RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies show interdisciplinary treatment is highly effective for addressing chronic pain syndromes, including headache disorders. Increasingly, advanced practice pharmacists work collaboratively with physicians to apply their unique skills to enhance patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study aimed to elucidate the potential in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for increased roles of clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPPs)-advanced practice pharmacists with a scope of practice-in collaborative, interdisciplinary headache care teams. Our research question was: How do CPPs integrate with interdisciplinary headache care teams in Headache Centers of Excellence (HCoE) and non-HCoE VHA facilities, and how can their roles be configured to optimize headache specialty care services? METHODS: This cross-sectional qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit CPPs providing headache care within HCoEs and in non-HCoE VHA facilities for virtual, recorded, individual interviews. Multi-stage qualitative data analysis entailed: team discussions; immersion/crystallization for close reading of transcripts to identify emerging patterns of HCoE/non-HCoE comparison of CPPs' experiences; team data sorting using spreadsheets; and further immersion into sorted data for final identification of comparisons and interpretation of the data. RESULTS: A total of 15 CPPs involved in headache care were interviewed, with about half working in HCoEs and half in non-HCoE VHA facilities across the United States. CPPs' roles within and outside HCoEs have considerable overlap as both groups co-manage patients with headache with physicians. CPPs have independent and collaborative responsibilities as they extend headache specialists' services by providing direct patient care and referring to additional providers for headache treatment. When their roles differ within and outside HCoEs it is largely due to level of integration on interdisciplinary headache or pain teams. CPPs in HCoEs collaborate with headache neurologists and interdisciplinary teams; some outside HCoEs do as well, while others work with primary care. CPPs' weekly time dedicated specifically to headache tends to be greater in HCoEs. Nevertheless, most interviewees in both groups stated patient need exceeds CPP availability at their facilities for conducting detailed chart reviews, initial visits to understand the context of patients' headache, and scheduled follow-ups over time to monitor and adjust treatment. CPPs also consult with and educate physicians on headache pharmacy, particularly regarding appropriate use of non-formulary medications. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study suggest that CPPs' roles in headache care are valuable to clinical colleagues and their patients and should be leveraged and expanded within HCoEs and non-HCoE VHA facilities. When substantively integrated into interdisciplinary headache care teams, CPPs offer unique knowledge, headache management and patient behavior change skills, extend headache specialists' services, and provide both patient and physician education. These combined responsibilities contribute to enhancing patient outcomes and facilitating ongoing access to high quality, evidence-based headache care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients' satisfaction with their treatment directly impacts the control of their diabetes. Quality of life is crucial for patients with diabetes mellitus to maintain long-term health and minimize complications. The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of diabetes education on quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The current study was a randomized controlled trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes who were attending the diabetes clinic for 1 year were recruited. The overall sample in this study was 364 participants; 182 controls 182 cases. The interventional and control group participants were assigned randomly by simple random sampling technique. Controls were managed per usual care while cases were managed per usual care plus education done by the researcher. Pre-structured standardized questionnaires were used to collect the data. Data were processed and analyzed by using SPSS; version 28. RESULTS: More than three-fourth of the participants; 76.4% were females. The average (±SD) age of the cases was 54.5 (±10) years, while was 56 (±9.8) years for controls. The overall median (IQR) years of DM diagnosis for all participants was 8 (4-14) years. The results showed a statistically significant difference between the mean satisfaction score from baseline to 12 months in the cases compared the controls (P < .001). Furthermore, there are statistically insignificant differences between the changes of mean overall QoL score from baseline to 12 months among the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The education provided improved self-reported treatment-satisfaction among individuals with diabetes .A statistically insignificant differences in QoL between the 2 groups compared to baseline have been shown at the study end.The trial registration number is PACTR202311766174946 which was registered by pan African clinical trials registry, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=26928.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Drug therapy problems (DTPs) continuously occur in hospitalized patients. This study aims to emphasize the role of clinical pharmacists in evaluating the DTP's frequencies, causes, severity ratings, and contributing factors at a general surgery ward in Jordan. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at one of the major teaching and referral hospitals in Jordan. Data were collected through clinical pharmacist reviews of paper and electronic medical records as well as patient interviews. DTPs were identified using Cipolle's classification system and rated for severity on a scale of 10. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify factors contributing to DTPs. Drug classes primarily associated with DTPs were specified. Results: During enrollment, a total of 80 patients were recruited in this study. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 52.35 ± 14.82 years, and 49 (61.25%) of them were males. Within the study period, 192 DTPs were identified by clinical pharmacists in 87.5%of the total recruited patients. The mean number of DTPs per patient was 2.40 ± 1.83. The most common categories of DTPs were "needs additional therapy" 46 (23.96%), "unnecessary drug therapy" 45 (23.44%), and "dosage too low" 39 (20.31%). Of the total DTPs, 127 (66.15%) were rated as severe. Multiple linear regression revealed that patients' length of hospital stay and the number of current medications had a statistically significant effect on the number of DTPs identified during hospitalization. Endocrine and metabolic drugs 51 (26.56%) and cardiovascular drugs 36 (18.75%) were the most frequent classes of drugs contributing to DTPs. Conclusion: DTPs are common in the general surgery ward. Clinical pharmacists can provide medication reviews for surgical patients to identify DTPs and rate their severities. Detecting risk factors for DTPs and the most common drug classes associated with them can assist in decision-making relevant to reducing DTPs in the surgical ward.

RESUMEN

Background: Anticoagulation therapy is crucial for managing various cardiovascular and thrombotic conditions; however, optimal delivery remains challenging in primary care. Pharmacist-led anticoagulation services have emerged as a potential strategy for enhancing patient care and outcomes in such settings. Understanding the perspectives of key stakeholders is critical for successful implementation. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of key stakeholders involved in the implementation of pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics in primary care settings. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using structured, pilot-tested questionnaires between August and October 2023. Patients receiving warfarin, pharmacists, and physicians working across various primary healthcare centres were invited to complete an online survey. Each group of stakeholders had individualised questionnaires to assess their perceptions and expectations with regard to developing pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics in primary care. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: The response rates for the survey were 29.4% for physicians, 10.4% for patients, and 48.6% for pharmacists. Participants expressed positive perceptions toward pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics, acknowledging benefits such as improved access to care, enhanced medication management, and increased patient education. The respondents expressed confidence in the expertise and skills of pharmacists in this role. However, healthcare providers strongly agree that pharmacists should receive additional training specific to anticoagulation management. Establishing standardised protocols and fostering interprofessional collaboration were identified as the main facilitators for practical implementation. Conclusions: Broad support exists for pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics in primary care, though additional pharmacist training and accountability concerns need to be addressed for successful implementation.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This research aimed to determine postpartum females' self-reported adherence to and experience with short-term thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin injection, after counselling by pharmacists. It also sought to assess their knowledge of thromboprophylaxis, injection techniques, and confidence in self-injecting. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at a public tertiary hospital in Malaysia from March to June 2023. Self-injection-naïve postpartum females who were initiated on thromboprophylaxis and counselled by a pharmacist were conveniently sampled. Knowledge regarding thromboprophylaxis, injection readiness, and technique were assessed one day after the counselling session. A telephonic interview was conducted at the end of the 10-day therapy to determine adherence and adverse effects experienced. KEY FINDINGS: A total of 259 subjects were successfully followed up, with 87.6% (n = 227) adherent to the therapy. Nonadherence was predominantly due to forgetfulness; four had their treatment withheld due to bleeding. One-third of subjects experienced localised pain and bruising. Subjects answered a median of 5/7 knowledge questions and recalled a median of 8/10 injection steps correctly, with those who read the information leaflet provided after counselling scoring significantly higher (P = .02). The majority declared moderate confidence in their ability to self-inject. Subjects who intended to self-inject (P < .01) and were more confident (P = .02) demonstrated better injection technique. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum females counselled by pharmacists largely adhered to short-term enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis. The impact of the counselling session may be enhanced by addressing their psychological readiness to self-inject, awareness of adverse effects identification, mitigation, and management, as well as setting reminders to prevent forgetfulness to inject.

RESUMEN

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-related morbidity and mortality can be reduced through medication counselling and risk reduction. Objectives: This study evaluated the impact of short online modular NSAID training on the type and quality of questions asked, risk factors assessed, and counselling offered by community pharmacists to NSAID users. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-guided survey conducted in Ibadan, Nigeria, among 87 pharmacists evaluated the frequency of counselling, NSAID risk factor assessment and barriers to risk assessment. Additionally, a before-and-after RCT was used to evaluate the impact of short online modular NSAID training for the intervention group (IG) on the type and quality of the questions asked, counselling provided, and risk assessed by the pharmacists. Eight standardised patients, aged 25-43 years, four at pre- and postintervention, presented four standardised scenarios at community pharmacies [IG, n = 22, control group (CG, n = 30)] to assess these outcomes. The quality of each outcome (questions asked, counselling offered and risk assessed) was classified as poor (0-≤20%), fair (>20-≤40%), moderate (>40 - ≤60%), or optimal (>60-100%). The data are presented with descriptive statistics. Results: The community pharmacists reported counselling patients on NSAID precautions (80-86%) and dosages (51-69%). Gastrointestinal bleeding risk was assessed by 61-89% of the pharmacists, and time constraints (39-42%) and patient impatience (47-75%) were some barriers to risk assessment. Online modular educational intervention significantly improved the types and quality of questions asked by pharmacists (CG: poor to fair, 16%-21%; IG: poor to moderate, 14%-45%), NSAID risk factors assessed (CG: poor to poor, 10%-9%; IG: poor to fair, 11%-27%) and counselling offered (CG: poor to poor, 6%-7%; IG: poor to fair, 6%-22%). Conclusions: Short online modular educational training on NSAIDs improved the types and quality of the questions asked, NSAID risk factors assessed, and counselling provided by community pharmacists to patients during consultations.

RESUMEN

Background: A type 3 medication review (MR3) is a patient-centred medication service primarily provided by pharmacists and is presently employed routinely in several countries. In this process, pharmacists interview patients and collaborate with the treating physician to optimize the patient's pharmacotherapy, taking into account the patient's medication history and other medical data including laboratory values. The need to maintain the quality of such interventions during and after their initial implementation cannot be overstated. Aim: The objective of this study was to refine and assess a scoring table to evaluate the quality of MR3 conducted in Belgian community pharmacies. Methods: The comprehensive quality of MR3s was assessed by scoring its various components using a previously developed scoring table, called BRANT-MERQS, Brussels Antwerp Medication Review Quality Score. MR3s were analysed from an implementation study with patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA, subproject 1) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM, subproject 2). Additional information was obtained during a telephone call with a subset of participating pharmacists of subproject 1 who finalized their first MR3. Results: In subproject 1, a total of 21 MR3s of patients with RA were examined. The assessment showed favourable scores for elements such as a well-organized medication schedule, treatment adherence, and the elaboration of specific interventions. However, certain other quality criteria posed challenges in the evaluation, for example, the use of simple and understandable language. Pharmacists faced time constraints, and elderly general practitioners (GPs) displayed limited enthusiasm, which were notable barriers observed for this subproject. In the context of subproject 2 that investigated 41 MR3s in patients with T2DM, the quality criteria of interaction between pharmacist and GP, and used sources and tools received high scores. However, there was still room for improvement, especially in areas such as accurate dosing, handling kidney function, QT prolongation, correctly associating laboratory values with relevant drugs and medical conditions, and optimisation of medication schedules for patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of MR3 quality assessment through a scoring system. However, it also unveiled the tool's current imperfections and highlighted the ongoing need for refinement, something expected of a new service in an implementation phase.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New pharmacists, PharmD graduates of 2020 and 2021, faced the unique challenge of entering the workforce during the volatile and divisive COVID-19 pandemic. They had to navigate patient-driven misinformation while adapting to evolving roles, including the distribution and administration of COVID-19 vaccines. Understanding the experiences of new pharmacists during this period is crucial for professional development and patient care. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to describe new pharmacists' experiences of handling COVID-19 vaccine misinformation presented by patients. METHODS: Semi-structured Zoom interviews were conducted with PharmD 2020 and 2021 graduates recruited from St. John's University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (SJUCPHS) and the University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy (UMSOP) until saturation was achieved. Interview questions were based on constructs of the HURIER model and WHO algorithm on how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers. Data analysis was performed through deductive thematic content analysis, and findings were reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. RESULTS: A total of 13 interviews were conducted, with 61.5% of participants from SJU and 38.5% from UM. They worked in various pharmacy settings, including independent (30.8%), chain (23.0%), long-term care (15.4%), and ambulatory care/hospital pharmacies (30.8%). The types of COVID-19 misinformation new pharmacists heard during the pandemic align with the techniques and topics of anti-vaccine arguments outlined by the WHO's algorithm. New pharmacists utilized evaluation skills to identify credible sources and information, interpreted patients' language and sources, and assessed patients' willingness to be corrected. All new pharmacists responded to misinformation regardless of the technique or topic; however, the mechanism of response may have differed depending on whether a technique or topic was presented. CONCLUSIONS: This baseline understanding of new pharmacists' practices in managing health misinformation can inform the development of recommendations for health misinformation management and assist pharmacy schools in identifying areas for further training for student pharmacists.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-led smoking cessation programs in pre-admission clinics (PAC) have shown to increase quit attempts and achieve abstinence by the day of surgery (DOS). AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility of Pharmacist E-script Transcription Service (PETS) initiated nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in PAC, including smoking cessation on DOS. METHODS: A single centre, pre and post-intervention pilot study conducted at an Australian public hospital PAC. In a two-month intervention period, PAC nursing staff invited smokers (≥1 cigarette/day) to see a smoking cessation PET pharmacist. Pharmacist-initiated NRT and Quitline© referrals were offered. Cessation outcomes were compared with the preceding two-month control period. PRIMARY OUTCOME: feasibility of intervention. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: DOS smoking abstinence rates and three-months post-surgery. RESULTS: PAC nurses identified 112 smokers over 4 months; 53 during pre-intervention period, and 59 during intervention period. Twenty-two intervention patients (37%) accepted seeing the pharmacist, with 16 subsequent Quitline© referrals (73%) and 11 NRT prescriptions (50%) written. The median nursing smoking status documentation time increased in the intervention period (1 min vs. 4, p < .001). The intervention did not impact pharmacist's workload. Verified abstinence increased from 8.5% (4/47) pre-intervention to 9.4% (5/53) post-intervention, p =1.00. Relapse rates in the intervention period increased (20% vs. 50%) at three-months post-surgery. CONCLUSION: A PETS-initiated NRT program in PAC is feasible and increased preoperative use of NRT and Quitline© with minimal impact on smoking cessation. SO WHAT?: This study has highlighted the importance of implementing a multidisciplinary smoking cessation program in PAC however, larger studies are needed to determine the true impact of the program on smoking cessations.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with hematologic malignancies often receive multiple medications, leading to potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Identifying and managing these DDIs is crucial for ensuring patient safety and effective care. This study aimed to identify and describe DDIs and associated factors in hematologic malignancy patients. METHODS: This prospective interventional study was conducted at a referral center and included hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies who were receiving at least four concurrent medications. A pharmacist initially compiled a comprehensive list of all medications through patient interviews and medication reviews, and subsequently, identified and categorized potential DDIs using the Lexi-interact® and Micromedex® databases. The clinical pharmacist then evaluated the clinical impact of the identified DDIs in every individual patient and provided appropriate interventions to resolve them. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, with 1281 DDIs identified across 337 distinct types. The majority of identified DDIs exhibited major severity (52.1%) and pharmacokinetic mechanisms (50.3%), with an unspecified onset (79.4%) and fair evidence (67%). Of the identified DDIs, 81.1% were considered clinically significant, prompting 1059 pharmacotherapy interventions by the clinical pharmacist. Additionally, a significant relationship was observed between the number of drugs used during hospitalization and the occurrence of DDIs (P < 0.001, r = 0.633). CONCLUSION: DDIs are highly prevalent among hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies, with their occurrence increasing alongside the number of medications administrated. The intervention of a clinical pharmacist is crucial to evaluate the clinical impact of these DDIs and implement effective interventions for their management.

RESUMEN

Objectives: The study aimed to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) and risk factors associated with the emergence of DRPs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients in the anesthesiology and reanimation ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. DRPs identified by clinical pharmacists were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Classification for DRPs version 9.1. The association between various patient-related factors, and having DRPs were evaluated. Results: In total, 222 patients were included in the study, 128 of which were male (57.7%). The number of DRPs was 388 in 135 patients (1.75 ± 2.47 DRPs per patient). The group in which at least 1 DRP was identified, the duration of hospitalization was longer than in the group in which no DRP was identified (p < 0.001). In the groups in which there was the presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission or mortality, the mean DRP count was significantly higher than that in the other group (p < 0.05). Age, duration of hospitalization, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at admission had positive relationships with the DRP count, but the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) showed a negative relationship (p < 0.05). According to the binary logistic regression analysis (p < 0.001), in which the age of the patient, GCS score, APACHE II score at admission, duration of hospitalization, and presence of mechanical ventilation support at admission were included, only the APACHE II score at admission and duration of hospitalization significantly affected the emergence of DRPs. The major problem was related to treatment effectiveness (47.9%), followed by treatment safety problems (29.9%). The major causes of these problems were dose selection (44.0%) and drug selection (36.8). Interventions were made at the drug (97.2%) and prescriber level (2.3%). The acceptance rate of interventions and resolution rate of the DRPs were 93.6% and 85.1%, respectively. The top three medications that caused DRPs the most were as follows: meropenem, colistin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Conclusion: Clinical pharmacists can detect and treat DRPs quickly. Our analysis shows that clinical pharmacy services are needed in high-DRP wards like ICU.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of community pharmacists toward acute uncomplicated cystitis regarding diagnosis, referral, and conformity to guidelines of the chosen antibiotic and to identify the associated factors with the pharmacist's knowledge. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey using a questionnaire. Data was collected from 349 community pharmacies in upper southern Thailand between December 2021 and February 2022. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with an inappropriate diagnosis of acute uncomplicated cystitis. The variables with P-value < 0.2 were included in the multivariate model. The statistically significant level was set as P-value < 0.05. KEY FINDINGS: Three hundred and forty-nine pharmacists from 349 community pharmacies were included. Approximately 65% and 69% of the participants had the knowledge to identify which patients should be considered for cystitis and which patients should be considered for acute uncomplicated cystitis. Ninety eight percentage of pharmacists could select the appropriate antibiotic for uncomplicated cystitis patients. The most prescribed antibiotics were ciprofloxacin (44.7%), norfloxacin (40.7%), and ofloxacin (10.3%). Inappropriate diagnosis was significantly related to age (P = 0.016) and role in the community pharmacy (P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: The majority of participants had misconceptions about the differential diagnosis between complicated and uncomplicated cystitis. These were related to the community pharmacists' advanced age. Continuous pharmacy education should be established to advocate rational antibiotic use, especially in a country where community pharmacists are legally allowed to dispense antimicrobials without a prescription.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In Australia, 64% of pharmacists are women but continue to be under-represented. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is potentially transformative but also has the potential for errors, misrepresentations, and bias. Generative AI text-to-image production using DALL-E 3 (OpenAI) is readily accessible and user-friendly but may reinforce gender and ethnicity biases. METHODS: In March 2024, DALL-E 3 was utilized to generate individual and group images of Australian pharmacists. Collectively, 40 images were produced with DALL-E 3 for evaluation of which 30 were individual characters and the remaining 10 images were comprised of multiple characters (N = 155). All images were independently analysed by two reviewers for apparent gender, age, ethnicity, skin tone, and body habitus. Discrepancies in responses were resolved by third-observer consensus. RESULTS: Collectively for DALL-E 3, 69.7% of pharmacists were depicted as men, 29.7% as women, 93.5% as a light skin tone, 6.5% as mid skin tone, and 0% as dark skin tone. The gender distribution was a statistically significant variation from that of actual Australian pharmacists (P < .001). Among the images of individual pharmacists, DALL-E 3 generated 100% as men and 100% were light skin tone. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation reveals the gender and ethnicity bias associated with generative AI text-to-image generation using DALL-E 3 among Australian pharmacists. Generated images have a disproportionately high representation of white men as pharmacists which is not representative of the diversity of pharmacists in Australia today.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The goal of pharmacogenetic testing is to identify genetic variants with significant implications on drug safety and efficacy. Several professional organizations and institutions have demonstrated the value of pharmacist involvement in the implementation of pharmacogenomic services. Therefore, we aimed to establish a pharmacist-guided model for interpretation of pharmacogenetic results for all oncology patients seen at the Dartmouth Cancer Center (DCC) in Lebanon, NH. METHODS: A pilot of a pharmacist-guided pharmacogenomics dosing service was implemented at the DCC. Pharmacy services included review of results from a next generation sequencing panel for DPYD, TPMT, NUDT15, and UGT1A1 variants. The pharmacist wrote a note in the electronic health record (EHR) detailing actionable drug-gene interactions and drug-dosing guidance, which was then routed to the treating oncologist. Outcomes collected included highlighting actionable mutations and defining pharmacist interventions. In addition, time spent formulating and documenting patient-specific drug-dosing recommendations was collected. RESULTS: From February 2024 through May 2024, a total of 71 patients with pharmacogenetic results, provided by the clinical molecular laboratory at Dartmouth Health, were reviewed by the pharmacist. The majority of patients tested were diagnosed with a malignancy of gastrointestinal origin. Twenty-one patients were found to have actionable variants in at least one of the four genes evaluated, and five of the 21 identified patients had active treatment plans for which dose changes were then implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a pharmacist-guided pharmacogenomics based dosing service aided in optimizing drug therapy and has positioned Dartmouth Health for further expansion of pharmacogenomics and personalized patient care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While there is an accumulation of evidence that pharmacist prescribing is safe and effective, there is a lack of research on processes of implementation into practice, particularly for patients with complex clinical conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD). AIM: The aim was to explore the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of pharmacist prescribing for patients with CKD in the United Kingdom (UK). METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with UK Renal Pharmacy Group members who were independent prescribers. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) underpinned the interview schedule. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by two researchers. A thematic approach was used for analysis, with data generation continuing until saturation of themes. Ethical approval was granted. RESULTS: Data saturation was achieved following 14 interviews. Most interviewees were female (n = 11), all had secondary care as their main practice setting, and were highly experienced prescribers with 8 having 11 or more years of prescribing practice. Interviewees were positive regarding the development of their prescribing practice. Facilitators and barriers emerged across all 5 of the CFIR domains. Key facilitators were aspects of inner setting (e.g., organisational support and communication) while key barriers were also related to inner setting, specifically the need for adequate structural and financial resources. CONCLUSION: This theory-based study has illuminated the facilitators and barriers for the implementation of pharmacist prescribing in CKD. There is a need to consider the resources required for implementation of prescribing practice at an early stage of planning and development.

RESUMEN

Introduction: COPD is a progressive lung disease that adds significant economic burden to the healthcare system in the United States. Digital platforms integrated into clinical workflows have demonstrated success in improving patient outcomes in COPD, but few studies have explored the impact of an integrated digital and clinical approach on drivers of direct healthcare costs (COPD-related prescriptions, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a six-month retrospective matched control analysis to assess the impact of a digital quality improvement (QI) program delivered by clinical pharmacists on healthcare resource utilization among people living with COPD. Results: Compared to matched controls at six months, participants in the digital QI program had a nearly two-third relative reduction in COPD-related ED visits and hospitalizations (p=0.044), as well as a 47% reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations (p=0.059). Participants in the digital QI program also had higher rates of COPD-related prescription fills for antibiotics and oral corticosteroids, as well as a greater number of non-acute care visits compared to matched controls. Conclusion: Digital health platforms integrated into a virtual clinical pharmacist workflow can help reduce costly COPD-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Care models integrating digital platforms may also offer a scalable approach to managing COPD and should be explored in different clinical settings.

RESUMEN

Background: The roll-out of antiretroviral medicines has improved life expectancy in people living with HIV (PLHIV). This has resulted in more patients being hospitalised for non-communicable diseases, increasing risk for medication errors (MEs). Pharmacists, through medication reconciliation, may identify and reduce MEs in this population. Objectives: To describe the importance of a pharmacist's involvement in identifying and quantifying types of MEs. Method: A quantitative, prospective observational study was conducted over 14 weeks. A pharmacist reviewed HIV-positive, hospitalised patients' files, using a data collection instrument, to determine the prevalence of MEs in PLHIV. The study pharmacist recommended appropriate actions to the prescriber to resolve MEs and documented resolution of the MEs. Results: The study population of n = 180 patient files were reviewed 453 times, identifying 466 MEs. Medication errors included incorrect medication reconciliation from history (19; 4.1%), prescription omission (17; 3.7%), duplication of therapy (10; 2.2%), missed doses (265; 57.1%), incorrect dosing (103; 22.2%), incorrect administration frequency (2; 0.4%), incorrect duration of therapy (15; 3.2%) and drug-drug interactions (18; 3.9%). More than half (58.2%) of the MEs were resolved in less than 24 h, with involvement of the pharmacist. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the magnitude of MEs experienced in hospitalised PLHIV and highlights the role clinical pharmacists play in identifying and resolving MEs to improve patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

This article aims to explore the access of patient assistance program (PAPs) and the role of pharmacists in improving access to oncology care in Pakistan. PAPs aim to reduce the financial burden of cancer in Pakistan, with pharmaceutical companies providing medication at reduced costs, ranging from 33% to 90%. Pharmacists play a pivotal role in managing these programs, facilitating PAP, pharmacist, oncology care setting, cancer therapy more accessible to those who faced financial barriers to accessing them.

RESUMEN

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: To review causes, risk factors, and consequences of sleep disruption in critically ill patients; evaluate the role of nonpharmacological and pharmacological therapies for management of sleep in the intensive care unit (ICU); and discuss the role of pharmacists in implementation of sleep bundles. SUMMARY: Critically ill patients often have disrupted sleep and circadian rhythm alterations that cause anxiety, stress, and traumatic memories. This can be caused by factors such as critical illness, environmental factors, mechanical ventilation, and medications. Methods to evaluate sleep, including polysomnography and questionnaires, have limitations that should be considered. Multicomponent sleep bundles with a focus on nonpharmacological therapy aiming to reduce nocturnal noise, light, and unnecessary patient care may improve sleep disorders in critically ill patients. While pharmacological agents are often used to facilitate sleep in critically ill patients, evidence supporting their use is often of low quality, which limits use to patients who have sleep disruption refractory to nonpharmacological therapy. Dedicated interprofessional teams are needed for implementation of sleep bundles in the ICU. Extensive pharmacotherapeutic training and participation in daily patient care rounds make pharmacists vital members of the team who can help with all components of the bundle. This narrative review discusses evidence for elements of the multicomponent sleep bundle and provides guidance on how pharmacists can help with implementation of nonpharmacological therapies and management of neuroactive medications to facilitate sleep. CONCLUSION: Sleep bundles are necessary for patients in the ICU, and dedicated interprofessional teams that include pharmacists are vital for their successful creation and implementation.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) is a commonly reported side effect of antidepressant medications in clinical trials. Limited literature exists exploring the role of routine use of the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) in identification of TESD in clinical practice. Therefore, we completed a retrospective study with the primary goal of capturing the rates of sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressant use among adult patients at an outpatient encounter with a psychiatric clinical pharmacist between June 2020 and March 2022. Methods: Rates of identification of sexual dysfunction were compared pre-ASEX survey (June 2020 to June 2021) to post-ASEX survey (July 2021 to March 2022). Results: There was a significant increase in the identification of sexual dysfunction following implementation of the ASEX scale (10% in the pre-ASEX group versus 59% meeting sexual dysfunction criteria with the ASEX scale). Approximately 70% of patients in the post-ASEX group shared they would not have reported symptoms unless directly asked. Discussion: In conclusion, a validated survey (ASEX) in an ambulatory psychiatry clinic improves identification of sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressants. Use of interdisciplinary care teams in the setting of medication follow-up can assist with identifying tolerability concerns between visits with patients' prescribing clinicians.