RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical value of the Gleason score upgrading (GSU) prediction model after radical prostatectomy (RP) based on a Bayesian network. METHODS: The data of 356 patients who underwent prostate biopsy and RP in our hospital from January 2018 to May 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Fourteen risk factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), prostate volume, total prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), the number and proportion of positive biopsy cores, PI-RADS score, clinical stage and postoperative pathological characteristics, were included in the analysis. Data were used to establish a prediction model for Gleason score elevation based on the tree augmented naive (TAN) Bayesian algorithm. Moreover, the Bayesia Lab validation function was used to calculate the importance of polymorphic Birnbaum according to the results of the posterior analysis and to obtain the importance of each risk factor. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, 110 patients (30.89%) had GSU. Based on all of the risk factors that were included in this study, the AUC of the model was 81.06%, and the accuracy was 76.64%. The importance ranking results showed that lymphatic metastasis, the number of positive biopsy cores, ISUP stage and PI-RADS score were the top four influencing factors for GSU after RP. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction model of GSU after RP based on a Bayesian network has high accuracy and can more accurately evaluate the Gleason score of prostate biopsy specimens and guide treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/cirugía , Próstata/patología , Clasificación del Tumor , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Teorema de Bayes , ProstatectomíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Worldwide, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle remains the most common method of diagnosing prostate cancer. Due to high infective complications reported, some have suggested it is now time to abandon this technique in preference of a trans-perineal approach. The aim of this study was to report on the infection rates following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in multiple Australian centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from seven Australian centres across four states and territories that undertake transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, including major metropolitan and regional centres. In four centres, the data were collected prospectively. Rates of readmissions due to infection, urosepsis resulting in intensive care admission and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: 12,240 prostate biopsies were performed in seven Australian centres between July 1998 and December 2020. There were 105 readmissions for infective complications with rates between centres ranging from 0.19 to 2.60% and an overall rate of 0.86%. Admission to intensive care with sepsis ranged from 0 to 0.23% and overall 0.03%. There was no mortality in the 12,240 cases. CONCLUSION: Infective complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies are very low, occurring in less than 1% of 12,240 biopsies. Though this study included a combination of both prospective and retrospective data and did not offer a comparison with a trans-perineal approach, TRUS prostate biopsy is a safe means of obtaining a prostate cancer diagnosis. Further prospective studies directly comparing the techniques are required prior to abandoning TRUS based upon infectious complications.
Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Australia/epidemiología , Biopsia , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prostate biopsy report is key for risk stratification of prostate cancer patients and subsequent therapeutic decision-making. However, due to the inclusion of a multitude of additional parameters its interpretation is becoming more challenging. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine how urologists currently interpret prostate biopsy reports, in particular how they consider different histopathological parameters for therapy decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to all urology practices in Germany with the help of the BDU (Berufsverband der Deutschen Urologen e.â¯V.). In total, there were 106 complete responses that could be included for further analyses. RESULTS: Most urologists consider the number of positive cores and relative tumor burden (%) per core as crucial for the assessment of tumor extension. In case of targeted biopsies, the majority of urologists prefers a separate statement of positive cores per random biopsy scheme and per region of interest, respectively. The core with the highest Gleason score is mostly the basis for therapy decision-making (versus the overall Gleason score). Proportion of Gleason 4 pattern also seems to be critical for prostate cancer management. Only half of the urologists demand reporting of the new ISUP/WHO (International Society of Urological Pathology/World Health Organization) grade groups. Additional parameters claimed are Ki67, prostate-specific membrane antigen status, presence of intraductal or neuroendocrine component of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey shows that there is no standardized reporting for prostate biopsies and that the interpretation of prostate biopsy reports varies among urologists. Further studies and guideline recommendations are necessary to establish a standardized reporting scheme for prostate biopsies.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Patólogos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Urólogos , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Clasificación del Tumor , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
We aimed to analyze the correlation of perineural invasion on transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy with predictors of biochemical cancer recurrence, as well as its impact on clinical outcomes, for non-metastatic prostate cancer. For the study, patients with perineural invasion (N = 86) were recruited into group I and underwent open retropubic prostatectomy, regardless of clinical stage; cases with prostate cancer but without perineural invasion on biopsy, who received radical prostatectomy as the treatment modality, were placed into group II (n = 90). Perineural invasion was detected preoperatively in 43% of cases that revealed surgical margin positivity postoperatively, while 85% of the remaining cases (group II) had negative surgical margins. There was no correlation on prostate biopsy between perineural invasion and Gleason score or PSA, based on Sperman's rank-order correlation analysis. However, there was strong positive correlation of perineural invasion with clinical stage and patients age. Additionaly, we demonstrated that perineural invasion on biopsy is a non-independent risk factor for metastatic occurrence, although the correlation was significant in univariate analysis. Nevertheless, we found strong correlation between invasion on initial biopsy specimen with biochemical cancer recurrence, suggesting that perineural invasion on prostate biopsy is a significant predictor of worse prognostic outcome.
Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Envejecimiento , Biopsia , Biopsia con Aguja , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Needle biopsy of the prostate is a diagnostic method for prostate cancer which is a relatively safe method with low risk of serious complications. The evidences regarding the occurrence of erectile dysfunction following prostate biopsy are controversial. Herein, we aimed at determining the rate of erectile dysfunction in those undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. METHOD: All candidates for prostate biopsy were enrolled. The International Index of Erectile Function-5 was completed 1 m before and 1, 3, and 6 months after ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy by each patient for erectile dysfunction. Patients with a previous history of erectile dysfunction which due to a positive pathology had received any type of treatment were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Eighty patients with the mean age of 64.8 years, the mean prostate-specific antigen level of 11.64 ng/dL, and the mean prostate volume of 62.43 cc were included. The prostate biopsy result was positive in 38.8% of the cases. No significant relationship was found between erectile dysfunction and prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, and the pathology result (P = 0.320, 0.509, and 0.131). The mean questionnaire score 1 month before and after the biopsy was 23 and 18, respectively; it demonstrated a significant difference (P < 0.001). The same score was 17 and 14.5 three and six months after biopsy. The mean score 1 m before and 3 m after biopsy also revealed a significant difference (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate causes progressive erectile dysfunction in these patients. This relationship is not affected by the biopsy result, prostate volume, or the prostate-specific antigen level.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/epidemiología , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Próstata/patología , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of a combined regimen of levofloxacin (LVFX) plus isepamicin (ISP) as prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate (TRUSP-Bx). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 562 patients undergoing TRUSP-Bx were included in the present study. All patients were administered a single-dose of oral LVFX (500 mg) in the morning and intravenous ISP (400 mg) 60 min before biopsy. All biopsies were performed via TRUSP-Bx with an 18-gauge needle, and 12-core specimens were routinely obtained. Before initiating antibiotic treatment, urine and blood bacterial cultures were tested to determine the causative microorganisms in the patients with acute bacterial prostatitis. RESULTS: Acute bacterial prostatitis developed in three (0.53%) participants. The incidence rates of acute bacterial prostatitis in the low- and high-risk groups were 0.79% and 0.46%, respectively. These patients showed clinical symptoms of acute bacterial prostatitis 12-24 h after their biopsy. Escherichia coli (E. coli) was isolated in the urine or bladder cultures of all of patients. All three isolates were determined to be LVFX-resistant E. coli, although they had good sensitivity to aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. All patients were administered antibiotic treatment (cephalosporin or carbapenem) immediately and were treated successfully with no evidence of further disease progression. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prophylaxis with LVFX plus ISP was effective, resulting in a lower incidence of acute bacterial prostatitis after TRUSP-Bx in both low- and high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Prostatitis/prevención & control , Enfermedad Aguda/epidemiología , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Anciano , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/orina , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/microbiología , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Prostatitis/epidemiología , Prostatitis/etiología , Prostatitis/orina , Recto/microbiología , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
The introduction of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening has caused a stage shift in diagnosis of prostate cancer and an increasing number of patients receiving early diagnosis. This has led to early detection of limited foci of cancer on prostate biopsy, and clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. Therefore, current methods for sampling, diagnosing and managing prostate cancer have significantly evolved in recent years. In light of recent management changes and conservative surveillance protocols prompting new handling, grading and staging guidelines, the evaluation of prostate biopsy in contemporary practice has become pivotal. It is therefore critical to recognize minor foci of cancer or atypical glands, and distinguish these from benign mimics that could lead to a false positive diagnosis.In this chapter, current biopsy modalities and imaging techniques, tissue handling and recent updates in the interpretation of prostate biopsy will be discussed.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico , ProstatectomíaRESUMEN
The objective of the present study was to explore the clinical value and safety of trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided transperineal prostate 12+X core biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Patients who received a TRUS-guided transperineal prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer at the General Hospital of The People's Liberation Army between September 2009 and May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, this consisted of 1,300 patients. These patients were randomly divided into the 12+X core group or the standard 12-core group. The mean age of all the patients was 70.5 years old. Levels of prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were checked and used as reference prior and subsequent to the biopsy procedure. The 12+X core group consisted of 937 patients and the 12-core group consisted of 363 patients. The mean number of core samples taken from both groups was 14.5 (ranging from 12 to 24) and the mean operative time of the whole group was 20.4 min (ranging from 15 to 40 min). The puncture positive detection rate of abnormal rectal examination, trans-rectal ultrasound, and MRI was 24.0, 30.1, and 59.2%, respectively, whereas the puncture positive rate was 47.2% in 12+X core group and 34.5% in 12-core group. Improved prostate needle biopsy with 12+X cores was found to have significantly higher detection rate than that with 12 cores as well as fewer post-operative complications, therefore making the method ideal for diagnosing prostate cancer.
RESUMEN
(Objective) A single prophylactic dose of new quinolones is recommended to prevent infection associated with transrectal prostate needle biopsy (TRPB), except in high-risk patients, and a single dose of levofloxacin (LVFX) 500 mg is often administered. We examined single administrations of LVFX and sitafloxacin (STFX), in relation to the frequency of febrile infection. (Patients and methods) The subjects were 411 patients deemed to be suitable candidates for TRPB and ranging in age from 52 to 84 years (median, 75 years). Their PSA values ranged from 3.89 to 2,450 ng/mL (median, 6.92 ng/mL). They were randomly assigned to receive LVFX (group A, 204 patients) or STFX (group B, 207 patients), and the two groups were compared for the incidence of infection with a temperature of 38°C or more within 48 hours after TRPB. (Results) Febrile infection was observed in 8 (3.92%) of the 204 patients in group A and 1 (0.48%) of the 207 patients in group B. Of the 9 patients with febrile infection, 8 had acute prostatitis. There was a significant difference in the incidences of febrile infection between the two groups (p = 0.041; odds ratio, 8.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-67.85). The pathogenic bacteria in the 9 patients were Escherichia coli in 7 (Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL]-producing bacteria in 3, LVFX-resistant bacteria in 2), Klebsiella pneumoniae in one, and Enterococcus faecalis in one. (Discussion) Measures against quinolone-resistant bacteria, ESBL-producing bacteria, and gram-positive bacteria should be considered for the prevention of infections associated with TRPB. Based on our present observations, STFX is considered to have more favorable effects than LVFX.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy among men worldwide and the sixth cause of cancer-related death. Some authors have reported a relationship between perineural invasion (PNI), Gleason score, and the invasion of peripheral organs during prostatectomy. However, it is not yet clear whether pathological evidence of PNI is necessary for risk stratification in selecting treatment type. OBJECTIVES: The clinical and pathological stages of prostate cancer are compared in patients under radical prostatectomy and in patients without perineural invasion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using a sample of 109 patients who attended a tertiary health care center from 2008 to 2013. The selection criteria were PNI in prostate biopsy with Gleason scores less than six, seven, and eight to ten. The participants were enrolled in a census manner, and they underwent clinical staging. After radical prostatectomy, the rates of pathological staging were compared. The under-staging and over-staging rates among those with and without perineural invasion in biopsy samples were compared. RESULTS: The concordance between Gleason scores according to biopsy and pathology was 36.7% (40 subjects). The concordance rate was 46.4% and 33.3% among those with and without PNI, respectively. The concordance rates were significantly varied in different subclasses of Gleason scores in patients without PNI (P = 0.003); the highest concordance rate was a Gleason score of 7 (63.6%) and the lowest was a Gleason score of eight to ten (25%). However, there were no significant differences in patients with PNI (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the presence of PNI in prostate biopsy is accompanied by higher surgical stages, PNI is not an appropriate independent factor in risk stratification.
RESUMEN
AIM: To investigate the relationship of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels with outcomes of prostate needle biopsy in men 50 or more years old. METHODS: We measured serum PSA levels in 1472 healthy men 50 or more years old. Men who had serum PSA values 4.0ng/mL or higher underwent digital rectal examination. If there were either an elevated PSA level (≥4ng/mL) or abnormal digital rectal examination, a transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy was performed. RESULTS: The mean serum total PSA level was 13.73±11.44ng/mL, and the mean serum free PSA level was 4.99±0.97ng/mL. Of the 260 men who had serum total PSA levels of≥4ng/mL, 139 underwent biopsy. Of these 139 men, 45 (32.4%) had prostate cancer. Benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without prostatitis was diagnosed in 94 patients (67.6%). There was no significant correlation between age and histologic results of prostate needle biopsy (P-value=0.469). The serum free PSA showed no significant correlation with histologic results of prostate needle biopsy, whereas the serum total PSA level had a significant correlation in patients with adenocarcinoma compared with other diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The overall frequency of detection of prostate adenocarcinoma was 32.4%. This study revealed that no level of PSA was associated with a 100% positive predictive value and negative biopsy can occur virtually at any PSA level. There is a need to create awareness among the general population and health professionals for an early diagnosis of this common form of cancer.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Tacto Rectal , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Prostatitis/sangre , Prostatitis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several studies evaluating the tolerance of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsies showed that moderate-to-severe pain was associated with the procedure. Additionally, prebiopsy anxiety or rebiopsy as a result of a prior biopsy procedure is mentioned as factors predisposing to higher pain intensity. Thus, in this study, we investigated the effects of hypnotherapy during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy for pain and anxiety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients presenting for TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsy were randomly assigned to receive either 10-min presurgery hypnosis session (n = 32, mean age 63.5 ± 6.1, p = 0.289) or a presurgery control session (n = 32, mean age 61.8 ± 6.8, p = 0.289). The hypnosis session involved suggestions for increased relaxation and decreased anxiety. Presurgery pain and anxiety were measured using visual analog scales (VAS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS), respectively. In our statistics, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Postintervention, and before surgery, patients in the hypnosis group had significantly lower mean values for presurgery VAS [mean 1 (0-8); p = 0.011], BAI (6.0 vs 2.0; p < 0.001), and HAS (11.0 vs 6.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study results indicate that a brief presurgery hypnosis intervention can be an effective means of controlling presurgical anxiety, and therefore pain, in patients awaiting diagnostic prostate cancer surgery.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/efectos adversos , Hipnosis , Dolor/prevención & control , Próstata/patología , Anciano , Ansiedad/etiología , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Escalas de Valoración PsiquiátricaRESUMEN
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a simple marker of systemic inflammatory response, has been demonstrated as an independent prognosticator for some solid malignancies, including prostate cancer. In the present study, we evaluated the role of NLR in men who underwent prostate needle biopsy for their initial diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. Both complete blood counts and free/total (F/T) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio were examined in a total of 3,011 men in our institution. Of these, 1,207 had a PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/mL, and 357 of 810 who subsequently underwent prostate needle biopsy were found to have prostatic adenocarcinoma. NLR value was significantly higher in men with PSA of ≥ 20 ng/mL than in those with PSA of < 20 ng/mL (p < 0.001). NLR was also significantly higher in men with positive biopsy than in those with negative biopsy (p < 0.001). Using NLR cut-off point of 2.40 determined by the AUROC curve, positive/negative predictive values of NLR alone and NLR combined with F/T PSA ratio (cut-off: 0.15) were 56.6%/60.8% and 80.7%/60.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that not only F/T PSA ratio (HR = 3.13) but also NLR (HR = 2.21) was an independent risk factor for prostate cancer. NLR is thus likely elevated in patients with prostate cancer. Accordingly, NLR, with or without combination with F/T PSA ratio, may function as a new biomarker to predict prostate cancer in men undergoing prostate needle biopsy.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Linfocitos/inmunología , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangre , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangreRESUMEN
ERG and PTEN biomarkers are increasingly being analyzed on prostate core biopsies (NBXs); ERG as a marker of clonality and number of separately arising tumor foci and PTEN for prognostic information. Yet, in patients with multiple biopsy cores positive for cancer (PCa), there is no standardized approach for interrogation of these biomarkers in terms of the number of positive cores to evaluate. A total of 194 NBX cases containing more than one positive core with cancer were evaluated for ERG overexpression and PTEN loss by immunostaining (immunohistochemistry) of all positive cores. ERG overexpression or PTEN loss in at least one cancer core was present in 111 (57%) and 69 (36%) cases respectively. ERG overexpression was significantly associated with PTEN loss (P < .0001), and PTEN loss was associated with a high Gleason score (P < .0001). Inter- and intra-tumor core staining heterogeneity for ERG overexpression occurred in 42% and 5% cases and for PTEN loss both intra- and inter-tumor core heterogeneity was 68%. PTEN staining was highly discordant between PCa sites regardless of laterality. When the Gleason score was non-uniform across PCa sites, the combination of cores showing the highest Gleason score and largest tumor volume provided the best representation of ERG overexpression (92%) and PTEN loss (98%). When grades were uniform across cancer sites, the highest tumor volume core was generally representative of ERG overexpression (90%) but was less representative for PTEN loss (76%). Our results suggest that knowledge of this heterogeneity is critical for developing optimal yet cost-effective strategies to identify these underlying molecular abnormalities.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/metabolismo , Neoplasia Intraepitelial Prostática/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Transactivadores/metabolismo , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Neoplasia Intraepitelial Prostática/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Riesgo , Regulador Transcripcional ERGRESUMEN
Accurate recognition of Gleason pattern 5 (GP5) prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) on core biopsy (NBX) is critical because it is associated with disease progression and the worst clinical outcome. We evaluated 1557 consecutive and prospectively collected NBXs to determine the frequency of diagnosis, morphologic subpatterns, and their relation to the amount and pattern distribution of GP5 PCa based on the 2005 modified Gleason grading system. Tertiary GP5 was upgraded to a secondary pattern to derive the final Gleason score. GP5 accounted for 6% of all NBXs and 14% of PCa cases. GP5 PCas were associated with high-risk preoperative clinical and biopsy characteristics, regardless of the amount of GP5. Most patients (85%) with % GP5 greater than 5% of PCa had the final Gleason score of 9 to 10, compared with % GP5 of 5% or less of PCa (P < .0001). The morphologic subpatterns of GP5 PCas were as follows: infiltrating cords (96%), single cells (76%), solid sheets (29%), and comedocarcinoma (2%). Infiltrating cords and single-cell patterns frequently coexisted (76%). The GP5 was distributed in a tertiary (66%), followed by secondary (32%) and primary (2%) components of PCa. Infiltrating cords and single cells were the 2 most frequently encountered patterns, specifically when GP5 involved 5% or less of PCa and represented secondary or tertiary component of PCa. GP5 PCa is a relatively frequent presentation in the contemporary NBX practice. Because of its important prognostic and therapeutic implications, pathologists must be aware of its varied morphologic presentations and to the fact that most cases with GP5 represent a tertiary component of PCa.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Pronóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
A 12-core systematic biopsy that incorporates apical and far-lateral cores in the template distribution allows maximal cancer detection and avoidance of a repeat biopsy while minimizing the detection of insignificant prostate cancers. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy has an evolving role in both initial and repeat prostate biopsy strategies, potentially improving sampling efficiency, increasing the detection of clinically significant cancers, and reducing the detection of insignificant cancers. Hematuria, hematospermia, and rectal bleeding are common complications of prostate needle biopsy, but are generally self-limiting and well tolerated. All men should receive antimicrobial prophylaxis before biopsy.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/efectos adversos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/tendencias , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/tendencias , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the advantages of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assis-ted prostate biopsy by comparing with systemic prostate biopsy . Methods From Jan.2010 to Dec.2011, 213 cases were selected randomly.Patient's mean age was 71.0±8.9 (54-83) years.Their PSA level was 22.5±19.4 (4.1-150.0) μg/L.The positive rates of DRE and transrectal ultrasound were 55.9%( 119/213) and 37.6%(80/213).This group of patients were biopsied according to transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsies ( experimental group ) .During the same period , another 218 cases were selected randomly.Patient′s mean age was 65.0±9.1 (36-94) years.Their PSA level was 23.3±18.9 (4.6-147.0) μg/L.The positive rates of DRE and transrectal ultrasound were 57.3%( 125/218 ) and 38.1%(83/213).This group of patients were biopsied according to systemic prostate biopsy (control group).The data of two groups were compared to find out the advantages and disadvantages of transrectal contrast -en-hanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsy . Results Comparing these two groups , the positive rates of prostate cancer in experimental group and control group were 38.0%(81/213) and 34.9%(76/218), with no statistically significance ( P>0.05); the numbers of cores were 9.5 and 12.0, with statistically signifi-cance (P<0.05);the positive rates of single needle were 18.2%(369/2 025) and 11.5%(301/2 616), with statistically significance (P<0.05); and the mean Gleason scores were 7.1 and 6.6, with statistically significance (P<0.05). Conclusions The efficiency of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsy is higher than systemic prostate biopsy .Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsy can be considered as a new option for prostate biopsy .
RESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: This study aims at correlating different digital rectal examination (DRE) abnormalities with histopathological results in patients with prostatic diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 236 patients who underwent prostate needle biopsy (PNB). Inclusion criteria were presence of abnormal DRE findings or elevated prostate specific antigen above 4 ng/ml or both. They all had 10-core extended transrectal biopsy and specimens were sent for histopathological examination. Correlations were made between DRE findings and histopathology results. Two separate multivariate logistic regression models were created; the first evaluated the relationship of predictors (DRE findings) to the likelihood of detecting cancer and the second explored predictors of high-grade cancer on PNB. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled with a mean age of 66.9 years and range of 43-90 years. Histopathology results were malignant in 102 (43.2%) and benign in 134 (56.8%). Ninety-one (38.6%) and 145 (61.4%) had normal DRE and abnormal DRE findings with cancer detection rates of 23.1% and 55.8% respectively. Nodular prostate is the most common abnormality in 63.4% patients with abnormal DRE. Each sign of DRE had different predictive value with enhanced positive predictive value when combinations of abnormalities are present. Abnormal DRE is an independent predictor of high-grade tumor. Mean Gleason scores were 4.7 and 7.1 in patients with normal and abnormal DRE respectively. CONCLUSION: DRE is a useful and important tool in assessing patients with suspected prostate diseases who need prostate biopsy. An abnormal DRE correlated well with prostate cancer and independently predicted high-grade disease in these men.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We describe a simple and effective method to reduce the risk of infection after prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,642 consecutive prostate biopsy procedures during a 4-year period (2008 to 2012) were included in the study. Inclusion criteria consisted of pre-biopsy negative urine culture, bisacodyl enema and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (3 days). Formalin (10%) was used to disinfect the needle tip after each biopsy core. All patients were monitored for post-biopsy infection. The rate of infection was compared to that of a historical series of 990 procedures. Two ex vivo experiments were conducted to test the disinfectant effectiveness of formalin against fluoroquinolone resistant Escherichia coli, and another experiment was performed to quantitate formalin exposure. RESULTS: Post-biopsy clinical sepsis with positive urine and blood cultures (quinolone resistant E. coli) developed in 2 patients (0.122%). Both patients were hospitalized, treated with intravenous antibiotics and had a full recovery without long-term sequelae. Mild uncomplicated urinary infection developed in 3 additional patients (0.183%). All were treated with outpatient oral antibiotics and had a complete recovery. The overall rate of urinary infection and sepsis using formalin disinfection was approximately a third of that of a prior series (0.30% vs 0.80%, p=0.13). Ex vivo experiments showed a complete lack of growth of fluoroquinolone resistant E. coli on blood and MacConkey agars after exposure to formalin. The amount of formalin exposure was negligible and well within the safe parameters of the Environmental Protection Agency. CONCLUSIONS: Formalin disinfection of the biopsy needle after each prostate biopsy core is associated with a low incidence of urinary infection and sepsis. This technique is simple, effective and cost neutral.