RESUMEN

Worldwide use of robotic-assisted hepatectomy has increased dramatically over the past two decades. The role of robotic liver surgery is still controversial, especially with respect to its long-term oncological outcomes in treating early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The Glissonean approach is a fundamental technique for anatomical resection using open and laparoscopic liver surgery. To our knowledge, there have been few reports on purely robotic anatomical segmentectomy 7 for HCC using the Glissonean approach have been described. The present study describes the technical details and surgical outcomes of totally robotic segmentectomy 7 using the Glissonean approach. Fourteen patients with HCC limited to segment 7 underwent segmentectomy 7 from January 2019 through April 2023 in our hospital. The surgical techniques, peri-operative, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Purely robotic anatomical segmentectomy 7 using the Glissonean approach was safe and feasible with the technology described herein in all of the 14 patients. The peri-operative and oncological outcomes were better and/or comparable with those of other similar hepatic resections using open approach and/or laparoscopic approach. The median follow-up time was 18 months. Intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 2 (14.3%) patient within one year following surgery. The 3-year overall survival rate was 81%. Although technically challenging, the purely robotic segmentectomy 7 could be performed safely and simultaneously with oncological radicality using the Glissonean approach.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of robotic liver resection (RLR) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been reported worldwide. However, the exact role of RLR in HCC patients with liver cirrhosis is not sufficiently determined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patients with cirrhosis or non-cirrhosis who received RLR for HCC from 2018 to 2023. Data on patients' demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS) and morbidity. RESULTS: Of the 571 patients included, 364 (64%) had cirrhosis. Among the cirrhotic patients, 48 (13%) were classified as Child-Pugh B. After PSM, the cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis group (n = 183) had similar operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion, LOS, overall morbidity (p > 0.05). In addition, the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were similar between the two groups in the subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥ 5 cm, major hepatectomy, and high/expert IWATE difficulty grade. However, patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis had longer LOS and more overall morbidity than that of Child-Pugh A. Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, ASA score > 2, longer operative time, and multiple tumors were risk factors of prolonged LOS or morbidity in patients with cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: The presence of Child-Pugh A cirrhosis didn't significantly influence the difficulty and perioperative outcomes of RLR for selected patients with HCC. However, even in high-volume center, Child-Pugh B cirrhosis was a risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising approach for managing complex hepatic malignancies. This report presents a case of a single-port robotic liver resection for a patient with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastases, focusing on the surgical technique and outcomes. METHOD: An 18-year-old female with a history of left hepatectomy for fibrolamellar HCC underwent robotic liver resection using the Da Vinci SP Surgical System. The procedure entailed excising a 30 mm tumor in liver segment 4 (Sg4) along with peritoneal metastases in the superior pole of the spleen and cardiophrenic lymph node metastasis. Surgical techniques comprised adhesiolysis, resection of the peritoneal nodule, Sg4 partial liver resection, and excision of the cardiophrenic lymph node. RESULTS: The operative time was 310 min, with a blood loss of 37 mL. The patient experienced an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home after 8 days. Partial liver resection of Sg4 revealed a moderately differentiated HCC with negative resection margins. Additionally, excision of peritoneal metastases in the superior pole of the spleen and cardiophrenic lymph nodes, consistent with metastasis, was performed. Notably, the Da Vinci SP system's relocation function proved useful in this case, particularly in slender patients with multiple distant metastases. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the importance of technological advancements in robotic surgery. The Da Vinci SP system, with its advantageous features, shows promise in challenging clinical scenarios. Its ability to facilitate precise navigation and manipulation within the patient's restricted abdominal cavity contributed to the observed successful outcome.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver surgery is associated with a significant hospital stay regardless the type of liver resection. A large incision is essential for open liver surgery which is a major factor in the course of the patient's recovery. For patients with small parenchyma liver lesions requiring surgical resection, robotic surgery potentially offers the opportunity to transform the patient's post-operative course. A day-case robotic liver resection pathway was formulated and implemented at our institution when patients were planned for discharge within 24 h of admission for liver surgery. METHODS: Single surgeon case series of cases performed at a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre between September 2022 and November 2023. The inclusion criteria were non-anatomical wedge resections, < 2 anatomical segmental resections, left lateral hepatectomy and minimally invasive surgery. RESULTS: This is the first series of robotic day-case minor liver resection in the United Kingdom. 20 patients were included in this case series. The mean operative time was 86.6 ± 30.9 min and mean console time was 58.6 ± 24.5 min. Thirteen patients (65%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery. The main cause of hospitalisation beyond 24 h was inadequate pain relief. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade III or above complications, no 30-day readmission and 90-day mortalities. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrates that robotic day-case liver resection is safe and feasible. Robust follow-up pathways must be in place to allow for the safe implementation of this approach, to monitor for any complications and to allow intervention as required in a timely manner.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study's aim was to show the feasibility and safety of robotic liver resection (RLR) even without extensive experience in major laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). METHODS: A single center, retrospective analysis was performed for consecutive liver resections for solid liver tumors from 2014 to 2022. RESULTS: The analysis included 226 liver resections, comprising 127 (56.2%) open surgeries, 28 (12.4%) LLR, and 71 (31.4%) RLR. The rate of RLR increased and that of LLR decreased over time. In a comparison between propensity score matching-selected open liver resection and RLR (41:41), RLR had significantly less blood loss (384 ± 413 vs 649 ± 646 mL, P = .030) and shorter hospital stay (4.4 ± 3.0 vs 6.4 ± 3.7 days, P = .010), as well as comparable operative time (289 ± 123 vs 290 ± 132 mins, P = .954). A comparison between LLR and RLR showed comparable perioperative outcomes, even with more surgeries with higher difficulty score included in RLR (5.2 ± 2.7 vs 4.3 ± 2.5, P = .147). The analysis of the learning curve in RLR demonstrated that blood loss, conversion rate, and complication rate consistently improved over time, with the case number required to achieve the learning curve appearing to be 60 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that RLR is a feasible, safe, and acceptable platform for liver resection, and that the safe implementation and dissemination of RLR can be achieved without solid experience of LLR.

RESUMEN

Background Although various types of adhesion barriers are widely utilized in liver surgery, the safety and feasibility of their use during repeat robotic liver resection (R-RLR) are still unknown. Methods Among the 68 patients undergoing RLR with the application of the spray-type adhesion barrier at Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan, between 2021 and 2023, 24 cases that underwent R-RLR were included in this study. The included patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent previous hepatectomy with the use of a spray-type adhesion barrier (R-RLR-B, n = 14) and those without its previous use (R-RLR-NB, n = 10). The perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Results There were no differences between the R-RLR-B and R-RLR-NB groups in background characteristics, difficulty scores, operative and console time, or surgical blood loss. Although no difference was found between the groups in the time required for adhesiolysis before the robotic operation, both the time required for robotic adhesiolysis (75 minutes vs. 58 minutes, p = 0.034) and total time for adhesiolysis (192 minutes vs. 141 minutes, p = 0.014) were significantly shorter in the R-RLR-B group than in the R-RLR-NB group. Otherwise, there was no conversion to open hepatectomy, no intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells, no cases of grade B or C post-hepatectomy liver failure, and no mortality in the whole cohort. Conclusions The spray-type adhesion barrier may not be associated with an increase in the incidence of postoperative complications, including bile leakage or intraperitoneal abscess. In addition, its application during the previous hepatectomy can facilitate a secure R-RLR with reduced time for adhesiolysis. Thus, the use of the spray-type adhesion barrier for R-RLR is safe, effective, and time efficient.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence concerning long-term outcome of robotic liver resection (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is scarce. METHODS: This study enrolled all patients who underwent RLR and LLR for resectable HCC between July 2016 and July 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to create a 1:3 match between the RLR and LLR groups. A comprehensive collection and analysis of patient data regarding efficacy and safety have been conducted, along with the evaluation of the learning curve for RLR. RESULTS: Following PSM, a total of 341 patients were included, with 97 in the RLR group and 244 in the LLR group. RLR group demonstrated a significantly longer operative time (median [IQR], 210 [152.0-298.0] min vs. 183.5 [132.3-263.5] min; p = 0.04), with no significant differences in other perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was similar between the two groups (p = 0.43), but RLR group exhibited improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median of 65 months vs. 56 months, p = 0.006). The estimated 5-year OS for RLR and LLR were 74.8% (95% CI: 65.4-85.6%) and 80.7% (95% CI: 74.0-88.1%), respectively. The estimated 5-year RFS for RLR and LLR were 58.6% (95% CI: 48.6-70.6%) and 38.3% (95% CI: 26.4-55.9%), respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, RLR (HR: 0.586, 95% CI (0.393-0.874), p = 0.008) emerged as an independent predictor of reducing recurrence rates and enhanced RFS. The operative learning curve indicates that approximately after the 11th case, the learning curve of RLR stabilized and entered a proficient phase. CONCLUSIONS: OS was comparable between RLR and LLR, and while RFS was improved in the RLR group. RLR demonstrates oncological effectiveness and safety for resectable HCC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This research is the first study in the United States to document more than a decade of experience with 530 patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy at a single high-volume institution. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy from 2012 to January 2024 was reviewed. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). RESULTS: Of the 530 robotic hepatectomies, 231 (44.0%) were minor resections, 133 (25.0%) were technically major resections, and 166 (31.0%) were major resections. The patients were aged 63.0 (61.0 ± 14.7) years with a body mass index of 28.0 (29.0 ± 7.9) kg/m2. Cirrhosis was present in 80 patients (19.0%), with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3.0 (3.0 ± 0.5) and a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 7.0 (8.0 ± 3.0). Of note, 280 patients (53.0%) had previous abdominal operations, and 44 patients (8%) had previous liver resections. The operative time was 233.0 (260.0 ± 130.7) minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 100.0 (165.0 ± 205.0) mL. Moreover, 353 patients (66%) had hepatectomies for neoplastic disease, and 500 patients (95%) had an R0 resection margin. The tumor size was 4.0 (5.0 ± 3.6) cm. The total 90-day postoperative complications were 45 (8%), of which 21 (4%) were classified as major complications (Clavien-Dindo score of >III). The length of stay was 3.0 (4.0 ± 3.7) days, and the 30-day readmission rate was 86 (16%). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82%, 65%, and 59% for colorectal liver metastases, 84%, 68%, and 60% for hepatocellular carcinoma, and 79%, 61%, and 50% for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, respectively. CONCLUSION: After a decade of application and optimization at a high-volume institution, the robotic approach has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective approach to liver resection.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver parenchymal transection during robotic liver resection (RLR) remains a significant challenge due to the limited range of specialised instruments. This study introduces our 'Burn and Push' technique as a novel approach to address these challenges. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients who underwent RLR using the 'Burn and Push' technique at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System from November 2021 to August 2023. The study evaluated peri- and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: The median operation time was 241.5 min (range, 90-620 min), and the median blood loss was 100 mL (range, 10-600 mL). Major complications occurred in one case, with no instances of postoperative bleeding, bile leak, or liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: The 'Burn and Push' technique is a viable and efficient alternative for liver parenchymal transection in RLR. Further research with larger sample sizes and consideration of the learning curve is necessary to validate these findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The robotic platform is growing in popularity for hepatobiliary resections. Although the learning curve for basic competency has been reported, this is the first study to analyze the learning curve to achieve long-term mastery on a decade of experience with more than 500 robotic hepatectomies. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 500 consecutive robotic hepatectomies from 2013 to 2023 were analyzed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis using operative duration was used to determine the learning curves. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients were included in this study: composed of 230 men (46.0 %) and 270 women (54.0 %), aged 63.0 (61.0 ± 14.6) years, with a body mass index of 28.0 (29.0 ± 8.0) kg/m2, a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 7 (8 ± 3.0), an albumin-bilirubin score of -3.0 (-3.0 ± 0.6), and a Child-Pugh score of 5.0 (5.0 ± 0.7). Operative duration was 235.0 (260.1 ± 131.9) minutes, estimated blood loss was 100.0 (165.0 ± 208.1) mL, tumor size was 4.0 (5.0 ± 3.5) cm, and 94.0 % of patients achieved R0 margins. The length of hospital stay was 3.0 (4.0 ± 3.7) days, with 4.0 % of patient having major complications. Of note, 30-day readmission was 17.0 %, 30-day mortality was 2.0 %, and 90-day mortality was 3.0 %. On CUSUM analysis, the learning curve for minor resection (n = 215) was 75 cases, major resection (n = 154) was 100 cases, and technically challenging minor resection (n = 131) was 57 cases. Gaining more experience in performing surgical procedures resulted in shorter operative duration, lower blood loss, higher R0 resections, and lower major postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The minimum number of robotic hepatectomies to overcome the learning curves for mastery of minor, major, and technically challenging minor resections was significant. Our study can help guide surgeons in their early experience to optimize patient safety and outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction While there are several advantages to utilizing robotics in liver surgery compared to traditional open and laparoscopic approaches, the most challenging part of robotic liver resection (RLR) remains the liver parenchymal transection. This is primarily due to the constraints of the existing robotic tools and the absence of a standard procedure. This study presents detailed technical aspects of our novel saline-linked cautery (SLiC) method for RLR and assesses the short-term outcomes for both non-anatomical and anatomical RLRs. Methods In this study, 82 cases that underwent RLR utilizing the SLiC method at our hospital from September 2021 to December 2023 were examined. A novel SLiC method is introduced in this study for robotically transecting the liver parenchyma utilizing bipolar cautery or monopolar scissors. The technique involves activating the SLiC and robotic suctioning simultaneously. The included patients were divided into two groups: patients undergoing robotic anatomical hepatectomy (n=39), and those receiving robotic non-anatomical hepatectomy (n=43). Short-term outcomes, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, were assessed in patients receiving both anatomical and non-anatomical hepatectomies. Results In the whole cohort, 74% of patients had performance status 1 or 2, and 24% were classified as Child-Pugh class B. RLR was performed without Pringle's maneuver in more than 80% of cases in patients receiving robotic non-anatomical hepatectomy, and more than 80% of patients undergoing robotic anatomical hepatectomy required only four or fewer 15-minute Pringle's maneuvers. There was no conversion to open hepatectomy, no cases of grade B or C post-hepatectomy liver failure, and no mortality in the entire cohort. Four postoperative complications with CDC IIIa or higher occurred (small bowel obstruction in two cases, intraabdominal hemorrhage in one, and bile leak in another), but no differences in the frequency of complications were found between those undergoing non-anatomical and anatomical hepatectomy (p=0.342). Conclusions The SLiC method, which involves simultaneously activating SLiC and robotic suctioning with either monopolar scissors or bipolar cautery, appears to be a secure and convenient technique for liver parenchymal transection in RLR. This innovative method permits precise access to the major Glissonean and venous structures within the liver, making RLR more standardized and easily applicable in routine patient care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the first comprehensive investigation into hospital readmissions following robotic hepatectomy for neoplastic disease, this study aims to fill a critical knowledge gap by evaluating risk factors associated with readmission and their impact on survival and the financial burden. METHODS: The study analyzed a database of robotic hepatectomy patients, comparing readmitted and non-readmitted individuals post-operatively using 1:1 propensity score matching. Statistical methods included Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, T-test, binomial logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among 244 patients, 44 were readmitted within 90 days. Risk factors included hypertension (p â€‹= â€‹0.01), increased Child-Pugh score (p â€‹< â€‹0.01), and R1 margin status (p â€‹= â€‹0.05). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated with lower readmission risk (p â€‹= â€‹0.045). Readmissions didn't significantly impact five-year survival (p â€‹= â€‹0.42) but increased fixed indirect hospital costs (p â€‹< â€‹0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission post-robotic hepatectomy correlates with hypertension, higher Child-Pugh scores, and R1 margins. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower admission rate due to less diffuse liver disease in these patients. While not affecting survival, readmissions elevate healthcare costs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Difficulty scoring system (DSS) has been established for laparoscopic hepatectomy and serves as useful tools to predict difficulty and guide preoperative planning. Despite increased adoption of robotics and its unique technical characteristics compared with laparoscopy, no DSS currently exists for robotic hepatectomy. We aimed to introduce a new DSS for robotic hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 328 patients undergoing a robotic hepatectomy were identified. After removing the first 24 major and 30 minor hepatectomies using cumulative-sum analysis, 274 patients were included in this study. Relevant clinical variables underwent linear regression using operative time and/or estimated blood loss (EBL) as markers for operative difficulty. Score distribution was analyzed to develop a difficulty-level grouping system. RESULTS: Of the 274 patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; tumor location, size, and type; the extent of parenchymal resection; the need for portal lymphadenectomy; and the need for biliary resection with hepaticojejunostomy were significantly associated with operative time and/or EBL. They were used to develop the difficulty scores from 1 to 49. Grouping system results were group 1 (less demanding/beginner), 1 to 8 (n = 39); group 2 (intermediate), 9 to 24 (n = 208); group 3 (more demanding/advanced), 25 to 32 (n = 17); and group 4 (most demanding/expert), 33 to 49 (n = 10). When stratified by group, age, previous abdominal operation, Child-Pugh score, operative duration, EBL, major resection, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and length of stay were significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSION: In addition to established variables in laparoscopic systems, new factors such as the need for portal lymphadenectomy and biliary resection specific to the robotic approach have been identified in this new robotic DSS. Internal and external validations are the next steps in maturing this robotic DSS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Surgical resection is still considered the optimal treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Although laparoscopic and robotic surgery demonstrated their reliability especially in referral centers, the comparison between perioperative outcomes of robotic liver resection (RLR) and open (OLR) liver resection are still debated when performed in referral centers for robotic surgery, not dedicated to HPB. Our study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of perioperative outcomes after RLR and OLR for CRLM in an HUB&Spoke learning program (H&S) between a high volume center for liver surgery and high volume center for robotic surgery. Methods: We analyzed prospective databases of Pineta Grande Hospital (Castel Volturno) and Robotic Surgical Units (Foligno-Spoleto and Arezzo) from 2011 to 2021. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed according to baseline characteristics of patients, solitary/multiple CRLM, anterolateral/posterosuperior location. Results: 383 patients accepted to be part of the study (268 ORL and 115 RLR). After PSM, 45 patients from each group were included. Conversion rate was 8.89 %. RLR group had a significantly lower blood loss (226 vs. 321 ml; p=0.0001), and fewer major complications (13.33 % vs. 17.78 %; p=0.7722). R0 resection was obtained in 100% of OLR (vs.95.55%, p =0.4944. Hospital stay was 8.8 days in RLR (vs. 15; p=0.0001).Conclusion: H&S represents a safe and effective program to train general surgeons also in Hepatobiliary surgery providing R0 resection rate, blood loss volume and morbidity rate superimposable to referral centers. Furthermore, H&S allow a reduction of health mobility with consequent money saving for patients and institutions.

RESUMEN

Accurate minimally invasive anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (MIAS) is technically demanding and not yet standardized, and its surgical outcomes are undefined. To study the impact of the minimally invasive approach on perioperative outcomes of anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (AS), we retrospectively studied and compared perioperative outcomes of 99 open AS (OAS) and 112 MIAS (laparoscopic 77, robotic 35) cases using the extrahepatic Glissonean approach, based on the 1:1 propensity score matched analyses. After matching (71:71), MIAS was superior to OAS in terms of blood loss (p < 0.0001), maximum postoperative serum total bilirubin (p < 0.0001), C-reactive protein (p = 0.034) levels, R0 resection rate (p = 0.021), bile leak (p = 0.049), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001). The matched robotic and laparoscopic AS groups (30:30) had comparable outcomes in terms of operative time, blood loss, transfusion, open conversion, postoperative morbidity and mortality, R0 resection, and hospital stay, although the rate of Pringle maneuver application (p = 0.0002) and the postoperative aspartate aminotransferase level (p = 0.002) were higher in the robotic group. Comparing the matched posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy cases or unmatched repeat hepatectomy cases between MIAS and OAS, we observed significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays in MIAS. Robotic AS yielded comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS in the posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy settings, despite the worse tumor and procedural backgrounds in robotic AS. In conclusion, various types of MIAS standardized by the extrahepatic Glissonean approach were feasible and safe with more favorable perioperative outcomes than those of OAS. Although robotic AS had almost comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS, robotics may serve to decrease the surgical difficulty of MIAS in selected patients undergoing posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Segmental or subsegmental anatomical resection (AR) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in minimal access liver surgery (MALS) has been technically proposed. The Glissonean approach or dye injection technique are generally adopted. The tumor-feeding portal pedicle compression technique (C-AR) is an established approach in open surgery, but its feasibility in the MALS environment has never been described. METHODS: Eligible patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound-guided C-AR based on HCC location and preoperative identification of a single tumor-feeding portal pedicle. Initial C-AR experience was gained with laparoscopic cases in the beginning of 2020. Following our progressive experience in laparoscopic C-AR, patients requiring AR for HCC were consecutively selected for robotic C-AR. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients underwent minimal access C-AR. All patients had Child-Pugh A HCC. The surgical procedures included 6 laparoscopic and 4 robotic C-AR. Median tumor size was 3.1 cm (range 2-7 cm). All procedures had R0 margin. Postoperative complications were nil. CONCLUSION: C-AR technique is a feasible and promising technique for patients eligible for laparoscopic and robotic AR for HCC. Further data are necessary to validate its applicability to more complex minimal access AR.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a malignancy with an increasing incidence worldwide and is one of the most serious cancers in adults. We encountered a case of initially unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma in which conversion to curative resection and pathological complete response were achieved after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination chemotherapy may be one of the most promising options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is applicable for the treatment of early gallbladder cancer (GBC), minimally invasive surgery is not widely used for advanced GBC. This is because advanced GBCs necessitate complicated surgical techniques, including lymph node dissection and liver resection. Robotic extended cholecystectomy (REC) is thought to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, but oncological safety studies are lacking. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of REC compared with those of open extended cholecystectomy (OEC). METHODS: A total of 125 patients, who underwent extended cholecystectomy for GBC with tentative T2 or higher stage between 2018 and 2021, were included and stratified by surgical methods. To minimize the confounding factors, 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed between the patients who underwent REC and those who underwent OEC. RESULTS: Regarding short-term outcomes, the REC group showed significantly lower estimated blood loss (382.7 vs. 717.2 mL, P = 0.020) and shorter hospital stay (6.9 vs. 8.5 days, P = 0.042) than the OEC group. In addition, the REC group had significantly lower subjective pain scores than the OEC group from the day of surgery through the 5th postoperative day (P = 0.006). Regarding long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences in the 3-year [5-year] overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates between the REC group [OS, 92.3% (92.3%); DFS, 84.6% (72.5%)] and the OEC group [OS, 96.8% (96.8%); DFS, 78.2% (78.2%)] (P = 0.807 for OS and 0.991 for DFS). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, REC showed superior short-term outcomes to OEC and no difference in long-term survival outcomes. Additionally, REC was superior to OEC in terms of postoperative pain. Therefore, REC may be a feasible option with early recovery compared with OEC for patients with advanced GBC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is an emerging technique that requires both mastery in minimally invasive liver resection and biliary reconstruction. Due to technical difficulties in biliovascular dissection, radical portal lymphadenectomy and the need for fine suturing during bilioenteric anastomosis, this type of resection is generally not performed laparoscopically, even at high-volume, liver-surgery centers.1-3 In modern literature, a detailed, operative description of robotic technique for this operation with outcome data is lacking. This video article demonstrates a pure robotic Klatskin Type 3A resection with clinical outcomes of our initial series. VIDEO: A 77-year-old man presented with jaundice and findings of bilateral, intrahepatic, ductal dilation (Right > Left). Radiological imaging showed a type 3A Klatskin tumor with associated thrombosis of the right, anterior portal vein. A further endoscopic evaluation with cholangioscopy confirmed a high-grade Bismuth 3A biliary malignant stricture. Endoscopic drainage was achieved with placement of two, 7-French, 15-cm, plastic, endobiliary stents. A 3-D anatomical liver reconstruction showed a 2-cm mass located in the area of right, anterior, sectoral, Glissonean pedicle with standardized, future, liver-remnant (left hepatic lobe) volume of 50%. The patient was placed supine on the operating table. General endotracheal anesthesia was administered. After exclusion of metastatic peritoneal disease with diagnostic laparoscopy, cholecystectomy and systematic radical portal lymphadenectomy were first completed with a goal to obtain more than six lymph nodes. After appropriate portal lymphadenectomy, the common bile duct was isolated and transected at the level of pancreatic head. The plastic, endobiliary stents were removed, and a distal common bile duct margin was sent for a frozen-section examination to rule out distal extension of the cholangiocarcinoma. A small, accessory, right, hepatic artery lateral to the main portal vein was ligated with locking clips and removed together with the adjacent nodes and lymphatic bearing tissues. The intrapancreatic portion of the distal common bile duct was suture closed once the distal common bile duct margin was confirmed to be negative for neoplasia by the frozen-section examination. The proximal bile-duct dissection commenced cephalad toward the hilar bifurcation. Once the biliary bifurcation has been adequately dissected and detached from the hilar plate, the distal, left, hepatic duct was then transected near the base of the umbilical fissure to gain an R-0 resection margin. A second frozen-section specimen was obtained from the left, hepatic duct cut edge to ensure an absence of infiltrating tumor cells on the future, bile-duct remnant side. Division of short, hepatic veins off the inferior vena cava (IVC) were next completed. Once the line of hepatic-parenchymal transection was confirmed by using indocyanine green administration, the right hepatic artery and portal vein were ligated and clipped. The liver, parenchymal transection began with a crush-clamp technique utilizing robotic, fenestrated bipolar forceps and a vessel-sealing device. Preservation of the middle hepatic vein is always the preferred technique to avoid congestion of the left medial sector of the liver. The entire right hepatic lobe and the caudate lobe were removed en bloc. A large, Makuuchi ligament was isolated and divided by using a robotic, vascular-load stapler once the liver is open-booked. Finally, the root of the right hepatic vein was exposed and transected flush to the IVC by using another load of robotic vascular stapler. The biliary reconstruction then began by creating a 60-cm, roux limb for a hepaticojejunostomy bilioenteric anastomosis. A side-to-side, stapled jejunojejunostomy was created by using two applications for robotic 45-mm, blue load staplers. The common enterotomy was closed with running barbed sutures. The roux limb was then transposed retrocolically toward the porta hepatis. A single end-to-side hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis was created with running absorbable 4-0 barbed sutures. Finally, a closed suction abdominal drain was placed before closing. RESULTS: The operative time was approximately 8 hours with 150 ml of blood loss. The postoperative course was unremarkable. The final pathology report confirmed a moderately differentiated perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with negative resection margins. Ten lymph nodes were harvested. No nodal metastasis or lymphovascular invasion was found. Since 2021, we have undertaken robotic resection of Klatskin 3A tumor in four patients with a median age of 70 years. All patients presented with jaundice, and they mainly underwent preoperative biliary drainage using ERCP. The median operative duration was 508 minutes with estimated blood loss of 150 ml. R-0 resection margins were obtained in all patients. One patient suffered from postoperative complications requiring treatment of line sepsis using intravenous antibiotics. We did not find a 90-day mortality in this series. At a median follow-up period of 15 months, all of the patients were alive without any evidence of disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic resection of Type 3A Klatskin tumor is safe and feasible with appropriate experience in robotic hepatobiliary surgery, as demonstrated in this video article.

Asunto(s)