RESUMEN
Introducción: La utilidad de las técnicas de anestesia regional se ha mostrado por muchos años, estas son las de elección por los beneficios que aporta, como es el caso de la cesárea, aunque no están exentas de complicaciones, y las neurológicas que son las más temidas por la gravedad del cuadro clínico presentado y los posibles desenlaces. Objetivo: Describir la evolución clínica de la puérpera con diagnóstico de neumoencéfalo después de anestesia neuroaxial peridural. Presentación de caso: Se trata de una paciente puérpera con antecedente de cefalea migrañosa que después de ser sometida a una anestesia peridural, comienza con dolor de cabeza ligero a moderado que en un principio aliviaba con analgésicos, después hace una convulsión tónica clónico generalizada que fue necesaria intubar y trasladar a terapia intensiva. Mediante la tomografía axial computarizada se detecta neumoencéfalo de pequeñas proporciones en región parietal, además, de signos de edema cerebral, el cuadro evoluciona satisfactoriamente, la paciente a las horas es trasladad a sala donde se reencuentra con su bebe y días después es dada de alta sin secuelas. Conclusiones: El neumoencéfalo como complicación de la anestesia peridural en la paciente gestante, generalmente no tienen gran repercusión clínica y desaparece solo en un período no mayor de 72 horas, pero en ocasiones puede presentarse como complicación grave que puede acarrear daño neurológico permanente e incluso la muerte.
Introduction: Regional anesthesia techniques have been used for many years and there are surgeries where they are the ones of choice due to the proven benefits they provide, as is the case with anesthesia forces is a section, which is not free of complications, but the neurological ones are the ones. Most feared, due to the complexity of the situation and the possible outcomes they could entail. Objective: To describe the evolution of a postpartum patient who was diagnosed with Pneumocephalus after epidural anesthesia. Clinical case: Postpartum patient with a history of migraine headache, which after undergoing epidural anesthesia, began with light to moderate headache that was initially relieved with analgesics, then had a generalized tonic-clonic seizure that required intubation and transfer to the intensive therapy. Using computed axial tomography, small Pneumocephalus was detected in the parietal region in addition to signs of cerebral edema. The condition progressed satisfactorily. Within hours, the patient was transferred to the ward where she was reunited with her baby and day slater she was discharged without squeals. Conclusions: Pneumocephalus as a complication of epidural anesthesia in pregnant patients generally does not have great clinical repercussions and disappears only in a period of no more than 72 hours, but sometime sit can occur as a serious complication that can lead to permanent neurological damage and even death, death.
RESUMEN
The present study evaluated patients with diagnosis of surgical site infection (SSI) following cesarean section and their controls to determinate risk factors and impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on this condition. Methods: All cesareans performed from January 2009 to December 2012 were evaluated for SSI, based on criteria established by CDC/NHSN. Control patients were determined after inclusion of case patients. Medical records of case and control patients were reviewed and compared regarding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Our study demonstrated an association following univariate analysis between post-cesarean SSI and number of internal vaginal examinations, time of membrane rupture, emergency cesarean and improper use of antibiotic prophylaxis. This same situation did not repeat itself in multivariate analysis with adjustment for risk factors, especially with regard to antibiotic prophylaxis, considering the emergency cesarean factor only. Conclusion: The authors of the present study not only question surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis use based on data presented here and in literature, but suggest that the prophylaxis is perhaps indicated primarily in selected groups of patients undergoing cesarean section. Further research with greater number of patients and evaluated risk factors are fundamental for better understanding of the causes and evolution of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery. .
Asunto(s)
Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: The present study evaluated patients with diagnosis of surgical site infection (SSI) following cesarean section and their controls to determinate risk factors and impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on this condition. METHODS: All cesareans performed from January 2009 to December 2012 were evaluated for SSI, based on criteria established by CDC/NHSN. Control patients were determined after inclusion of case patients. Medical records of case and control patients were reviewed and compared regarding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated an association following univariate analysis between post-cesarean SSI and number of internal vaginal examinations, time of membrane rupture, emergency cesarean and improper use of antibiotic prophylaxis. This same situation did not repeat itself in multivariate analysis with adjustment for risk factors, especially with regard to antibiotic prophylaxis, considering the emergency cesarean factor only. CONCLUSION: The authors of the present study not only question surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis use based on data presented here and in literature, but suggest that the prophylaxis is perhaps indicated primarily in selected groups of patients undergoing cesarean section. Further research with greater number of patients and evaluated risk factors are fundamental for better understanding of the causes and evolution of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery.