RESUMEN

Las técnicas de Biología Molecular de última generación, como es la secuenciación masiva en paralelo o NGS (Next Generation Sequencing), permite obtener gran cantidad de información genómica, la cual muchas veces va más allá de la detección de una variante patogénica en un gen que explique la patología (hallazgo primario). Es así como surgió desde hace años la discusión internacional respecto a la decisión a tomar frente a los hallazgos secundarios accionables, es decir, aquellos hallazgos de variantes clasificadas como patogénicas o probablemente patogénicas que no están relacionadas con el fenotipo del paciente, pero que tiene alguna medida preventiva o tratamiento posible y, por lo tanto, podría ser de utilidad para la salud del paciente. Luego de revisar la bibliografía internacional y debatir entre los expertos del Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan, se logró establecer una política institucional y reforzar el hecho de que se trata de una disciplina multidisciplinaria. Así, fue posible definir que solo se atenderá las cuestiones relacionadas con la edad pediátrica, dejando para un tratamiento posterior aquellas variantes detectadas en genes que sean accionables en edad adulta. En el Hospital Garrahan, ha sido posible definir claramente cómo proceder frente a los hallazgos secundarios, al adaptar el consentimiento informado a esta necesidad, definiendo cuándo serán informados, y sabiendo que serán buscados intencionalmente en los genes clínicamente accionables enlistados en la última publicación del American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, siempre y cuando el paciente/padre/tutor lo consienta (AU)

The latest generation of molecular biology techniques, including massive parallel sequencing or NGS (Next Generation Sequencing), allows us to obtain a whealth of genomic information, which often goes beyond the detection of a pathogenic variant in a gene that explains the pathology (primary finding). As a result, an international discussion has arisen over the years regarding the decision-making concerning actionable secondary findings, it means, those findings of variants classified as pathogenic or probably pathogenic that are not related to the patient's phenotype, but which have some possible preventive measure or treatment and, therefore, could be useful for the patient's health. After reviewing the international literature and discussing among the experts of the Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan, an institutional policy was established and the concept that this is a multidisciplinary discipline was reinforced. Consequently, it has been defined that only issues related to children will be addressed, reserving those variants detected in genes that are actionable in adulthood for later treatment. At Garrahan Hospital, we were able to clearly define how to proceed with secondary findings by adapting the informed consent to this need, defining when they will be reported, and knowing that they will be intentionally searched for in the clinically actionable genes listed in the latest publication of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, as long as the patient/parent/guardian consents (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Whether and how to disclose secondary finding (SF) information to children is ethically debated. Some argue that genetic testing of minors should be limited to preserve the child's future autonomy. Others suggest that disclosure of SFs can occur if it is in the best interests of the child. However, the ways that parents conceptualize and weigh their child's future autonomy against the interests of their child and other family members are unknown. METHODS: To explore how parents understand SF disclosure in the context of their child and other family members' lives, we conducted semistructured interviews with 30 families (40 parents in total). All parents had children who were enrolled in a genetic sequencing protocol that returned results by default. RESULTS: We found that parents did not routinely conceptualize SFs as distinctive health information. Rather parents saw this information as part of their child's overall health. To make decisions about disclosure, parents weighed their child's ability to understand the SF information and their other family member's need to know. CONCLUSION: Because most families desired SF information, we argue that disclosure of SF be reconceptualized to reflect the lived experiences of those who may receive this information.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Rare diseases comprise a diverse group of conditions, most of which involve genetic causes. We describe the variable spectrum of findings and clinical impacts of exome sequencing (ES) in a cohort of 500 patients with rare diseases. In total, 164 primary findings were reported in 158 patients, representing an overall diagnostic yield of 31.6%. Most of the findings (61.6%) corresponded to autosomal dominant conditions, followed by autosomal recessive (25.6%) and X-linked (12.8%) conditions. These patients harbored 195 variants, among which 43.6% are novel in the literature. The rate of molecular diagnosis was considerably higher for prenatal samples (67%; 4/6), younger children (44%; 24/55), consanguinity (50%; 3/6), gastrointestinal/liver disease (44%; 16/36) and syndromic/malformative conditions (41%; 72/175). For 15.6% of the cohort patients, we observed a direct potential for the redirection of care with targeted therapy, tumor screening, medication adjustment and monitoring for disease-specific complications. Secondary findings were reported in 37 patients (7.4%). Based on cost-effectiveness studies in the literature, we speculate that the reports of secondary findings may influence an increase of 123.2 years in the life expectancy for our cohort, or 0.246 years/cohort patient. ES is a powerful method to identify the molecular bases of monogenic disorders and redirect clinical care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of rapid exome sequencing (rES) in critically ill children with likely genetic disease using a standardized process at a single institution. To provide evidence that rES with should become standard of care for this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented a process to provide clinical-grade rES to eligible children at a single institution. Eligibility included (a) recommendation of rES by a consulting geneticist, (b) monogenic disorder suspected, (c) rapid diagnosis predicted to affect inpatient management, (d) pretest counseling provided by an appropriate provider, and (e) unanimous approval by a committee of 4 geneticists. Trio exome sequencing was sent to a reference laboratory that provided verbal report within 7-10 days. Clinical outcomes related to rES were prospectively collected. Input from geneticists, genetic counselors, pathologists, neonatologists, and critical care pediatricians was collected to identify changes in management related to rES. RESULTS: There were 54 patients who were eligible for rES over a 34-month study period. Of these patients, 46 underwent rES, 24 of whom (52%) had at least 1 change in management related to rES. In 20 patients (43%), a molecular diagnosis was achieved, demonstrating that nondiagnostic exomes could change medical management in some cases. Overall, 84% of patients were under 1 month old at rES request and the mean turnaround time was 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: rES testing has a significant impact on the management of critically ill children with suspected monogenic disease and should be considered standard of care for tertiary institutions who can provide coordinated genetics expertise.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We present cases of 3 children diagnosed with the same genetic condition, Gitelman syndrome, at different stages using various genetic methods: panel testing, targeted single gene sequencing, and exome sequencing. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method and review the potential of genomic sequencing for early disease detection.

Asunto(s)