RESUMEN
Radial artery occlusion (RAO), a complication of transradial access, has an incidence of 4.0% to 9.1% in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may preclude its use creation of arteriovenous fistula. Distal transradial access (dTRA) has lower rates of RAO compared with TRA, but prior studies excluded patients with advanced CKD. This was a single center study of patients with advanced CKD who underwent coronary procedures with dTRA from January 1, 2019 to May 12, 2022 who were retrospectively evaluated for radial artery patency in follow-up with reverse Barbeau testing or repeat access of the artery. Of 71 patients, 66% were on hemodialysis and the remainder had CKD 3 to 5. Access was ultrasound-guided, and all received adequate spasmolytic therapy and patent hemostasis. Proximal radial arteries were patent in 100% of the patients at follow-up. Our data suggest that dTRA is safe for patients with advanced CKD and preserves radial artery patency.
RESUMEN
Acute limb ischemia requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Thromboembolic events are common, especially in patients with multiple risk factors. This case report describes a rare complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) involving thromboembolic occlusion of the radial artery and highlights the risk of embolic complications during TAVR. While TAVR is minimally invasive and preferred for high-risk patients, it carries the risk of complications such as paravalvular leakage and cerebrovascular events. Prompt recognition and management are crucial. Various mechanisms, including catheter manipulation and altered hemodynamics, contribute to embolic risks during TAVR. Awareness and management of rare embolic complications during TAVR are essential. Further research is needed to prevent these complications and improve patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
Aim: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a major complication of catheterization via transradial access (TRA). Our aim is to reveal the ability of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and complete blood count (CBC) components, which are inflammation markers, to predict RAO. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: 103 with RAO and 300 without RAO. The relationship between CRP, CBC components and RAO was evaluated. Results: A significant increase in hs-CRP, monocyte, platelet (PLT), platelet distribution width (PDW) and plateletcrit values was observed after TRA, and only the increase in PDW, PLT and hs-CRP was found to be independent determinants in regression analysis. Conclusion: High PDW and PLT and increased hs-CRP levels are new independent determinants of the development of RAO.
The role of inflammation markers in occurrence of radial artery occlusion that restricts the transradial cardiac catheterization.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva , Inflamación , Arteria Radial , Humanos , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Masculino , Femenino , Biomarcadores/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inflamación/sangre , Anciano , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/sangre , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radial access is the default approach in interventional cardiology. The Axiostat® surgical hemostatic dressing, using chitosan as its active component, has demonstrated potential in accelerating blood clotting. This study aims to assess the efficacy and the safety of the Axiostat® dressing in achieving hemostasis in patients undergoing transradial coronary angioplasty (TRCA). METHODS: This prospective, single-center observational study, conducted in 2022, enrolled consecutive patients undergoing TRCA, with a target of 150 participants. The primary outcome was the success rate of radial artery hemostasis at 120 min, without bleeding necessitating immediate re-compression. The secondary outcome included Axiostat® performance at 24 h and 30 days Postprocedure. RESULTS: The study was terminated prematurely for ethical and patient safety reasons, after inclusion of 41 consecutive TRCA patients due to an unexpectedly high radial artery thrombosis rate (19.5%, n = 8/41) observed 24 h Postprocedure. The success rate of radial hemostasis with the Axiostat® dressing was 78.0%. Procedural details and patient characteristics were comparable between successful Axiostat® removal and device failure cases. CONCLUSION: The use of the Axiostat® dressing to achieve hemostasis after TRCA is effective but is associated with an unexpectedly high incidence of radial thrombosis. Our results should encourage caution in the future evaluation and use of this device for radial artery compression following TRCA.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Diseño de Equipo , Hemorragia , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Punciones , Arteria Radial , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/etiología , Quitosano , Hemostáticos/administración & dosificación , Hemostáticos/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Vendajes , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Background/Objectives: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most common complication of transradial coronary catheterization. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence of RAO and identify the risk factors that predispose patients to it. Methods: We conducted an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, open-label study involving 1357 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization via the transradial route for angiography and/or a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of RAO occurrence. Additionally, a subgroup analysis only for patients undergoing PCIs was performed. Results: The incidence of RAO was 9.5% overall, 10.6% in the angiography-only group and 6.2% in the PCI group. Independent predictors of RAO were as follows: (i) the female gender (aOR = 1.72 (1.05-2.83)), (ii) access site cross-over (aOR = 4.33 (1.02-18.39)), (iii) increased total time of the sheath in the artery (aOR = 1.01 (1.00-1.02)), (iv) radial artery spasms (aOR = 2.47 (1.40-4.36)), (v) the presence of a hematoma (aOR = 2.28 (1.28-4.06)), (vi) post-catheterization dabigatran use (aOR = 5.15 (1.29-20.55)), (vii) manual hemostasis (aOR = 1.94 (1.01-3.72)) and (viii) numbness at radial artery ultrasound (aOR = 8.25 (1.70-40)). Contrariwise, two variables were independently associated with increased odds for radial artery patency (RAP): (i) PCI performance (aOR = 0.19 (0.06-0.63)), and (ii) a higher dosage of intravenous heparin per patient weight (aOR = 0.98 (0.96-0.99)), particularly, a dosage of >50 IU/kg (aOR = 0.56 (0.31-1.00)). In the PCI subgroup, independent predictors of RAO were as follows: (i) radial artery spasms (aOR = 4.48 (1.42-14.16)), (ii) the use of intra-arterial nitroglycerin as a vasodilator (aOR = 7.40 (1.67-32.79)) and (iii) the presence of symptoms at echo (aOR = 3.80 (1.46-9.87)), either pain (aOR = 2.93 (1.05-8.15)) or numbness (aOR = 4.66 (1.17-18.57)). On the other hand, the use of intra-arterial verapamil as a vasodilator (aOR = 0.17 (0.04-0.76)) was independently associated with a greater frequency of RAP. Conclusions: The incidence of RAO in an unselected, all-comers European population after transradial coronary catheterization for angiography and/or PCIs is similar to that reported in the international literature. Several RAO prognostic factors have been confirmed, and new ones are described. The female gender, radial artery trauma and manual hemostasis are the strongest predictors of RAO. Our results could help in the future identification of patients at higher risk of RAO, for whom less invasive diagnostic procedures maybe preferred, if possible.
RESUMEN
Limb reimplantation is widely described, but there are sparse reports of limb ischemia complications. We present the case of a patient with hand reimplantation who developed limb-threatening ischemia 20 years later. The patient is a 37-year-old man with a history of traumatic wrist amputation and reimplantation who presented with fingertip ulcerations. Testing demonstrated ischemic digit pressures and no flow in the palmar arch. The initial angiogram demonstrated radial artery occlusion. Balloon angioplasty had initial success; however, the loss of primary patency prompted repeat angiography with the use of intravascular ultrasound and laser atherectomy. His symptoms and wounds resolved, with normalized digit pressures. His radial artery remains patent after 2 years.
RESUMEN
A 59-year-old diabetic man with a history of numerous coronary angiographies (CAs) and peripheral artery disease underwent CA due to a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Femoral, radial, and ulnar arteries were unpalpable.
RESUMEN
A 59-year-old male, with a history of angiogram via the left radial artery during the workup for multi-trauma, presented to the hand clinic with a 14-day history of progressive critical ischemia in the left thumb and index finger, along with dry gangrene of the distal index fingertip. Radial artery occlusion was confirmed on imaging. The patient underwent radial artery thrombectomy, arterial reconstruction with vein graft, and amputation of the index fingertip. Postoperatively, perfusion to the thumb and index finger was restored, resulting in the resolution of associated pain and hypersensitivity. This case demonstrates the delayed presentation of ischemia following radial artery cannulation, which was successfully managed with radial artery thrombectomy and a saphenous vein graft.
RESUMEN
Background Transradial access (TRA) is a medical procedure primarily used for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and cardiac catheterization. Based on the recently published Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX (MATRIX) trial, TRA is being used more frequently than transfemoral access (TFA) since it has reduced rates of bleeding and fatality. A structural complication of TRA is radial artery occlusion (RAO), which may cause temporary pain to limit TRA in the future. Objective This study aimed to investigate the onset and risk factors of RAO following TRA for coronary interventions. Material and methods An observational study was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. The study included 1,680 patients recruited between April 2021 to December 2023. Fifty-eight patients were lost to follow-up, while another 95 patients did not come for a visit within the study period. The final study, therefore, included 1,527 patients. Results The mean age of patients was 58.09 ± 8.07 years. Patients were divided into two age groups (greater or less than 60 years). Diagnostic angiograms were completed for 955 patients, while 572 also underwent PCI. The overall RAO onset was 81 (5.3%). There was a significantly higher RAO onset in patients over 60 years old (7.1 vs 3.8%, p = 0.003). Conclusion Overall, the risk of RAO is low following TRA. The risk of RAO is significantly higher in people aged over 60 years.
RESUMEN
Transradial access has garnered increasing popularity and acceptance among the neuro-interventional community. As this technique becomes commonplace for both diagnostic and interventional procedures, an understanding of potential complications and management is tantamount. Here, we describe two cases of thrombosed radial arteries successfully recanalized with traditional thrombectomy techniques. Two patients presented with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and were found to have ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Both patients were deemed appropriate candidates for endovascular treatment. During attempted access, both patients were found to have occluded right radial arteries due to previous arterial access, one from a prior intervention and one from an arterial line placed at another facility. Thrombectomies were subsequently performed, one via manual aspiration through the access sheath and the other with a commercially available aspiration system. Both radial arteries were successfully recanalized and the interventions were completed via transradial access. Endovascular thrombectomy for radial artery thrombosis is a feasible and simple technique that can be employed to facilitate transradial access for neuro-endovascular procedures when a thrombosed radial artery is encountered. This technique can be attempted in cases of radial artery thrombosis prior to conversion to transfemoral access.
RESUMEN
Proximal radial artery (PRA) access for cardiac catheterization is safe but can jeopardize subsequent use of the artery because of occlusion. Distal radial artery (DRA) access in the anatomical snuffbox preserves the RA but safety and potential detrimental effects on hand function are unknown. We aimed to assess hand function and complications after DRA and PRA. In this single-center trial, 300 patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to cardiac catheterization through DRA or PRA. The primary end point of change in hand function from baseline to 1 year was a composite of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, hand grip test, and thumb-forefinger pinch test. The secondary end points included access feasibility and complications. Of 216 patients with 1-year completed follow-up, 112 were randomly allocated to DRA and 104 to PRA, with balanced demographics and procedural characteristics. Both groups had similar access site bleeding rates (DRA 0% vs PRA 1.4%, p = 0.25). Radial artery occlusion occurred in 1 PRA patient versus 2 in DRA. There was no significant difference in change of hand function, median (interquartile range) hand grip (DRA 0.7 [-3 to 4.5] vs PRA 1.3 [-2 to 4.3] kg, p = 0.57), pinch grip (DRA -0.1 [-1.1 to 1] vs PRA -0.3 [-1 to 0.7] kg, p = 0.66), and Quick DASH (DRA 0 [-6.6 to 2.3] vs PRA 0 [-4.6 to 2.9] points, p = 0.58). The composite of hand function was comparable between PRA and DRA. In conclusion, DRA is a safe strategy for cardiac catheterization, with a low complication rate. Compared with PRA, there is no increased risk of hand dysfunction or radial artery occlusion at 1 year.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Arteria Radial , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Objectives: The transradial route is used in most coronary procedures today. Although this method seems to be advantageous in terms of bleeding complications and patient comfort, the small radial artery diameter brings with it complications such as radial artery spasm and occlusion. It has been demonstrated in previous studies that subcutaneous nitrate administration dilates the radial artery. The Glidesheath Slender, which has a thinner outer wall than conventional sheaths, is another method that has been shown to reduce complications by reducing friction on the radial artery wall. Our aim was to compare these two methods in terms of complications. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with complete clinical and radial Doppler ultrasound records who had undergone transradial interventions. We compared procedures using subcutaneous nitrate application plus conventional sheaths with procedures using the Glidesheath Slender sheath in terms of procedural and post-procedural complications. Results: Eighty-seven patients in the subcutaneous nitrate group and 35 patients in the Glidesheath Slender group were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of procedural and postprocedural complications (p = 0.511 and p = 0.333, respectively). Conclusions: In cases where a thin-walled sheath such as a Glidesheath Slender is not available, subcutaneous nitrate administration seems to be similar, especially in terms of preventing radial artery spasm.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patent hemostasis (PH) is essential for preventing radial artery occlusion (RAO) after trans-radial procedures; however, it remains unclear how it should be obtained. The aim of this multicenter randomized study was to evaluate whether the use of an adjustable device (AD), inflated with a pre-determined amount of air (AoA), was more effective than a non-adjustable device (non-AD) for achieving PH, thereby reducing the incidence of RAO. METHODS: We enrolled a total of 480 patients undergoing transradial procedure at 3 Italian institutions. Before the procedure, a modified Reverse Barbeau Test (mRBT) was performed in all patients to evaluate the AoA to be eventually inflated in the AD. After the procedure, patients were randomized into 2 groups: (1) AD Group, using TR-Band (Terumo) inflated with the pre-determined AoA; and 2) non-AD Group, using RadiStop (Abbott). An RBT was performed during compression to demonstrate the achievement of PH, as well as 24 hours later to evaluate the occurrence of RAO. RESULTS: PH was more often obtained in the AD Group compared with the non-AD Group (90% vs 64%, respectively, P less than .001), with no difference in terms of bleedings. RAO occurred more often in the non-AD Group compared with the AD Group (10% vs 3%, respectively, P less than .001). Of note, mRBT was effective at guiding AD inflation and identifying high-risk patients in whom PH was more difficult to obtain. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AD, filled with a predetermined AoA, allowed PH significantly more often compared with non-AD, providing a significantly reduced incidence of RAO.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Arteria Radial , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/prevención & control , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Hemostasis/fisiología , Italia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diseño de EquipoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The distal transradial access (dTRA) has become an attractive and alternative access to the conventional transradial access (TRA) for cardiovascular interventional diagnosis and/or treatment. There was a lack of randomized clinical trials to evaluate the effect of the dTRA on the long-term radial artery occlusion (RAO). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of long-term RAO at 3 months after discharge. The secondary endpoints included the successful puncture rate, puncture time, and other access-related complications. RESULTS: The incidence of long-term RAO was 0.8% (3/361) for dTRA and 3.3% (12/365) for TRA (risk ratio = 0.25, 95% confidence interval = 0.07-0.88, P = 0.02). The incidence of RAO at 24 h was significantly lower in the dTRA group than in the TRA group (2.5% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.01). The puncture success rate (96.0% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.03) and single puncture attempt (70.9% vs. 83.9%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the dTRA group than in the TRA group. However, the number of puncture attempts and puncture time were higher in the dTRA group. The dTRA group had a lower incidence of bleeding than the TRA group (1.5% vs. 6.0%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in the success rate of the procedure, total fluoroscopy time, or incidence of other access-related complications between the two groups. In the per-protocol analysis, the incidence of mEASY type ≥ II haematoma was significantly lower in the dTRA group, which was consistent with that in the as-treated analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The dTRA significantly reduced the incidence of long-term RAO, bleeding or haematoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifer: NCT05253820.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/epidemiología , Hemorragia , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/complicaciones , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study investigated the effectiveness and safety of left distal transradial access (LDTRA) in patients with cardiovascular disease in Trinidad undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: Procedural parameters, including technical success and safety outcomes such as vascular complications and radial artery occlusion (RAO), were assessed in 111 consecutive patients undergoing CAG or PCI from January 2023 to June 2023 at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Trinidad and Tobago. Eighty-eight patients underwent LDTRA, while 23 received left transradial access (LTRA). RESULTS: There was no difference in procedural success with LDTRA compared to LTRA, 90.9% vs. 100%, p-value 0.202, non-significant (ns). LDTRA was associated with shorter fluoroscopy times (8.4 ± 6.8 minutes vs. 12.4 ± 7.7 minutes, p-value = 0.02), procedural duration (26.7 ± 18 minutes vs. 35.8 ± 20 minutes, p-value = 0.04), and hemostasis time (142 ± 41 minutes vs. 186 ± 44 minutes, p-value < 0.05). There were no significant differences in procedural-related complications (8% for LDTRA vs. 4.3% for LTRA, p-value = 0.476, ns). There were no reported cases of RAO. In the subgroup of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the fluoroscopy and procedure times were similar for both access sites; however, LDTRA was associated with a shorter hemostasis time (128 ± 30 minutes vs. 194 ± 39 minutes, p-value = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LDTRA is effective and safe for coronary procedures and is associated with a shorter hemostasis time. This study may prove clinically pertinent in a limited-resource Caribbean setting.
RESUMEN
Aim: To predict the development of radial artery thrombus (RAT) in patients with radial approach coronary angiography of platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio (PHR). Materials & methods: This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between RAT and PHR. A total of 1156 patients who had coronary angiography via the transradial approach between 2021 and 2022 in the authors' center were included in the study. Results: Radial thrombus was detected in 52 (4.5%) patients. PHR was higher in the group with thrombus and was statistically significant. In the regression model, PHR was an independent predictor of the development of radial thrombus (p = 0.007). Conclusion: High PHR may be an independent predictor of the development of radial thrombus.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains a significant limitation of neuroendovascular procedures peformed through transradial access (TRA) when radial artery needs to be reused. Instances of early RAO recanalization to successfully complete neuroendovascular procedures have been rarely documented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Documents and imaging data were extracted retrospectively for all patients who underwent TRA diagnostic angiography and neuroendovascular procedures in our center from June 2022 to February 2023. The patients with early RAO who required repeat TRA were included. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients underwent repeat TRA, and 13 consecutive patients who experienced early RAO after angiography as confirmed by ultrasonography were enrolled in this study. The occluded radial arteries were successfully recanalized, and subsequent neuroendovascular procedures were carried out successful. During an average follow-up time of 7.1 months, no patients exhibited symptomatic RAO, dissection, hematoma or pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: Early RAO recanalization and reused for neuroendovascular procedures through TRA is feasible. A visually guided and stable puncture process plays a crucial role in successfully recanalizing early RAO.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Arteria Radial , Humanos , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transradial access is an important tool for many neuroendovascular procedures. Occlusion of the radial or ulnar artery is not uncommon after transradial or transulnar access and can present a challenge for patients requiring repeat angiography. METHODS: Between March 2022 and June 2023, patients undergoing transradial or transulnar angiography who were found to have a radial artery occlusion or ulnar artery occlusion were identified. Repeat catheterization of the occluded artery was attempted using a 21-gauge single wall puncture needle and a 0.021-inch wire to traverse the occlusion and insert a 23-cm sheath into the brachial artery. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients undergoing 26 angiograms during the study period were found to have a radial artery occlusion or ulnar artery occlusion. Successful repeat catheterization of the occluded artery was achieved in 21 of 26 cases (80.7%). Outer diameter sheath size ranged from 5 Fr (0.0655 inch) to 8 Fr (0.1048 inch). No access complications were encountered. Number of prior angiograms, time since prior angiogram, and prior angiogram procedure time were associated with lower likelihood of successful access. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial or transulnar neuroangiography through an occluded radial or ulnar artery is safe and feasible by traversing the occlusion into the brachial artery with a 23-cm sheath. Repeat catheterization is most successful in patients with an arterial occlusion <6 months old. This technique is important in patients who have limited options for arterial access, avoiding access site complications inherent in transfemoral access, and in patients who specifically require radial or ulnar artery access.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Arteria Cubital , Humanos , Lactante , Arteria Cubital/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Cubital/cirugía , Arteria Braquial/cirugía , Angiografía , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Angiografía Coronaria/métodosRESUMEN
Radial artery occlusion (RAO) has been the most common postprocedural complication of transradial artery access. The optimal method of prevention of RAO is still lacking. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of patent hemostasis on early (24 hours) and late (2 weeks) RAO prevention. The Open Radial Artery Study was a single-arm, prospective, and multicenter study. The primary end points were early and late RAO at the vascular access site after transradial coronary procedures. Secondary end points were access site hematoma, pseudoaneurysm formation, arteriovenous fistula, and nerve injury. A total of 2,181 patients were analyzed (67% male, mean age 68 years). The mean interventional duration and hemostatic times were 75.6 ± 55.6 and 60 ± 5.6 minutes, respectively. Radial artery spasm occurred in 10% of patients (n = 218). Catheter kinking, radial artery rupture, or dissection were not observed during the procedure. RAO, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or nerve damage was not observed in any of the patients in the early or late period. In patients who undergo coronary diagnostic or interventional procedures through transradial artery access, the patent hemostasis method seems a critical step in the prevention of early and late RAO.