Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 143(9): 5609-5614, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37058158

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroid injections (CSI) may increase the risk of peri-prosthetic infections (PJI) following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our study specifically assessed the risk of PJI in patients who received CSI: (1) less than 4 weeks prior to TSA; (2) 4-8 weeks prior to TSA; and (3) 8-12 weeks prior to TSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national all-payer database was queried to identify patients who underwent TSA with a shoulder osteoarthritis diagnosis from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020 (n = 25,422). There were four cohorts: CSI within 4 weeks of TSA (n = 214), CSI 4-8 weeks prior to TSA (n = 473), CSI 8-12 weeks prior to TSA (n = 604), and a control cohort that did not receive CSI (n = 15,486). Bivariate chi-square analyses of outcomes were performed in addition to multivariate regression. RESULTS: A significant increase in PJI risk at 1 year (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.19-3.99, p = 0.007) and 2 years (OR = 2.03, CI = 1.09-3.46, p = 0.016) in patients who received CSI within 1 month of TSA was noted. PJI risk was not significantly increased at any time point for patients who received a CSI greater than 4 weeks prior to TSA (all p ≥ 0.396). CONCLUSION: PJI risk is increased at both 1 and 2 years post-operatively in patients who received a CSI within 4 weeks of TSA. Therefore, TSA should be deferred at least 4 weeks after a patient receives a CSI to mitigate PJI risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Osteoartritis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Osteoartritis/etiología , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 32(7): 1459-1464, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36737032

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are used for the symptomatic management of osteoarthritis. However, their use may contaminate the joint space and pose an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess whether there is any association between the timing of CSI and the incidence of PJI at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Specifically, we assessed the risk of PJI in patients who received CSI <1 month, 1-2 months, 2-3 months, and >3 months prior to RSA, as well as associated risk factors for PJI with CSI. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer database to identify patients who underwent RSA from October 1, 2015, to October 31, 2020 (1.5 million patients). Patients who received an osteoarthritis diagnosis prior to RSA were selected, whereas those with bilateral RSA or >1 injection on the same side were excluded. This resulted in 5 cohorts: cohort receiving CSI within 4 weeks of RSA (n = 5607), cohort receiving CSI 1-2 months prior to RSA (n = 3024), cohort receiving CSI 2-3 months prior to RSA (n = 1572), cohort receiving CSI >3 months prior to RSA (n = 16,302), and control cohort with no injection prior to RSA (n = 21,938). Bivariate χ2 analyses of outcomes were conducted, in addition to multivariate regressions performed to adjust for comorbidities, as well as to assess associated risk factors. RESULTS: The adjusted analyses demonstrated a significantly increased risk of PJI at 90 days in patients who received CSI within 1 month of RSA (P < .001). Additionally, the PJI risk was increased at 1 year postoperatively in patients who received CSI within 1 month of RSA (P = .015). However, no significant increase in the PJI risk was noted at any time point for patients who received CSI >1 month before RSA (all P ≥ .088). Furthermore, alcohol abuse, chronic kidney disease, and depression were identified as risk factors that increased the risk of PJI. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular shoulder CSIs <4 weeks prior to RSA are associated with increased risks of PJI at 90 days and 1 year postoperatively as compared with patients who did not receive CSIs. RSA should be deferred ≥4 weeks after a patient receives a CSI.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Osteoartritis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Artroplastia/efectos adversos , Artritis Infecciosa/cirugía , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía
3.
World J Orthop ; 13(3): 259-266, 2022 Mar 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35317253

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular glenohumeral joint injections are essential procedures for treating various shoulder disorders. Fluoroscopy-guided injections have been extensively used; however, they pose a risk of radiation exposure and are expensive and time-consuming. Recently, it has been suggested that ultrasound-guided injections are accurate and cost effective procedures. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound-guided glenohumeral injections using a posterior approach that is confirmed using magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). METHODS: The study included 179 shoulders of patients with recurrent anterior instability (150 patients; 103 and 76 right and left shoulders, respectively; 160 males and 19 females; average age = 20.5 years; age range: 14-63 years) who underwent MRA for preoperative diagnosis. They were injected with 12 mL lidocaine (1%) using the ultrasound-guided posterior approach and then underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Two shoulder surgeons, except for the injector, evaluated the transverse relaxation (T2)-weighted images of axial planes and classified the intra-articular condition of injected contrast into three groups based on one of the three following scenarios: no leakage, injection into the glenohumeral joint without leakage; minor leakage, practical intra-articular injection with some leakage outside the posterior rotator cuffs; and major leakage, inaccurate injection with mass leakage without any contrast into the joint. The inter-rater reliability between two assessors was also evaluated by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficient. The learning curve was assessed regarding the inaccurate injection rate by analyzing Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of the 179 injections, 163 shoulders (91.0%) had no leakage, 10 shoulders (5.6%) had minor leakage, and six shoulders (3.4%) had major leakage. In total, 173 shoulders (96.6%) were intra-articularly injected; thus, we could detect anterior labrum and capsular pathologies. Regarding the inter-rater reliability, the kappa coefficient was 0.925, indicating consistency in the evaluations by both examiners. Regression analysis of the inaccurate injection rate for assessingtechnical learning showed a logarithmic curve with a downward trend (R2 = 0.887, P < 0.001). Three (50%) of the six inaccurate injections classified into "major leakage" were observed in the first 30 injections, indicating that the accurate injection showed a leaning effect. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided intra-articular glenohumeral injections using a posterior approach had high accuracy; however, injection accuracy depends on clinical experience.

4.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 210(6): 1279-1287, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29629805

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of landmark-based and image-guided intraarticular steroid injections for the initial treatment of a population with adhesive capsulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analytic model from the health care system perspective over a 6-month time frame for 50-year-old patients with clinical findings consistent with adhesive capsulitis was used to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of three techniques for administering intraarticular steroid to the glenohumeral joint: landmark based (also called blind), ultrasound guided, and fluoroscopy guided. Input data on cost, probability, and utility estimates were obtained through a comprehensive literature search and from expert opinion. The primary effectiveness outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Costs were estimated in 2017 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided injections were the dominant strategy for the base case, because it was the least expensive ($1280) and most effective (0.4096 QALY) strategy of the three options overall. The model was sensitive to the probabilities of getting the steroid into the joint by means of blind, ultrasound-guided, and fluoroscopy-guided techniques and to the costs of the ultrasound-guided and blind techniques. Two-way sensitivity analyses showed that ultrasound-guided injections were favored over blind and fluoroscopy-guided injections over a range of reasonable probabilities and costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ultrasound-guided injections were cost-effective in 44% of simulations, compared with 34% for blind injections and 22% for fluoroscopy-guided injections and over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided injections are the most cost-effective option for the initial steroid-based treatment of patients with adhesive capsulitis. Blind and fluoroscopy-guided injections can also be cost-effective when performed by a clinician likely to accurately administer the medication into the correct location.


Asunto(s)
Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fluoroscopía/economía , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/economía , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Esteroides/administración & dosificación , Esteroides/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
5.
Shoulder Elbow ; 9(3): 188-194, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28588659

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the short-term effects following corticosteroid injection into the shoulder. METHODS: Type-specific shoulder injection was administered, followed by physiotherapy 7 days to 10 days later. One hundred and sixteen adult patients were prospectively followed-up. The primary outcome was a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain. Scores were recorded immediately before injection, 30 minutes after, daily until day 7 and then at 6 weeks. Post injection pain was defined as an increase of 2 or more points in the VAS score after the injection. The secondary outcome was determined at 6 months as successful discharge or progression onto surgery. RESULTS: The VAS showed a significant reduction from the pre-injection score for all patients at day 1 and was maintained until week 6. Forty-one (35.3%) patients experienced post-injection pain. The mean duration of symptoms was 3.9 days. At 6 months, 81 (69.8%) patients were discharged successfully and, at a mean of 23.2 months, did not require re-referral; 29 (25%) had surgery; and six (5.2%) were referred for a spinal opinion. CONCLUSIONS: One in three patients developed delayed post-injection pain. Flare phenomenon had no determinate effect on outcome. Patients' pain response by 6 weeks is predictive of final outcome at 6 months and may help clinicians plan further treatment without delay.

6.
Pain Manag ; 5(6): 465-82, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26402316

RESUMEN

Ultrasonography has multiple advantages over traditional radiologic imaging modalities when used for interventional procedures. It allows improved visualization of the anatomy while avoiding ionizing radiation and risks associated with contrast use. It has proved superiority at accuracy of delivery and procedural effectiveness over blind procedures when used in association with interventional pain procedures. Although limited in its ability to see through bony structures, ultrasound has utility in visualizing soft tissues and vascular structures in anatomic regions of interest resulting in increased use for posterior neuraxial, periaxial, peripheral nerve and joint-related structures. Current evidence for use in these settings is presented here. In some cases, optimal utility may be improved by combining ultrasonography with other imaging modalities.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares/métodos , Inyecciones Espinales/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA