Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 7(1): 47-54, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24332422

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the incidence, correlates, and clinical implications of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO). BACKGROUND: The risk of PMI during CTO PCI may be underestimated because systematic cardiac biomarker measurement was not performed in published studies. METHODS: We retrospectively examined PMI among 325 consecutive CTO PCI performed at our institution between 2005 and 2012. Creatine kinase-myocardial band fraction and troponin were measured before PCI and 8 to 12 h and 18 to 24 h after PCI in all patients. PMI was defined as creatine kinase-myocardial band increase ≥ 3 x the upper limit of normal. Major adverse cardiac events during mid-term follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age was 64 ± 8 years. The retrograde approach was used in 26.8% of all procedures. The technical and procedural success was 77.8% and 76.6%, respectively. PMI occurred in 28 patients (8.6%, 95% confidence intervals: 5.8% to 12.2%), with symptomatic ischemia in 7 of those patients. The incidence of PMI was higher in patients treated with the retrograde than the antegrade approach (13.8% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.04). During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, compared with patients without PMI, those with PMI had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.25, p = 0.006). Patients with only asymptomatic PMI also had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events on follow-up (HR: 2.26, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic measurement of cardiac biomarkers post-CTO PCI demonstrates that PMI occurs in 8.6% of patients, is more common with the retrograde approach, and is associated with worse subsequent clinical outcomes during mid-term follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Forma MB de la Creatina-Quinasa/sangre , Cardiopatías/sangre , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Troponina/sangre , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedad Crónica , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico , Femenino , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Texas/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 6(11): 1129-37, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24139933

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the causes of and to develop a risk score for failure of transradial approach (TRA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: TRA-PCI failure has been reported in 5% to 10% of cases. METHODS: TRA-PCI failure was categorized as primary (clinical reasons) or crossover failure. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of TRA-PCI failure, and an integer risk score was developed. RESULTS: From January to June 2010, TRA-PCI was attempted in 1,609 (97.3%) consecutive patients, whereas 45 (2.7%) had primary TRA-PCI failure. Crossover TRA-PCI failure occurred in 30 (1.8%) patients. Causes of primary TRA-PCI failure included chronic radial artery occlusion (11%), previous coronary artery bypass graft (27%), and cardiogenic shock (20%). Causes for crossover TRA-PCI failure included: inadequate puncture in 17 patients (57%); radial artery spasm in 5 (17%); radial loop in 4 (13%); subclavian tortuosity in 2 (7%); and inadequate guide catheter support in 2 (7%) patients. Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95 to 5.26, p < 0.0001), previous coronary artery bypass graft (OR: 6.1; 95% CI: 3.63 to 10.05, p < 0.0001), and cardiogenic shock (OR: 11.2; 95% CI: 2.78 to 41.2, p = 0.0011) were independent predictors of TRA-PCI failure. Risk score values from 0 to 7 predicted a TRA-PCI failure rate from 2% to 80%. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume radial center, 2.7% of patients undergoing PCI are excluded from initial TRA on clinical grounds, whereas crossover to femoral approach is required in only 1.8% of the cases. A new simple clinical risk score is developed to predict TRA-PCI failure.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Arteria Radial , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Quebec , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Choque Cardiogénico/complicaciones , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA