RESUMEN

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-associated condition posing risks of both fetal and maternal mortality and morbidity that can only resolve following delivery and removal of the placenta. Because in its typical form preeclampsia can arise before delivery, but not after, these two events exemplify the time-to-event setting of "semi-competing risks" in which a non-terminal event of interest is subject to the occurrence of a terminal event of interest. The semi-competing risks framework presents a valuable opportunity to simultaneously address two clinically meaningful risk modeling tasks: (i) characterizing risk of developing preeclampsia, and (ii) characterizing time to delivery after onset of preeclampsia. However, some people with preeclampsia deliver immediately upon diagnosis, while others are admitted and monitored for an extended period before giving birth, resulting in two distinct trajectories following the non-terminal event, which we call "clinically immediate" and "non-immediate" terminal events. Though such phenomena arise in many clinical contexts, to-date there have not been methods developed to acknowledge the complex dependencies between such outcomes, nor leverage these phenomena to gain new insight into individualized risk. We address this gap by proposing a novel augmented frailty-based illness-death model with a binary submodel to distinguish risk of immediate terminal event following the non-terminal event. The model admits direct dependence of the terminal event on the non-terminal event through flexible regression specification, as well as indirect dependence via a shared frailty term linking each submodel. We develop an efficient Bayesian sampler for estimation and corresponding model fit metrics, and derive formulae for dynamic risk prediction. In an extended example using pregnancy outcome data from an electronic health record, we demonstrate the proposed model's direct applicability to address a broad range of clinical questions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Recurrent events are common in clinical studies and are often subject to terminal events. In pragmatic trials, participants are often nested in clinics and can be susceptible or structurally unsusceptible to the recurrent events. We develop a Bayesian shared random effects model to accommodate this complex data structure. To achieve robustness, we consider the Dirichlet processes to model the residual of the accelerated failure time model for the survival process as well as the cluster-specific shared frailty distribution, along with an efficient sampling algorithm for posterior inference. Our method is applied to a recent cluster randomized trial on fall injury prevention.

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer is a prevalent malignancy with global significance. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the influence of stage and tumor site on survival outcomes in 284 colorectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2017. Patients were categorized into four groups based on tumor site (colon and rectum) and disease stage (early stage and advanced stage). Demographic characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were recorded. Bayesian survival modeling was performed using semi-competing risks illness-death models with an accelerated failure time (AFT) approach, utilizing R 4.1 software. Results demonstrated significantly higher time ratios for disease recurrence (TR = 1.712, 95% CI 1.489-2.197), mortality without recurrence (TR = 1.933, 1.480-2.510), and mortality after recurrence (TR = 1.847, 1.147-2.178) in early-stage colon cancer compared to early-stage rectal cancer. Furthermore, patients with advanced-stage rectal cancer exhibited shorter survival times for disease recurrence than patients with early-stage colon cancer. The interaction effect between the disease site and cancer stage was not significant. These findings, derived from the optimal Bayesian log-normal model for terminal and non-terminal events, highlight the importance of early detection and effective management strategies for colon cancer. Early-stage colon cancer demonstrated improved survival rates for disease recurrence, mortality without recurrence, and mortality after recurrence compared to other stages. Early intervention and comprehensive care are crucial to enhance prognosis and minimize adverse events in colon cancer patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In a semi-competing risks model in which a terminal event censors a non-terminal event but not vice versa, the conventional method can predict clinical outcomes by maximizing likelihood estimation. However, this method can produce unreliable or biased estimators when the number of events in the datasets is small. Specifically, parameter estimates may converge to infinity, or their standard errors can be very large. Moreover, terminal and non-terminal event times may be correlated, which can account for the frailty term. Here, we adapt the penalized likelihood with Firth's correction method for gamma frailty models with semi-competing risks data to reduce the bias caused by rare events. The proposed method is evaluated in terms of relative bias, mean squared error, standard error, and standard deviation compared to the conventional methods through simulation studies. The results of the proposed method are stable and robust even when data contain only a few events with the misspecification of the baseline hazard function. We also illustrate a real example with a multi-centre, patient-based cohort study to identify risk factors for chronic kidney disease progression or adverse clinical outcomes. This study will provide a better understanding of semi-competing risk data in which the number of specific diseases or events of interest is rare.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Analyzing the causal mediation of semi-competing risks has become important in medical research. Semi-competing risks refers to a scenario wherein an intermediate event may be censored by a primary event but not vice versa. Causal mediation analyses decompose the effect of an exposure on the primary outcome into an indirect (mediation) effect: an effect mediated through a mediator, and a direct effect: an effect not through the mediator. Here we proposed a model-based testing procedure to examine the indirect effect of the exposure on the primary event through the intermediate event. Under the counterfactual outcome framework, we defined a causal mediation effect using counting process. To assess statistical evidence for the mediation effect, we proposed two tests: an intersection-union test (IUT) and a weighted log-rank test (WLR). The test statistic was developed from a semi-parametric estimator of the mediation effect using a Cox proportional hazards model for the primary event and a series of logistic regression models for the intermediate event. We built a connection between the IUT and WLR. Asymptotic properties of the two tests were derived, and the IUT was determined to be a size [Formula: see text] test and statistically more powerful than the WLR. In numerical simulations, both the model-based IUT and WLR can properly adjust for confounding covariates, and the Type I error rates of the proposed methods are well protected, with the IUT being more powerful than the WLR. Our methods demonstrate the strongly significant effects of hepatitis B or C on the risk of liver cancer mediated through liver cirrhosis incidence in a prospective cohort study. The proposed method is also applicable to surrogate endpoint analyses in clinical trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We propose a novel methodology to quantify the effect of stochastic interventions for a non-terminal intermediate time-to-event on a terminal time-to-event outcome. Investigating these effects is particularly important in health disparities research when we seek to quantify inequities in the timely delivery of treatment and its impact on patients' survival time. Current approaches fail to account for time-to-event intermediates and semi-competing risks arising in this setting. Under the potential outcome framework, we define causal contrasts relevant in health disparities research and provide identifiability conditions when stochastic interventions on an intermediate non-terminal time-to-event are of interest. Causal contrasts are estimated in continuous time within a multistate modeling framework and analytic formulae for the estimators of the causal contrasts are developed. We show via simulations that ignoring censoring in intermediate and/or terminal time-to-event processes or ignoring semi-competing risks may give misleading results. This work demonstrates that a rigorous definition of the causal effects and joint estimation of the terminal outcome and intermediate non-terminal time-to-event distributions are crucial for valid investigation of interventions and mechanisms in continuous time. We employ this novel methodology to investigate the role of delaying treatment uptake in explaining racial disparities in cancer survival in a cohort study of colon cancer patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We aim to evaluate the marginal effects of covariates on time-to-disability in the elderly under the semi-competing risks framework, as death dependently censors disability, not vice versa. It becomes particularly challenging when time-to-disability is subject to interval censoring due to intermittent assessments. A left truncation issue arises when the age time scale is applied. We develop a flexible two-parameter copula-based semiparametric transformation model for semi-competing risks data subject to interval censoring and left truncation. The two-parameter copula quantifies both upper and lower tail dependence between two margins. The semiparametric transformation models incorporate proportional hazards and proportional odds models in both margins. We propose a two-step sieve maximum likelihood estimation procedure and study the sieve estimators' asymptotic properties. Simulations show that the proposed method corrects biases in the marginal method. We demonstrate the proposed method in a large-scale Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study and provide new insights into preventing disability in the elderly. The proposed method could be applied to the general semi-competing risks data with intermittently assessed disease status.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Intensity-based multistate models provide a useful framework for characterizing disease processes, the introduction of interventions, loss to followup, and other complications arising in the conduct of randomized trials studying complex life history processes. Within this framework we discuss the issues involved in the specification of estimands and show the limiting values of common estimators of marginal process features based on cumulative incidence function regression models. When intercurrent events arise we stress the need to carefully define the target estimand and the importance of avoiding targets of inference that are not interpretable in the real world. This has implications for analyses, but also the design of clinical trials where protocols may help in the interpretation of estimands based on marginal features.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Simulation studies play an important role in evaluating the performance of statistical models developed for analyzing complex survival data such as those with competing risks and clustering. This article aims to provide researchers with a basic understanding of competing risks data generation, techniques for inducing cluster-level correlation, and ways to combine them together in simulation studies, in the context of randomized clinical trials with a binary exposure or treatment. We review data generation with competing and semi-competing risks and three approaches of inducing cluster-level correlation for time-to-event data: the frailty model framework, the probability transform, and Moran's algorithm. Using exponentially distributed event times as an example, we discuss how to introduce cluster-level correlation into generating complex survival outcomes, and illustrate multiple ways of combining these methods to simulate clustered, competing and semi-competing risks data with pre-specified correlation values or degree of clustering.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Semi-competing risks refer to the time-to-event analysis setting, where the occurrence of a non-terminal event is subject to whether a terminal event has occurred, but not vice versa. Semi-competing risks arise in a broad range of clinical contexts, including studies of preeclampsia, a condition that may arise during pregnancy and for which delivery is a terminal event. Models that acknowledge semi-competing risks enable investigation of relationships between covariates and the joint timing of the outcomes, but methods for model selection and prediction of semi-competing risks in high dimensions are lacking. Moreover, in such settings researchers commonly analyze only a single or composite outcome, losing valuable information and limiting clinical utility-in the obstetric setting, this means ignoring valuable insight into timing of delivery after preeclampsia has onset. To address this gap, we propose a novel penalized estimation framework for frailty-based illness-death multi-state modeling of semi-competing risks. Our approach combines non-convex and structured fusion penalization, inducing global sparsity as well as parsimony across submodels. We perform estimation and model selection via a pathwise routine for non-convex optimization, and prove statistical error rate results in this setting. We present a simulation study investigating estimation error and model selection performance, and a comprehensive application of the method to joint risk modeling of preeclampsia and timing of delivery using pregnancy data from an electronic health record.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Semi-competing risks data often arise in medical studies where the terminal event (e.g., death) censors the non-terminal event (e.g., cancer recurrence), but the non-terminal event does not prevent the subsequent occurrence of the terminal event. This article considers regression modeling of semi-competing risks data to assess the covariate effects on the respective non-terminal and terminal event times. We propose a copula-based framework for semi-competing risks regression with time-varying coefficients, where the dependence between the non-terminal and terminal event times is characterized by a copula and the time-varying covariate effects are imposed on two marginal regression models. We develop a two-stage inferential procedure for estimating the association parameter in the copula model and time-varying regression parameters. We evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed method through simulation studies and illustrate the method through an application to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data for elderly women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and initially treated with breast-conserving surgery.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at utilizing a Bayesian approach semi-competing risks technique to model the underlying predictors of early recurrence and postoperative Death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 284 patients with colorectal cancer, who underwent surgery, referred to Imam Khomeini clinic in Hamadan from 2001 to 2017. The primary outcomes were the probability of recurrence, the probability of Mortality without recurrence, and the probability of Mortality after recurrence. The patients 'recurrence status was determined from patients' records. The Bayesian survival modeling was carried out by semi-competing risks illness-death models, with accelerated failure time (AFT) approach, in R 4.1 software. The best model was chosen according to the lowest deviance information criterion (DIC) and highest logarithm of the pseudo marginal likelihood (LPML). RESULTS: The log-normal model (DIC = 1633, LPML = -811), was the optimal model. The results showed that gender(Time Ratio = 0.764: 95% Confidence Interval = 0.456-0.855), age at diagnosis (0.764: 0.538-0.935 ), T3 stage (0601: 0.530-0.713), N2 stage (0.714: 0.577-0.935 ), tumor size (0.709: 0.610-0.929), grade of differentiation at poor (0.856: 0.733-0.988), and moderate (0.648: 0.503-0.955) levels, and the number of chemotherapies (1.583: 1.367-1.863) were significantly related to recurrence. Also, age at diagnosis (0.396: 0.313-0.532), metastasis to other sites (0.566: 0.490-0.835), T3 stage (0.363: 0.592 - 0.301), T4 stage (0.434: 0.347-0.545), grade of differentiation at moderate level (0.527: 0.387-0.674), tumor size (0.595: 0.500-0.679), and the number of chemotherapies (1.541: 1.332-2.243) were the significantly predicted the death. Also, age at diagnosis (0.659: 0.559-0.803), and the number of chemotherapies (2.029: 1.792-2.191) were significantly related to mortality after recurrence. CONCLUSION: According to specific results obtained from the optimal Bayesian log-normal model for terminal and non-terminal events, appropriate screening strategies and the earlier detection of CRC leads to substantial improvements in the survival of patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

An immunotherapy trial often uses the phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose, which monitors the efficacy and toxicity outcomes simultaneously in a single trial. The progression-free survival rate is often used as the efficacy outcome in phase I/II immunotherapy trials. As a result, patients developing disease progression in phase I/II immunotherapy trials are generally seriously ill and are often treated off the trial for ethical consideration. Consequently, the happening of disease progression will terminate the toxicity event but not vice versa, so the issue of the semi-competing risks arises. Moreover, this issue can become more intractable with the late-onset outcomes, which happens when a relatively long follow-up time is required to ascertain progression-free survival. This paper proposes a novel Bayesian adaptive phase I/II design accounting for semi-competing risks outcomes for immunotherapy trials, referred to as the dose-finding design accounting for semi-competing risks outcomes for immunotherapy trials (SCI) design. To tackle the issue of the semi-competing risks in the presence of late-onset outcomes, we re-construct the likelihood function based on each patient's actual follow-up time and develop a data augmentation method to efficiently draw posterior samples from a series of Beta-binomial distributions. We propose a concise curve-free dose-finding algorithm to adaptively identify the optimal biological dose using accumulated data without making any parametric dose-response assumptions. Numerical studies show that the proposed SCI design yields good operating characteristics in dose selection, patient allocation, and trial duration.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Hepatitis B has been a well-documented risk factor of liver cancer and mortality. To what extent hepatitis B affects mortality through increasing liver cancer incidence is of research interest and remains to be studied. We formulate the research question as a hypothesis testing problem of causal mediation where both the mediator and the outcome are time-to-event variables. The problem is closely related to semicompeting risks because time to the intermediate event may be censored by an occurrence of the outcome. We propose two hypothesis testing methods: a weighted log-rank test (WLR) and an intersection-union test (IUT). A test statistic of the WLR is constructed by adapting a nonparametric estimator of the mediation effect; however, the test may be conservative regarding its Type I Error rate. To address this, we further propose the IUT, the test statistic of which is constructed under the composite null hypothesis. Asymptotic properties of the two tests are studied, showing that the IUT is a size α test with better statistical power than the WLR. The theoretical properties are supported by extensive simulation studies under finite samples. Applying the proposed methods to the motivating hepatitis study, both WLR and IUT provided strong evidence that hepatitis B had a significant mediation effect on mortality via liver cancer incidence.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

For semi-competing risks data involving a non-terminal event and a terminal event we derive the asymptotic distributions of the event-specific win ratios under proportional hazards (PH) assumptions for the relevant cause-specific hazard functions of the non-terminal and terminal event, respectively. The win ratios converge to the respective hazard ratios under the PH assumptions and therefore are censoring-free, whether or not the censoring distributions in the two treatment arms are the same. With the asymptotic bivariate normal distributions of the win ratios, confidence intervals and testing procedures are obtained. Through extensive simulation studies and data analysis, we identified proper transformations of the win ratios that yield good control of the type one error rate for various testing procedures while maintaining competitive power. The confidence intervals also have good coverage probabilities. Furthermore, a test for the PH assumptions and a test of equal hazard ratios are developed. The new procedures are illustrated in the clinical trial Aldosterone Antagonist Therapy for Adults With Heart Failure and Preserved Systolic Function, which evaluated the effects of spironolactone in patients with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The proper analysis of composite endpoints consisting of both death and non-fatal events is an intriguing and sometimes contentious topic. The current practice of analyzing time to the first event often draws criticisms for ignoring the unequal importance between component events and for leaving recurrent-event data unused. Novel methods that address these limitations have recently been proposed. To compare the novel versus traditional approaches, we review three typical models for composite endpoints based on time to the first event, composite event process, and pairwise hierarchical comparisons. The pros and cons of these models are discussed with reference to the relevant regulatory guidelines, such as the recently released ICH-E9(R1) Addendum "Estimands and Sensitivity Analysis in Clinical Trials". We also discuss the impact of censoring when the model assumptions are violated and explore sensitivity analysis strategies. Simulation studies are conducted to assess the performance of the reviewed methods under different settings. As demonstration, we use publicly available R-packages to analyze real data from a major cardiovascular trial.

RESUMEN

Ultrahigh-dimensional gene features are often collected in modern cancer studies in which the number of gene features p is extremely larger than sample size n. While gene expression patterns have been shown to be related to patients' survival in microarray-based gene expression studies, one has to deal with the challenges of ultrahigh-dimensional genetic predictors for survival predicting and genetic understanding of the disease in precision medicine. The problem becomes more complicated when two types of survival endpoints, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival, are of interest in the study and outcome data can be subject to semi-competing risks due to the fact that distant metastasis-free survival is possibly censored by overall survival but not vice versa. Our focus in this paper is to extract important features, which have great impacts on both distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival jointly, from massive gene expression data in the semi-competing risks setting. We propose a model-free screening method based on the ranking of the correlation between gene features and the joint survival function of two endpoints. The method accounts for the relationship between two endpoints in a simply defined utility measure that is easy to understand and calculate. We show its favorable theoretical properties such as the sure screening and ranking consistency, and evaluate its finite sample performance through extensive simulation studies. Finally, an application to classifying breast cancer data clearly demonstrates the utility of the proposed method in practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Quantile regression offers a useful alternative strategy for analyzing survival data. Compared to traditional survival analysis methods, quantile regression allows for comprehensive and flexible evaluations of covariate effects on a survival outcome of interest, while providing simple physical interpretations on the time scale. Moreover, many quantile regression methods enjoy easy and stable computation. These appealing features make quantile regression a valuable practical tool for delivering in-depth analyses of survival data. In this paper, I review a comprehensive set of statistical methods for performing quantile regression with different types of survival data. This review covers various survival scenarios, including randomly censored data, data subject to left truncation or censoring, competing risks and semi-competing risks data, and recurrent events data. Two real examples are presented to illustrate the utility of quantile regression for practical survival data analyses.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Semi-competing risks arise when interest lies in the time-to-event for some non-terminal event, the observation of which is subject to some terminal event. One approach to assessing the impact of covariates on semi-competing risks data is through the illness-death model with shared frailty, where hazard regression models are used to model the effect of covariates on the endpoints. The shared frailty term, which can be viewed as an individual-specific random effect, acknowledges dependence between the events that is not accounted for by covariates. Although methods exist for fitting such a model to right-censored semi-competing risks data, there is currently a gap in the literature for fitting such models when a flexible baseline hazard specification is desired and the data are left-truncated, for example when time is on the age scale. We provide a modeling framework and openly available code for implementation. METHODS: We specified the model and the likelihood function that accounts for left-truncated data, and provided an approach to estimation and inference via maximum likelihood. Our model was fully parametric, specifying baseline hazards via Weibull or B-splines. Using simulated data we examined the operating characteristics of the implementation in terms of bias and coverage. We applied our methods to a dataset of 33,117 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members aged 65 or older examining the relationship between educational level (categorized as: high school or less; trade school, some college or college graduate; post-graduate) and incident dementia and death. RESULTS: A simulation study showed that our implementation provided regression parameter estimates with negligible bias and good coverage. In our data application, we found higher levels of education are associated with a lower risk of incident dementia, after adjusting for sex and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: As illustrated by our analysis of Kaiser data, our proposed modeling framework allows the analyst to assess the impact of covariates on semi-competing risks data, such as incident dementia and death, while accounting for dependence between the outcomes when data are left-truncated, as is common in studies of aging and dementia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cross-sectional length-biased data arise from questions on the at-risk time for an event of interest from those who are at-risk but have yet to experience the event. For example, in the National Survey on Family Growth (NSFG), women who were currently attempting to become pregnant were asked how long they had been attempting pregnancy. Cross-sectional survival analysis methods use the observed at-risk times to make inference on the distribution of the unobserved time-to-failure. However, methodological gaps in these methods remain such as how to handle semi-competing risks. For example, if the women attempting pregnancy had undergone fertility treatment during their current pregnancy attempt. In this paper, we develop statistical methods that extend cross-sectional survival analysis methods to incorporate semi-competing risks. They can be used to estimate the distribution of the length of natural pregnancy attempts (i.e., without fertility treatment) while correctly accounting for women that sought fertility treatment prior to being sampled using cross-sectional data. We demonstrate our approach based on simulated data and an analysis of data from the NSFG. The proposed method results in separate survival curves for: time-to-natural-pregnancy, time-to-fertility treatment, and time-to-pregnancy after fertility treatment.