RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only proven strategy to eradicate factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A (HA). AIM: To identify patients and treatment options with the highest chance of inhibitor eradication by primary ITI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the frame of the Italian ITI Registry, carried out from 1995 to 2015 (last follow-up 2018), 137 primary ITI courses in severe HA patients (90/137 with poor prognosis) were analysed for predictors of outcome (complete/partial response or failure). Sixty-six of them (48%) were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: ITI was successful in 91/137 patients (66.4%) and 70 (51.1%) achieved complete response within 11 months (median). Historical peak titres ≤200 BU/ml (P = .033), inhibitor titres ≤5 BU/ml at ITI start (P = .001), peak titres ≤100 BU/ml during ITI (P < .001) and missense mutations and small insertions/deletions of FVIII gene (P = .027) predicted complete inhibitor eradication. A score that considers the cumulative number of these variables predicted complete response with positive predictive values up to .81 at ITI start and .91 during ITI, respectively. Patients who had no bleeding (OR, 3.45, 95% CI: 1.4-8.6) nor other adverse events (OR 2.6, 95%CI: 1.3-5.3) during ITI had higher chances of complete response. During the 120-month follow-up (median), 2/70 patients who had achieved complete response relapsed (2.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This Registry, with a centralized review of outcomes, homogeneous data collection (half of which prospective) and long-term follow-up, provides insights for optimizing ITI, with a rationale for further studies in the currently evolving scenario of inhibitor management in HA patients.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Factor VIII , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia , Humanos , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While single embryo transfer (SET) is widely advocated, double embryo transfer (DET) remains preferable in clinical practice to improve IVF success rate, especially in poor prognosis patients with only poor quality embryos (PQEs) available in addition to one or no good quality embryos (GQEs). Furthermore, previous studies suggest PQE might adversely affect the implantation of a GQE when transferred together. This study aims to evaluate the effect of transferring an additional PQE with a GQE on the outcomes in poor prognosis patients. METHODS: A total of 5037 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles between January 2012 and May 2019 were included. Propensity score matching was applied to control for potential confounders, and we used generalized estimating equations (GEE) models to identify the association between the effect of an additional PQE and the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, transferring a PQE with GQE (Group GP) achieved significantly higher pregnancy rate (PR), live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) than GQE only (group G). The addition of a PQE increased LBR in patients aged 35 and over and in patients who received over 3 cycles of embryo transfer (ET) (48.1% vs 27.2%, OR:2.56, 95% CI: 1.3-5.03 and 46.6% vs 35.4%, OR:1.6, 95% CI: 1.09-2.35), but not in women under 35 and in women who received less than 3 cycles of ET (48.7% vs 43.9%, OR:1.22, 95% CI: 0.93-1.59 and 48.3% vs 41.4%, OR:1.33, 95% CI: 0.96-1.85). Group GP resulted in significantly higher MPR than group G irrespective of age and the number of previous IVF cycles. CONCLUSIONS: An additional PQE does not negatively affect the implantation potential of the co-transferred GQE. Nevertheless, the addition of a PQE contributes to both live birth and multiple birth in poor prognosis patients. Physicians should still balance the benefits and risks of DET.
Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión , Embrión de Mamíferos/citología , Infertilidad , Embarazo Múltiple , Adulto , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Transferencia de Embrión/normas , Transferencia de Embrión/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Infertilidad/terapia , Masculino , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Índice de Embarazo , Embarazo Múltiple/fisiología , Embarazo Múltiple/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Control de Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transferencia de un Solo Embrión/normas , Transferencia de un Solo Embrión/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented global situation. As assisted reproductive technology (ART) specialists, we should be cautious, carefully monitoring the situation while contributing by sharing novel evidence to counsel our patients, both pregnant women and would-be mothers. Time to egg collection and drop-out rates are critical parameters for scheduling treatments once the curve of infections has peaked and plateaued in each country. In order to reduce the values for these two parameters, infertile patients now require even more support from their IVF team: urgent oocyte collection for oncology patients must be guaranteed, and oocyte retrievals for women of advanced maternal age and/or reduced ovarian reserve cannot be postponed indefinitely. This document represents the position of the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR) in outlining ART priorities during and after this emergency.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad , Italia , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Recent evidence suggests that follicular development occurs in a wave-like model during the ovarian cycle, where up to three cohorts of follicles are recruited to complete folliculogenesis. This understanding overtakes the previous dogma stating that follicles grow only during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Therefore, in in vitro fertilization (IVF), novel protocols regarding ovarian stimulation have been theorized based on the use of gonadotrophins to prompt the growth of antral follicles at any stage of the menstrual cycle. These unconventional protocols for ovarian stimulation aim at a more efficient management of poor-prognosis patients, otherwise exposed to conflicting outcomes after conventional approaches. DuoStim appears among these unconventional stimulation protocols as one of the most promising. It combines two consecutive stimulations in the follicular and luteal phases of the same ovarian cycle, aimed at increasing the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos produced in the short time-frame. This protocol has been suggested for the treatment of all conditions requiring a maximal and urgent exploitation of the ovarian reserve, such as oncological patients and poor responders at an advanced maternal age. At present, data from independent studies have outlined the consistency and reproducibility of this approach, which might also reduce the drop-out between consecutive failed IVF cycles in poor-prognosis patients. However, the protocol must be standardized, and more robust studies and cost-benefit analyses are needed to highlight the true clinical pros and cons deriving from DuoStim implementation in IVF.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In RPA V-VI glioblastoma patients both hypofractionated radiotherapy and exclusive temozolomide can be used; the purpose of this trial is to compare these treatment regimens in terms of survival and quality of life. METHODS: Patients with histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma were randomized to hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT-30 Gy in 6 fractions) and exclusive chemotherapy (CHT-emozolomide 200 mg/m2/day 5 days every 28 days). Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated with Kaplan Maier curves and correlated with prognostic factors. Quality- adjusted survival (QaS) was evaluated according to the Murray model (Neurological Sign and Symptoms-NSS) RESULTS: From 2010 to 2015, 31 pts were enrolled (CHT: 17 pts; RT: 14pts). Four pts were excluded from the analysis. RPA VI (p = 0.048) and absence of MGMT methylation (p = 0.001) worsened OS significantly. Biopsy (p = 0.048), RPA class VI (p = 0.04) and chemotherapy (p = 0.007) worsened PFS. In the two arms the initial NSS scores were overlapping (CHT: 12.23 and RT: 12.30) and progressively decreased in both group and became significantly worse after 5 months in CHT arm (p = 0.05). Median QaS was 104 days and was significantly better in RT arm (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained are limited by the poor accrual. Both treatments were well tolerated. Patients in RT arm have a better PFS and QaS, without significant differences in OS. The deterioration of the NSS score would seem an important parameter and coincide with disease progression rather than with the toxicity of the treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Glioblastoma/patología , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Temozolomida/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Outcome measures of IVF success, which account for effectiveness of IVF and perinatal outcome risks, have recently been described. The association between number of embryos transferred in average and poor-prognosis IVF patients, and the chances of having good or poor IVF and perinatal outcomes, was investigated. Good IVF and perinatal outcome was defined as the birth of a live, term, normal-weight infant (≥2500 g). Poor IVF and perinatal outcome was defined as no live birth or birth of a very low weight neonate (<1500 g) or severe prematurity (birth at <32 weeks gestation). Each neonate was analysed as a separate outcome. A total of 713 IVF cycles in 504 average and poor-prognosis patients from January 2010 to December 2013 were identified. The odds of having good IVF and perinatal outcomes increased by 28% for each additional embryo transferred. The odds of poor IVF and perinatal outcome decreased by 32% with an additional embryo transferred. The likelihood of live birth with good perinatal outcome in average- and poor-prognosis patients after IVF increases with additional embryos being transferred. These data add to recently reported evidence in favour of multiple embryo transfer in older women and those with average or poor IVF prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Edad Materna , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Pronóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine live-birth rates (LBRs) at various ages in very poor prognosis patients, who are defined as poor responders under the Bologna criteria. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academically affiliated private fertility center. PATIENT(S): Among 483 patients, who under the Bologna criteria (three or fewer oocytes, >40 years of age, and/or antimüllerian hormone [AMH] <1.1 ng/mL [2/3 criteria minimum]) were poor responders, 278 (381 fresh IVF cycles) qualified for the study because they had at least one embryo on day 3 for transfer. INTERVENTION(S): IVF cycles in women with low functional ovarian reserve, involving androgen and CoQ10 supplementation and ovarian stimulation with daily gonadotropin dosages of 300-450 IU of FSH and 150 IU of hMG in microdose agonist cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Age-specific LBRs per ET. RESULT(S): Ages did not differ between nonelective (ne) single ET (SET), ne2-ET, and ne ≥ 3-ET cycles (41.3 ± 3.9, 41.7 ± 3.1, and 42.4 ± 2.1 years, respectively). Patients with neSETs demonstrated significantly lower AMH and higher FSH levels and required higher gonadotropin dosages than ne2-ET and ne ≥ 3-ET patients. LBRs declined with age. Above age 42, three or more embryos are required to achieve reasonable LBRs and two or more to avoid futility under American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines. CONCLUSION(S): Very poor prognosis patients can still achieve acceptable pregnancy rates at least till their mid-40s if they reach ET. The degree to which egg donation is emphasized as the only treatment option in such patients, therefore, requires reconsideration. Above age 42, at least two, and preferably three embryos, are however required to exceed futility, as defined by ASRM.