RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) causes significant mortality and morbidity worldwide. Surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for locally advanced resectable OSCC. Results from landmark trials have established postoperative concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy (Cis-RT) as the standard treatment for OSCC patients with high-risk pathologic features. However, cisplatin-related toxicity limits usage in clinical practice. Given the need for effective but less toxic alternatives, we previously conducted a single-arm trial showing favorable safety profiles and promising efficacy of concurrent docetaxel-radiotherapy (Doc-RT). METHODS: In this randomized phase 2 trial, we aimed to compare Doc-RT with the standard Cis-RT in postoperative OSCC patients. Eligible patients had AJCC stage III-IV resectable OSCC with high-risk pathologic features. Two hundred twenty-four patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive concurrent Doc-RT or Cis-RT. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and adverse events (AEs). Integrin ß1 (ITGB1) expression was analyzed as a biomarker for efficacy. RESULTS: After a median 28.8-month follow-up, 2-year DFS rates were 63.7% for Doc-RT arm and 56.1% for Cis-RT arm (p = 0.55). Meanwhile, Doc-RT demonstrated comparable efficacy to Cis-RT in OS, LRFS, and DMFS. Doc-RT resulted in fewer grade 3 or 4 hematological AEs. Low ITGB1 was associated with improved Doc-RT efficacy versus Cis-RT. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial directly compared Doc-RT with Cis-RT for high-risk postoperative OSCC patients, with comparable efficacy and less toxicity. ITGB1 merits further validation as a predictive biomarker to identify OSCC patients most likely to benefit from Doc-RT. Findings indicate docetaxel may be considered as a concurrent chemoradiation option in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . NCT02923258 (date of registration: October 4, 2016).
Asunto(s)
Cisplatino , Docetaxel , Integrina beta1 , Neoplasias de la Boca , Humanos , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Boca/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Boca/terapia , Anciano , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Objective:To analyze the differences in clinical outcomes and toxicities between postoperative radiotherapy alone and postoperative radiochemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), as well as the related factors affecting clinical prognosis of STS patients.Methods:Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with primary STS admitted to Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from May 2012 to May 2019 was performed, who received adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery, combined with or without postoperative chemotherapy. A total of 100 patients were enrolled and divided into postoperative radiotherapy group ( n=52) and postoperative radiochemotherapy group ( n=48). The median follow-up time was 65 months (24-124 months). The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities were recorded in two groups. The survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank test was used for univariate analysis, and Cox model was used for multivariate analysis. Results:In multivariate analysis, the maximum tumor diameter was an independent predictor of local tumor recurrence ( HR=4.80, 95% CI=1.16-19.85, P=0.031), distant metastasis ( HR=4.67, 95% CI=1.53-14.26, P=0.007) and OS ( HR=4.10, 95% CI=1.35-12.48, P=0.013). In addition, the degree of myelosuppression in patients in postoperative radiochemotherapy was significantly higher than that in their counterparts in postoperative radiotherapy group ( P<0.001). Conclusions:In the limited number of patients, radiochemotherapy has no advantages over radiotherapy alone in distant metastasis or survival rate. Besides, it increases toxicities, but the overall tolerability is favorable. It is necessary to conduct prospective randomized studies in a large population and subgroup analysis of histological subtypes, aiming to obtain results with better reference value.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to determine whether patients with intermediate-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can benefit from postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT). METHODS: Patients without extracapsular extension (ECE) or positive margins (PMs) who received POCRT or postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) at our center were retrospectively (December 2009 to October 2018) included for analysis, in particular, using a propensity score-matching method. RESULTS: After matching, 264 patients were enrolled, including 142 (41.2%) patients with pT3-4, 136 (38.3%) patients with pN2-3, 68 (21.1%) patients with perineural invasion, and 45 (12.8%) patients with lymphatic/vascular space invasion. With a median follow-up of 52 months, 3-year overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 72.4%, 79.3%, 83.5% and 62.5%, respectively. pN2-3 was an independent risk factor for OS (p < 0.001), DFS (p < 0.001), LRFS (p < 0.001) and DMFS (p = 0.002), while pT3-4 was a poor prognostic factor for DMFS (p = 0.005). Overall, patients receiving POCRT had no significant differences from those receiving PORT in OS (p = 0.062), DFS (p = 0.288), LRFS (p = 0.076) or DMFS (p = 0.692). But notably, patients with pN2-3 achieved better outcomes from POCRT than PORT in 3-year OS (p = 0.050, 63.9% vs. 47.9%) and LRFS (p = 0.019, 74.6% vs. 54.9%). And patients with pT3-4 also had higher 3-year LRFS (p = 0.014, 88.5% vs. 69.1%) if receiving POCRT. CONCLUSIONS: Among all intermediate-risk pathological features, pN2-3 and pT3-4 were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for patients with HNSCC without PMs or ECE. POCRT can improve the survival outcomes of patients with pN2-3 or pT3-4.
Asunto(s)
Extensión Extranodal , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Puntaje de Propensión , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in gastric cancer inevitably results in an unintentional spleen radiation dose. We aimed to determine the association between the spleen radiation dose and the observed severity of lymphopenia which may affect the clinical outcomes (survival time and infection risk). Methods: Patients who received adjuvant CRT for gastric cancer between January 2015 and December 2020 were analyzed. The splenic dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were reported as mean splenic dose (MSD) and percentage of splenic volume receiving at least × Gray (Gy). Peripheral blood counts were recorded pre- and post-CRT. The development of severe (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, grade ≥ 3) post-CRT lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] < 0.5 K/µL) was assessed by multivariable logistic regression using patient and dosimetric factors. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence of infectious events were estimated and analyzed using the Cox model or competing risk analysis. Results: Eighty-four patients with a median follow-up duration of 42 months were analyzed. Pre- and post-CRT median ALC values were 1.8 K/µL (0.9-3.1 K/µL) and 0.9 K/µL (0.0-4.9 K/µL), respectively (P < 0.001). MSD > 40 Gy (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.26; P = 0.041), sex (OR for male to female, 0.25; 95 % CI, 0.09-0.70; P = 0.008), and baseline absolute neutrophil count (OR per 1 unit increase, 1.61; 95 % CI, 1.02-2.58; P = 0.040) were associated with the development of severe post-CRT lymphopenia, which was a risk factor for poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.47; 95 % CI, 1.24-4.92; P = 0.010) and RFS (HR = 2.27; 95 % CI, 1.16-4.46; P = 0.017). The cumulative incidence of infections was higher among severe post-CRT lymphopenia patients (2.53, 95 % CI, 1.03-6.23, P = 0.043). Conclusion: High splenic radiation doses increase the odds of severe post-CRT lymphopenia, an independent predictor of lower OS and higher risks of recurrence and infections in gastric cancer patients receiving adjuvant CRT. Therefore, optimizing the splenic DVH parameters may decrease the risk of severe post-CRT lymphopenia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peri-operative chemo-radiotherapyplayed important rolein locally advanced gastric cancer. Whether preoperative strategy can improve the long-term prognosis compared with postoperative treatment is unclear. The study purpose to compare oncologic outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (pre-CRT) and postoperative chemo-radiotherapy (post-CRT). METHODS: From January 2009 to April 2019, 222 patients from 2 centers with stage T3/4 and/or N positive gastric cancer who received pre-CRT and post-CRT were included. After propensity score matching (PSM), comparisons of local regional control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test between pre- and post-CRT groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 30 months. 120 matched cases were generated for analysis. Three-year LC, DMFS, DFS and OS for pre- vs. post-CRT groups were 93.8% vs. 97.2% (p = 0.244), 78.7% vs. 65.7% (p = 0.017), 74.9% vs. 65.3% (p = 0.042) and 74.4% vs. 61.2% (p = 0.055), respectively. Pre-CRT were significantly associated with DFS in uni- and multi-variate analysis. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT showed advantages of oncologic outcome compared with postoperative CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01291407 , NCT03427684 and NCT04062058 , date of registration: Feb 8, 2011.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Gastrectomía , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Periodo Preoperatorio , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of preoperative and postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapies in the treatment of stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ A gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy with R0 resection. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients with stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ A gastric cancer who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy with R0 resection in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2012 to 2019. Among these patients, 25 received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (group A) and 22 received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (group B). The disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and adverse reactions were compared between both groups. The total dose, single dose, fractions, and duration of radiotherapy for all the patients were 45-50.4 Gy, 1.8-2.0 Gy, 25-28 fractions, and 5-6 weeks, respectively. The target areas were delineated in accordance with the ASTRO and EORTC-ROG guidelines. Results:There was no statistical difference in clinical baseline characteristics between the two groups. The median follow-up was 48 months (3-72 months). The 1-year OS of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (92% vs. 54.5%, χ2= 5.68, P = 0.017). The 3-year OS and DFS of the two groups were 56% vs. 40.9% ( P> 0.05) and 51.4% vs. 31.8% ( P> 0.05), respectively. There was no significant difference in the local recurrence rate between both groups ( P> 0.05), but the distant metastasis rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B ( χ2= 6.01, P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in digestive side effects and myelosuppression between both groups ( P> 0.05). Conclusions:For patients with stageⅢ-Ⅳ A gastric cancer after D2 lymphadenectomy with R0 resection, the preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapies yield similar efficacy and safety. However, compared to postoperative chemoradiotherapy, preoperative chemoradiotherapy improves the 1-year OS and reduces the distant metastasis rate.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with postoperative CRT regarding survival, local control, disease control, sphincter preservation, toxicity and also prognostic factors for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Records of 140 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative or postoperative CRT were analyzed retrospectively. We compared the treatment groups (preoperative vs postoperative) according to baseline characteristics (demographic and rectal cancer disease characteristics), and also carried out the survival analyses. RESULTS: From January 2010 to December 2019, 140 patients were included in the analysis, 65 received preoperative treatment and 75 postoperative treatment. There was no difference in survival, recurrence or distant metastasis rate in both treatment groups. The ratios of the failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy (32% vs 4.6%) and acute grade 3-4 toxicity (32% vs 6.2%) were higher in the postoperative group (p < 0.001). In lower located tumors (≤5 cm from anal verge) the ratio of the sphincter preserving in the preoperative group was 60.7% (n = 17/28), and was 16.6% (n = 3/18) in the postoperative group (Yates χ2 = 5.829, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference in recurrence and survival rate. Preoperative CRT is the preferred treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, given that it is associated with a superior overall treatment compliance rate, reduced toxicity, and an increased rate of sphincter preservation in low-lying tumors, but not for overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pronóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The standard approaches for resectable stomach cancer are postoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCR) or perioperative chemotherapy (PC). Limited evidence is available regarding the superiority of one of the two approaches. We aimed to compare the survival of patients with operable stomach cancer who were treated with PC or PCR. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with operable stomach cancer diagnosed between 2005-2015 in the province of Saskatchewan were identified and, based on type of treatment, were placed into PCR and PC groups. A Cox proportional multivariate analysis was performed to assess independent prognostic variables, including survival advantage of PC over PCR. RESULTS: A total of 88 eligible patients with a median age of 66 (56-71) and a male to female ratio of 1:0.44 were identified. Seventy-three (83%) patients had pathologically node positive disease. Sixty-seven (76%) patients received PCR, while 21 (24%) patients received PC. The median overall survival of the whole group was 34 months, with 38 months (95% CI 24.6-51.3) in the PCR group vs. 30 months (14.3-45.7) in the PC group (p = 0.29). Median relapse-free survival was 34 months (20.7-47.3) in the PCR group vs. 23 months (6.7-39.3) in the PC group (p = 0.20). Toxicities were comparable. On multivariate analysis, T ≥ 3 tumor (HR, 3.57 (1.39-8.56)), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (LNR) > 2.8 (HR, 1.85 (1.05-3.25)), and positive resection margins (HR, 1.89 (1.06-3.37)) were independently correlated with inferior survival. CONCLUSIONS: This well-designed population based cohort study suggests a lack of survival benefit of PC over PCR. Both treatment options remain viable approaches for resectable stomach cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Quimioradioterapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Saskatchewan/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility in routine practice of postoperative chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) at high risk of recurrence. METHOD: A single-center retrospective study recruited all patients receiving postoperative cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for HNSCC at high risk of recurrence. The main endpoints were the rate of complete postoperative chemoradiotherapy and the impact of various clinical factors. Secondary endpoints comprised the impact of completion of therapy on survival and on acute and late toxicity. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were included. 24.5% showed severe comorbidity. Chemoradiotherapy was complete in 61 patients (57.5%). Radiation therapy was interrupted for >3 days in 16 patients (15.1%). The 3rd concomitant cisplatin course could not be implemented in 34 patients (32.1%). Low pre-treatment glomerular filtration rate was significantly associated (p=0.003) with treatment interruption; >5% weight-loss during treatment showed suggestive association (p=0.026). Completion of treatment was not associated with any significant difference in overall survival (p=0.441) or progression-free survival (p=0.81). 14.9% of patients showed post-treatment kidney failure; there were 10 cases of osteoradionecrosis (9.4%). CONCLUSION: The rate of complete postoperative chemoradiotherapy was comparable to that reported in clinical trials, despite frequent comorbidity and poor nutritional status. Early nutritional support is a key factor for treatment under optimal conditions.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioradioterapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared the efficacy and side effect profile between postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in stage II or stage III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients who underwent curative (R0) esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 272 TESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy from 2007 to 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. All cases were pathologically confirmed with stage II or III disease and 148 patients received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while the remaining 124 patients received postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone. RESULTS: In CRT and RT groups, the three-year overall survival rates were 51.3 versus 31.5% (P < 0.01) and the median overall survival (OS) was 39 months (95% CI, 31.6 to 46.3 months) and 30 months (95% CI, 21.0 to 38.9 months), respectively (P = 0.213). Three-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) were 30.5% versus 15.9% (P = 0.008), while the median DFS times were 26 months (95% CI, 17.7 to 34.3 months) and 19 months (95% CI, 16.4 to 21.6 months), respectively (P = 0.156). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition) stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, while the N stage was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative chemoradiotherapy led to one- and three-year overall survival benefits along with an obvious increase in treatment side effects for stage II to III TESCC patients, with no further improvement in five-year survival. However, the chemoradiotherapy benefits mainly favor stage III,number of resected lymph nodes less than 15, younger (less than 60 years old) and smoking patients.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/mortalidad , Radioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal therapeutic strategy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) primarily treated by surgery remains unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of postoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy on survival in this population. METHODS: The study included a total of 228 consecutive patients who underwent radical esophagectomy and were confirmed to have stage pT3-4 or pN+ ESCC from September 2011 to September 2017 at our institution. All patients received postoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent or sequential chemotherapy after esophagectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the survival of patients with postoperative radiotherapy, postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 52 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 63.7-76.7%] and 62.2% (95% CI, 54.6-69.8%), respectively. The disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 3 and 5 years were 65.2% (95% CI, 58.7-71.7%) and 55.2% (95% CI, 47.6-62.8%), respectively. The 3- and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 65.1% (95% CI, 58.4-71.8%) and 55.5% (95% CI, 47.7-63.3%). Of the 228 patients, 38 (16.7%) had distant metastases. Subgroup analysis showed that being male and having a higher T stage were independent poor prognostic factors for OS and DFS in patients with pN+ or stage III + IVA ESCC. The results also showed that in patients with stage III + IVA ESCC, the DFS of the patients in the concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) group was improved compared with that in the no CCT group [hazard ratio (HR), 0.551; 95% CI, 0.323-0.938; P=0.028]. Multivariate analysis showed that sequential chemoradiotherapy was associated with poor LRFS (HR, 2.312; 95% CI, 1.078-4.959; P=0.031), especially in stage T3-4 patients, and it was also related to the poor DFS (HR, 1.781; 95% CI, 1.086-2.921; P=0.022) in patients with stage T3-4 ESCC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced ESCC, those who underwent sequential chemoradiotherapy had a worse LRFS. Postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy was the most effective adjuvant therapy for resected stage III-IVA ESCC. In addition, being male, having a higher T stage, and being node-positive were independent poor prognostic factors for OS and DFS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/radioterapia , Humanos , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) following surgery in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with N2 lymph node metastasis (N2-NSCLC). METHODS: The clinical data of patients with N2-NSCLC treated with POCRT or postoperative chemotherapy (pCT) alone were retrospectively collected and reviewed. The overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors significantly associated with survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics and OS was compared after matching. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2014, a total of 175 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 60 of whom were treated with POCRT, while 115 were administered pCT. The 1, 3 and 5-year OS rates in the POCRT and pCT groups were 98.3 vs. 86.1%, 71.7 vs. 53.0% and 45.7 vs. 39.0%, respectively (P = 0.019). Compared with pCT, POCRT improved OS in patients with squamous cell subtype (P = 0.010), no lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.006), pN2a (P = 0.006) or total number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤7 (P = 0.016). After PSM, these survival differences between POCRT and pCT remained significant in patients with squamous cell lung cancer (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: POCRT following complete resection may be beneficial for patients with squamous cell lung cancer, particularly those with limited nodal involvement.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) dissection in the surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2016, 98 previously untreated patients with pathological diagnosed hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma underwent total pharyngolaryngectomy and bilateral neck dissection at Kobe University Hospital. Bilateral dissection of RPLN was simultaneously performed in all patients. Pharynx was reconstructed with free jejunal transfer in 94 patients and primarily closed in 4 patients. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy was performed in patients with high risk factors including metastasis to RPLN, multiple lymph node metastasis, extranodal invasion, and/or positive/close surgical margins. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 25 months ranging from 1 to 105 months. RPLN adenopathy was preoperatively identified in 9 patients in FDG-positron emission tomography. All of them had pathologically diagnosed RPLN metastases, which had been controlled in all patients during the observation periods. Among the other 89 patients, 7 patients had RPLN metastasis. The 2-year overall survival rates of the patients with and without RPLN metastasis were 65.7% and 69.8% (P = .61), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, patients with RPLN metastasis showed equally favorable oncological outcome compared with patients without RPLN metastasis. At least, ipsilateral RPLN dissection should be considered in the surgical treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal cancer and multiple neck lymph node metastasis regardless of primary subsite.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Faringectomía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección del Cuello , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To compare the impact of adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (ACRT) versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) alone on recurrence and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing upfront curative resection. Prospective observational review of colorectal database at Tata Memorial Hospital from July 2010 to March 2015 identified 84 patients who underwent upfront curative resection for stage II or III rectal cancer. None of the patient received preoperative chemo-radiation. Of these, adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy was administered to 29 patients (ACRT group) and 55 patients received CAPEOX/FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT group) alone. At a median follow-up of 20 months, there were 10 recurrences (3 local recurrence) in the ACRT group and 15 (2 local recurrence) in ACT group. The estimated disease-free survival at 3 years in the ACRT group was 62.7% and in ACT group was 49.7% (p = 0.417) with an estimated 3-year overall survival of 74 and 78% in the ACRT and ACT group, respectively (p = 0.241). Subgroup analysis was performed after risk stratifying prognostic features (pT4, pN2, poor differentiation, involved resection margin). Our study does not show any benefit of ACRT over ACT on local control, disease-free and overall survival after upfront rectal cancer resection for low-risk stage II-III. In the subgroup analysis, local recurrence did not occur in patients who did not have poor prognostic features irrespective whether they received ACRT or ACT. Adjuvant chemo-radiation can be avoided in low-risk stage II-III rectal cancer after upfront resection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves outcomes for younger adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and positive margins or extranodal extension (ENE), but its benefit for older adults is not well established. METHODS: Patients from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) with HNSCC undergoing curative-intent resection, neck dissection, and postoperative radiation with positive margins or ENE were identified. RESULTS: This analysis included 1199 patients aged ≥ 70 years with median follow-up of 42.6 months. Postoperative concurrent CRT was associated with improved overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.752; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.638-0.886) compared to radiation alone in multivariable analysis. Three-year OS was 52.4% with CRT versus 43.4% with radiation (P = .012) in propensity-score matched cohorts. The survival impact of CRT varied by N classification (P = .002 for interaction), with benefit seen only in those with N2 to N3 disease. CONCLUSION: Postoperative concurrent CRT may benefit older patients with HNSCC with positive margins or ENE, particularly those with higher nodal burden.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Disección del Cuello , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy or postoperative adjutant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 76 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer from 2011 to 2016 in Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analysed.A total of 30 cases received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (group A),5 of them received concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with bevacizumab target treatment.The other 46 cases (group B) were given post-operative adjutant chemoradiotherapy.Both group A and group B were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).The chemoradiotherapy regime was as follows:the median of target volume dose was 50.4 Gy (45.0-55.8 Gy);the median of chemotherapy sessions was 26 times (24-28 times).Capecitabine tablets (825 mg/m2,twice a day) were also given on the date of chemotherapy.The clinical data and follow-up results of all patients were compared between the two groups.Results The five-year disease free survival rates of group A and group B were 66.7％ and 57.7％,respectively;and the five-year overall survival rates of group A and group B were 81.8％ and 73.0％,respectively,no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (P=0.599,0.489).The anus-preserving rates of patients with tumor below peritoneal reflection in group A and group B were 56.52％ and 25.00％,there was statistically significant difference (P=0.045).In the group A,86.6 ％ patients resulted in down-staging,including 3 cases with complete pathologic response.Conclusion Preoperative chemotherapy could down tumor stage and improve rates of anal preservation and local control without increasing possibility of postoperative complications.Preoperative chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab target treatment may be more effective in lowering tumor stage.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the efficacy of trimodality therapy and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) alone in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).Methods A total of 124 cases with locally advanced resectable esophageal SCC were retrospectively analyzed and classified into 2 groups.Fifty-four cases in trimodality group were treated with surgery and preoperative chemoradiation,while 70 cases in CRT alone group only received radiation and chemotherapy.Local tumor control,3-year survival and treatment-related mortality were assessed.Results The local recurrent rate of the resected patients was 18.5％ in trimodality group and 35.7％ in CRT alone group,respectively(x2 =4.445,P ＜ 0.05).The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 65.3％ (95％ CI 50.7-80.5) in trimodality group and31.9％ (95％CI 19.6-44.2) in CRT alone group (P＜0.05),while the overall survival (OS) 66.3％ (95％ CI43.0-89.6) and 34.4％ (95％ CI 21.1-47.7),respectively(P ＜ 0.05).Treatment-related mortality was 1.9％ in trimodality group and 2.9％ in CRT alone group (P ＞ 0.05).For CRT alone group,the sub-group analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the 3-year OS between patients who received 50-50.4 Gy and those who received the dose over 50.4 Gy (39.9％ 95％ CI 18.5-61.3 vs.31.5％ 95％ CI 14.8-48.2,P ＞0.05).Conclusions Compared with CRT alone,trimodality therapy showed the superior local control,PFS and OS,with similar treatment-related mortality in the treatment of patients with SCC of esophagus.The role of surgery could not be replaced by CRT alone even with the augment of radiation dose.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinona of the upper thoracic esophagus after radical resection with and without postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT).Methods From January 2007 to December 2011,168 patients with upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma who were treated in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were retrospectively included in this study.According to the different treatment method,they were divided into simple surgery group (86 cases) and POCRT group (82 cases) respectively.Based on SPSS statistical software,the group data composition,prognostic analysis and multivariate prognostic analysis were performed by x2 test,Log-rank method and Cox regression model,respectively.Results The 1,3,5 year-survival rate,recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate were 83.9％,52.4％,43.5％,26.5％,40.8％,43.4％ and 5.3％,11.4％,16.9％,respectively.The result of multivariate analysis showed that gender,T stage,N stage and treatment method were independent prognostic factors of overall survival (P =0.020,0.008,0.005,0.000);N staging and treatment method were the independent prognostic factors of local/regional recurrence (P =0.001,0.003);differentiation and T staging were the independent prognostic factors of distant metastasis (P =0.045,0.020).The intrathoracic regional recurrence rate of operation only group and POCRT group patients were 44.2％ (38/86) and 29.3％ (24/82) respectively,where the difference was statistically significant (x2 =7.110,P ＜ 0.05).The rate of metastasis were 19.8％ (17/86) and 13.4％ (11/82) respectively without significant difference (P ＞0.05).Conclusions The recurrence rate of patients with upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical resection was still high.Postoperative chemoradiotherapy can improve the overall survival rate and reduce the recurrence rate,but whether it can reduce the patient's distant metastasis rate needs further study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adaptive radiotherapy is being used in few institutions in patients with head and neck cancer having bulky disease using periodic computed tomography imaging accounting for volumetric changes in tumor volume and/or weight loss. Limited data are available on ART in the postoperative setting. We aim to identify parameters that would predict the need for ART in patients with head and neck cancer and whether ART should be applied in postoperative setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with stage III-IV head and neck cancer were prospectively accrued. A computed tomography simulation was done prior to treatment and repeated at weeks 3 and 6 of concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The final plan was coregistered with the subsequent computed tomography images, and dosimetric/volumetric changes at weeks 1 (baseline), 3, and 6 were quantified in high-risk clinical target volumes, low-risk clinical target volumes , right parotid , left parotid , and spinal cord . An event to trigger ART was defined as spinal cord maximum dose >45 Gy, parotid mean dose >26 Gy, and clinical target volume coverage <95%. RESULTS: Comparing the 2 groups, the proportion of patients with at least 1 event triggering ART was higher in bulky disease than in postoperative group: 72.7% versus 18.2% (P = .03) overall; 54.6% versus 1.8% (P = .064) at week 3; and 63.6% versus 18.2% (P = .081) at week 6. In the bulky disease group, 8 of 11 patients had events at week 3 and/or 6 as follows: overdose in spinal cord (n = 2), right parotid (n = 3), left parotid (n = 5), coverage < 95% seen in low-risk clinical target volumes (n = 3), and high-risk clinical target volumes (n = 5). In the postoperative group, 2 of 11 patients had events: spinal cord (n = 1) and low-risk clinical target volume (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the need for ART in patients with head and neck cancer having bulky disease due to target under dosing and/or spinal cord/parotids overdosing in weeks 3 and 6. In contrast, the benefit of ART in postoperative patients is less clear.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both perioperative chemotherapy (PECT) and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) have a significant survival advantage over surgery alone for the treatment of patients with gastric cancer. However, to the best of our knowledge, these regimens have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial. The purpose of the current observational study was to compare overall survival among patients receiving PECT versus POCRT for the treatment of gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Patients with resected clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage II or III adenocarcinomas of the stomach or GEJ from 2004 through 2013 were identified utilizing the National Cancer Data Base. Hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence intervals, and P values were computed using a Cox proportional hazards procedure. Multivariable models were adjusted for treatment regimen, age, race, ethnicity, tumor size, TNM stage, Charlson comorbidity index, and tumor grade. RESULTS: Patients receiving PECT had a 72% survival advantage compared with those treated with POCRT (5058 patients; HR, 0.58 [adjusted P<.0001]). The 5-year actuarial survival rate for PECT was 44% compared with 38% for POCRT. A statistically significant survival advantage for PECT also was observed when the analysis was stratified by clinical stage of disease (stage II [3192 patients]: adjusted HR, 0.79 [P = .041]; and stage III [1866 patients]: adjusted HR, 0.49 [P<.0001]). This benefit was greatest among patients with lymph node-positive disease who converted to lymph node-negative status with PECT. CONCLUSIONS: In this large series of patients with stage II/III resected gastric/GEJ adenocarcinomas from >1500 American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities, patients receiving PECT were shown to survive longer than those receiving POCRT. Cancer 2017;123:2909-17. © 2017 American Cancer Society.