. developed a surgical strategy called "extended-OE (EOE)," showing encouraging outcomes. We hypothesized that a similar resection is achievable under endoscopic guidance through the exenterated orbit (endoscopic-EOE). METHODS: The study was conducted in three institutions: University of Vienna; Mayo Clinic; University of Insubria; 48 orbital dissections were performed. A questionnaire was developed to evaluate feasibility and safety of each step, scoring from 1 to 10, ("impossible" to "easy," and "high risk" to "low risk," respectively), most likely complication(s) were hypothesized. RESULTS: The step-by-step technique is thoroughly described. The questionnaire was answered by 25 anterior skull base surgeons from six countries. Mean, median, range, and interquartile range of both feasibility and safety scores are reported. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-EOE is a challenging but feasible procedure. Clinical validation is required to assess real-life outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Evisceración Orbitaria , Humanos , Endoscopía/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/patología , Neoplasias Orbitales/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica/patologíaRESUMEN
Sinonasal malignant tumors are a group of uncommon malignancies that account for less than 1% of all tumors. These tumors often involve the maxillary sinus and nasal cavity, with less cumulative incidence in the ethmoidal sinus, sphenoidal sinus, and frontal sinus. The lack of consensus on the management of sinonasal malignancies is due to their rarity, diagnostic challenges, and the heterogeneity of treatments. In this paper, we present a case of endoscopic-assisted medial canthus incision combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors, with the aim of providing valuable insights to clinicians on the management of these tumors.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Estesioneuroblastoma Olfatorio , Neoplasias Nasales , Humanos , Estesioneuroblastoma Olfatorio/cirugía , Estesioneuroblastoma Olfatorio/patología , Estesioneuroblastoma Olfatorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Endoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Nasales/cirugía , Neoplasias Nasales/patología , Cavidad Nasal/cirugía , Cavidad Nasal/patología , Cavidad Nasal/diagnóstico por imagen , Pronóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/patología , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sinonasal malignant tumors (SNMTs) have a high recurrence risk, which is responsible for the poor prognosis of patients. Assessing recurrence risk in SNMT patients is a current problem. PURPOSE: To establish an MRI-based radiomics nomogram for assessing relapse risk in patients with SNMT. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 143 patients with 68.5% females (development/validation set, 98/45 patients). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 1.5-T and 3-T, fat-suppressed fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI), FSE T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and FSE contrast-enhanced T1WI (T1WI + C). ASSESSMENT: Three MRI sequences were used to manually delineate the region of interest. Three radiomics signatures (T1WI and FS-T2WI sequences, T1WI + C sequence, and three sequences combined) were built through dimensional reduction of high-dimensional features. The clinical model was built based on clinical and MRI features. The Ki-67-based and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) model were established for comparison. The radiomics nomogram was built by combining the clinical model and best radiomics signature. The relapse-free survival analysis was used among 143 patients. STATISTICAL TESTS: The intraclass/interclass correlation coefficients, univariate/multivariate Cox regression analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression algorithm, concordance index (C index), area under the curve (AUC), integrated Brier score (IBS), DeLong test, Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, optimal cutoff values. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The T1 + C-based radiomics signature had best prognostic ability than the other two signatures (T1WI and FS-T2WI sequences, and three sequences combined). The radiomics nomogram had better prognostic ability and less error than the clinical model, Ki-67-based model, and TNM model (C index, 0.732; AUC, 0.765; IBS, 0.185 in the validation set). The cutoff values were 0.2 and 0.7 and then the cumulative risk rates were calculated. DATA CONCLUSION: A radiomics nomogram for assessing relapse risk in patients with SNMT may provide better prognostic ability than the clinical model, Ki-67-based model, and TNM model. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Nomogramas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Antígeno Ki-67 , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Resumen Los carcinomas neuroendocrinos son tumores poco frecuentes en nariz y senos paranasales. Se consideran tumores primitivos y son los menos diferenciados del sistema neuroendocrino difuso. Se discute el caso de una paciente femenina de 49 años quien acude al servicio de otorrinolaringología en el Hospital Central Militar refiriendo masa en cavidad nasal izquierda de crecimiento progresivo en un periodo de 9 meses, así como epistaxis y obstrucción nasal izquierda. Mediante resonancia magnética y tomografía computada se observó tumoración de la cavidad nasal izquierda en su totalidad hasta nasofaringe, con captación heterogénea del medio de contraste. Se decide resección de tumoración mediante abordaje endoscópico (sinusotomía maxilar tipo III, etmoidectomía anterior y posterior izquierda, Draf esfenoidal tipo II izquierdo, Draf IIa del seno frontal izquierdo, así como septectomía posterior). El estudio histopatológico reportó un carcinoma neuroendocrino moderadamente diferenciado, por lo que se trató de forma conjunta con servicio de oncología médica. Este tipo de tumores son un reto diagnostico por la complejidad para diferenciarlos en un estudio histopatológico. La diferenciación efectiva de los mismos puede tener un impacto clínico, por lo que los avances en la intervención terapéutica podrían prolongar la supervivencia del paciente, mejorar la calidad de vida e incluso la cura.
Abstract Neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare tumors of the nose and sinuses. They are considered primitive tumors and are the least differentiated from the diffuse neuroendocrine system. We report a 49-year-old female patient who attends the otolaryngology service at the Central Military Hospital referring mass in the left nasal cavity with a progressive growth over a period of 9 months, including epistaxis, as well as left nasal obstruction. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography imaging studies showed a tumor occupying the entirety of the left nasal cavity to the nasopharynx, with heterogeneous uptake of the contrast medium. Tumor resection is decided by endoscopic approach (maxillary sinusotomy type III, left anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, left sphenoid Draf type II, left frontal Draf IIa as well as posterior septectomy). The pathology service reported a moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. The treatment was decided joint session with the medical oncology service. These types of tumors are a diagnostic challenge because of the complexity to differentiate them in a histopathological study. Their effective differentiation can have a clinical impact, that's why the advances in therapeutic intervention could prolong patient survival, improve quality of life and even find a cure.
RESUMEN
Sinonasal malignant tumors are characterized by high histological variability and complexity of the differential diagnosis. Currently, there are classifications of these tumors, which are based on their localization and involvement of various anatomical structures. However, generally accepted algorithms for treatment of this pathology have not yet been developed. This review describes the most important algorithms for treatment of the most common histological variants of sinonasal malignant tumors: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, esthesioneuroblastoma, adenoid cystic cancer, and sinonasal adenocarcinoma. The main problems in choosing the approach for treating these tumors are the lack of generally accepted resectability criteria and contradictions between oncological and neurosurgical indications for surgical treatment. Further research is needed to study the role of radiosensitizers and radioprotectors in comprehensive treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico , Estesioneuroblastoma Olfatorio/cirugía , Estesioneuroblastoma Olfatorio/terapia , Neoplasias Nasales , Humanos , Cavidad Nasal , Base del CráneoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Craniofacial resection (CFR) for advanced sinonasal malignant tumors (SNMTs) is mandatory for radical resection. Surgeons must be aware of perioperative complications and long-term outcome because this procedure is extremely invasive, especially when the tumor involves the anterior skull base. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive surgical patients with advanced SNMT of T4 stage or Kadish stage C (31 men and 7 women; mean age, 55 years; range: 19-76 years) treated with CFR in the past 28 years were followed up for 59.4 months. In cases of unilateral orbital extension, en-bloc resection was achieved using several neurosurgical techniques (extended CFR) from 2005 onwards. Herein, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of surgery by comparing survival data between 2 time periods (first stage: 1984-2004, second stage: 2005-2012). RESULTS: Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological type observed (65.8%), followed by esthesioneuroblastoma (15.8%). Using a combination of adjuvant radiation therapy, the 5-year overall survival and the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 55.5% and 59.4%, respectively. Sarcomatous histology was a poor prognostic factor. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 48.9% in the first stage and improved to 82.1% in the second stage (P = 0.057); this was related to improvements in local control rate. CONCLUSIONS: CFR and postoperative radiotherapy are safe and effective for treating advanced SNMTs. Extended CFR, including radical orbital exenteration, may contribute to good long-term outcomes. A diverse surgical team may help perform radical resection and reconstruction in patients with advanced tumors.