RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This scoping review aimed to map the evidence about the microbiota found in persistent endodontic infections. METHODS: The study protocol was prospectively registered and is available at https://osf.io/3g2cp. The electronic search was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Lilacs, BBO, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The eligibility criteria were based on the PCC acronym, where P (Population) represents patients with teeth presenting persistent endodontic infection, C (Concept) represents microbial profile, and C (Context) represents undergoing endodontic retreatment. Clinical studies that evaluated the microbial profile of samples collected from root canals of teeth undergoing retreatment, using classical or molecular methods, were included. Studies that did not show a minimum period of 1 year between primary endodontic treatment and retreatment or did not radiographically evaluate the quality of primary root canal filling were excluded. Two reviewers independently selected the articles and collected data. RESULTS: From a total of 957 articles, 161 were read in full, and 32 studies were included. The most prevalent species were Enterococcus faecalis, Parvimonas micra, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Dialister invisus, Propionibacterium acnes, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola. Cases with symptomatology or inadequate root canal filling presented an increase in specific bacterial species compared to those with no symptomatology or adequate filling. A greater number of microorganisms was observed in teeth with inadequate coronal restoration compared to those with adequate restoration. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent endodontic infections have a polymicrobial profile identified by the commonly used methods for bacterial detection/identification and are subject to the limitations present in each of those methods.
Asunto(s)
Cavidad Pulpar , Porphyromonas gingivalis , Humanos , Cavidad Pulpar/microbiología , Prevotella intermedia , Porphyromonas endodontalisRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The relationship between Enterococcus faecalis and pulpal or periradicular diseases has been studied for many years; however, whether E. faecalis is correlated with persistent intraradicular infections (teeth after failed endodontic treatments) compared with primary intraradicular infections remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review was to compare the prevalence of E. faecalis in primary and persistent intraradicular infections. METHODS: An exhaustive literature search combined with specified inclusion criteria was performed to collect all studies comparing the prevalence of E. faecalis in root canals with primary and persistent intraradicular infections. Descriptive statistics were applied first because of the high heterogeneity among studies. Subgroup analysis according to different detecting methods (culture and polymerase chain reaction) and sensitivity analysis was then applied. Meta-analysis was conducted with the help of Stata/SE 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) after excluding studies with uncertain forms of pulpal and periradicular lesions in their primary infection groups. RESULTS: The systematic review included 10 studies covering 972 teeth. Among them, 2 studies used the culture technique, 6 studies used polymerase chain reaction, and the other 2 used both techniques. The detection rate of E. faecalis by both methods was higher in persistent infections compared with untreated chronic periapical periodontitis as primary infections. The difference was statistically significant (odds ratio = 7.247; 95% confidence interval, 4.039-13.002). CONCLUSIONS: E. faecalis is more highly correlated with persistent intraradicular infections compared with untreated chronic periapical periodontitis.