RESUMEN

What is this summary about? This summary describes the first analysis of the PERSEUS study, which looked at adults with multiple myeloma that had never been treated before, also called newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma is a type of cancer in the blood, specifically in plasma cells within the soft, spongy tissue in the center of most bones, called the bone marrow. Researchers wanted to see if adding daratumumab (D) to a standard treatment of three other medicines called VRd, which stands for bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d), could stop the multiple myeloma from getting worse and help participants live longer without multiple myeloma.Half of the participants were assigned to the treatment plan with daratumumab; they received D-VRd during initial treatment phases (induction and consolidation), followed by daratumumab as well as lenalidomide (D-R) in the maintenance phase. The other half of participants received treatment without daratumumab; they received VRd induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide alone (R) maintenance. In addition, all participants were able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant, a procedure used to further help reduce multiple myeloma.What were the results? At the time of this analysis of PERSEUS, about 4 years after participants started the study, participants who received D-VRd treatment followed by D-R maintenance had a better response to treatment (as measured by specific markers of multiple myeloma) and were more likely to be alive and free from their multiple myeloma getting worse in comparison to participants who received VRd followed by R maintenance. Side effects (unwanted or undesirable effects of treatment) in both treatment groups were in line with the known side effects of daratumumab and VRd.What do the results mean? The results of the PERSEUS study showed that including daratumumab in D-VRd induction/consolidation and D-R maintenance was better for treating multiple myeloma than the current standard VRd treatment followed by R maintenance alone in adults with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma who were also able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant. Of importance, there were no unexpected side effects in either group.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02874742 (GRIFFIN) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary outlines the findings from the ANANKE study on the treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) with benralizumab. SEA is an inflammatory disease of the lungs caused by eosinophils. Patients with SEA may experience asthma attacks (exacerbations) and decreased ability to breathe (lung function) despite taking medications. Benralizumab (Fasenra®) is a biologic therapy (a medicine produced using living cells) approved for the treatment of SEA.The ANANKE study was conducted in Italy and evaluated the characteristics of patients with SEA who received benralizumab as prescribed by their doctors. It also described the effects of benralizumab on participants in terms of frequency of exacerbations, lung function and overall control of asthma, and their need to take oral corticosteroids (OCS) to control symptoms. The effects of benralizumab have been observed in participants treated for: 1) an average of 10.3 months, and 2) up to 96 weeks (approximately 2 years). The effects were also compared between different groups: 1) participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and those without, and 2) participants who received other biologics before benralizumab (bio-experienced) and those who started with benralizumab as their first biologic (naïve). CRSwNP is an inflammatory condition that makes breathing even more difficult. WHAT WERE THE KEY FINDINGS?: Before receiving benralizumab, participants showed a high blood eosinophil count (the number of eosinophils in the bloodstream), frequent exacerbations, insufficient lung function, and poor disease control (symptom management). After 96 weeks, benralizumab almost eliminated exacerbations, improved lung function, reduced the use of OCS, and increased the control of SEA symptoms while lowering blood eosinophil count. Comparable effects were observed between participants with and without CRSwNP and between naïve and bio-experienced participants. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: The ANANKE study showed that participants had frequent exacerbations and were characterized by eosinophilic inflammation before starting benralizumab. Overall, benralizumab improved the control of the disease for up to 2 years and induced similar beneficial effects regardless of the presence of CRSwNP and the use of previous biologics. These findings highlight the long-lasting and broad action of benralizumab.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04272463 (ANANKE) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of an article about an ongoing study called the BICSTaR study.The BICSTaR study includes people with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) who are taking a medicine called bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (shortened to B/F/TAF). B/F/TAF is a single tablet that contains 3 different drugs for the treatment of HIV. The drugs work together to reduce the levels of HIV so that the virus can no longer be detected by a blood test.People taking part in the study are adults with HIV living in Europe, Canada, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. People take 1 tablet of B/F/TAF once a day. They are either taking B/F/TAF as their first treatment for HIV, or they have switched to B/F/TAF from another HIV treatment.Researchers looked at how well B/F/TAF worked and how safe it was in people who took B/F/TAF for a year. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: Researchers found that B/F/TAF worked well in almost all people in the study by reducing levels of HIV in the blood. The virus could not be found in the blood of more than 9 out of 10 (94%) people who were taking B/F/TAF as their first HIV medicine and more than 9 out of 10 people (97%) who had taken another HIV medicine before starting B/F/TAF. This is known as having an 'undetectable viral load' and is a major goal for HIV treatment success. Researchers did not find any evidence of HIV developing resistance to B/F/TAF, which might stop B/F/TAF from working properly.Around 1 out of 10 people (13%) had side effects (any unwanted sign or symptom that people have when taking a medicine that researchers think might be caused by the medicine) that might have been caused by B/F/TAF. Most of these side effects were not classified as serious. Less than 1 out of 100 (0.1%) people had serious side effects that might have been caused by B/F/TAF. Only 6 out of 100 people stopped taking B/F/TAF due to side effects caused by B/F/TAF. As a result, more than 9 out of 10 people (95%) took B/F/TAF for at least 1 year. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: B/F/TAF worked well in people with HIV in this study. Most people (around 9 out of 10) did not have any side effects.

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a plain-language summary of an article that reported on two studies of the medication bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (shortened to B/F/TAF). B/F/TAF is a single pill containing three different drugs used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (known as HIV). The drugs work together to lower the levels of HIV (called viral load) in the body and make the virus undetectable in the blood. Researchers measured whether B/F/TAF was safe and effective when taken over 5 years in over 400 people in 10 countries who had never taken HIV medication before. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: After 5 years, almost all (99%) of the people who took B/F/TAF had an undetectable viral load. This does not mean that they were cured, but that the levels of HIV were so low that the tests used by researchers could not detect the virus in the blood. CD4 is a type of immune system cell. HIV causes CD4 cell numbers to decrease. On average, the number of CD4 cells increased by more than 300 cells per microliter (cells/µL) of blood over 5 years. This means that the immune system was improving. HIV is able to change its genes to escape the effects of the drugs. This is known as HIV resistance to treatment. Nine people had a viral load high enough to suggest that the drugs might not be working, but no resistance to B/F/TAF was seen. Some people (less than one in three) experienced medical problems thought to be linked to B/F/TAF treatment, known as side effects. The most common side effects were headache, diarrhea, nausea, tiredness (fatigue), dizziness, and difficulty falling or staying asleep (insomnia). On average, people's body weight increased by 3 kg in the first year of taking B/F/TAF. This might be because their general health improved after starting HIV treatment. Weight gained after that time was similar to the level of weight gain expected in the general population. Very few people (less than 1 in 100) stopped taking B/F/TAF because of side effects thought to have been caused by B/F/TAF. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: B/F/TAF was effective at treating HIV in people who had never taken HIV medication before. Most (70%) people were still taking B/F/TAF after 5 years.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02607930 (Study 1489); NCT02607956 (Study 1490) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a phase 3 clinical trial called CARTITUDE-4. This trial compared the anti-cancer therapy ciltacabtagene autoleucel (or cilta-cel) with standard therapies in people who have multiple myeloma, a cancer that affects specific kinds of blood cells called plasma cells. The people in the study had been treated with 1 to 3 previous treatments for multiple myeloma, including a common anti-myeloma treatment called lenalidomide, but their multiple myeloma did not get better. HOW WAS THE STUDY IN THIS SUMMARY CONDUCTED?: About half of the 419 participants in this study received cilta-cel, while the other half received standard therapies, or therapies that are commonly used to treat multiple myeloma. Participants who received cilta-cel had a type of immune cell called T cells collected from their blood and genetically modified to recognize a specific protein found on myeloma cells. These modified T cells, which comprise cilta-cel, were then infused back into the bloodstream. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY?: After approximately 1 year in the study, more participants were alive without their cancer getting worse in the cilta-cel group (76%) than in the standard therapies group (49%). The most common side effects in both groups were infections and low blood cell counts. Cytokine release syndrome (a potentially serious side effect caused by overactivation of the immune system) was common but mostly mild. Neurotoxicities (including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, which can cause symptoms such as headaches, changes in consciousness, and difficulty with memory, attention, speaking, or understanding others) were less common and were reported in 20.5% of participants treated with cilta-cel. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: In CARTITUDE-4, more participants treated with cilta-cel showed improvements and were alive with control of their disease 12 months after receiving cilta-cel compared with participants who received standard therapies.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04181827 (CARTITUDE-4) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

RESUMEN

What is this summary about? This is a plain language summary of a research study called ALPINE. The study involved people who had been diagnosed with, and previously treated at least once for, relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).Lymphocytes help to find and fight off viruses and infections in the body, but when someone has CLL or SLL, the body creates abnormal lymphocytes, leaving the patient with a weakened immune system and susceptible to illness. In CLL, these lymphocytes are in the bone marrow and bloodstream, whereas for SLL, they are mostly found in the lymph nodes, such as those in the neck.How was the research done? The ALPINE study was designed to directly compare the cancer-fighting effects and side effects of zanubrutinib and ibrutinib as treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL.What were the results? After 30 months, zanubrutinib was more effective than ibrutinib at reducing and keeping the cancer from coming back. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03734016 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a plain language summary of a published article in the journal Sleep. Narcolepsy is a sleep condition that has 2 different subtypes: narcolepsy type 1 and narcolepsy type 2. These are called NT1 and NT2 for short. Sodium oxybate (SXB) is approved to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy. People with NT1 and NT2 both have EDS, but cataplexy is only present in people with NT1. Limited information is available about how SXB works in people with NT2. This is because previous trials have included only people with NT1 or people with unspecified narcolepsy. For more than 20 years, the only available formulation of this medicine had to be given twice during the night. Many people with narcolepsy find that chronically waking up in the middle of the night for a second dose of SXB is disruptive to themselves or others in their household. People have also reported sleeping through alarm clocks, missing their second dose, and feeling worse the next day. Some people have accidentally taken the second dose too early, putting them at risk for serious adverse effects. These adverse effects may include slow breathing, low blood pressure, or sedation. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a medicine called LUMRYZ™ (sodium oxybate) for extended-release oral suspension in May 2023. LUMRYZ is a once-nightly formulation of SXB (ON-SXB for short) and is taken as a single dose before bedtime. This medicine treats EDS and muscle weakness (also known as cataplexy) in people with narcolepsy. A clinical trial called REST-ON studied ON-SXB to find out if it was better at treating narcolepsy symptoms than a medicine with no active ingredients (placebo). This summary describes a study that tested whether ON-SXB was better than placebo at treating narcolepsy symptoms in people with NT1 or NT2. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: This study showed that compared to people who took placebo, people who took ON-SXB were able to stay awake longer during the day, felt less sleepy during the daytime, had less cataplexy, and had more improvements in their symptoms overall than people who took placebo. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: ON-SXB has been proven effective for people with NT1 or NT2. Unlike prior formulations of SXB, ON-SXB is taken once at bedtime, without requiring waking up in the middle of the night for a second dose.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Talquetamab is the first-in-class GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Given limited real-world data, this study was conducted with US healthcare providers (HCPs) to understand real-world talquetamab dosing and symptom management. METHODS: In February/March 2024, individual in-depth interviews (IDIs; n = 10) were conducted with HCPs administering talquetamab in real-world settings. A subsequent expert panel (n = 6) further discussed current practices. RESULTS: The IDIs reported a variety of settings for step-up dosing (SUD), including inpatient (n = 5), outpatient (n = 3), and hybrid models (n = 2), with a trend toward shorter SUD length to reduce healthcare resource utilization. Most HCPs used a biweekly (Q2W) schedule in SUD (n = 7) and treatment phases (n = 8). Six participants explored reducing dose frequency to every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients following positive disease response to treatment, considering patient convenience and relieving GPRC5D-related symptoms. Panelists recommended symptom management and prophylactic strategies, such as dexamethasone and nystatin mouthwash or zinc and vitamin B complex for oral symptoms, and topical steroids and cosmetic products for skin and nail symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study outlines current real-world practices for talquetamab. Findings indicate variation in the SUD care setting. The 0.8 mg/kg Q2W dosing schedule was most common, although switching to Q4W is a real-world symptom management strategy for some patients with responses to therapy. GPRC5D-related symptom management approaches are evolving; prophylactic use of dexamethasone and nystatin mouthwash or zinc and vitamin B complex may be effective strategies to alleviate oral symptoms. Further real-world evidence is needed to inform optimal dosing schedules while mitigating symptom impact.

Talquetamab is a new treatment that was approved in the United States in 2023 for a type of blood cancer called multiple myeloma. This drug is administered at one of two doses, each of which includes a defined step-up dosing schedule where patients first receive smaller amounts of the drug to help avoid serious side effects. Because talquetamab is new and associated with treatment-related symptoms not normally seen with other multiple myeloma treatments, doctors and patients need more guidance on drug administration and symptom management. In this study, we describe findings from interviews and an expert panel discussion with healthcare professionals who have experience using talquetamab. This study found that most healthcare professionals administered step-up dosing with patients staying overnight in the hospital, while other providers administered these doses during outpatient visits. Most providers administered talquetamab once every 2 weeks after utilizing the associated step-up dosing schedule. Additionally, healthcare providers described transitioning some patients, who had responded positively to treatment, to a less frequent dosing schedule of once per month to help reduce the effect of treatment-related symptoms. Participants in the expert panel described approaches for managing or preventing these symptoms, such as dexamethasone and nystatin mouthwashes or zinc and vitamin B complex for oral symptoms, and topical steroids and cosmetic products for skin and nail symptoms. In summary, this study provides valuable real-world information from healthcare providers who have experience treating patients with multiple myeloma with talquetamab.

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a paper that describes the results of the SPARTAN and TITAN studies, which looked at whether a treatment called apalutamide can help treat individuals with advanced prostate cancer.The SPARTAN study included 1207 participants with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (or nmCRPC). The TITAN study included 1052 participants with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (or mCSPC). Treatment with apalutamide was compared with treatment with placebo. In both studies, all participants were also given androgen deprivation therapy (or ADT), which has been used for many years for the treatment of prostate cancer.The results showed that treatment with apalutamide plus ADT increased participants' survival time while their health-related quality of life stayed the same, compared with placebo plus ADT. Also, apalutamide plus ADT increased the length of time that the cancer did not spread to other parts of the body (metastasize) or did not continue to grow. In both studies, treatment with apalutamide plus ADT was associated with a deep decline in blood prostate-specific antigen (or PSA) levels (called a deep PSA decline). This additional analysis of the SPARTAN and TITAN studies was performed to understand whether the deep PSA decline in participants who received apalutamide plus ADT was linked to their overall health-related quality of life. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF THE ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS?: In participants who received apalutamide plus ADT, those who achieved a deep PSA decline after the start of treatment had a greater chance that their health-related quality of life would remain stable. When participants achieved a deep PSA decline at 3 months after the start of treatment, the benefit to their health-related quality of life, including physical wellbeing, was even greater. WHAT DO THESE RESULTS MEAN FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER?: For individuals with advanced prostate cancer, it is important to monitor both PSA decline and any impacts on health-related quality of life. These results will help doctors and other healthcare professionals have a better understanding of patients' cancer experience and the impact of their treatment.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01946204 (SPARTAN) and, NCT02489318 (TITAN) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

RESUMEN

What is this summary about? This is a plain language summary of a late-stage clinical trial called IMPALA, originally reported in The New England Journal of Medicine. The IMPALA trial studied a drug called molgramostim nebulizer solution (molgramostim) to see how well it worked and how safe it was in patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP). Normally, tiny air sacs (alveoli) in the lungs are covered by a thin layer of an oily substance called surfactant that helps to keep them open. In aPAP, surfactant builds up and clogs alveoli making it difficult to breathe. Inhaled molgramostim helps to reduce the amount of surfactant clogging the alveoli.What were the results of the trial? After 24 weeks of treatment, patients who received molgramostim every day had better oxygen transfer into blood than patients who received an inactive substance (placebo). Patients' sense of well-being and quality of life was improved more with daily molgramostim than placebo. The amount of surfactant in the lungs measured using scans and the number of whole-lung lavages (lung washes) patients required were lower with daily molgramostim than placebo. The number of medical problems (adverse events) was similar in patients who received molgramostim and placebo except for chest pain, which was more common with molgramostim.What do the results of the trial mean? The IMPALA trial demonstrated that molgramostim is a promising treatment option for people with aPAP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary describes how researchers worked with people with multiple sclerosis (MS), neurologists and measurement experts to create an easy-to-use questionnaire to measure the physical function of people with MS. This questionnaire covers topics that are relevant and important to people with MS and their doctors.The ability to do what you want to do, when you want to do it, is one of the most important concerns for people with MS. This questionnaire could help doctors to record and manage how much MS affects people's lives.MS can bring a range of challenging symptoms such as 'brain fog', tiredness, and problems with movement and balance. Many of these symptoms can make day-to-day activities, like working, very difficult for people with MS. Doctors currently use examinations like the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the MS Functional Composite (MSFC), but these do not fully consider what is important to people living with MS. A questionnaire that specifically measures physical functioning of people with MS could help doctors and people with MS to better understand, communicate and manage the physical effects of MS. In this study, people with MS were asked to help create a questionnaire about physical function that reflects topics that are important to them. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: The PROMIS®nq physical function - Multiple Sclerosis 15a (the PROMIS® PF MS questionnaire) was successfully created with the help of people with MS. People with MS thought that the PROMIS® PF MS questionnaire covered issues important to their physical function. Scores were in line with results of other physical symptom measurement scales like the EDSS. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The PROMIS® PF MS questionnaire could be used to meaningfully record physical function among people with MS.

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This article summarizes the most recent results of the monarchE study. This study was completed in participants with a type of breast cancer called HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer. In this study, abemaciclib, a non-chemotherapy treatment, was administered with standard of care endocrine therapy after curative surgery. Most participants had received prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The study investigated if abemaciclib helped participants live longer without their cancer returning compared with participants who only received standard of care endocrine therapy. The study participants were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Participants in Group A were assigned to receive standard of care endocrine therapy with abemaciclib for 2 years, followed by endocrine therapy for a total of at least 5 years. Participants in Group B were assigned to receive standard of care endocrine therapy only for at least 5 years. The effect of treatment was compared between these 2 groups. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Overall, the results showed that the cancer was 34% less likely to come back after surgery in the participants in Group A (abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy) compared with those in Group B (endocrine therapy only). At 4 years since the start of the study treatment, more participants who received the combination of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy remained free of cancer compared with participants who received endocrine therapy alone (86% versus 79%). Participants who received abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy had more side effects than those who received endocrine therapy alone, but most of these effects were mild to moderate and reversible upon the end of therapy. The most common side effects in the abemaciclib group were diarrhea, infections, low number of white blood cells, and tiredness. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: This study found that administering abemaciclib in combination with standard endocrine therapy after curative breast surgery helped lower the risk of cancer returning in people with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer. Abemaciclib is a new treatment option for people with this diagnosis. People with high-risk early breast cancer should always talk to their doctors and nurses before making any decisions about their treatment.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03155997 (monarchE study).

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of two articles. The first article is about a clinical trial called SPOTLIGHT and it was published in the medical journal The Lancet in in April of 2023. The second article is about a clinical trial called GLOW and it was published in the medical journal Nature Medicine in July of 2023. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: Until recently, chemotherapy was the first treatment given to people with stomach cancer or gastroesophageal junction (or GEJ) cancer that is locally advanced unresectable or metastatic. When cancer cells have high amounts of the protein CLDN18.2 but do not have high amounts of the protein HER2, the cancer is known as CLDN18.2-positive (or CLDN18.2+) and HER2-negative (or HER2-). New medicines to treat cancer are being developed. These medicines attach to proteins on cancer cells to help the body recognize and kill cancer cells.The clinical trials SPOTLIGHT and GLOW included participants with CLDN18.2+ and HER2- stomach or GEJ cancer that was locally advanced unresectable or metastatic. These trials looked at whether adding a medicine called zolbetuximab to chemotherapy as the first treatment for cancer helped people live longer before their tumors grew bigger or new tumors grew, after starting the trial. These studies also looked at whether adding zolbetuximab to chemotherapy helped people live longer after starting the trial. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: In SPOTLIGHT and GLOW, on average, participants assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy lived 1.4 to 1.9 months longer before their tumors grew bigger or new tumors grew, after starting the trial, than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy. On average, participants assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy also lived 2.2 to 2.7 months longer, after starting the trial, than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy. These results suggest that zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy could be a new first treatment for people with CLDN18.2+ and HER2- stomach or GEJ cancer that is locally advanced unresectable or metastatic.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03504397 (SPOTLIGHT); NCT03653507 (GLOW).

The clinical trials SPOTLIGHT and GLOW showed that, on average, participants with stomach or GEJ cancer assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy lived 2.2 to 2.7 months longer than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy.

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of findings from two research studies (known as clinical trials). The studies looked at how well a medicine called relugolix combination therapy worked in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (heavy bleeding during a period) with uterine fibroids (noncancerous or benign growths in the uterus). In this analysis of the studies, researchers looked at how patients self-reported their uterine fibroid symptoms before and after taking relugolix combination therapy. Researchers also looked at how patients self-reported the impact of uterine fibroids on their health-related quality of life before and after taking relugolix combination therapy. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Women took either relugolix combination therapy or placebo (a pill that contains no medicine) by mouth once daily for 24 weeks. Women completed the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire (where "quality of life" refers to the women's health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids) before, during, and after treatment. The questionnaire let researchers see if the women felt that relugolix combination therapy decreased the burden of uterine fibroid symptoms and improved the women's health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids. More women said that they felt less distress due to their uterine fibroid symptoms and that their health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids was better after taking relugolix combination therapy compared with women who took placebo. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Relugolix combination therapy may lessen distress associated with uterine fibroid symptoms and improve health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

What is this summary about? This is a plain language summary of a clinical research study. The study was looking the effects of a drug called anamorelin for Japanese people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (often shortened to NSCLC) who also had a condition called cachexia. People with cachexia have a loss of appetite, severe weight loss, loss of body fat and loss of muscle mass (called muscle wasting). Cachexia is common in many chronic (long term) diseases, such as cancer and can lead to a decrease in a person's ability to do everyday tasks (called functional strength). Cachexia can negatively affect a person's quality of life and increases the risk of serious side effects during chemotherapy.Anamorelin is a drug that has been shown in previous research studies to improve appetite and increase lean body mass (the total weight of the body, not counting fat) and overall body weight. In this study, participants were given anamorelin (100 mg daily) for 12 weeks.What did the researchers find out? Participants who took anamorelin had an increase in their lean body mass and body weight, and had an improvement in their appetite. Their overall body condition improved but no improvement was seen in how well their muscles worked.The researchers found that anamorelin did not cause a large number of significant or severe side effects.What do the results mean? The study showed that anamorelin can help people with advanced NSCLC and cachexia to substantially increase their lean body mass, improve their nutritional status, and increase their appetite. Since January 2021, anamorelin for cachexia has been approved for use in Japanese people with NSCLC.

RESUMEN

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis, characterized by considerable pathophysiological and molecular heterogeneity. While this makes it difficult to treat, it also provides targeted therapy opportunities. Current standard-of-care is chemotherapy ± immunotherapy, but several targeted agents have recently been approved. The current investigational landscape in BTC emphasizes the importance of biomarker testing at diagnosis. MDM2/MDMX are important negative regulators of the tumor suppressor p53 and provide an additional target in BTC (∼5-8% of tumors are MDM2-amplified). Brigimadlin (BI 907828) is a highly potent MDM2-p53 antagonist that has shown antitumor activity in preclinical studies and promising results in early clinical trials; enrollment is ongoing in a potential registrational trial for patients with BTC.

[Box: see text].

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary describes what researchers learned during interviews of women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding (or period bleeding). At this time, little is known about how women perceive the impact of uterine fibroids on their lives and more information is needed. The goal of this study was to provide new information about the symptoms women have and how these symptoms affect their everyday lives. These interviews were done to better understand how uterine fibroid symptoms affect the lives of women in their own words. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Thirty women from the United States, who had completed a clinical trial for a new treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids, agreed to be interviewed. The women described what their experiences with uterine fibroids were and the impact these experiences with uterine fibroids had on their lives before participating in the clinical trial. The most common symptoms of uterine fibroids the women described were heavy bleeding with their menstrual periods, pain in the pelvis or groin area, the passing of blood clots, and anemia (or low hemoglobin in red blood cells). Women said their symptoms affected them physically, emotionally, socially, and financially. They also said their symptoms made it hard to do daily activities, sleep, have a sex life, and go to work or school. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Women who have heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids experience various uterine fibroid symptoms, and these symptoms affect most parts of the their lives.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In recent decades, members of the general public have become increasingly reliant on findings of scientific studies for decision-making. However, scientific writing usually features a heavy use of technical language, which may pose challenges for people outside of the scientific community. To alleviate this issue, plain language summaries were introduced to provide a brief summary of scientific papers in clear and accessible language. Despite increasing attention paid to the research of plain language summaries, little is known about whether these summaries are readable for the intended audiences. Based on a large corpus sampled from six biomedical and life sciences journals, the present study examined the readability and jargon use of plain language summaries and scientific abstracts on a technical level. It was found that (1) plain language summaries were more readable than scientific abstracts, (2) the reading grade levels of plain language summaries were moderately correlated with that of scientific abstracts, (3) researchers used less jargon in plain language summaries than in scientific abstracts, and (4) the readability of and the jargon use in both plain language summaries and scientific abstracts exceeded the recommended threshold for the general public. The findings were discussed with possible explanations. Implications for academic writing and scientific communication were offered.

RESUMEN

SummaryWhat are variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines?The COVID-19 vaccine developed by BioNTech and Pfizer is known as BNT162b2 (Comirnaty). BNT162b2 contains messenger RNA, or mRNA, from SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for COVID-19. mRNA is a type of genetic material that contains the instructions that tell cells in the body how to make a protein. The mRNA in BNT162b2 tells the body to make one of the proteins from SARS-CoV-2 known as the spike protein.This teaches the body's defense system, known as the immune system, to recognize and respond to a SARS-CoV-2 infection.The BNT162b2 vaccine contains mRNA from the first SARS-CoV-2 virus, which was detected in December 2019. Since this original vaccine was developed, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has evolved, resulting in the appearance of new versions of the virus, known as variants. Certain variants that might be more concerning for public health are labeled as either 'variants of concern' or 'variants of interest' by the World Health Organization (WHO). Variants have differences in their proteins compared with the original virus that can affect how well the original vaccine works against them. Therefore, BioNTech and Pfizer developed updated versions of the BNT162b2 vaccine that contain mRNA from certain variants. These new vaccines are called variant-adapted COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.Another company, Moderna, has also developed their own variant-adapted versions of their COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, mRNA-1273 (SpikeVax).Variant-adapted vaccines can contain parts of the variant mRNA either in addition to, or instead of, that from the original virus. Vaccines that contain mRNA from two different viruses are known as bivalent, whereas vaccines that contain mRNA from a single virus are called monovalent.

Asunto(s)