RESUMEN

Aim: Chronic shoulder pain due to iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve (SAN) injury continues to be under-recognized, resulting in delayed time-to-diagnosis and poorer outcomes. Solutions are needed to improve the management of this condition, which can be challenging as care needs to be coordinated across pain management, neurophysiology, rehabilitation and reconstructive surgery.Cases: We present a series of six patients with shoulder pain refractory to conservative pain treatments to highlight how SAN injuries continued to be missed and treatment delayed, even at advanced care centers. The time to diagnosis of SAN palsy took an average of 21 months and treatment was inconsistent for all patients.Discussion: None of the six cases had initial suspicion of SAN palsy and only one patient received targeted SAN injury care. SAN treatment should be started as early as possible so that patients can be referred for prompt surgical evaluation if they fail conservative management. Integrated care pathways may be a solution for formalizing multidisciplinary team involvement and improving SAN injury outcomes.Conclusion: Systemic processes, such as integrated care pathways, are needed to optimize early recognition and targeted treatment of SAN injury and may be beneficial for other underdiagnosed and undertreated neuropathic pain conditions.

Neck dissection surgeries, which are done to treat various head and neck cancers, can often lead to shoulder pain. This pain commonly involves damage to a nerve called the spinal accessory nerve (SAN). Even though this nerve injury has been well-described by experts, many patients continue to experience delays in getting a correct diagnosis and treatment for this pain.This study describes six cases from a large cancer center where patients developed chronic shoulder pain after neck dissection. These patients waited an average of 21 months to reach a correct diagnosis of SAN injury. The pain and symptoms were often mistaken for other conditions. In one case, a patient received delayed treatment from a coordinated team of medical specialists, leading to improvements in her pain and shoulder function.The delay in diagnosing SAN injuries is likely due to two main challenges: a lack of awareness among providers and a tendency for healthcare to focus on specific areas rather than a team-based approach. Early diagnosis is crucial to prevent and minimize long-term pain and muscle loss.To improve patient care, this study suggests using an integrated care pathway approach and gives an example of how providers can adopt this approach. This method involves coordinating various medical specialists to ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment. By improving how SAN injuries are managed, patients can receive better care and avoid chronic pain and disability.

RESUMEN

"State of the Art" Learning Objectives: This manuscript serves to provide the reader with a general overview of the contemporary approaches to peripheral nerve reconstruction as the field has undergone considerable advancement over the last 3 decades. The learning objectives are as follows: To provide the reader with a brief history of peripheral nerve surgery and some of the landmark developments that allow for current peripheral nerve care practices.To outline the considerations and management options for the care of patients with brachial plexopathy, spinal cord injury, and lower extremity peripheral nerve injury.Highlight contemporary surgical techniques to address terminal neuroma and phantom limb pain.Review progressive and future procedures in peripheral nerve care, such as supercharge end-to-side nerve transfers.Discuss rehabilitation techniques for peripheral nerve care.

Le présent manuscrit vise à fournir au lecteur un aperçu général des approches contemporaines de la reconstruction des nerfs périphériques puisque le domaine a beaucoup progressé depuis trois décennies. Les objectifs d'apprentissage s"établissent comme suit : Fournir au lecteur un bref historique de la chirurgie des nerfs périphériques et quelques-unes des avancées historiques qui ont donné lieu aux pratiques de soins actuelles des nerfs périphériques.Décrire les considérations et les possibilités de prise en charge pour les soins des patients ayant une plexopathie brachiale, une lésion médullaire ou une lésion des nerfs périphériques des membres inférieurs.Souligner les techniques chirurgicales contemporaines pour traiter les neurones terminaux et les douleurs des membres fantômes.Examiner les interventions progressives et futures pour les soins des nerfs périphériques, comme l'amplification du transfert du nerf terminal au nerf latéral.Parler des techniques de réadaptation pour les soins des nerfs périphériques.

RESUMEN

Peripheral nerve surgeries for compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity are generally successful. However, cases that either fail or have complications requiring revision surgery are challenging. During revision consideration, surgeons should perform a comprehensive preoperative workup to understand the etiology of the patient's symptoms and categorize symptoms as persistent, recurrent, or new in relation to the index procedure. Revision surgery often requires an open, extensile approach with additional procedures to optimize outcomes. Even with proper workup and treatment, clinical outcomes of revision surgeries are inferior compared to primary surgeries and patients should be well informed prior to undergoing such procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The primary treatment for peripheral nerve tumors involves maximal surgical resection while preserving nerve function. Sodium fluorescein shows potential for enhancing the safety and efficacy of nerve tumor surgery. This review evaluates the advantages and limitations of sodium fluorescein in this context. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, and Scopus were searched following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to include studies reporting the use of sodium fluorescein in peripheral nerve tumors surgery. Intervention-related outcomes (i.e., extent of resection, clinical outcomes, complication rates, recurrence rates, and duration of surgery) were evaluated and summarized. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies encompassing 166 patients with 168 tumors were included. Patients were mostly female (98; 53.6%), 101 (69.2%) had sporadic (non-syndromic) tumors, and at histopathology, 114 (67.9%) tumors were WHO grade-1 schwannomas. Gross total resection was achieved in 146 (86.9%) tumors. Postoperative complications were reported in 16 cases (10.2%%), none related to side effects of the fluorescent dye. High tumor fluorescence was reported in 150 (94.3%) tumors, while absent and low parent nerve fluorescence was reported in 121 (79.6%) and 27 (17.8%), respectively. The median duration of surgery was 51.5 (range: 24-92) minutes. CONCLUSION: Sodium fluorescein shows promise as assisting tool in nerve tumor surgery by facilitating differentiation between the tumor, parent nerve, and surrounding soft tissue. However, multi-center randomized controlled trials are necessary to determine its effect on extent of resection rates, clinical outcomes, postoperative complication rates, and surgical duration in comparison to current standard of care.

RESUMEN

Novel surgical treatments for painful neuromas are increasingly used, but determining which provides the greatest benefit has been difficult due to the inconsistent use of outcome measures. We mapped the current literature of outcome measures used to evaluate peripheral nerve surgery for the management of symptomatic neuromas in patients who underwent an adult-acquired upper extremity amputation (UEA). Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for primary research written in the English language from inception to February 2023. The search yielded 1137 articles, of which 35 were included for final analysis. Studies varied in their assessment of pain, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), neurotrophic measures, psychological and sensorimotor function, highlighting a consensus on crucial domains but also revealing significant heterogeneity in the use and application of outcome measures among primary studies. Our findings highlight the need to establish common standards that reflect the best evidence and unique needs of the UEA population. This includes developing a core outcome set, utilizing multi-center trials, and maintaining flexibility to adapt to ongoing advancements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) research.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Restoration of pinch and grasp is a chief concern of patients with cervical spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve injury involving the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN). We hypothesize that supinator nerve-to-AIN (Sup-AIN) nerve transfer is a viable option for AIN neurotization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who received Sup-AIN. Reported outcomes included Medical Research Council strength of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus and passive range of digit motion. Patients with <12 months of follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent Sup-AIN, eight with peripheral nerve injury, and three with spinal cord injury. Three patients were excluded because of insufficient follow-up. Average follow-up was 17 months (range: 12-25 months). Six patients had M4 recovery (75%), one patient had M3 recovery (12.5%), and one did not recover function because of severe stiffness (12.5%). We observed no complications or donor site morbidity in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Sup-AIN nerve transfer is an effective option to restore digital flexion in patients with peripheral nerve injury or spinal cord injury involving the AIN motor distribution. In comparison to previously described extensor carpi radialis brevis to AIN and brachialis to AIN nerve transfers, Sup-AIN offers the benefits of a more expendable donor nerve and shorter regenerative distance, respectively. The one failed Sup-AIN in our series highlights the importance of patient selection. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Africa, peripheral nerve pathologies are a major source of disability, and the results of surgical therapies differ greatly among countries. The goal of this narrative review is to compile the most recent data on peripheral nerve surgery results in Africa, pinpoint critical variables that affect surgical outcomes, and offer suggestions for enhancing patient care. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published over the past four decades. The sources included peer-reviewed journals, hospital records, and reports from healthcare organizations. The review examined outcomes related to functional recovery, quality of life, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The outcomes of peripheral nerve surgeries in Africa are influenced by the availability of medical infrastructure, the level of surgeon expertise, and the timeliness of the intervention. Urban centers with better resources tend to report more favorable outcomes, whereas rural areas face significant challenges. Common barriers include limited access to advanced surgical tools, a shortage of specialized surgeons, and inadequate postoperative care and rehabilitation services. Despite these challenges, successful interventions have been reported, particularly in settings where targeted training programs and international collaborations are in place. CONCLUSION: Enhancing surgeon training programs, building comprehensive postoperative care and rehabilitation facilities, and investing in healthcare infrastructure are critical to improving peripheral nerve surgery results in Africa. International and regional collaborations can be extremely helpful in advancing these initiatives by enabling the sharing of knowledge and granting access to cutting-edge methods. Patients with peripheral nerve injuries across the continent may experience improved functional recovery and overall quality of life if these criteria are met.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Sensory nerve transfers may be performed to restore protective sensation and tactile perception after peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity. There is a paucity of literature on the available donor-recipient configurations for sensory nerve transfers. This article presents a systematic review of reported sensory nerve transfers in the upper extremity. METHODS: Original articles published between 1982 and 2022 were searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles describing a sensory nerve transfer were included if patient sensory outcomes were reported. Outcomes were categorized according to the modified British Medical Research Council scale, with an outcome of S3 or better defined as satisfactory. RESULTS: Of 1,049 articles, 39 met inclusion and quality criteria. Twenty-seven articles were primary research studies reporting on 197 patients who underwent 11 unique nondigital sensory donor nerve transfers and 24 unique digital donor nerve transfer procedures. The most reliable recipient nerve for restoring sensation to the ulnar border of the small finger was proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger (38 patients, 89% satisfactory sensory outcome). The best available donors for transfer into the proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger were proper ulnar digital nerve of the long finger (16 patients, 87.5% good sensory outcome) and palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (15 patients, 100% good sensory outcome). To restore sensation along the ulnar border of the thumb and radial aspect of the index finger, the best available donor was the superficial branch of the radial nerve, regardless of transfer into common digital nerve 1 (38 patients, success rate 63%) or directly to proper ulnar digital nerve of the thumb or proper radial digital nerve of the index finger (nine patients, success rates 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after sensory nerve transfers are generally good. Surgeons should transfer into a digital nerve recipient when attempting to reconstruct sensation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

RESUMEN

The sciatic nerve is the body's largest peripheral nerve. Along with their two terminal divisions (tibial and fibular), their anatomic location makes them particularly vulnerable to trauma and iatrogenic injuries. A thorough understanding of the functional anatomy is required to adequately localize lesions in this lengthy neural pathway. Proximal disorders of the nerve can be challenging to precisely localize among a range of possibilities including lumbosacral pathology, radiculopathy, or piriformis syndrome. A correct diagnosis is based upon a thorough history and physical examination, which will then appropriately direct adjunctive investigations such as imaging and electrodiagnostic testing. Disorders of the sciatic nerve and its terminal branches are disabling for patients, and expert assessment by rehabilitation professionals is important in limiting their impact. Applying techniques established in the upper extremity, surgical reconstruction of lower extremity nerve dysfunction is rapidly improving and evolving. These new techniques, such as nerve transfers, require electrodiagnostic assessment of both the injured nerve(s) as well as healthy, potential donor nerves as part of a complete neurophysiological examination.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 2-year functional outcomes of nerve transfer (NT) for upper extremity reanimation. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective case series. SETTING: A highly specialized rehabilitation hospital for spinal cord injury (SCI) in Italy. INTERVENTION: Upper limb nerve transfer (32 NTs, 15 upper limbs). PARTICIPANTS: Twelve male individuals with traumatic SCI (AIS A or B, neurological level from C4 to C7) were enrolled; 24-month follow-up data were available for 11. OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated the strength recovery of recipient muscles through the Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength. Upper limb function and independence were assessed with the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) test version 1 and the Spinal Cord Independent Measure III (SCIM III). Patient satisfaction was also evaluated. RESULTS: After 24 months, median MRC scores (range) were: triceps 2 (1-2); extensor digitorum communis 3 (1-4); extensor pollicis longus 2.5 (1-4); flexor digitorum profundus 2 (0-4); flexor pollicis longus 2 (0-4). No complication occurred. GRASSP prehension ability and prehension performance total scores significantly improved at 24 months from 1 (0-4) to 2 (0-7) and from 1 (0-8) to 5 (0--22), respectively. The SCIM III self-care sub-scale score improved at 24-month follow-up (p = 0.009).This study has important limitations, including a limited generalizability of the results and a small sample size that does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn. A large multicenter prospective study is needed to confirm our findings. CONCLUSIONS: NT represents a functional surgery option with few complications for the resuscitation of upper limbs in persons with tetraplegia.

RESUMEN

Measuring the outcome of peripheral nerve surgery is challenging because of the spectrum of functional impairment is dependent on the level and severity of the lesion. There are no nerve-specific patient-reported outcome measures, and no universally accepted outcome measurement both in terms of the parameters to be assessed and the methods and timing of the assessment. Nevertheless, the use of patient-reported outcome measures is fundamental to better understand the needs and expectations of patients, to take advantage of all treatment opportunities to offer the best possible support to these patients. This paper outlines current concepts in the measurement of outcome in peripheral nerve surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Brachial plexus reconstruction (BPR) consists of the complex surgical restoration of nerve structures. To further understand the underlying motor cortex changes and evaluate neuroplasticity after a successful surgery, we performed a navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) study mapping the postoperative motor representation of the formerly plegic arm. We conducted a prospective nTMS study mapping the musculocutaneous nerve as a representative, prominent target of BPR including a patient (n = 8) and a control group (n = 10). Measurements like resting motor threshold (RMT), cortical motor area location, and size were taken. Mathematical analysis was performed using MATLAB 2022, statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26, and nTMS mapping was performed using the Nexstim NBS 5.1 system. Mapping was feasible in seven out of eight patients. Median RMT on the affected hemisphere was 41% compared to 50% on the unaffected hemisphere and they were 37% and 36% on the left and right hemispheres of the control group. The motor area location showed a relocation of bicep brachii representation at the middle precentral gyrus of the corresponding contralateral hemisphere. Motor area size was increased compared to the control group and the patient's unaffected, ipsilateral hemisphere. Understanding cortical reorganization is important for potential future treatments like therapeutic nTMS. The issue of motor neuroplasticity in patients with brachial plexus lesions is worth exploring in further studies.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: SARS-Cov-19 pandemic totally changed daily routine work in German hospitals. As hospital capacity was reduced, many surgeries were postponed or even cancelled. On March 25th 2020 the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC) published a statement in which urgent non-elective surgeries were defined for each neurosurgical domain, whereas elective interventions were deferred. The present work examines the impact of these Covid strategies focusing on patients with peripheral lesions who were conducted to our department during this period of time. METHODS: All patients who underwent any peripheral nerve surgery at our department from January 2018 until December 2022, were included. The complete range of surgeries including peripheral nerve lesions was examined encompassing compression syndromes, traumatic lesions of brachial plexus, traumatic lesions and tumors of single peripheral nerves. The numbers of surgical procedures were compared before, during and after pandemic. Pearson correlation coefficient was analysed. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2022 the total number of surgical procedures involving peripheral nerves included 2422 procedures. Compression syndromes made up the largest proportion (1433 operations, 59%), followed by peripheral nerve lesions (445 operations, 18%), peripheral nerve tumors (344 operations, 14%) and lesions of the brachial plexus (142 operations, 6%). The average was 40,5 interventions per month, the range was 7-63. Two declines in the number of peripheral nerve surgeries were noted during this period. The first was in April and May 2020 with an average drop of 65% and 41% respectively. In these months the average number of operations was 37. The second decrease was from October 2021 until January 2022, where number of surgeries was reduced by 16%, 36%, 83% and 18% with an average number of 50 operations. Both declines showed a significant and strong correlation with the lower number of compression syndrome treatments (r = 0.952, p < 0.001 and r = 0.968, p < 0.001), while no drop and no significant correlation was found in the treatment of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries (p = 0.769, r = 0.095 and p = 0.243, r = 0.366) and traumatic brachial plexus injuries (p = 0.787, r = 0.088 and p = 0.780, r = 0.09). A weak significant correlation was seen in the treatment numbers of peripheral nerve tumors (p = 0.017, r = 0.672 and p = 0.015, r = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Covid-19 pandemic lead to a significant decrease in the number of nerve decompressions, since, according to the German Society of Neurosurgery, those were considered as elective surgeries.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a relatively recent surgical innovation that involves the coaptation of major peripheral nerves to a recipient motor branch that innervates an expendable muscle target. The original indication for TMR was augmentation and optimization of myoelectric signals in the amputated limb for use of myoelectric prosthetics. Incidentally, surgeons and patients discovered that the technique also could treat and prevent phantom and residual limb pain. TMR is performed at the time of amputation or delayed any time after the amputation, and TMR can also be performed at any level of amputation. In the upper extremity, studies have detailed the various techniques and coaptations possible at each amputation level to create intuitive myoelectric signals and treat neurogenic pain. Treatment of peripheral nerves in the amputee with TMR should be a consideration for all patients with major upper extremity amputations, especially at large institutions able to support multidisciplinary limb salvage teams. This review article summarizes the current literature and authors' techniques and recommendations surrounding TMR in the upper extremity amputee including techniques relevant to each level of upper extremity amputation.

RESUMEN

Significance: Multispectral photoacoustic imaging has the potential to identify lipid-rich, myelinated nerve tissue in an interventional or surgical setting (e.g., to guide intraoperative decisions when exposing a nerve during reconstructive surgery by limiting operations to nerves needing repair, with no impact to healthy or regenerating nerves). Lipids have two optical absorption peaks within the NIR-II and NIR-III windows (i.e., 1000 to 1350 nm and 1550 to 1870 nm wavelength ranges, respectively) which can be exploited to obtain photoacoustic images. However, nerve visualization within the NIR-III window is more desirable due to higher lipid absorption peaks and a corresponding valley in the optical absorption of water. Aim: We present the first known optical absorption characterizations, photoacoustic spectral demonstrations, and histological validations to support in vivo photoacoustic nerve imaging in the NIR-III window. Approach: Four in vivo swine peripheral nerves were excised, and the optical absorption spectra of these fresh ex vivo nerves were characterized at wavelengths spanning 800 to 1880 nm, to provide the first known nerve optical absorbance spectra and to enable photoacoustic amplitude spectra characterization with the most optimal wavelength range. Prior to excision, the latter two of the four nerves were surrounded by aqueous, lipid-free, agarose blocks (i.e., 3% w/v agarose) to enhance acoustic coupling during in vivo multispectral photoacoustic imaging using the optimal NIR-III wavelengths (i.e., 1630 to 1850 nm) identified in the ex vivo studies. Results: There was a verified characteristic lipid absorption peak at 1725 nm for each ex vivo nerve. Results additionally suggest that the 1630 to 1850 nm wavelength range can successfully visualize and differentiate lipid-rich nerves from surrounding water-containing and lipid-deficient tissues and materials. Conclusions: Photoacoustic imaging using the optimal wavelengths identified and demonstrated for nerves holds promise for detection of myelination in exposed and isolated nerve tissue during a nerve repair surgery, with possible future implications for other surgeries and other optics-based technologies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the surgical management of peripheral nerve pathologies over the past several decades, it is unknown how public awareness of these procedures has changed. We hypothesize that Google searches for peripheral nerve surgery have increased over time. METHODS: Google Trends was queried for search volumes of a list of 40 keywords related to the following topics in peripheral nerve surgery: spasticity, nerve injury, prosthetics, and nerve pain. Monthly relative search volume over the first 5 years of the study period (2010-2014) was compared with that of the last 5 years (2018-2022) of the study period. RESULTS: Search volumes for keywords "nerve injury," "nerve laceration," "peripheral nerve injury," "nerve repair," "nerve transfer", "neuroma," "neuroma pain," "nerve pain," "nerve pain surgery," and "neuroma pain surgery" all increased more than 10% points in relative search volume over the study period (P < 0.0001 for each keyword). In contrast, searches for "rhizotomy," "spasticity surgery," "targeted muscle reinnervation," "bionic arm," and "myoelectric prosthesis" either decreased or remained stable. Technical terms such as "selective neurectomy," "hyperselective neurectomy," "regenerative peripheral nerve interface," and "regenerative peripheral nerve interface surgery" did not have adequate search volume to be reported by Google Trends. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in Google searches related to nerve injury and pain between 2010 and 2022 may reflect increasing public recognition of these clinical entities and surgical techniques addressing them. Technical terms relating to nerve pain are infrequently searched, surgeons should use plain English terms for online discovery. Interest in spasticity and myoelectric prosthetics remains stable, indicating an opportunity for better public outreach.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Peripheral nerve surgery mostly involves elective procedures; thus, the associated complications are of great clinical, social, and medicolegal importance. Apart from the general perioperative morbidity, complications during interventions on peripheral nerves are extremely rare. However, iatrogenic peripheral nerve injuries during unrelated surgical procedures performed by those not specialised in peripheral nerve surgery remain the most significant group of complications, accounting for up to approximately 17% of all cases. The aims of this review are to provide better insight into the multifaceted nature of complications related to peripheral nerve surgery-from the perspective of their causes, treatment, and outcome-and to raise surgeons' awareness of the risks of such morbidity. It should be emphasized that intraoperative complications in peripheral nerve surgery are largely "surgeon-related" rather than "surgery-related"; therefore, they have great potential to be avoided.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Limb amputation can cause residual limb pain (RLP) and/or phantom limb pain (PLP). Although targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was initially introduced to facilitate the control of prosthetic limbs, it has been noted that these patients experience less pain and improved prosthetic functional outcomes. As a result, the use of TMR in managing neuroma-related RLP is increasing. The aim of this review is to assess the quality and strength of the evidence supporting the effectiveness of TMR in managing amputation-related pain. METHODS: Five different databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched from inception to March 2022. The protocol for this systematic review has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020218242). To be included, studies needed to compare pre- and postoperative pain outcomes or different techniques for adult patients who underwent TMR following amputation. Eligible studies also needed to use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and be clinical trials or observational studies published in English. Excluded studies were case reports, case series, reviews, proof of concept studies, and conference proceedings. A meta-analysis was performed on studies that had similar intervention and control groups to examine treatment effects using a random-effects model. Studies were weighted using the inverse variance method, and a statistically significant p-value was considered to be less than or equal to 0.05. RESULTS: This review included five studies for qualitative analysis and four studies for quantitative analysis. Reviewed studies enrolled a total of 127 patients. The TMR group was compared with standard treatment at 12 months follow-up. The TMR group showed significantly better PLP as assessed by the numerical rating score RLP, and PLP assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) also showed significantly lower pain intensity in the TMR group. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence of good quality favoring TMR in reducing postamputation PLP and RLP pain compared with standard care. Randomized clinical trials are encouraged to compare the efficacy of different surgical techniques.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST) of the retroperitoneum are rare and are often treated by general surgeons dealing with retroperitoneal cancers. However, resection without the correct microsurgical technique can cause permanent neurological deficits and pain. Here, we discuss our interdisciplinary approach based on the integration of expertise from neurosurgery and abdominal surgery, allowing for both safe exposure and nerve-sparing microsurgical resection of these lesions. We present a series of 15 patients who underwent resection of benign retroperitoneal or pelvic PNST at our institution. The mean age of patients was 48.4 years; 67% were female. Tumors were 14 schwannomas and 1 neurofibroma. Eight patients (53%) reported neurologic symptoms preoperatively. The rate of complete resection was 87% (n = 13); all symptomatic patients showed improvement of their preoperative symptoms. There were no postoperative motor deficits; one patient (7%) developed a permanent sensory deficit. At a mean postoperative follow-up of 31 months, we observed no recurrences. To our best knowledge, this is the second-largest series of benign retroperitoneal PNST consistently managed with microsurgical techniques. Our experience confirms that interdisciplinary management allows for safe treatment of these tumors with good neurological and oncological outcomes.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral nerve surgeons disagree on the optimal timing and treatment of brachial plexus injuries (BPI). This study aims to survey peripheral nerve surgeons on their management of BPI, including disagreement. METHODS: Surgeons responded to a case-based survey involving traumatic and birth injuries leading to BPI involving the upper and lower trunks, and pre- and post-ganglionic injuries. RESULTS: Out of 255 invited surgeons, 154 participated, with specialties of Neurosurgery (33.7%), Plastic surgery (32.5%), and Orthopedics (32.5%). For the adult C5-6 avulsion injury, 97.4% agreed they would operate. There was 46.2% disagreement regarding the pediatric upper trunk neuroma-in-continuity case, and similar disagreement (50.0%) was recorded on exploring the brachial plexus for a pediatric lower trunk injury case. High percentages of surgeons were more likely to explore the plexus, such as at upper BPI. Also, most participants reported nerve transfer for the upper and lower trunk avulsion injuries, but there was 55.6% disagreement regarding nerve transfer for the infant with the upper trunk neuroma-in-continuity. Among those elected to perform nerve transfer, most (70.0%-84.5%) would perform an accessory-to-suprascapular nerve transfer for upper BPI, while brachialis-to-anterior interosseous and supinator branch of the radial nerve-to-posterior interosseous were preferred for lower BPI (30.0%-55.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial disagreement exists among peripheral nerve surgeons in managing adult and pediatric BPI. In adult BPI, most prefer to operate at the time of the presentation and perform extensive nerve transfers. The accessory-suprascapular transfer was recommended for upper BPI, while brachialis and radial nerves were preferred for lower BPI. The most significant disagreements exist in operation and nerve transfer for pediatric upper BPI and brachial plexus explorations. Geography, specialty, and operative volume contribute to the differences seen.

Asunto(s)