RESUMEN

Effective pain management is vital for critically ill patients, particularly post-surgery or trauma, as it can mitigate the stress response and positively influence morbidity and mortality rates. The suboptimal treatment of pain in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients is often due to a lack of education, apprehensions about side effects, and improper use of medications. Hence, the engagement of pain management and anesthesiology experts is often necessary. While opioids have been traditionally used in pain management, their side effects make them less appealing. Local anesthetics, typically used for anesthesia and analgesia in surgical procedures, have carved out a unique and crucial role in managing pain and other conditions in critically ill patients. This work aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the role, advantages, challenges, and evolving practices related to the use of local anesthetics in ICUs. The ability to administer local anesthetics continuously makes them a suitable choice for controlling pain in the upper and lower extremities, with fewer side effects. Epidural analgesia is likely the most used regional analgesic technique in the ICU setting. It is primarily indicated for major abdominal and thoracic surgeries, trauma, and oncology patients. However, it has contraindications and complications, so its use must be carefully weighed. Numerous challenges exist regarding critically ill patients, including renal and hepatic failure, sepsis, uremia, and the use of anticoagulation therapy, which affect the use of regional anesthesia for pain management. Appropriate timing and indication are crucial to maximizing the benefits of these methods. The advent of new technologies, such as ultrasonography, has improved the safety and effectiveness of neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks, making them feasible options even for heavily sedated patients in ICUs.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although various subaxial cervical pedicle screw implantation techniques have been proposed, clinical operators have been unable to exactly determine the entry points and trajectory . The objective of this article is to propose freehand regional techniques (FRT) for subaxial cervical pedicle screw placements and to investigate the clinical effectiveness of FRT. METHODS: A total of 80 consecutive patients who underwent open subaxial cervical pedicle screw fixation using FRT from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and preoperative cervical computed tomography (CT) images were used to observe the entry point and screw trajectory. The horizontal and vertical lines at the center of the cervical lateral mass was marked, and the entry point was chosen at the outer upper quadrant of the lateral mass. Both sagittal and axial trajectories were determined by CT images, generally perpendicular to the cervical laminae. Screw implantation accuracy was assessed using postoperative CT. RESULTS: After virtually inserting pedicle screws by FRT on preoperative cervical CT images, all of the entry points were located in the outer upper quadrant of the lateral mass and the trajectory perpendicular to the cervical laminae was just parallel to the pedicle's axis. A total of 694 pedicle screws were placed by FRT clinically, with a 96% accuracy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle screw implantation by FRT for subaxial cervical spine can be performed with acceptable safety and accuracy.

RESUMEN

Canine ovariectomy is an elective surgery with a moderate level of pain. Despite its relative simplicity, it requires surgical pain management. This study aimed to collect all recent information about local and regional anaesthetic/analgesic techniques in a review of the literature describing the technique utilised. The various procedures described in this review use local anaesthetics to improve analgesia in the routine systemic anaesthetic protocol. The approach described in this paper is called multimodal analgesia and is used in addition to the normal standard anaesthetic protocol. These techniques proved effective in minimising responses to the surgical stimulus and ensured adequate intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. The routine use of multimodal analgesia is considered a useful alternative for pain management in canine ovariectomy, in that it minimises patient suffering, improves the recovery of rescue analgesia, increases drug savings, and improves animal outcomes. In addition, the use of these local and regional techniques ensures satisfactory analgesic coverage that lasts for the first hours postoperatively.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Children with solid organ tumours often present for curative surgery. Even with the best surgical technique, micrometastases can occur. Preclinical studies support the postulation that neuraxial anaesthesia maintains the body's immune and inflammatory milieu against metastasis. However, human retrospective adult studies showed varying results, and no study has been done in children. We aimed to find out if intraoperative epidural, perioperative opioid and volatile dose are associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) in children with solid organ tumours. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 126 children from a tertiary paediatric unit who were diagnosed with solid organ tumours (neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma or sarcoma) over a 16-year period. RFS, stratified by tumour subtypes, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were obtained from multivariable Cox regression models after taking potential covariates into account. RESULTS: Of 126 children with solid organ tumours (51.6% neuroblastoma, 34.9% sarcoma and 13.5% hepatoblastoma), 53.2% received combined general anaesthesia (GA)/epidural. A total of 21 (31.3%) and 20 (33.9%) patients relapsed during the study period in the combined GA/epidural group and the GA alone group, respectively. Patients with sarcoma receiving combined GA/epidural had a clinically meaningful lower risk of relapse compared to patients receiving GA alone (aHR 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.79), although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated some clinically meaningful associations, especially in paediatric sarcoma patients. Overall, however, there was no statistically significant association between epidural use and an improved RFS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In older patients with comorbidities, hip fractures are both an important and debilitating condition. Since multimodal and multidisciplinary perioperative strategies can hasten functional recovery after surgery improving clinical outcomes, the choice of the most effective and safest pathway represents a great challenge. A key point of concern is the anesthetic approach and above all the choice of the locoregional anesthesia combined with general or neuraxial anesthesia.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION@#Children with solid organ tumours often present for curative surgery. Even with the best surgical technique, micrometastases can occur. Preclinical studies support the postulation that neuraxial anaesthesia maintains the body's immune and inflammatory milieu against metastasis. However, human retrospective adult studies showed varying results, and no study has been done in children. We aimed to find out if intraoperative epidural, perioperative opioid and volatile dose are associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) in children with solid organ tumours.@*METHODS@#This is a retrospective cohort study of 126 children from a tertiary paediatric unit who were diagnosed with solid organ tumours (neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma or sarcoma) over a 16-year period. RFS, stratified by tumour subtypes, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were obtained from multivariable Cox regression models after taking potential covariates into account.@*RESULTS@#Of 126 children with solid organ tumours (51.6% neuroblastoma, 34.9% sarcoma and 13.5% hepatoblastoma), 53.2% received combined general anaesthesia (GA)/epidural. A total of 21 (31.3%) and 20 (33.9%) patients relapsed during the study period in the combined GA/epidural group and the GA alone group, respectively. Patients with sarcoma receiving combined GA/epidural had a clinically meaningful lower risk of relapse compared to patients receiving GA alone (aHR 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.79), although this was not statistically significant.@*CONCLUSION@#Our study demonstrated some clinically meaningful associations, especially in paediatric sarcoma patients. Overall, however, there was no statistically significant association between epidural use and an improved RFS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Resumen: El dolor postoperatorio se espera moderado a severo en las primeras 24 horas después de mastectomía, este dolor puede no resolverse en 10% de las cirugías, y puede persistir hasta después de seis meses en 53% de las pacientes. El síndrome doloroso postmastectomía (SDPM), también llamado neuralgia intercostobraquial, suele presentarse después de una cirugía total o segmentaria, y puede persistir por meses o años, en 20-68% de las pacientes. Inicia en el postoperatorio inmediato, es de intensidad moderada y de características neuropáticas. Los factores asociados con este tipo de dolor además del tipo de cirugía son: la quimioterapia neoadyuvante previa, tumores en cuadrantes superiores, resección mamaria previa, enfermedad metastásica, receptores hormonales positivos, manejo con terapia endocrina, radioterapia y el grado de malignidad del tumor. Nuevas estrategias analgésicas en el perioperatorio han surgido en los últimos años, como son el uso de gabapentinoides, lidocaína y nuevos bloqueos regionales como el bloqueo del plano del erector spinae, bloqueo del serrato, BRILMA, PEC1 y PEC2, las cuales son estrategias efectivas en dolor agudo y que, actualmente, se analiza su impacto a largo plazo (este artículo puede ser consultado en versión completa en http://www.painoutmexico.com).

Abstract: Postoperative pain is moderate to severe in the first 24 hours after mastectomy, this pain may not resolve in 10% of surgeries, and may persist until after six months in 53% of patients. Postmastectomy pain syndrome (SDPM), also called intercosto-brachial neuralgia, may persist for months or years, in 20-68% of patients. It begins in the immediate postoperative period, is of moderate intensity and of neuropathic characteristics. The factors associated with this type of pain as well as the type of surgery are: prior neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, tumors in upper quadrants, previous mammary resection, metastatic disease, positive hormonal receptors, management with endocrine therapy, radiotherapy and the degree of malignancy of the tumor. New analgesic strategies in the perioperative have emerged in recent years, such as: the use of gabapentinoids, lidocaine and new regional blocks such as blockade of the erector spinae plane, serratus blockade, BRILMA, PEC1 and PEC2, which are effective strategies in acute pain and that is currently analyzing its long-term impact (full version is available inhttp://www.painoutmexico.com ) .

RESUMEN

Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure intended to stabilize the fractured bone and restore bone height. It involves percutaneous introduction of an inflatable bone tamp into a fractured vertebral body, followed by injection of bone cement into the ballooned pocket. Anesthetic options typically considered for this procedure include intravenous sedation or general anesthesia. These patients are often elderly, frail, in significant pain, and may poorly tolerate sedation or general anesthesia in the prone position. Spinal anesthesia has been suggested as an alternative method. However, it has major limitations. We would like to report a case of a 79-year-old patient with multiple comorbidities, who presented for kyphoplasty, where epidural anesthesia was conducted and successfully provided adequate analgesia as well as optimal surgical conditions.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Unilateral analgesia often occurs with epidural analgesia. Traditional methods of troubleshooting this problem can be insufficient in obtaining adequate pain relief in a timely manner for terminal cancer patients. This case report demonstrates a safe and effective solution which can be utilized in these circumstances. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old female with stage IV pancreatic cancer and life expectancy of a few weeks presented to the interventional pain clinic with intractable sacral pain. The decision to place an epidural catheter and external pump for analgesia was made. An epidural catheter placed at the L5-S1 level showed contrast spread only along the right nerve roots and a test dose produced only right-sided analgesia. Suspecting compartmentalization of the epidural space, a second left-sided epidural catheter was placed and bilateral analgesia was achieved by using both catheters. This dual catheter technique gave the patient effective bilateral analgesia until she passed away several weeks later. CONCLUSION: The bilateral epidural catheter technique is safe and effective in patients who present with persistent unilateral epidural analgesia despite exhausting traditional solutions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Lumbar plexus block has been shown to be effective for providing postoperative analgesia after major hip surgeries in children. The goal of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound guidance during lumbar plexus block in children undergoing hip surgery for congenital hip dislocation. After obtaining local institutional ethical committee approval and parental informed consent, ASA I or II, 1-6 years old children undergoing hip surgery were included into the study. Lumbar plexus block was performed after general anaesthesia using ultrasound guided Shamrock Method. Bupivacaine 0.25 % was used during block performance. Dose of the local anaesthetic was 1 ml/kg and the maximum dose was limited to 20 ml. In the postoperative period pain was assessed using modified CHEOPS (Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) pain score. If pain score in the postoperative period exceeded 3, patients received IV paracetamol 15 mg/kg-1. Morphine 0.1 mg/kg-1 IV was planned to administer if pain scores were still higher than 3 despite paracetamol treatment. 75 patients whose mean age was 47 months were enrolled into the study. All blocks were performed successfully and without complications. Mean time for the first analgesic is found as 10 h after surgery. Only one patient required morphine in the recovery unit and 23 patients received paracetamol. US guided lumbar plexus block using Shamrock Method is an effective technique for providing postoperative analgesia after hip surgeries in children and it's effect lasts for 8-12 h after surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clear visibility of the needle and catheter tip is desirable to perform safe and successful ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. This can be challenging with deeper blocks in obese patients. This study compared the visibility of echogenic and non-echogenic block needles and catheters in proximal sciatic blocks when performed with a low-frequency curved probe. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients undergoing total knee joint arthroplasty were randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided continuous sciatic nerve block using either a non-echogenic needle and stimulating catheter or an echogenic needle and echogenic non-stimulating catheter. Block needles in both groups were placed using both neurostimulation and ultrasound guidance, after which the catheter was positioned using either neurostimulation alone (Stimulating group) or imaging alone (Echogenic group). Three anaesthetists blinded to group allocation graded video clips recorded during the blocks for nerve, needle and catheter visibility. Performance characteristics and block parameters were also compared. RESULTS: No significant differences between the two groups were observed with regard to needle or catheter visibility (P=0.516). The Stimulating group required more needle redirections (P=0.009), had a longer procedure time [Echogenic median 274 s vs Stimulating 344 s (P=0.016)], and resulted in greater patient discomfort (P=0.012). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of block onset or completion time. CONCLUSIONS: Use of echogenic needles and catheters reduced procedure time and patient discomfort compared with a stimulating catheter system. There were no differences in the visibility scores of the two systems. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTR Protocol ID: R-11-495, Clinical Trials.Gov ID: NCT 01492660.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of local anesthetic intraperitoneal nebulization with intraperitoneal instillation during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy on postoperative morphine consumption and pain. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, case-control trial. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Canadian Task Force Classification I. SETTING: University hospitals in Italy. PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients scheduled for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either nebulization of ropivacaine 150 mg before surgery or instillation of ropivacaine 150 mg before surgery. Nebulization was performed using the Aeroneb Pro device (Aerogen, Galway, Ireland). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were enrolled, and 123 completed the study. There was no difference between the 2 groups in average morphine consumption (7.3 ± 7.5 mg in the nebulization group vs 9.2 ± 7.2 mg in the instillation group; p = .17). Eighty-two percent of patients in the nebulization group required morphine compared with 96% in the instillation group (p < .05). Patients receiving nebulization had a lower dynamic Numeric Ranking Scale compared with those in the instillation group in the postanesthesia care unit postanesthesia care unit and 4 hours after surgery (p < .05). Ten patients (15%) in the nebulization group experienced shivering in the postanesthesia care unit compared with 2 patients (4%) in the instillation group (p = .035). CONCLUSION: Nebulization of ropivacaine prevents the use of morphine in a significant proportion of patients, reduced postoperative pain during the first hours after surgery, and was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative shivering when compared with instillation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of peritoneal cold nebulization of ropivacaine on pain control after gynecologic laparoscopy. DESIGN: Evidence obtained from a properly designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-five women with American Society of Anesthesiologists disease classified as ASA I-III who were scheduled to undergo operative laparoscopy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either nebulization of 30 mg ropivacaine before surgery (preoperative group), nebulization of 30 mg ropivacaine after surgery (postoperative group), instillation of 100 mg ropivacaine before surgery (instillation group), or instillation of saline solution (control group). Nebulization was performed using the Aeroneb Pro device. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Pain scores, morphine consumption, and ambulation time were collected in the post-anesthesia care unit and at 4, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. One hundred eighteen patients completed the study. Patients in the preoperative group reported lower pain Numeric Ranking Scale values compared with those in the control group (net difference 2 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-3.1 at 4 hours, 1-3 at 6 hours, and 0.7-3 at 24 hours; p = .01) Patients in the preoperative group consumed significantly less morphine than did those in the control group (net difference 7 mg; 95% CI, 0.7-13; p = .02). More patients who received nebulization walked without assistance within 12 hours after awakening than did those in the instillation and control groups (net difference 15%; 95% CI, 6%-24%; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cold nebulization of ropivacaine before surgery reduced postoperative pain and morphine consumption and was associated with earlier walking without assistance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US) vs nerve stimulation (NS) guidance for peripheral nerve catheter placement. METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement and the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. For dichotomous outcomes relative risks [RRs; 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] were calculated, while for continuous outcomes, mean differences (MDs; 95% CI) were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using the Revman® statistical software (Version 5.1). RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials including 977 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Peripheral nerve catheters placed under US guidance showed a higher RR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.02-1.27; P=0.02) for an overall successful block in comparison with NS. However, postoperative pain scales at movement (numeric rating scale: 0-10) were comparable between US- vs NS-guided peripheral nerve catheters 24 (MD: 0.08; 95% CI: -0.77 to 0.94; P=0.85) and 48 (MD: 1.0; 95% CI: -0.3 to 2.3; P=0.13) h after surgery. Patients receiving a US-guided peripheral nerve catheter had a lower RR of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.04-0.38; P=0.0002) for an accidental vascular puncture. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that US-guided peripheral nerve catheters show a higher success rate and a lower risk for an accidental vascular puncture compared with NS guidance. However, this difference resulted only in marginally lower postoperative pain scores at rest. Nevertheless, these results were influenced by heterogeneity and should be interpreted with caution.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Nerve blocks improve postoperative analgesia, but their benefits may be short-lived. This quantitative review examines whether perineural dexmedetomidine as a local anaesthetic (LA) adjuvant for neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with LA alone. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of dexmedetomidine as an LA adjuvant to LA alone on neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks were reviewed. Sensory block duration, motor block duration, block onset times, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, and side-effects were analysed. RESULTS: were combined using random-effects modelling. A total of 516 patients were analysed from nine RCTs. Five trials investigated dexmedetomidine as part of spinal anaesthesia and four as part of a brachial plexus (BP) block. Sensory block duration was prolonged by 150 min [95% confidence interval (CI): 96, 205, P<0.00001] with intrathecal dexmedetomidine. Perineural dexmedetomidine used in BP block may prolong the mean duration of sensory block by 284 min (95% CI: 1, 566, P=0.05), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Motor block duration and time to first analgesic request were prolonged for both intrathecal and BP block. Dexmedetomidine produced reversible bradycardia in 7% of BP block patients, but no effect on the incidence of hypotension. No patients experienced respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine is a potential LA adjuvant that can exhibit a facilitatory effect when administered intrathecally as part of spinal anaesthesia or peripherally as part of a BP block. However, there are presently insufficient safety data to support perineural dexmedetomidine use in the clinical setting.

Asunto(s)