RESUMEN

Rectal cancer management has evolved significantly, particularly with neoadjuvant treatment strategies. This narrative review examines the development and effectiveness of these therapies for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), highlighting the historical quest that led to current neoadjuvant alternatives. Initially, trials showed the benefits of adding radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) to surgery, reducing local recurrence (LR). The addition of oxaliplatin to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) further improved outcomes. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy preoperatively to enhance adherence, timing, and systemic control. Key trials, including PRODIGE 23, CAO/ARO/AIO 12, OPRA, RAPIDO, and STELLAR, are analyzed to compare short-course and long-course RT with systemic chemotherapy. The heterogeneity and difficulty in comparing TNT trials due to different designs and outcomes are acknowledged, along with their promising long-term results. On the other hand, it briefly discusses the potential for non-operative management (NOM) in select patients, a strategy gaining traction due to favorable outcomes in specific trials. As a conclusion, this review underscores the complexity of rectal cancer treatment, emphasizing individualized approaches considering patient preferences and healthcare resources. It also highlights the importance of interpreting impressive positive or negative results with caution due to the variability in study designs and patient populations.

Asunto(s)

Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos

RESUMEN

Background: Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) of 25 Gy in five daily fractions is a recommended strategy in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as in cases of metastatic disease for local control. There is scarce information regarding the use of SCRT for patients who have received nonoperative management. Objectives: To describe the characteristics of patients who received treatment with SCRT for LARC and metastatic rectal cancer, toxicity, and the approach after radiation treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent SCRT for rectal cancer at the Alexander Fleming Institute from March 2014 to June 2022. Results: In total, 44 patients were treated with SCRT. The majority were male (29, 66%), with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range 46-73). Most patients had stage IV disease (26, 59.1%), followed by LARC (18, 40.9%). Most lesions were located in the middle rectum (30, 68%). The majority of LARC patients underwent SCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (ChT) (16/18, 89%), while most patients with metastatic disease underwent SCRT followed by consolidation ChT (14/26, 53.8%). A clinical complete response (cCR) was documented in 8/44, 18.2% of patients. Most patients with LARC and cCR were managed by a watch and wait approach (5/18, 27.7%). Local recurrence was observed in LARC cases (2/18, 11.1%). Patients who underwent SCRT following consolidation ChT were more likely to have adverse events (AEs) than those undergoing induction ChT following SCRT (11/30, 36.7% versus 3/12, 25%, p = 0.02). Conclusion: In a subgroup of patients diagnosed with LARC and treated with SCRT followed by ChT, surgical treatment could be omitted after they achieved a cCR. Local recurrence was similar to that reported in a previous study. SCRT is a reasonable option for local disease control in stage IV disease, yielding low toxicity rates. Therefore, decisions must be made by a multidisciplinary team. Prospective studies are necessary to reach further conclusions.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Conventional long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) and a new paradigm of short-course radiotherapy with total neoadjuvant therapy (SCRT-TNT) are used in locally advanced rectal cancer (RC). There are few economic assessment reports available on TNT that focus on cost analysis in a country with limited funding for healthcare systems. The objective of this study was to perform a cost analysis comparing SCRT-TNT versus LCRT. Materials and Methods: In 2020-2021, a prospective registry was created to document RC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and the costs of cancer treatments, transportation and the time patients and family members spent in the hospital. This registry outlined the direct and indirect costs of LCRT versus SCRT-TNT. Results: LCRT and SCRT-TNT regimens have direct costs that range from S/.5,993.30 to S/.27,928.36 and from S/.3,409.81 to S/.18,159.42, respectively. FOLFOX regimens are the most expensive. Administering radiotherapy in 28 3D sessions and 5 sessions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) sessions costs S/.2,603.88, S/.1,277.19 and S/.1,027.77, respectively. The indirect cost of FOLFOX regimens is twice that of the similar modality that combines irradiation and Oxaliplatin IV and Capecitabine VO (CAPOX). SCRT-TNT regimens with CAPOX reduce costs by at least 50%, while SCRT-TNT regimens with FOLFOX reduce costs by 32%. Conclusion: Despite using IMRT/VMAT, SCRT-TNT is a less expensive approach for patients with RC when compared to LCRT. The costs to patients using SCRT-TNT are much lower, but it is also a better option because it saves hospital resources.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease presents challenging issues, as the radical treatment of the whole disease is difficult. Surgery and chemotherapy (CT) play an unquestionable role, but the contribution of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) is not very clear. METHODS: In 2009, we established a prospective treatment protocol that included CT, short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCRT) with surgery of the primary tumour and all metastatic locations. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. Eight (20%) patients did not receive CT due to significant comorbidities. Radical surgery treatment was possible in 22 (55%) patients. The mean follow-up was 42.81 months (3.63-105.97). Overall survival at 24 and 36 months was 71.4% and 58.2%, respectively. There was good local control of the disease, as 97.2% of pelvic surgeries were R0 and there were no local recurrences. CONCLUSION: In stage IV with resectable metastatic disease, the proposed therapeutic regimen seems very appropriate in well selected patients able to tolerate the treatment. We bet on the role of pelvic RT, due to the good local control of the disease in our series.

Asunto(s)

Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/radioterapia , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Radioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pélvicas/secundario , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia

RESUMEN

Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a condition that impacts directly on the patient's prognosis. OBJECTIVE: The study purpose was to identify predictors of overall survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MSCC. METHODS: A cohort study involving NSCLC patients enrolled between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Sixty-four patients treated with short-course radiotherapy were included. Clinical and socio-demographic data were extracted from medical records. Data were analysed using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: The median survival time was 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.6-3.5). Patients >60 years had shorter survival than younger patients (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.06-3.24; p = 0.02), and patients with performance status (PS) >2 had shorter survival than those with PS≤2 (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.12-3.33; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study found worse PS and higher age are independent predictors of overall survival in NSCLC patients with MSCC treated with short-course radiotherapy after adjusting the potential confounding factors (PS, age and target therapy).

Asunto(s)

Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Compresión de la Médula Espinal , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia

RESUMEN

In the following review we intend to ascertain the optimal neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. In 2004, a study revealed that chemoradiotherapy (CRT) resulted in better local control when performed preoperatively rather than postoperatively, thus neoadjuvant treatment was established as a standard treatment. Subsequently, the Polish study and the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group showed no statistically significant difference between concomitant CRT over 5 wk vs short-course radiotherapy (RT). Therefore, both were established as standard neoadjuvant treatments. Later, the Stockholm III study demonstrated that short-course RT had a higher complete pathological response than long-course RT. It also showed that a delay between RT and surgery presented fewer complications. This opened a window of time to provide an early and effective systemic treatment to prevent distant metastases. Studies show that short-course RT plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy could achieve this. When comparing this total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) vs concomitant CRT, the former showed greater complete pathological response and lower acute toxicity. Studies presented during 2020 have also shown the benefits of TNT in terms of complete pathological response, as well as disease and metastasis-free survival. Our review suggests that probably TNT should be the new standard treatment for these patients. However, we will have to wait for the full text publications of these studies to confirm this statement.