RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The pelvic floor (PF) is a highly complex structure which may be affected by various stimulating factors like decreased PF support. As ultrasound can dynamically observe the position and mobility of anatomical structures, However, there are very few studies on PF ultrasound in males. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one male patients with normal conditions underwent transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound (TPFU) examination. Ultrasound was performed in a supine lithotomy position. The probe was pressed on the sagittal plane of the perineum and adjusted till the anorectal angle, as well as bladder, were located and the median prostate and pubic symphysis were visible on the sagittal plane. TPFU was carried out to observe the patterns of pelvic floor movement during different phases, measure ultrasound parameters of the PF in men, and assess the potential applications and prospects of the male PF. RESULTS: Two-dimensional male PF ultrasound can detect the bladder, prostate, male urethra, anus, rectum. Resting, Valsalva, and contraction phases of the PF are clearly shown, the pelvic organs in the Valsalva phase shift to the dorsal foot side, and shift to the cephalic ventral side when the levator ani muscle (LAM) contracts. Three-dimensional male PF ultrasound can visually show the shape and structure of the levator ani muscle hiatus. CONCLUSION: It is a feasible examination tool for detecting PF disorders. However, there are still many fields to explore in the future.

Asunto(s)

Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Diafragma Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Vejiga Urinaria , Contracción Muscular/fisiología , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos

RESUMEN

One of the advances in physiotherapy in recent years is the exploration and treatment by ultrasound imaging. This technique makes it possible to study the relationship between the musculature of the anterolateral wall of the abdomino-pelvic cavity, the pelvic floor muscles and the diaphragm muscle, among others, and thus understand their implication in non-specific low back pain (LBP) in pathological subjects regarding healthy subjects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate by RUSI (rehabilitative ultrasound imaging) the muscular thickness at rest of the abdominal wall, the excursion of the pelvic floor and the respiratory diaphragm, as well as to study their activity. METHODOLOGY: Two groups of 46 subjects each were established. The variables studied were: non-specific low back pain, thickness and excursion after tidal and forced breathing, pelvic floor (PF) excursion in a contraction and thickness of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO) and transverse (TA) at rest. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. RESULTS: Good-to-excellent reliability for measurements of diaphragm thickness at both tidal volume (TV) (inspiration: 0.763, expiration: 0.788) and expiration at forced volume (FV) (0.763), and good reliability for inspiration at FV (0.631). A correlation was found between the EO muscle and PF musculature with respect to diaphragmatic thickness at TV, inspiration and expiration, and inspiration at FV, in addition to finding significant differences in all these variables in subjects with LBP. CONCLUSION: Subjects with LBP have less thickness at rest in the OE muscle, less excursion of the pelvic diaphragm, less diaphragmatic thickness at TV, in inspiration and expiration, and in inspiration to FV.