Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Itch associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) has a profoundly negative effect on patients of all ages. Therefore, itch is a main target for AD therapeutic approaches, and treatments are perceived as beneficial when they achieve an itch reduction. In the absence of a validated scale for children aged 6-11 years that is suitable for assessing itch intensity in clinical trial settings, the Worst Itch Scale was developed. METHODS: Qualitative interviews, comprising concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing, were conducted to develop and evaluate the content validity of the Worst Itch Scale. Psychometric assessments used data from the LIBERTY AD PEDS phase 3 trial of dupilumab in patients aged 6-11 years with severe AD. These included test-retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity and responsiveness. Thresholds for clinically meaningful change were defined using anchor- and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: The Worst Itch Scale consisted of two items asking about 'worst itching' experienced 'last night' and 'today'. Worst Itch Scale scores showed large, positive correlations with existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of itch, and weaker correlations with clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) measures assessing objective signs of AD. Improvements in Worst Itch Scale scores were highly correlated with improvements in other itch PROs and moderately correlated with improvements in ClinROs. The responder definition based on the primary anchor, a 1-point improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Disease, was 2.84. Supportive anchors produced response estimates ranging from 2.43 to 4.80 points. CONCLUSIONS: The Worst Itch Scale is a fit-for-purpose (e.g. well-defined, reliable, responsive and valid) scale for evaluating worst itch intensity in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD. The within-patient threshold for defining a clinically meaningful response was a ≥ 3-4-point change in the Worst Itch Scale score. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03345914. Video: How can we reliably assess itch intensity in children 6-11 years with severe atopic dermatitis in clinical trial settings?

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic cough experience considerable burden. The cough severity visual analog scale (VAS) records patients' assessment of cough severity on a 100-mm linear scale ranging from "no cough" (0 mm) to "worst cough" (100 mm). Although cough severity scales are widely used in clinical practice and research, their use in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough has not been formally validated. METHODS: This analysis includes data from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial of the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant for treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough (NCT02612610). Cough severity VAS scores were assessed at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12. The cough severity VAS was validated using several outcomes, including the Cough Severity Diary (CSD), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale, and objective cough frequency. Validation metrics included test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation (i.e., clinically meaningful change threshold). RESULTS: The analysis included 253 patients (median age, 61.0 years; females, 76%). Test-retest reliability of the cough severity VAS was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.51). The cough severity VAS had acceptable convergent validity with other related measures (Pearson r of 0.53 and -0.41 for CSD and LCQ total scores, respectively; p < 0.0001 for each). Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in mean cough severity VAS scores across severity groups defined using CSD, LCQ, and cough frequency tertiles. A large effect size was observed in patients with the greatest improvements in PGIC (Cohen d = -1.8). A ⩾ 30-mm reduction in the cough severity VAS was estimated as a clinically meaningful change threshold for clinical trials in chronic cough. CONCLUSIONS: The cough severity VAS is a valid and responsive measure. A cough severity VAS reduction of ⩾ 30 mm can discriminate clinically meaningful changes in chronic cough severity in clinical studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) assesses patient-reported severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms, whereas the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) measures how AD affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children. Although the POEM and CDLQI have established thresholds for clinically meaningful within-patient change in adolescents (aged 12-17 years), there are no defined within-patient responder thresholds for clinically meaningful change in children aged 6-11 years. METHODS: Data from the LIBERTY AD PEDS phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dupilumab in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD were used to define the threshold for within-patient meaningful change in POEM and CDLQI scores. Anchor-based methods were applied to estimate mean change in POEM and CDLQI scores from baseline to week 16, with anchors of a 1-point improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Disease (PGID) scale and an improvement in score of ''A little better'' on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. The distribution-based methods, a one-half standard deviation (SD) at baseline and a standard error mean (SEM) were also used. RESULTS: The mean POEM change scores associated with the anchors were a change of - 8.40 with the PGID anchor and - 6.30 with the PGIC anchor. Distribution-based estimates for POEM were one-half SD at baseline of 2.76, with a SEM of 3.32. Mean CDLQI change scores corresponding to the PGID and PGIC anchors were - 7.30 and - 6.80, respectively, while distribution-based estimates for CDLQI were a one-half SD at baseline of 3.69, with a SEM of 3.52. CONCLUSIONS: In children with severe AD, an appropriate minimum threshold of clinically meaningful within-patient change was estimated as 6 points for both the POEM and CDLQI scores. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345914. What is the clinically meaningful within-person change in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index scores in children 6 to 11 years old with severe atopic dermatitis? (MP4 289443 KB).

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cluster headache (CH) is a highly disabling primary headache disorder. To date, characterization of outcomes in the preventive treatment of episodic CH, including precise definitions of clinically meaningful attack frequency reduction and impact on acute treatment management, is lacking. METHODS: This was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients (men or women aged 18-65 years) diagnosed with episodic CH as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 beta criteria. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the median time-to-first occurrence of ≥50, ≥75, or 100% reduction from baseline in CH attack frequency, and impact on acute medication use. An anchor-based assessment of clinically relevant attack frequency reduction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scores at Week 4 was also assessed. RESULTS: The median time-to-first occurrence of ≥50, ≥75, or 100% reduction from baseline in CH attacks was consistently shorter (9-10 days sooner) with galcanezumab vs placebo (median [95% confidence interval, 95% CI]: ≥50%, 5 days [4.0 to 7.0] vs 14 days [6.0 to 19.0]; ≥75%, 11 days [7.0 to 16.0] vs 21 days [13.0 to 26.0]; 100%, 22 days [16.0 to 37.0] vs 32 days [23.0 to 34.0]). Mean reduction from baseline in the overall frequency of weekly pooled acute medication use across Weeks 1-3 was significantly greater with galcanezumab vs placebo (11.0 vs 5.5; odds ratio, OR [95% CI]: 5.52 [1.02, 10.01]; P value = .017). Patients reporting "much better" on the PGI-I experienced a median weekly CH attack reduction of approximately 43% from baseline across Weeks 1-3. The overall odds of achieving an attack reduction threshold of 43% across Weeks 1-3 was significantly higher with galcanezumab vs placebo (Weeks 1-3: OR [95% CI], 2.60 [1.3 to 5.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Faster median time-to-first occurrence of response rates, lower frequency of pooled acute medications use, and a greater proportion of patients achieving a response anchored by patient-reported improvement were observed for galcanezumab vs placebo.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Haem-A-QoL is frequently utilized in haemophilia clinical trials and captures relevant aspects of disease impact. Thresholds for some domains 'Physical Health' (PH), 'Sports & Leisure' (S&L) and 'Total Score' (TS) have previously been identified to benchmark the amount of change that is meaningful to patients, but not been independently confirmed. AIM: The objective of this analysis was to determine the clinically important responder (CIR) thresholds for these three domains. METHODS: CIR thresholds in adult persons with haemophilia A (PwHA) enrolled in HAVEN 1, 3 and 4 studies were determined for improvements from baseline to 24 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis using anchor-based methodology with the EQ-5D-5L as the validated anchor, cumulative distribution functions (CDF) and distribution-based methodology. The results were compared with previously published thresholds. RESULTS: At baseline and after 24 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis, Haem-A-QoL data from 241/258 patients were available. Concordance was observed between the Haem-A-QoL and EQ-5D-5L in patterns of improvement, deterioration or lack of change. CDF estimates of the Haem-A-QoL PH and TS grouped by response categories on the Mobility, Pain/Discomfort and Usual Activities EQ-5D-5L domains demonstrated the same pattern of responses to each scale; distribution-based estimates were 11.9 for PH, 13.9 for S&L, and 8.3 for TS. CONCLUSION: Our responder thresholds are mostly consistent with those proposed by Wyrwich et al (cut-offs of -10 and -7 for PH and TS, respectively). The majority of responders to emicizumab prophylaxis had improvements greater than the previously reported 10-point reduction in PH and 7-point reduction in TS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) assesses patient-reported frequency of atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms, while the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) measures the impact of skin disease on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children. There is currently no threshold for clinically meaningful within-person change in POEM or CDLQI scores in adolescents. Here we empirically derive within-person thresholds of meaningful within-person change in POEM and CDLQI scores in adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: Data were used from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dupilumab in adolescents (aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD. Anchor-based methods were employed using the mean change in POEM and CDLQI scores from baseline to week 16 linked with a 1-point improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Disease (PGAD), a score of "a little better" on the Patient Global Assessment of Treatment effect (PGAT), a 50-74% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50-74), and a 1-point improvement in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score. RESULTS: A mean change of - 7.8 and - 5.6 in the POEM score was associated with PGAD and PGAT anchors, respectively. EASI-50-74 was associated with a mean change in POEM score of - 8.2, while the IGA anchor was associated with a mean change of - 7.9 in POEM score. The mean changes in CDLQI score associated with PGAD and PGAT anchors were - 6.4 and - 6.6, respectively, while CDLQI mean scores changed by - 8.3 and - 8.0 for the EASI and IGA anchors, respectively. CONCLUSION: In adolescents (aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD, a within-person change of 6-8 points in POEM and CDLQI scores, independently, can be considered a reasonable responder threshold for clinically meaningful change in each of the two scales, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03054428. FUNDING: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: As patient assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer clinical trials has increased over the years, so has the need to attach meaningful interpretations to differences in HRQOL scores between groups and changes within groups. Determining what represents a minimally important difference (MID) in HRQOL scores is useful to clinicians, patients and researchers, and can be used as a benchmark for assessing the success of a healthcare intervention. Our objective is to provide an evidence-based protocol to determine MIDs for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). We will mainly focus on MID estimation for group-level comparisons. Responder thresholds for individual-level change will also be estimated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be derived from published phase II and III EORTC trials that used the QLQ-C30 instrument, covering several cancer sites. We will use individual patient data to estimate MIDs for different cancer sites separately. Focus is on anchor-based methods. Anchors will be selected per disease site from available data. A disease-oriented and methodological panel will provide independent guidance on anchor selection. We aim to construct multiple clinical anchors per QLQ-C30 scale and also to compare with several anchor-based methods. The effects of covariates, for example, gender, age, disease stage and so on, will also be investigated. We will examine how our estimated MIDs compare with previously published guidelines, hence further contributing to robust MID guidelines for the EORTC QLQ-C30. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All patient data originate from completed clinical trials with mandatory written informed consent, approved by local ethical committees. Our findings will be presented at scientific conferences, disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and also compiled in a MID 'blue book' which will be made available online on the EORTC Quality of Life Group website as a free guideline document.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase - Stimulator Trial 1 (CHEST-1) study, riociguat improved 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) vs placebo in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy. In this study, the proportion of patients who achieved responder thresholds that correlate with improved outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension was determined at baseline and at the end of CHEST-1. METHODS: Patients received placebo or riociguat individually adjusted up to 2.5 mg 3 times a day for 16 weeks. Response criteria were defined as follows: 6MWD increase ≥40 m, 6MWD ≥380 m, cardiac index ≥2.5 liters/min/m(2), pulmonary vascular resistance <500 dyn∙sec∙cm(-5), mixed venous oxygen saturation ≥65%, World Health Organization functional class I/II, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide <1,800 pg/ml, and right atrial pressure <8 mm Hg. RESULTS: Riociguat increased the proportion of patients with 6MWD ≥380 m, World Health Organization functional class I/II, and pulmonary vascular resistance <500 dyn∙sec∙cm(-5) from 37%, 34%, and 25% at baseline to 58%, 57%, and 50% at Week 16, whereas there was little change in placebo-treated patients (6MWD ≥380 m, 43% vs 44%; World Health Organization functional class I/II, 29% vs 38%; pulmonary vascular resistance <500 dyn∙sec∙cm(-5), 27% vs 26%). Similar changes were observed for thresholds for cardiac index, mixed venous oxygen saturation, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and right atrial pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory analysis, riociguat increased the proportion of patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy achieving criteria defining a positive response to therapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In PATENT-1, riociguat significantly improved 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and a range of secondary end-points in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We investigated whether riociguat increased the proportion of patients achieving clinically relevant responder thresholds compared with placebo during PATENT-1. METHODS: In PATENT-1, a randomized, double-blind study, treatment-naïve patients or patients on background PAH-targeted therapy with symptomatic PAH received 12 weeks of treatment with placebo, riociguat up to 2.5 mg 3 times daily, or riociguat up to 1.5 mg 3 times daily. Increases in 6MWD ≥40 m, 6MWD ≥380 m, cardiac index ≥2.5 liter/min/m(2), mixed venous oxygen saturation ≥65%, World Health Organization functional class I/II, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide <1,800 pg/ml, and right atrial pressure <8 mm Hg were chosen as threshold criteria of a positive response. RESULTS: Riociguat increased the proportion of treatment-naïve patients and patients on background PAH-targeted therapy with 6MWD ≥380 m at Week 12 (+21% and +15%, respectively), whereas there was a small reduction in 6MWD in placebo-treated patients for both sub-groups. Riociguat also increased the proportion of treatment-naïve patients and patients on background PAH-targeted therapy achieving World Health Organization functional class I/II (+12% and +19%, respectively) and cardiac index ≥2.5 liter/min/m(2) (+30% and +33%, respectively) at Week 12, whereas there was little change in the respective placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, riociguat increased the proportion of treatment-naïve patients and patients on background PAH-targeted therapy who fulfilled criteria defining a positive response to therapy.

Asunto(s)