RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated factors associated with the antihypertensive effects of esaxerenone and the incidence of serum potassium elevation in patients with hypertension. METHODS: Using pooled data from seven phase III studies, the study analyzed factors associated with changes in office systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure from baseline to 12 weeks, and factors associated with incidence of serum potassium levels ≥ 5.5 mEq/L in esaxerenone-treated patients. RESULTS: Overall, 1466 and 1472 patients were included in the full analysis and safety analysis sets, respectively. Male sex (4.02/2.40 mmHg), weight ≥ 78.4 kg (4.62/2.09 mmHg), hypertension duration ≥ 10 years (2.66/1.71 mmHg), prior antihypertensive treatment (2.38/1.40 mmHg), plasma aldosterone concentration ≥ 120 pg/mL (1.66/1.17 mmHg), urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥ 300 mg/gCr (8.94/4.85 mmHg) or 30-299 mg/gCr (5.17/4.15 mmHg), and smoking (2.62/1.27 mmHg) were associated with mean changes in SBP and DBP. Fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (- 2.73 mmHg) was associated with the mean change in SBP only, and older age (65-74 years, - 2.12 mmHg; and ≥ 75 years, - 3.06 mmHg) with mean change in DBP only. Factors significantly associated with incidence of serum potassium levels ≥ 5.5 mEq/L were higher baseline serum potassium (≥ 4.5 mEq/L, odds ratio [OR] 6.702); lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, OR 0.148; 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2, OR 0.331 vs 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively); higher UACR (30-299 mg/gCr, OR 7.317); higher DBP (≥ 100 mmHg, OR 3.248); and grade I hypertension (OR 2.168). CONCLUSION: Esaxerenone is effective in patients with a broad range of backgrounds, though some factors may predict increased benefit. Regarding elevated serum potassium, careful therapeutic management is recommended for patients with higher baseline serum potassium and reduced renal function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000047026.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomised phase III clinical trials represent a methodological milestone to select effective drugs against metastatic cancers. In this context, and particularly in the efficacy assessment of biologic drugs, the initial metastatic tumour burden is a strong prognostic factor. METHODS: A systematic literature review of randomised, phase III, first-line, clinical trials in metastatic breast, colorectal, and lung cancers, published from 2016 to 2021, was performed. Three groups of variables were collected: identity-, method- (including tumour burden assessment) and outcome-related. RESULTS: Seventy trials were selected. A large portion of studies (41.4%) focused on the effects of biologic agents (signal inhibitors and immuno-therapies). A definition of low-burden disease based predominantly on the number of involved organs was reported in 28.6% of studies. No explicit reference to oligo-metastatic disease was found either in inclusion/exclusion criteria or in final descriptive data analyses. Disease extent, heterogeneously defined, was a stratification factor for randomisation in only 25.7% of studies. In two studies, a significant imbalance between arms in patients with low-burden disease was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Attention to initial tumour burden in designing future clinical trials (including the harmonisation of definitions and the reporting of eventual oligo-metastatic disease, complete estimates of tumour volume, and its consideration as a stratification factor) should be increased.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical research and drug development in orphan diseases are challenging, since large-scale randomized studies are difficult to conduct. Formally synthesizing the evidence is therefore of great value, yet this is rarely done in the drug-approval process. Phase III designs that make better use of phase II data can facilitate drug development in orphan diseases. METHODS: A Bayesian meta-analytic approach is used to inform the phase III study with phase II data. It is particularly attractive, since uncertainty of between-trial heterogeneity can be dealt with probabilistically, which is critical if the number of studies is small. Furthermore, it allows quantifying and discounting the phase II data through the predictive distribution relevant for phase III. A phase III design is proposed which uses the phase II data and considers approval based on a phase III interim analysis. The design is illustrated with a non-inferiority case study from a Food and Drug Administration approval in herpetic keratitis (an orphan disease). Design operating characteristics are compared to those of a traditional design, which ignores the phase II data. RESULTS: An analysis of the phase II data reveals good but insufficient evidence for non-inferiority, highlighting the need for a phase III study. For the phase III study supported by phase II data, the interim analysis is based on half of the patients. For this design, the meta-analytic interim results are conclusive and would justify approval. In contrast, based on the phase III data only, interim results are inconclusive and require further evidence. CONCLUSION: To accelerate drug development for orphan diseases, innovative study designs and appropriate methodology are needed. Taking advantage of randomized phase II data when analyzing phase III studies looks promising because the evidence from phase II supports informed decision-making. The implementation of the Bayesian design is straightforward with public software such as R.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed safety data from the secukinumab psoriasis phase II/III program. METHODS: Data were pooled from 10 phase II/III secukinumab psoriasis studies. RESULTS: Analysis included 3993 subjects; 3430 received secukinumab, representing 2725 subject-years (SYs) of exposure. Over 52 weeks, for secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg, and etanercept, respectively, exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 SYs were comparable across treatments for total adverse events (AEs; 236.1, 239.9, and 243.4, respectively); infections (91.1, 85.3, and 93.7, respectively); serious AEs (7.4, 6.8, and 7.0, respectively); serious infections (1.4, 1.1, and 1.4, respectively); malignant or unspecified tumors (0.77, 0.97, and 0.68, respectively); and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (0.42, 0.35, and 0.34, respectively). AEs were not dose-related except for nonserious, mild/moderate, skin/mucosal candidiasis (IRs 3.55, 1.85, and 1.37 for secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg, and etanercept, respectively). LIMITATIONS: There was a limited number of patients in comparator groups and the exposure to placebo was short. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab had a favorable safety profile, had no meaningful difference between the 300- and 150-mg doses and, in terms of safety, was comparable to etanercept over 52 weeks in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used as experimental treatments of multiple sclerosis (MS) since the 1980s, with the advantage of a high specificity for their target but disadvantages due to their immunogenicity. A literature review of experimental and disposable mAbs in the treatment of MS was performed, putting into perspective the clinical impact that these novel therapies can have and the main challenges facing their use in the daily practice. mAbs therapy resulted in a clear paradigm shift in MS therapeutics. Their use in early, inflammatory phases could have the potential to prevent or delay disability. However, it is still unclear how and when these powerful biological weapons can be used safely in the management of MS. The challenge then is how to obtain the best benefit-risk ratio and how to monitor and prevent emergent safety concerns.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Linaclotide is the first member of a novel class of drugs to be extensively evaluated for the treatment of chronic constipation (CC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). AIM: To provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on linaclotide, its pharmacological properties, mode of action and efficacy in clinical trials to date. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The survey revealed that linaclotide is a minimally absorbed, 14-amino acid peptide which acts in the intestinal lumen on guanylate cyclase-C (GC-C). This results in generation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), which stimulates chloride secretion, resulting in increased luminal fluid secretion and an acceleration of intestinal transit. In animal models, linaclotide also decreased visceral hypersensitivity. Linaclotide softened stool and increased transit in CC and in IBS-C. Phase II and phase III clinical studies established efficacy of linaclotide in CC (linaclotide 145 µg daily approved in the United States for CC) and in IBS-C (linaclotide 290 µg daily US Food and Drug Administration-approved for IBS-C, with favourable recommendation for the European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Linaclotide showed a favourable safety profile, and the main treatment-emerging adverse event was diarrhea, leading to discontinuation rates of up to 5%. Linaclotide is an important addition to the therapeutic possibilities for treating IBS-C and CC.