Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52371, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694948

RESUMEN

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an imaging modality that has become a fundamental part of clinical care provided in the emergency department (ED). The applications of this tool in the ED have ranged from resuscitation, diagnosis, and therapeutic to procedure guidance. This review aims to summarize the evidence on the use of POCUS for diagnosis and procedure guidance. To achieve this, CrossRef, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were extensively searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2023. Additionally, the risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (for studies on the diagnostic role of POCUS) and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (for studies on the use of POCUS for procedure guidance). Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy outcomes were pooled using STATA 16 software (StatCorp., College Station, TX, USA), while outcomes related to procedure guidance were pooled using the Review Manager software. The study included 81 articles (74 evaluating the diagnostic application of POCUS and seven evaluating the use of POCUS in guiding clinical procedures). In our findings sensitivities and specificities for various conditions were as follows: appendicitis, 65% and 89%; hydronephrosis, 82% and 74%; small bowel obstruction, 93% and 82%; cholecystitis, 75% and 96%; retinal detachment, 94% and 91%; abscess, 95% and 85%; foreign bodies, 67% and 97%; clavicle fractures, 93% and 94%; distal forearm fractures, 97% and 94%; metacarpal fractures, 94% and 92%; skull fractures, 91% and 97%; and pleural effusion, 91% and 97%. A subgroup analysis of data from 11 studies also showed that the two-point POCUS has a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 96%, while the three-point POCUS is 87% sensitive and 92% specific in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. In addition, the analyses showed that ultrasound guidance significantly increases the overall success rate of peripheral venous access (p = 0.02) and significantly reduces the number of skin punctures (p = 0.01) compared to conventional methods. In conclusion, POCUS can be used in the ED to diagnose a wide range of clinical conditions accurately. Furthermore, it can be used to guide peripheral venous access and central venous catheter insertion.

2.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54049, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38481913

RESUMEN

Purpose This study aims to assess the significance of imaging techniques and needle thickness employed in transthoracic core needle biopsy for determining the cancer type and subtypes, ultimately guiding the treatment of lung cancer. Material and methods Between 2018 and 2023, a cohort of 350 patients (69.7% male, 30.3% female) underwent CT-guided lung biopsy, predominantly utilizing core biopsies. Fine needle aspiration biopsies employed 18 or 20 G Chiba needles, while core needle biopsies utilized 16 or 18-gauge coaxial system semi-automatic needles. The preferred needle and biopsy sample size were 16 G in thickness and 2 cm in length. Pre-procedure positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) images aided in identifying the most homogenous lesion with the highest SUV max value, guiding biopsy sample extraction. Post-procedure control CT evaluated complications according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) reporting standard. Results The average age of biopsied patients was 65.48 +/- 12.32 SD (range: 18-90). Tru-cut biopsy was predominant (69.7%), utilizing a larger number of 16G needles. Pathological diagnoses were mostly malignant (76.6%), with lesion sizes averaging 35.98 +/- 17.90 SD (range: 5-105 mm) and distances to pleura averaging 13.48 +/- 13.54 SD (range: 0-86 mm). Malignancy prevalence was higher in males (56.8%), tru-cut biopsies (72.7%), 16G needles used for tru-cut (47.7%), and PET-CT evaluation (59.1%). Complications were identified in 22% of cases, with distance to pleura significantly associated (p < 0.001). No significant differences in complication risk were observed between FNAB and tru-cut and between needle gauges (20 G-18 G and 16 G) (p: 0.734, p: 0.638, respectively). Conclusion The study underscores the paramount importance of biopsy sample size in diagnosing lung cancers and determining targeted therapy. Optimal biopsy localization, informed by pre-procedure imaging techniques, is crucial. Hence, the recommendation is to utilize the thickest needles and largest samples for lung biopsies.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA