RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to report on the technical eligibility of patients previously treated for Stanford type A aorta dissection for endovascular aortic arch repair based on contemporary anatomic criteria for an arch inner-branched stent graft. METHODS: All patients treated for type A aorta dissection from 2004 to 2015 at a single aortic center were identified. Extent of repair and use of circulatory arrest were reported. Survival and reoperation were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and competing risk models. Anatomic assessment was performed using 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging software. Primary outcome was survival of 1 year or more and fulfillment of the arch inner-branched stent graft anatomic criteria. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included (158 DeBakey I, 32 DeBakey II, and 8 intramural hematoma). Mortality was 30 days (16.2%), 1 year (16.3%), and 10 years (45.0%). A total of 129 patients had imaging beyond 1 year (mean, 47.8 months), and 89 patients (69.0%) were eligible for arch inner-branched stent grafting. During follow-up, 19 patients (14.7%) met the threshold criteria for aortic arch treatment, of whom 14 (73.7%) would be considered eligible for arch inner-branched stent graft. Patients who underwent type A aorta dissection repair with circulatory arrest and no distal clamp were more often eligible for endovascular repair (88.8%) than those operated with a distal clamp (72.5%; P = .021). Among patients who did not meet the arch inner-branched stent graft anatomic criteria, the primary reasons were mechanical valve (40%) and insufficient proximal seal (30%). CONCLUSIONS: More than two-thirds of patients post-type A aorta dissection repair are technically eligible for endovascular arch inner-branched stent graft repair. The development of devices that can accommodate a mechanical aortic valve and a greater awareness of sufficient graft length would significantly increase availability.

Asunto(s)

Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Selección de Paciente , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to determine dental practitioners' opinions, techniques, and materials used for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) in Saudi Arabia. A comprehensive nationwide survey regarding treatment strategies of ETT, on the post types and material used for core foundations were distributed either by email or by hard copies to general dentists in different parts of Saudi Arabia (North, South, West, East, and Center). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the responses to the questions. A total of 164 participants were included in the survey: 72.6% of them were male, and 27.4% were female. 42.1% of the participants were Saudi dental practitioners, whereas 57.9% were non-Saudi dental practitioners. Out of the surveyed dentists, 52% consider post placement for almost every post-endodontic restoration of ETT. The majority of the dentists (54%) believe that a post strengthens ETT. Cast posts and cores were used by 55% of all the dentists, whereas 34% used prefabricated posts exclusively. Screw posts were the most popular prefabricated post type (47%). Composite resin (51%) was preferred for the core foundation, followed by glass ionomer cements (GICs) (26%). Amalgam was seldom used (0.5%). Posts were placed primarily with zinc phosphate cement (51%), followed by GIC (38%). Within the limitations of this survey-based investigation among dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia, it was concluded that the treatment strategies of ETT are in accordance with the current state of evidence-based knowledge.