RESUMEN

The mechanisms of adenosine and specific adenosine receptor subtypes in promoting penile rehabilitation remain unclear. Single-cell RNA sequencing of human corpus cavernosum,  adenosine deaminase (ADA) and adenosine receptors knock-out mice (ADA-/-, A1-/-, A2a-/-, A2b-/-, and A3-/-), and primary corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells are used to determine receptor subtypes responsible for adenosine-induced erection. Three rat models are established to characterize refractory erectile dysfunction (ED): age-related ED, bilateral cavernous nerve crush related ED (BCNC), and diabetes mellitus-induced ED. In single-cell RNA sequencing data, the corpus cavernosum of ED patients show a decrease in adenosine A1, A2a and A2b receptors. In vivo, A2b receptor knock-out abolishes adenosine-induced erection but not that of A1, A2a, or A3 receptor. Under hypoxic conditions in vitro, activating the A2b receptor increases HIF-1α and decreases PDE5 expression. In refractory ED models, activating the A2b receptor with Bay 60-6583 improves erectile function and down-regulates HIF-1α and TGF-ß. Administering Dipyridamole (40 mg Kg-1) to BCNC rats improve penile adenosine levels and erectile function. Our study reveals that the A2b receptor mediates adenosine-induced penile erection. Activating the A2b receptor promotes penile rehabilitation of refractory ED by alleviating hypoxia and fibrosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The surgical management of prostate cancer through radical prostatectomy has the potential to impact patients' sexual function, including erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease (PD). Historical data suggests the incidence of PD in post-prostatectomy patients is higher than in the general population at 15.9%. Our study objective was to measure the rate of the development of PD among patients that receive penile rehabilitation (PR) regimen prior to and immediately after radical prostatectomy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 581 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, treated with radical prostatectomy, and engaged in a PR program. Patients with the diagnosis of PD prior to prostatectomy were excluded from this study. The PR program consists of daily tadalafil, L-citrulline, and weekly vacuum erectile device with the option of intracavernosal injections if patients fail to respond to the regular regimen. We found the incidence of PD to be 2.9%, suggesting that PR regimens programs may be associated with a reduced incidence of PD in post-prostatectomy patients. Ten (out of 17) patients were diagnosed with PD after 2 years of follow up. The return of erections was not statistically different among patients who developed PD and the rest of the patients. Prospective, multi-institutional trials will be required to elucidate whether PR can prevent the development of PD in this patient population.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor labeling states that these agents should not be used in conjunction with other erectogenic medications for fear of priapism occurring. AIM: We explored the risk of priapism and prolonged erections in men in our post-radical prostatectomy (RP) penile injection program who were using regular PDE5 inhibitor and intracavernosal injections (ICIs) as part of their rehabilitation program. METHODS: The study cohort included men on penile injection therapy who (1) were taking tadalafil 5 mg daily or taking sildenafil 25 mg on noninjection days, (2) had an RP, (3) were using their respective PDE5 inhibitor regularly at the time of penile injection training, and (4) complied with the program instructions regarding penile injection use. Demographics, comorbidity details, PDE5 inhibitor dose and utilization, and injection dose and utilization data were collected. All patients underwent in-office injection training and used trimix (papaverine/phentolamine/prostaglandin E1) as the intracavernosal medication. OUTCOMES: Priapism was defined as a patient self-reported penetration hardness erection ≥4 hours in duration, while prolonged erection was defined as a penetration hardness erection lasting ≥2 hours. RESULTS: A total of 112 tadalafil users and 364 sildenafil users were compared. Mean age and duration post-RP were 62 ± 14 years and 5.2 ± 12 months, respectively, and there was no difference between tadalafil and sildenafil groups. The mean trimix dose was tadalafil 24 ± 24 units and sildenafil 31 ± 37 units (P < .05). Priapism occurred in 2 (1.7%) of 112 tadalafil users and 5 (1.4%) of 364 sildenafil users (P = .47). Excluding those men experiencing priapism on any occasion, those with any reported penetration hardness erection lasting ≥2 hours were 7 (6.3%) of 112 tadalafil users and 12 (3.3%) of 364 sildenafil users (P < .01). A total of 53% of these prolonged erections occurred within the first 6 injections at home (no difference between tadalafil and sildenafil groups). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We emphasize the need for continued monitoring and education on proper injection techniques to minimize the risk of adverse events in ICI and PDE5 inhibitor combination therapy. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study has a relatively large patient population with a considerable follow-up time. Additionally, the rigorous training, education, and monitoring of the participants, as well as the use of formal definitions for priapism and prolonged erections, enhances the accuracy and reliability of the results. However, there are some limitations, such as social desirability, confounding factors, and recall bias. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the incidence of priapism in an ICI program in which men combine ICI with tadalafil or sildenafil. However, tadalafil patients had a higher rate of prolonged erections, which was found to occur mostly early during the titration phase.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Prostate cancer is the most common solid-organ malignancy in adult men. Early detection and treatment of prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy (RP) has improved cancer-specific survival but is associated with penile shortening and erectile dysfunction. Penile traction therapy (PTT) has been demonstrated to increase stretched penile length (SPL) prior to penile prosthesis placement and may improve erectile function (EF) in patients with Peyronie's disease. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PTT in preserving penile length and EF after bilateral cavernous nerve crush injury (BCNI) in a rat model. Methods: Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 11-13 weeks were randomly assigned to three groups (n=8, each): sham operation with no PTT (Sham), BCNI without PTT (Crush), and BCNI with PTT (Traction). PTT was started on postoperative day 3. A traction force of 1 Newton was applied to the penis for 30 minutes each day for 28 days. After 28 days of traction, the cavernous nerve was stimulated while recording the intracavernosal pressure (ICP) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) simultaneously. Cavernosal tissue was excised, and western blot analysis for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was performed. Significance was determined by using ANOVA with Tukey-Kruger post-hoc testing. Results: At 4 weeks after nerve injury, the Traction group had significantly greater SPL compared to the Sham and Crush groups (30 vs. 28 and 27 mm, respectively). The Sham group had significantly greater EF (ΔICP/MAP) compared to the Crush group at 2.5, 5, and 7.5 V. The EF of the Traction group was between that of the Sham and Crush groups and was not significantly different from the Sham group at any voltages. Further downstream analysis revealed that the Traction group had significantly greater eNOS expression in cavernosal tissue compared to the Crush group, which was confirmed on western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Conclusions: Findings from this animal study suggest that PTT has the potential to mitigate penile retraction after RP. While more studies are needed to determine the effect of PTT on preservation of EF, the increased eNOS expression observed in the Traction group offers a potential protective mechanism of action.

RESUMEN

Erectile dysfunction (ED) caused by cavernous nerve injury (CNI) is refractory to heal mainly ascribed to the adverse remodeling of the penis induced by ineffectual microvascular perfusion, fibrosis, and neurotrophins scarcity in cavernosum. Phosphodiesterase type V inhibitors (PDE5i) have been regarded as an alternative candidate drug for avoiding penile neuropathy. However, the therapeutic efficacy is severely limited due to poor accumulation under systemic medication and endogenous nitric oxide (NO) deficiency in cavernosum. Herein, an innovative liposomal microbubble (MB) loaded with both Sildenafil (one of PDE5i) and NO was designed. Ultrasound-targeted MB destruction (UTMD)-mediated efficient release and integration erectogenic agents into corpus cavernosum with high biosafety. On a bilateral CNI rat model, the multifunctional MB-cooperated UTMD improved microvascular perfusion in penis, simultaneously, alleviated hypoxia and oxidative stress, indicating successful activation of NO-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway. Also, evaluation of the endothelial/muscular composition, intracavernosal pressure, and neural integrity in the penis proved that coordinated intervention reversed the abnormal structural remodeling and promoted the recovery of functional erection. Our work demonstrates that MB loading Sildenafil and NO combined with UTMD hold great promise to "awaken" the efficacy of PDE5i in neurogenic ED, which provided a superior option for ensuring penile rehabilitation.

RESUMEN

Background and Objective: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent and impactful complication post definitive management of prostate cancer. The mechanism of ED is thought to be secondary to vascular and neural injury as well as corporal smooth muscle damage with resultant fibrosis. The use of penile rehabilitation in ED following treatment for prostate cancer has been studied. Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) is a novel treatment for ED thought to stimulate neovascularization and nerve regeneration, and as such, has gained interest in treatment of ED related to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Herein, we performed a narrative review on the use of Li-ESWT in management of ED following treatment for prostate cancer. Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies evaluating Li-ESWT following prostate cancer treatment were included. Key Content and Findings: We identified three randomized controlled trials and two observational studies that assessed use of Li-ESWT for ED after prostate surgery. Use of Li-ESWT across most studies showed improvements in the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function (IIEF-EF) domain scores, but this improvement was not statistically significant. Additionally, use of Li-ESWT in an early versus delayed fashion does not appear to affect changes in long-term sexual function scores. No data on use of Li-ESWT after radiotherapy were identified. Conclusions: There is a paucity of data regarding use of Li-ESWT for penile rehabilitation in treatment of ED post-prostate cancer therapy. Current protocols for Li-ESWT are not standardized and have a limited number of participants with short duration of follow-up. Additional evaluation is needed to determine optimal Li-ESWT protocols. Ideally, studies should have longer follow-up to truly evaluate the clinical significance of Li-ESWT in the treatment of post-prostatectomy ED. Furthermore, the role of Li-ESWT after radiotherapy remains elusive.

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men, and its treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Prostate surgery can often result in erectile dysfunction (ED), significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Penile rehabilitation techniques have been developed to restore erectile function following prostate surgery. This review discusses the different penile rehabilitation techniques available, their effectiveness, and the factors affecting their success. This paper also addresses the importance of addressing the psychological aspects of ED in these patients and the need for personalized and tailored rehabilitation plans. By providing a comprehensive understanding of penile rehabilitation techniques, this paper can assist clinicians in restoring the quality of life of patients who have undergone prostate surgery.

RESUMEN

Pelvic malignancies, including prostate, rectal, and bladder cancers, are among the most frequent malignancies found in the male population. These issues are most effectively and commonly treated with radiotherapy and/or surgery. However, these treatments can cause collateral damage, resulting in significant impacts on quality of life, with erectile dysfunction being one of the most frequent postoperative complications. Currently, there are several treatment options for erectile dysfunction, including oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, vacuum erection devices, intracorporeal injections, and penile prosthesis. The latter has shown to be an effective and safe technique, with results comparable to those obtained by patients without pelvic surgery or radiotherapy. The results of early penile rehabilitation programs are promising and they have been incorporated into a greater proportion of treatment plans more recently, with varying degrees of success. In this narrative review, we summarize the literature on erectile dysfunction after pelvic cancer treatments and its management.

RESUMEN

Background: Low intensity shockwave therapy is an emerging treatment option for men with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. Radial wave therapy (rWT), which differs from focused shockwave (fSWT) as it produces lower pressure waves with lower peak energy, is used to treat soft tissue and skin conditions and has some data to support its use in vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. There is limited data for the use of rWT for the treatment of erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy. We report the first trial of rWT for penile rehabilitation after NS radical prostatectomy. Methods: We performed a prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial. Men with good pre-operative erectile function who underwent a NS radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2018-2020 were considered for inclusion. We compared post-operative erectile function outcomes between the rWT (6 weekly treatments initiated approximately 2 weeks post-operatively) plus standard of care (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor) arm and the non-sham controlled standard of care arm. The primary end point for our study was the proportion of men who returned to "near normal" erectile function, defined as IIEF-5 score ≥17 and erectile hardness score (EHS) ≥3, by 3 months post-operatively between the intervention and control arm. We also compared mean IIEF-5 scores and median EHSs between the arms. Results: One hundred and six patients were enrolled, of whom 73 patients had at least one reported survey response between 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. Five (17%) and 11 (26%) patients recovered erectile function in the control and intervention arms, respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference (P=0.37). However, the intervention arm did have a significantly higher median EHS compared to the control arm (1 vs. 2, P=0.03). There were 4 adverse events related to pain during treatment and required only treatment intensity de-escalation. Conclusions: rWT is safe but did not substantially improve the recovery of early erectile function after NS radical prostatectomy.

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer treatment can significantly impact erectile function, and penile rehabilitation has been proposed to improve the impacts. However, the effectiveness of penile rehabilitations after treatment of prostate cancer is scarce. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions of penile rehabilitation program after prostate cancer treatment. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases, PubMed and Google Scholar, to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated interventions for penile rehabilitation after prostate cancer treatment. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed, and data were synthesized and analyzed. We identified 11 randomized controlled trials that evaluated different interventions for penile rehabilitation after prostate cancer treatment. The interventions included the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernous injections, vacuum erection devices, and penile rehabilitation programs. The data suggest that these phosphodiesterase inhibitors, intracavernous injections, vacuum erection devices, and penile rehabilitation programs are promising in improving erectile function after prostate cancer treatment. However, the optimal timing and duration of these interventions remain unclear, and there is a need for further research to determine their long-term effectiveness and safety. Healthcare providers should consider individualized approaches to penile rehabilitation, taking into account patient characteristics and preferences.

RESUMEN

There have been considerable advances in the field of penile rehabilitation for upwards of 90% of men adversely affected by either short-term or long-term erectile dysfunction after definitive prostate cancer treatment. Despite the evolving landscape of treatment modalities for penile rehabilitation, there is a lack of consensus in the urologic community on the best therapies due to the level of evidence and efficacies of the current and emerging offerings. This review of current and next-generation interventions provides a practical approach to the myriad of data to make a better-informed decision based on the pathophysiology and highest-quality evidence available.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect and feasibility of linear low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-LiESWT) as a penile rehabilitation method for erectile dysfunction (ED) after bilateral nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Patients who had undergone bilateral NS RP (either radical retropubic prostatectomy or robot-assisted laparoscopic RP), 3 or more months prior to the study, and who had no ED preoperatively and were suffering from mild to severe postoperative ED were included in the study. Four treatments were given over a 4-week period, using the PiezoWave2 device with a linear shockwave applicator and the linear shockwave tissue coverage (LSTC-ED®) technique. If the improvement in erectile function was still considered insufficient (less than an IIEF-5 score of 22-25) at 2 months after the start of LI-LiESWT, penile rehabilitation was supplemented by pharmacological penile rehabilitation. The final effect of treatment was evaluated after 12 months. The main outcome measure was changes in the five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score. RESULTS: Between September 2019 and September 2020, a total of 40 patients were included in the study and randomly divided into 2 groups: treatment group and sham group. Eight patients were excluded from the study and were not evaluated due to other conditions which required additional treatment (COVID-19 disease, postoperative incontinence, urethral stricture, and ischemic stroke). Thirty-two patients were included in the final analysis: 16 in the control group and 16 in the intervention group. At 6 months from the end of treatment, patients in both the treatment and the sham group achieved physiological IIEF-5 values, and the beneficial effect persisted for 12 months after the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: LI-LiESWT using the LSTC-ED® technique is a suitable and safe method for penile rehabilitation in patients with ED after bilateral NS RP, not only because of the vasculogenic effect of LI-LiESWT but also because of its neuroprotective and/or regenerative effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: The following article explores our evolving understandings of the role of regenerative technology as an effective penile rehabilitation tool in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the setting of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment and PCa survivorship. Methods: This narrative clinical review paper summarizes what is currently known about various modalities of regenerative therapy in restoring spontaneous erectile function (EF) in men following PCa treatment with an emphasis on penile rehabilitation strategies. Results: Conventional medical therapy often does not reverse underlying endothelial dysfunction or promote neuro-vasculogenesis to preserve penile health in men with ED. Over the past decade, there has been considerable interest in the role of regenerative therapy to restore endothelial dysfunction and ED without future dependency on medical therapy. Regenerative therapy can be classified into cellular-based (immunomodulators, stem cells, and platelet-rich plasma), biomaterials (nerve graft transfer), and device-related technology (low-intensity shockwave). Although published literature shows early promise in the role of regenerative technology for ED, there is a paucity of high-quality clinical trials in the setting of penile rehabilitation and PCa survivorship to support their use as standard care and be adopted in clinical guidelines. Conclusion: While the use of regenerative technology to restore EF is exciting and highly innovative, considerable limitations remain regarding actual clinical translation and the need for longer-term efficacy and safety data as well as governmental regulation on clinical framework and more robust clinical studies before they can be accepted as standard of care to restore EF in men following PCa treatment.

RESUMEN

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors are currently the most widely used penile rehabilitation treatment for ED following RP, but they are less effective than for those with general ED. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment (LI-ESWT), causing a biological change that induces neovascularization, has recently been used as a treatment for ED. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficiency of LI-ESWT in ED following RP. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up until December 2021. The endpoint was the change in IIEF scores after LI-ESWT. Five papers (460 patients) were included in the final analysis. In IIEF scores performed 3-4 months after LI-ESWT, the group receiving LI-ESWT showed statistically significantly better results than the control (WMD = -2.04; 95% CI, -3.72 to -0.35; p = 0.02). However, there were a total of two studies that measured the results after 9-12 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (WMD = -5.37; 95% CI, -12.42 to 1.69; p = 0.14). The results of this analysis indicate that LI-ESWT showed a statistically significant effect on early recovery in penile rehabilitation of ED following RP. However, the level of evidence was low. Therefore, careful interpretation of the results is required.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread practice of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (nsRARP) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa), erectile dysfunction remains a significant sequela of radical prostatectomy. AIM: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg once daily for erectile function recovery in patients who underwent nsRARP according to the timing of rehabilitation initiation. METHODS: In this double-blind, prospective pilot study, a total of 41 patients who underwent nsRARP were randomly assigned into 2 groups according to the timing of rehabilitation initiation. In the preRARP group (n = 20), tadalafil was started 2 weeks before nsRARP, and in the postRARP group (n = 21), it was started 4 weeks after nsRARP. Erectile function recovery after nsRARP was defined as an International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score of ≥17. OUTCOMES: The measures of EF recovery were the changes in IIEF-5 score. RESULTS: The rate of erectile function recovery at 12-month follow-up was 80.0% and 71.4% in the preRARP and postRARP groups, respectively. The mean differences between baseline and postoperative IIEF-5 scores at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up were -11.7 ± 3.2, -7.4 ± 3.2, -5.6 ± 1.5, and -4.1 ± 1.1 in the preRARP group and -14.7 ± 4.7, -12.0 ± 5.0, -9.7 ± 3.9, and -6.0 ± 3.1 in the postRARP group, respectively (1-month, P = .259; 3-months, P = .077; 6-months, P = .014; 12-months, P = .007). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Preoperative tadalafil 5 mg once a day could be used effectively and safely as a strategy for penile rehabilitation after nsRARP. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study is the first prospective trial of penile rehabilitation with tadalafil 5 mg once a day prior to nsRARP. This is a pilot study with the limitations of a small sample; further and large-scale studies with multiple cohorts, such as an untreated control group and an early immediate rehabilitation group for EF recovery, are needed. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that preoperative penile rehabilitation using tadalafil may lead to better erectile function recovery than postoperative penile rehabilitation using tadalafil. Noh T, Shim JS, Kang SG, et al. Efficacy of Tadalafil in Penile Rehabilitation Started Before Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Double-Blind Pilot Study. Sex Med 2022;10:100508.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing across the world, with over 1.2 million men diagnosed in 2018. Survival rates have increased significantly however the morbidity remains high. Men do report unmet sexual health needs post prostatectomy, despite this, many do not pursue treatment. OBJECTIVES: To explore men's perceptions of the education and support they receive surrounding post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and penile rehabilitation. DESIGN: Systematic review and qualitative analysis based on Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for conducting synthesis. METHODS: Based on the protocol registered with PROSPERO, data were collected from the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Psycinfo, The Cochrane Library and Embase. Titles and abstracts were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, full texts were then screened, and the methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institutes Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Synthesised findings were extracted from 13 articles; four synthesised findings were identified from nine categories with 57 findings and 108 illustrations. The findings related to a perceived lack of education and support regarding all aspects of sexuality post prostatectomy. Practitioners' knowledge of gay, bisexual and single men's needs was particularly lacking. Nurses and nurse practitioners were considered to contribute positively to educational needs. CONCLUSIONS: The synthesised findings demonstrated that men do not receive sufficient education and support to initiate penile rehabilitation post-prostatectomy. Men need a holistic approach to altered sexuality and practitioners should facilitate education and treatment in a non-judgmental and all-inclusive approach.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) following radical prostatectomy (RP) is a frequent complication often leading to erectile tissue remodeling and permanent ED. Low-intensity electrostimulation (LIES) has been shown to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration, however, its application on cavernous nerves (CN) has never been investigated. AIMS: To investigate whether LIES enhances CN regeneration, improves erectile function (EF) recovery, and prevents corpora cavernosal remodeling after CN injury, which is a principal factor for ED following RP. METHODS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into Sham, Bilateral Cavernous Nerve Injury (BCNI), and BCNI + LIES (1V, 0.1ms, 12Hz, 1h/day). After 7days, EF was assessed (ICP measurement). Penes and CN were collected for molecular analyses of TGF-ß1, Il-6, CRP, eNOS, ERK and AKT protein levels in corpus cavernosum (CC), and immunohistological analysis of DHE, total collagen and α-SMA in CC and S-100, Tub-III, DAPI, TUNEL, and nNOS in CN. OUTCOMES: Effects of LIES on EF, erectile tissue remodeling and CN structure. RESULTS: EF was decreased (P < .05) 7 days after BCNI and increased (P < .05) by LIES. Intracavernosal reactive oxygen species (DHE) was increased (P < .05) after BCNI and normalized by LIES. Protein expressions of TGF-ß1, IL-6, and CRP were increased in the penis (P < .05) after BCNI and normalized by LIES. The α-SMA and/or total collagen ratio was decreased (P < .05) after BCNI in the penis and normalized by LIES. Protein expression ratio of p-ERK/ERK and p-AKT/AKT did not change after BCNI but increased (P < .05) in LIES group. Myelination and number of nNOS positive cells in the CN were decreased (P < .05) after BCNI and normalized by LIES. The number of apoptotic nerve cells within the dorsal penile nerve was increased (P < .05) after BCNI and decreased (P < .05) by LIES compared to the BCNI group. There were no differences in eNOS expression in the penis between study groups. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: LIES may offer a potential new tool for penile rehabilitation and ED management following RP, potentially enhancing EF recovery and minimizing the side effects of this surgery. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study provides evidence of the protective effect of LIES on EF and tissue remodeling following CN injury; nevertheless, this study has been conducted on animals and the translation to humans remains to be demonstrated. Further research to identify the underlying mechanisms of action is required. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that LIES of the CN after CN injury protects CN structure, enhances EF recovery, and prevents corpora cavernosal remodeling. Sturny M, Karakus S, Fraga-Silva R, et al. Low-Intensity Electrostimulation Enhances Neuroregeneration and Improves Erectile Function in a Rat Model of Cavernous Nerve Injury. J Sex Med 2022;19:686-696.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)