RESUMEN
Objective: To summarize the research progress of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis (STT OA) and its etiology and clinical treatment. Methods: The domestic and foreign literature on STT OA in recent years was reviewed and the research progress was summarized. Results: STT OA is a common OA, which is highly prevalent in postmenopausal women and diagnosed by wrist X-ray films. The current treatment methods include conservative treatment and surgery. Among them, the conservative treatment can relieve clinical symptoms, but the long-term effectiveness is not ideal. In surgical treatment, scaphoid arthrodesis can effectively relieve wrist pain, but it sacrifices part of the range of motion and grip strength of the wrist, and there is a risk of fusion failure. Distal scaphoid resection and trapezium resection have the advantages of short operation time, simple operation, less damage to the joint capsule and ligament, and shorter postoperative external fixation time, but they lead to changes in carpal bone alignment and dorsal intercalated segmental instability. Arthroplasty can provide pain relief while restoring grip strength and preserving wrist motion, but there is a risk of dislocation of the prosthesis. Conclusion: At present, there is no gold standard for the STT OA treatment. The short-term effectiveness of arthroplasty and arthroscopic distal scaphoid resection are satisfactory, but the long-term effectiveness needs further study.
Asunto(s)
Articulaciones del Carpo , Osteoartritis , Hueso Escafoides , Humanos , Femenino , Articulaciones del Carpo/cirugía , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis/etiología , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Articulación de la Muñeca/cirugía , Artroplastia , Artrodesis , Hueso Escafoides/cirugía , Dolor/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento ArticularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Resection of the distal pole of the scaphoid has been advocated as a simple alternative to other wrist salvage procedures for scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse and scaphotrapezio-trapezoid arthritis. However, the extent of scaphoid that may be resected without adversely affecting carpal kinematics has never been clearly defined. METHODS: Seven cadaveric upper extremities were tested in a custom motion wrist simulator. A 3-stage sequential sectioning of the distal scaphoid protocol was performed in 25% increments then cyclic active wrist flexion-extension and dart thrower's motion trials were recorded. RESULTS: The extent of distal scaphoid resection had no effect on overall wrist range of motion. The lunate assumed a more extended position following resection of the distal scaphoid compared to intact. At 25%, 50%, and 75% of distal scaphoid resection, the lunate extended to 13.32° ± 9.4°, 23.43° ± 7.5°, and 15.81° ± 16.9°, respectively. The capitate migrated proximally with 25% and 50% distal scaphoidectomy, and proximally and radially with 75% of the scaphoid resected. Resection of 75% of the scaphoid resulted in unstable wrist kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of up to 25% of the distal scaphoid did not significantly influence carpal kinematics and induced mild lunate extension deformity. Resection of 50% of the scaphoid induced further and potentially clinically significant lunate extension and dorsal intercalated segment instability. Further removal of 75% of the distal scaphoid induced capitate migration radially and unpredictable wrist kinematics. Consequently, removal of over 25% of the scaphoid should be avoided or supplemented with partial wrist fusion.
Asunto(s)
Hueso Grande del Carpo , Hueso Semilunar , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Hueso Escafoides , Humanos , Hueso Escafoides/cirugía , Extremidad Superior , Articulación de la Muñeca/cirugíaRESUMEN
Four corner arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy are the most common techniques for the management of advanced radiocarpal arthritis due to longstanding scapholunate instability and scaphoid nonunion. The advantages and short comings of each technique have been well defined in the literature. Advancements in joint replacement and arthroscopic surgery have resulted in new operations to manage radiocarpal and midcarpal arthritis. Most of these new procedures are modifications of the two classical operations, but some use modern implants and newer materials. New individualized options, like osteochondral grafting in combination with proximal row carpectomy or (arthroscopic) distal resection of the scaphoid, allowed us to improve our treatment and offer patients less invasive but equally effective procedures. We consider that four corner arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy should not always be standard management for advanced radiocarpal arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Huesos del Carpo , Hueso Escafoides , Artrodesis , Huesos del Carpo/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos del Carpo/cirugía , Humanos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Hueso Escafoides/diagnóstico por imagen , Hueso Escafoides/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Articulación de la MuñecaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the radiographic and clinical results of arthroscopic distal scaphoid resection for isolated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) osteoarthritis and analyze the radiographic parameters associated with the functional outcomes. METHODS: From 2008 to 2014, 17 wrists with symptomatic isolated STT osteoarthritis without carpal deformity underwent arthroscopic distal scaphoid resection. We evaluated visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, grip strength, pinch strength, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores before surgery and at the final follow-up. We analyzed correlations between the resection height and the radiographic and functional outcomes. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 42 months. The average VAS score improved from 6.1 ± 2.3 before surgery to 1.7 ± 1.9 after surgery. The average grip strength improved from 18 ± 6 to 19 ± 9 kg, pinch strength from 2.5 ± 1.1 to 4.4 ± 1.7 kg, and PRWE score from 52 ± 23 to 32 ± 24. Carpal deformity (C-L angle of > 15°) was seen in 2 patients at the final follow-up. The deformity was more likely to occur when the resection height was greater than 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic distal scaphoid resection alone can reduce pain and improve functional outcomes for early to mid-stage isolated STT osteoarthritis in patients without dorsal intercalated segment instability deformity. Resection of greater than 3 mm of the distal scaphoid may result in carpal malalignment. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/métodos , Articulaciones del Carpo/cirugía , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Hueso Escafoides/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escala Visual Analógica , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term results of distal scaphoid excision for degenerative arthritis secondary to scaphoid nonunion and compare them with our original results published in 1999. METHODS: Nineteen patients who were treated by distal scaphoid resection arthroplasty from 1987 through 2010 were included. The mean follow-up was 15 years (range, 10-25 y) vs 4 years in the previous study. Clinical evaluation included measurement of the visual analog pain scale, wrist range of motion, and grip strength. Radiographs were taken at follow-up to assess for signs of arthritis and wrist collapse. RESULTS: The outcomes of this procedure include increased grip strength and total arc of motion, a small decrease in revised carpal height ratio, and a small increase in radiolunate angle. Two patients failed distal scaphoid resection arthroplasty necessitating proximal row carpectomy (1) and wrist arthrodesis (1) for recalcitrant pain. More than half of the remaining patients developed midcarpal arthritis on radiographs that was asymptomatic. No patients developed radiolunate arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that distal scaphoid resection arthroplasty produced favorable, long-term clinical results and did not result in noteworthy wrist collapse. Midcarpal arthritis, which may develop after the procedure, did not cause appreciable deterioration in patient outcomes. This procedure also did not eliminate the option of using additional, more conventional reconstructive procedures if needed. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.