Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Obes Surg ; 34(7): 2431-2437, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722474

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Obesity is a chronic metabolic disease with global distribution among adults and children which affects daily functioning and ultimately quality of life. Primary care physicians (PCPs) provide an important role for the treatment of severe obesity. Better understanding of obesity and its treatment options may increase patients' referral rates to the various treatment modalities, including metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quantitative cross-sectional study used a self-reported questionnaire among PCPs of Clalit Health Services (CHS) in Northern Israel. The quantitative questionnaire examined the PCP's knowledge, opinions, attitude, and approaches to managing severe obesity. RESULTS: A total of 246 PCPs from Northern Israel filled the questionnaire (42.9%), the majority were Muslim Arabs (54.5%), who gained their medical degree outside of Israel (73.8%) and practicing for over 10 years (58.8%). 64.3% of PCPs had a high workload (over 100 appointments per week), 77.1% did not know the definition of severe obesity, and 69.17% did not attend educational meetings regarding obesity during the previous year. The referral rate for MBS was 50.4% ± 23.3. Two prognostic factors that had a statistically significant effect on the referral rate for bariatric surgery were the total appointments per week, and the number of practice years. Both had a negative association. CONCLUSION: The knowledge and referral rates for bariatric surgery are higher among PCPs with lower workload and relatively fewer practice years. Workshops and annual training courses may fortify knowledge and awareness for the treatment of obesity, which in turn could increase the referral rate for MBS.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Israel , Estudios Transversales , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Hosp Top ; 101(1): 1-8, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34308782

RESUMEN

Achieving equitable access has been a central goal in healthcare for years; access by low-income Americans is a major concern for policymakers. We examined the differences in post-discharge primary care follow-up visits and 30-day post discharge ER visits across several characteristics. The results suggest that higher housing density, percent minority population, percent unemployed, and percent uninsured point to lower rates of PCP follow-up care and higher rates of post-discharge ER visits. These findings have implications for developing cost-effective programs targeting hospital to PCP communication, especially in densely populated areas.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
3.
J Clin Med ; 13(1)2023 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38202073

RESUMEN

The advent of virtual healthcare has reshaped patient management paradigms across various medical domains. This analysis examines the potential effectiveness of treating chronic kidney disease (CKD) using Reset Kidney Health's virtual, multidisciplinary, and integrated care approach. The pilot study concentrated on evaluating the impact of this care model on the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) of CKD patients over an eight-month period. The analyses showed that a majority of patients managed with the Reset Kidney Health Model experienced stability or improvements in their kidney function, as measured by eGFR. While this pilot study has several limitations, these early results suggest the potential benefits of digital healthcare innovations in chronic disease management and provide an argument for the broader integration of virtual care strategies in healthcare systems. These initial findings could lay the groundwork for further research into effectively integrating digital healthcare in chronic disease management.

4.
Kidney Med ; 4(7): 100493, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35866010

RESUMEN

Rationale & Objective: To design and implement clinical decision support incorporating a validated risk prediction estimate of kidney failure in primary care clinics and to evaluate the impact on stage-appropriate monitoring and referral. Study Design: Block-randomized, pragmatic clinical trial. Setting & Participants: Ten primary care clinics in the greater Boston area. Patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) were included. Patients were randomized within each primary care physician panel through a block randomization approach. The trial occurred between December 4, 2015, and December 3, 2016. Intervention: Point-of-care noninterruptive clinical decision support that delivered the 5-year kidney failure risk equation as well as recommendations for stage-appropriate monitoring and referral to nephrology. Outcomes: The primary outcome was as follows: Urine and serum laboratory monitoring test findings measured at one timepoint 6 months after the initial primary care visit and analyzed only in patients who had not undergone the recommended monitoring test in the preceding 12 months. The secondary outcome was nephrology referral in patients with a calculated kidney failure risk equation value of >10% measured at one timepoint 6 months after the initial primary care visit. Results: The clinical decision support application requested and processed 569,533 Continuity of Care Documents during the study period. Of these, 41,842 (7.3%) documents led to a diagnosis of stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD by the clinical decision support application. A total of 5,590 patients with stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD were randomized and included in the study. The link to the clinical decision support application was clicked 122 times by 57 primary care physicians. There was no association between the clinical decision support intervention and the primary outcome. There was a small but statistically significant difference in nephrology referral, with a higher rate of referral in the control arm. Limitations: Contamination within provider and clinic may have attenuated the impact of the intervention and may have biased the result toward null. Conclusions: The noninterruptive design of the clinical decision support was selected to prevent cognitive overload; however, the design led to a very low rate of use and ultimately did not improve stage-appropriate monitoring. Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award K23DK097187. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02990897.

5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 76(5): 636-644, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682696

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Most adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the United States are cared for by primary care providers (PCPs). We evaluated the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an electronic clinical decision support system (eCDSS) within the electronic health record with or without pharmacist follow-up to improve the management of CKD in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Pragmatic cluster-randomized trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 524 adults with confirmed creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rates of 30 to 59mL/min/1.73m2 cared for by 80 PCPs at the University of California San Francisco. Electronic health record data were used for patient identification, intervention deployment, and outcomes ascertainment. INTERVENTIONS: Each PCP's eligible patients were randomly assigned as a group into 1 of 3 treatment arms: (1) usual care; (2) eCDSS: testing of creatinine, cystatin C, and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio with individually tailored guidance for PCPs on blood pressure, potassium, and proteinuria management, cardiovascular risk reduction, and patient education; or (3) eCDSS plus pharmacist counseling (eCDSS-PLUS). OUTCOMES: The primary clinical outcome was change in blood pressure over 12 months. Secondary outcomes were PCP awareness of CKD and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and statin therapy. RESULTS: All 80 eligible PCPs participated. Mean patient age was 70 years, 47% were nonwhite, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 56±0.6mL/min/1.73m2. Among patients receiving eCDSS with or without pharmacist counseling (n=336), 178 (53%) completed laboratory measurements and 138 (41%) had laboratory measurements followed by a PCP visit with eCDSS deployment. eCDSS was opened by the PCP for 102 (74%) patients, with at least 1 suggested order signed for 83 of these 102 (81%). Changes in systolic blood pressure were-2.1±1.5mm Hg with usual care, -2.8±1.8mm Hg with eCDSS, and -1.1±1.1 with eCDSS-PLUS (P=0.7). PCP awareness of CKD was 16% with usual care, 26% with eCDSS, and 32% for eCDSS-PLUS (P=0.09). In as-treated analyses, PCP awareness of CKD was significantly greater with eCDSS and eCDSS-PLUS (73% and 69%) versus usual care (47%; P=0.002). LIMITATIONS: Recruitment of smaller than intended sample size and limited uptake of the testing component of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to demonstrate the effectiveness of eCDSS to lower blood pressure and uptake of the eCDSS was limited by low testing rates, eCDSS use was high when laboratory measurements were available and was associated with higher PCP awareness of CKD. FUNDING: Grants from government (National Institutes of Health) and not-for-profit (American Heart Association) entities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02925962.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
6.
Ann Transl Med ; 6(24): 469, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30740400

RESUMEN

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) are rare genetic or inherited disorders resulting from an enzyme defect in biochemical and metabolic pathways affecting proteins, fats, carbohydrates metabolism or impaired organelle function presenting as complicated medical conditions involving several human organ systems. They involve great complexity of the underlying pathophysiology, biochemical workup, and molecular analysis, and have complicated therapeutic options for management. Age of presentation can vary from infancy to adolescence with the more severe forms appearing in early childhood accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality. The understanding of these complex disorders requires special in-depth training, American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ABMGG) certification and experience. Most primary care physicians (PCPs) are reluctant to deal with IEM due to unfamiliarity and rarity of such conditions compounded by prompt progression to crisis situations along with paucity of time involved in dealing with such complex disorders. While there are biochemical geneticists aka metabolic specialists' expertise available, mostly in larger academic medical centers, with expertise to deal with these rare complex issues, their initial clinical presentation in most newborns, children, adolescents or adults including asymptomatic positive newborn screen (NBS), occur in the out-patient PCP settings. Therefore, it is important that PCPs' comfort to recognize early signs and symptoms is important to initiate appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and be able to make appropriate referrals. The following article reviews common IEM clinical presentations for a robust diagnostic differential and discuss evaluation and management approaches of patients with known or suspected IEM.

7.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 65(1): 67-79, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25183380

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals at risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, are prevalent in primary care physician (PCP) practices. A major systemic barrier to mitigating risk of progression to kidney failure and to optimal care is failure of communication and coordination among PCPs and nephrologists. STUDY DESIGN: Quality improvement. Longitudinal practice-level study of tool-based intervention in nephrology practices and their referring PCP practices. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 9 PCP and 5 nephrology practices in Philadelphia and Chicago. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN: Tools from Renal Physicians Association toolkit were modified and provided for use by PCPs and nephrologists to improve identification of CKD, communication, and comanagement. OUTCOMES: CKD identification, referral to nephrologists, communication among PCPs and nephrologists, comanagement processes. MEASUREMENTS: Pre- and postimplementation interviews, questionnaires, site visits, and monthly teleconferences were used to ascertain practice patterns, perceptions, and tool use. Interview transcripts were reviewed for themes using qualitative analysis based on grounded theory. Chart audits assessed CKD identification and referral (PCPs). RESULTS: PCPs improved processes for CKD identification, referral to nephrologists, communication, and execution of comanagement plans. Documentation of glomerular filtration rate was increased significantly (P=0.01). Nephrologists improved referral and comanagement processes. PCP postintervention interviews documented increased awareness of risk factors, the need to track high-risk patients, and the importance of early referral. Final nephrologist interviews revealed heightened attention to communication and comanagement with PCPs and increased levels of satisfaction among all parties. LIMITATIONS: Nephrology practices volunteered to participate and recruit their referring PCP practices. Audit tools were developed for quality improvement assessment, but were not designed to provide statistically significant estimates. CONCLUSIONS: The use of specifically tailored tools led to enhanced awareness and identification of CKD among PCPs, increased communication between practices, and improvement in comanagement and cooperation between PCPs and nephrologists.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Nefrología/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Médicos/psicología , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA